Iran - Persian Gulf Pro LeagueYadegar-e-Emam StadiumData current as of 31 August 2026

Tractor Sazi vs Persepolis: match statistics

Tractor Sazi crest
Tractor Sazi
1 : 0half-time 0:0
Persepolis crest
Persepolis

Tractor Sazi vs Persepolis: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Tractor Sazi played Persepolis in Persian Gulf Pro League (Iran). The match was played on 24 August 2026. Venue: Yadegar-e-Emam Stadium. Final score: 1:0.

Current form

Tractor Sazi: 2-0-0, 3.00 points/match. Persepolis: 2-0-0, 3.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Tractor Sazi scores 2.00 and concedes 0.00 goals per match. Persepolis scores 3.00 and concedes 0.50. League average: 1.86 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Tractor Sazi 0%, Persepolis 50%. Over 2.5: Tractor Sazi 0%, Persepolis 50%. League level: BTTS 38%, Over 2.5 19%.

xG, shots and style

xG is very similar for both teams. Tractor Sazi: -1.0 shots per match, Persepolis: -1.0.

Match halves

Tractor Sazi: half-time lead 50%, second-half goals 1.00. Persepolis: half-time lead 100%, second-half goals 1.00.

Goals by minute

Tractor Sazi: 31-45+ (2 goals). Persepolis: 0-15 (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Persian Gulf Pro League: 1.86 goals per match, BTTS 38%, Over 2.5 19%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Both teams opened the season with two wins, but Tractor Sazi have yet to concede, while Persepolis have allowed one goal. The hosts sit third in the table and won their only home match so far, averaging 2 goals with a 100% clean-sheet record. Persepolis also won their only away fixture 2:0, but their broader form has been less consistent: they have lost 3 of their last 5 matches and conceded 7 goals in that run, compared with 4 goals conceded by Tractor Sazi. The Tebriz side have won 3 of their last 5 games and scored 6 goals in the process, while home advantage and a more reliable defence slightly favour the hosts. However, the quality gap is narrow, as Persepolis have scored 6 goals in two league matches, making a draw a realistic outcome.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The stronger signal points toward at least one team failing to score, as BTTS occurs in only 33% of league matches and the average number of goals is just 1.78. Persepolis have kept a clean sheet in 100% of their away matches and have not conceded a single goal on the road, which directly limits Tractor Sazi’s chances. The hosts have recorded BTTS in only 20% of their last five matches, scoring an average of 1.2 goals and conceding 0.8. On the other hand, Persepolis have seen BTTS in 60% of their last five games and conceded an average of 1.4 goals, so a Goal/Goal scenario remains possible. However, the visitors’ very solid defence and the league’s low-scoring profile make BTTS No the more likely pick.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The league profile clearly favors low-scoring outcomes: the average is just 1.78 goals per match, while Over 2.5 goals lands in only 17% of games. Tractor have averaged 1.2 goals scored and 0.8 conceded in their last five matches, with only 20% of those games going over the 2.5-goal line. Persepolis have posted slightly more open recent results, averaging 1.6 goals scored and 1.4 conceded, but the projected total remains around 1.90 goals. In addition, 89% of league matches end with at least one clean sheet, limiting the likelihood of an end-to-end, high-scoring game. The strongest signal is therefore Under 3.5, as it takes at least four goals to lose this bet despite the league’s very low overall average.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest scenario is a draw at half-time followed by a Tractor Sazi win, as the hosts were level at the break in 3 of their last 5 matches and did not concede a single goal before half-time during that period. Persepolis were behind at half-time in 3 of their last 5 games, conceding an average of 0.8 goals in the first half, which increases the likelihood that the visitors will fade after a cautious opening. Tractor have recently averaged 2.0 points per match compared with Persepolis’ 1.2, while the full-time record shows 3 home wins against 3 defeats for the visitors across their five appearances. After the break, the two teams are relatively evenly matched, averaging 0.6 goals scored each, but Tractor have the home advantage and a stronger defence over the entire recent five-match period, conceding 0.8 goals per match compared with Persepolis’ 1.4. Current-season data for home and away matches covers only one game each, so greater weight should be given to the five-match form, which supports the X/1 outcome.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

-1Possession (%)-1
Tractor SaziPersepolis
-1Shots-1
Tractor SaziPersepolis
-1Shots on target-1
Tractor SaziPersepolis
0xG0
Tractor SaziPersepolis
-1Corners-1
Tractor SaziPersepolis
0Dangerous attacks0
Tractor SaziPersepolis
-1Fouls-1
Tractor SaziPersepolis
1Cards0
Tractor SaziPersepolis

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

2Goals scored / match3
Tractor SaziPersepolis
0Goals conceded / match0.5
Tractor SaziPersepolis
-1%Average possession-1%
Tractor SaziPersepolis
-1Shots on target / match-1
Tractor SaziPersepolis

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

-1Shots per match-1
Tractor SaziPersepolis
-1Shots on target-1
Tractor SaziPersepolis
-200%Shot conversion-300%
Tractor SaziPersepolis
-1%Possession-1%
Tractor SaziPersepolis
0xG for0
Tractor SaziPersepolis
0xG against0
Tractor SaziPersepolis

Shooting quality

Tractor Sazi: BalancedPersepolis: Balanced
Tractor SaziPersepolis
Accuracy (shots on target)0%0%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.000.00
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.000.00

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Tractor Sazi
WW
5 wins in a row
Season result split
100% W0% R0% P
Season (W-D-L)
2-0-0
3.00 pts / match · goal difference +4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-0
3.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-0-0
Last 5 at home
1-0-0
W
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 0.0xG: 0.00Opponent xG: 0.00BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 0%
Persepolis
WW
5 wins in a row
Season result split
100% W0% R0% P
Season (W-D-L)
2-0-0
3.00 pts / match · goal difference +5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-0
3.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-0-0
Last 5 away
1-0-0
W
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 3.0Goals conceded: 0.5xG: 0.00Opponent xG: 0.00BTTS: 50%Over 2.5: 50%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Persepolis is 50% better for: goals scored per match.

2 goals / match - Tractor Sazi · 3 goals / match - Persepolis

Tractor Sazi scoring profile: very strong

Tractor Sazi scores in 100% of matches (2 of 2 matches), while Persepolis keeps a clean sheet in 50% (1 of 2 matches).

Persepolis scoring profile: mixed

Persepolis scores in 100% of matches (2 of 2 matches), while Tractor Sazi keeps a clean sheet in 100% (2 of 2 matches).

4Goals scored (season)6
Tractor SaziPersepolis
0Goals conceded (season)1
Tractor SaziPersepolis
2Average goals in match3.5
Tractor SaziPersepolis
4Goals scored (last 5)6
Tractor SaziPersepolis
0Goals conceded (last 5)1
Tractor SaziPersepolis

How often they score at least...

100%1 goal100%
Tractor SaziPersepolis
100%2 goals100%
Tractor SaziPersepolis
0%3 goals50%
Tractor SaziPersepolis
0%4 goals50%
Tractor SaziPersepolis

How often they concede at least...

0%1 goal50%
Tractor SaziPersepolis
0%2 goals0%
Tractor SaziPersepolis
0%3 goals0%
Tractor SaziPersepolis
0%4 goals0%
Tractor SaziPersepolis

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

38%
League average

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time0%
Tractor SaziPersepolis
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Tractor SaziPersepolis
0%Scored in both halves50%
Tractor SaziPersepolis

BTTS and goal count

0%Min. 3 goals and BTTS50%
Tractor SaziPersepolis
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Tractor SaziPersepolis
0%BTTS - last 550%
Tractor SaziPersepolis

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

50%Min. 1 goal before half-time100%
Tractor SaziPersepolis
50%Min. 2 goals before half-time100%
Tractor SaziPersepolis
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
Tractor SaziPersepolis

2nd half

50%Min. 1 goal after half-time50%
Tractor SaziPersepolis
50%Min. 2 goals after half-time50%
Tractor SaziPersepolis
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time50%
Tractor SaziPersepolis

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Persepolis is 50% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

2 pts / match - Tractor Sazi · 3 pts / match - Persepolis

Tractor Sazi - half-time state
50% leading50% draw0% trailing
Persepolis - half-time state
100% leading0% draw0% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

2Points per match (1st half)3
Tractor SaziPersepolis
1Goals scored (1st half)2
Tractor SaziPersepolis
0Goals conceded (1st half)0
Tractor SaziPersepolis
1Average goals (1st half)2
Tractor SaziPersepolis
100%Clean sheet before half-time100%
Tractor SaziPersepolis
50%No goal before half-time0%
Tractor SaziPersepolis

After half-time (2nd half)

2Points per match (2nd half)2
Tractor SaziPersepolis
1Goals scored (2nd half)1
Tractor SaziPersepolis
0Goals conceded (2nd half)0.5
Tractor SaziPersepolis
1Average goals (2nd half)1.5
Tractor SaziPersepolis
100%Clean sheet after half-time50%
Tractor SaziPersepolis
50%No goal after half-time50%
Tractor SaziPersepolis

Tractor Sazi - second-half results

50% W50% R0% P
4
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
4
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding200%

Leads at half-time in 50% of matches and wins 100%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Persepolis - second-half results

50% W50% R0% P
6
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
+4
Goal difference (1st half)
4
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
3.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 100% of matches and wins 100%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Tractor Sazi - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.002.00
Goals scored / match1.01.0
Goals conceded / match0.00.0
Average goals in match1.01.0
1 goal50%50%
2 goals50%50%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet100%100%
No goal50%50%
Goal difference+2+2
Half-time: 50% leading - 50% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 50% won - 50% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2
Persepolis - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match3.002.00
Goals scored / match2.01.0
Goals conceded / match0.00.5
Average goals in match2.01.5
1 goal100%50%
2 goals100%50%
3 goals0%50%
Clean sheet100%50%
No goal0%50%
Goal difference+4+1
Half-time: 100% leading - 0% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 50% won - 50% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Tractor Sazi
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
0
0
16-30
2
0
31-45
0
0
46-60
0
0
61-75
2
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (2 goals). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

Persepolis
ScoredConceded
3
0
0-15
1
0
16-30
0
0
31-45
1
0
46-60
0
1
61-75
1
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (3 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.75
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.3 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
148%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
25%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-27%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
100%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Tractor Sazi

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
0.00
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+2.00
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
0.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+2.00
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
0.00
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
200%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
0%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
50% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
50%

Persepolis

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
0.00
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+2.50
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+3.00
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.50
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
349%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
50%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-1.0
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 50% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Persian Gulf Pro League).

Teams vs league

Tractor SaziLigaPersepolis
Average goals in match 2.001.86 3.50
Both teams scored 0%38% 50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 0%19% 50%
Clean sheets 100%40% 50%
Goal before half-time 50%57% 100%
Goal after half-time 50%62% 50%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

1.86
Average goals per match
38%
Both teams scored
19%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
40%
Clean sheets
1.00
Home goals / match
0.86
Away goals / match
+16%
Home attack advantage
+14%
Home defence advantage
+0%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
57%
1 goal
29%
2 goals
0%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
62%
1 goal
29%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
0%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Tractor SaziYellow cardShahriar Moghanlou
  2. Tractor SaziGoalTomislav Štrkalj

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Tractor Sazi 0 - 1 - 0 Persepolis. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

Tractor Sazi
1 : 1
Persepolis

FAQ

What was the result of Tractor Sazi vs Persepolis?

The Persian Gulf Pro League match finished Tractor Sazi 1:0 Persepolis. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Tractor Sazi vs Persepolis?

Tractor Sazi score 2.00 goals per game on average and Persepolis 3.00. The Persian Gulf Pro League average is 1.86 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 19% of games. Both teams score in 0% of Tractor Sazi's matches and 50% of Persepolis's.

What form are Tractor Sazi and Persepolis in?

Over the last 5 games Tractor Sazi have a 2-0-0 record (3.00 points per game) and Persepolis 2-0-0 (3.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Tractor Sazi vs Persepolis?

The statistical background for Tractor Sazi vs Persepolis — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.