Iran - Persian Gulf Pro LeagueData current as of 23 July 2026

Tractor Sazi vs Sepahan: match statistics

Tractor Sazi crest
Tractor Sazi
1 : 0half-time 1:0
Sepahan crest
Sepahan
135%(2.11)
X40%(2.99)
225%(3.31)

Sepahan occupies the first place in the table and demonstrates impressive away efficiency (67% wins, 67% clean sheets); however, their recent form is slightly weaker (1.2 PPG in the last 5 matches). Tractor Sazi plays solidly at home with only 11% losses and good form (1.8 PPG in the last 5 matches), along with an advantage in possession (64%) and xG (2.22). Both teams have an identical goal difference on their home grounds (+8), suggesting balanced strength. Sepahan tends to play defensively away (averaging 1.78 goals per match, low xG 0.96), while Tractor Sazi often draws at home (44% draws). Considering the visitors' solid defense, the hosts' stability, and the recent forms of both sides, a draw appears to be the most likely scenario.

Tractor Sazi vs Sepahan: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Tractor Sazi play Sepahan in Persian Gulf Pro League (Iran). The match date is 1 February 2026 at 12:30. Final score: 1:0.

Current form

Tractor Sazi: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. Sepahan: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Tractor Sazi scores 1.23 and concedes 0.55 goals per match. Sepahan scores 1.09 and concedes 0.59. League average: 1.79 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Tractor Sazi 41%, Sepahan 36%. Over 2.5: Tractor Sazi 36%, Sepahan 27%. League level: BTTS 38%, Over 2.5 28%.

xG, shots and style

Tractor Sazi has higher xG: 1.81 vs 1.30. Tractor Sazi: 2.4 shots per match, Sepahan: 4.2.

Match halves

Tractor Sazi: half-time lead 27%, second-half goals 0.73. Sepahan: half-time lead 32%, second-half goals 0.64.

Goals by minute

Tractor Sazi: 76-90+ (8 goals). Sepahan: 76-90+ (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Persian Gulf Pro League: 1.79 goals per match, BTTS 38%, Over 2.5 28%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 1-0-0. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 100%.

Match description

Sepahan occupies the first place in the table and demonstrates impressive away efficiency (67% wins, 67% clean sheets); however, their recent form is slightly weaker (1.2 PPG in the last 5 matches). Tractor Sazi plays solidly at home with only 11% losses and good form (1.8 PPG in the last 5 matches), along with an advantage in possession (64%) and xG (2.22). Both teams have an identical goal difference on their home grounds (+8), suggesting balanced strength. Sepahan tends to play defensively away (averaging 1.78 goals per match, low xG 0.96), while Tractor Sazi often draws at home (44% draws). Considering the visitors' solid defense, the hosts' stability, and the recent forms of both sides, a draw appears to be the most likely scenario.

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

-1Possession (%)-1
Tractor SaziSepahan
-1Shots-1
Tractor SaziSepahan
-1Shots on target-1
Tractor SaziSepahan
0xG0
Tractor SaziSepahan
-1Corners-1
Tractor SaziSepahan
0Dangerous attacks0
Tractor SaziSepahan
-1Fouls-1
Tractor SaziSepahan
2Cards2
Tractor SaziSepahan

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Tractor SaziSepahan
1.23Goals scored / match1.09
Tractor SaziSepahan
0.55Goals conceded / match0.59
Tractor SaziSepahan
12%Average possession26%
Tractor SaziSepahan
0.82Shots on target / match1.32
Tractor SaziSepahan

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

2.36Shots per match4.18
Tractor SaziSepahan
0.82Shots on target1.32
Tractor SaziSepahan
51.9%Shot conversion26.1%
Tractor SaziSepahan
12%Possession26%
Tractor SaziSepahan
1.81xG for1.3
Tractor SaziSepahan
1.21xG against0.75
Tractor SaziSepahan

Shooting quality

Tractor Sazi: Counter-attackingSepahan: Counter-attacking
Tractor SaziSepahan
Accuracy (shots on target)35%32%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.770.31
Finishing (goals per shot on target)1.500.83

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Tractor Sazi is 25% better for: last-5 form.

2 pts / match - Tractor Sazi · 1.6 pts / match - Sepahan

Tractor Sazi
WWLDW
Season result split
41% W45% R14% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-10-3
1.68 pts / match · goal difference +15
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
6-4-1
Last 5 at home
4-1-0
WDWWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 0.00Opponent xG: 0.00BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 20%
Sepahan
DLWWD
Season result split
50% W27% R23% P
Season (W-D-L)
11-6-5
1.77 pts / match · goal difference +11
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
6-3-2
Last 5 away
2-1-2
WWLLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 0.00Opponent xG: 0.00BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Tractor Sazi is 13% better for: goals scored per match.

1.23 goals / match - Tractor Sazi · 1.09 goals / match - Sepahan

Tractor Sazi is 7% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.55 goals / match - Tractor Sazi · 0.59 goals / match - Sepahan

Tractor Sazi scoring profile: mixed

Tractor Sazi scores in 59% of matches (13 of 22 matches), while Sepahan keeps a clean sheet in 55% (12 of 22 matches).

Sepahan scoring profile: mixed

Sepahan scores in 77% of matches (17 of 22 matches), while Tractor Sazi keeps a clean sheet in 55% (12 of 22 matches).

27Goals scored (season)24
Tractor SaziSepahan
12Goals conceded (season)13
Tractor SaziSepahan
1.77Average goals in match1.68
Tractor SaziSepahan
5Goals scored (last 5)5
Tractor SaziSepahan
3Goals conceded (last 5)3
Tractor SaziSepahan

How often they score at least...

59%1 goal77%
Tractor SaziSepahan
27%2 goals23%
Tractor SaziSepahan
18%3 goals9%
Tractor SaziSepahan
14%4 goals0%
Tractor SaziSepahan

How often they concede at least...

45%1 goal45%
Tractor SaziSepahan
9%2 goals14%
Tractor SaziSepahan
0%3 goals0%
Tractor SaziSepahan
0%4 goals0%
Tractor SaziSepahan

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

38%
League average

Goal patterns

18%BTTS at half-time9%
Tractor SaziSepahan
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Tractor SaziSepahan
23%Scored in both halves9%
Tractor SaziSepahan

BTTS and goal count

32%Min. 3 goals and BTTS23%
Tractor SaziSepahan
5%Min. 3 goals without BTTS5%
Tractor SaziSepahan
40%BTTS - last 540%
Tractor SaziSepahan

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

41%Min. 1 goal before half-time64%
Tractor SaziSepahan
18%Min. 2 goals before half-time14%
Tractor SaziSepahan
5%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
Tractor SaziSepahan

2nd half

55%Min. 1 goal after half-time55%
Tractor SaziSepahan
27%Min. 2 goals after half-time27%
Tractor SaziSepahan
14%Min. 3 goals after half-time9%
Tractor SaziSepahan

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Tractor Sazi is 10% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.55 pts / match - Tractor Sazi · 1.41 pts / match - Sepahan

Tractor Sazi - half-time state
27% leading73% draw0% trailing
Sepahan - half-time state
32% leading45% draw23% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.55Points per match (1st half)1.41
Tractor SaziSepahan
0.5Goals scored (1st half)0.45
Tractor SaziSepahan
0.18Goals conceded (1st half)0.32
Tractor SaziSepahan
0.68Average goals (1st half)0.77
Tractor SaziSepahan
82%Clean sheet before half-time68%
Tractor SaziSepahan
59%No goal before half-time59%
Tractor SaziSepahan

After half-time (2nd half)

1.41Points per match (2nd half)1.59
Tractor SaziSepahan
0.73Goals scored (2nd half)0.64
Tractor SaziSepahan
0.36Goals conceded (2nd half)0.27
Tractor SaziSepahan
1.09Average goals (2nd half)0.91
Tractor SaziSepahan
64%Clean sheet after half-time77%
Tractor SaziSepahan
59%No goal after half-time55%
Tractor SaziSepahan

Tractor Sazi - second-half results

27% W59% R14% P
34
Half-time points
11
Half-time goals
+7
Goal difference (1st half)
31
Second-half points
+8
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.55
PPG before half-time
Lead holding152%

Leads at half-time in 27% of matches and wins 41%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Sepahan - second-half results

36% W50% R14% P
31
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
35
Second-half points
+8
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.41
PPG before half-time
Lead holding156%

Leads at half-time in 32% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Tractor Sazi - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.801.20
Goals scored / match0.60.4
Goals conceded / match0.20.4
Average goals in match0.80.8
1 goal60%60%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference+20
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3
Sepahan - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.80
Goals scored / match0.40.6
Goals conceded / match0.60.0
Average goals in match1.00.6
1 goal80%40%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet40%100%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference-1+3
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 60% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Tractor Sazi
ScoredConceded
2
1
0-15
3
0
16-30
6
3
31-45
4
3
46-60
4
2
61-75
8
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.

Sepahan
ScoredConceded
3
3
0-15
2
0
16-30
5
4
31-45
3
1
46-60
5
2
61-75
6
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.73
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.9 : 0.8
Estimated goal split
home : away
97%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
39%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+74%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
45%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
9%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 11 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Tractor Sazi

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.60
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.08
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-18.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.58
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.66
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
122%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
70%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.32
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
30% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 7% come in the first quarter-hour.
30%

Sepahan

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.55
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.05
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-12.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.21
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.16
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
138%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
58%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.17
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Persian Gulf Pro League).

Teams vs league

Tractor SaziLigaSepahan
Average goals in match 1.771.79 1.68
Both teams scored 41%38% 36%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 36%28% 27%
Clean sheets 55%41% 55%
Goal before half-time 41%54% 64%
Goal after half-time 55%62% 55%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

1.79
Average goals per match
38%
Both teams scored
28%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
41%
Clean sheets
1.01
Home goals / match
0.79
Away goals / match
+28%
Home attack advantage
+22%
Home defence advantage
+15%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
54%
1 goal
19%
2 goals
4%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
62%
1 goal
24%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
4%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Tractor Sazi 1 - 0 - 0 Sepahan. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

Sepahan
1 : 2
Tractor Sazi

FAQ

What was the result of Tractor Sazi vs Sepahan?

The Persian Gulf Pro League match finished Tractor Sazi 1:0 Sepahan. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Tractor Sazi vs Sepahan?

Tractor Sazi score 1.23 goals per game on average and Sepahan 1.09. The Persian Gulf Pro League average is 1.79 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 28% of games. Both teams score in 41% of Tractor Sazi's matches and 36% of Sepahan's.

What form are Tractor Sazi and Sepahan in?

Over the last 5 games Tractor Sazi have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Sepahan 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Tractor Sazi vs Sepahan?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Tractor Sazi vs Sepahan: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.