Trakai vs TransINVEST Vilnius: match statistics
Trakai vs TransINVEST Vilnius: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Trakai played TransINVEST Vilnius in A Lyga (Lithuania). The match was played on 2 May 2026. Final score: 0:5.
Current form
Trakai: 0-3-2, 0.60 points/match. TransINVEST Vilnius: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
Trakai scores 0.30 and concedes 2.40 goals per match. TransINVEST Vilnius scores 1.60 and concedes 1.10. League average: 2.44 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Trakai 30%, TransINVEST Vilnius 50%. Over 2.5: Trakai 60%, TransINVEST Vilnius 70%. League level: BTTS 40%, Over 2.5 50%.
xG, shots and style
TransINVEST Vilnius has higher xG: 1.55 vs 1.05. Trakai: 8.6 shots per match, TransINVEST Vilnius: 13.3.
Match halves
Trakai: half-time lead 10%, second-half goals 0.00. TransINVEST Vilnius: half-time lead 40%, second-half goals 0.90.
Goals by minute
Trakai: 0-15 (2 goals). TransINVEST Vilnius: 31-45+ (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
A Lyga: 2.44 goals per match, BTTS 40%, Over 2.5 50%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
TransINVEST Vilnius is the clear favorite — they sit 2nd in the table versus Trakai's 10th and have a record of 5 wins, 2 draws and 3 losses, while the hosts have 0 wins, 3 draws and 7 losses at home. Recent form confirms the visitors' advantage: TransINVEST scored 18 goals in the last 5 matches and has 3 wins in that period with an average of 1.8 points per game, whereas Trakai scored only 1 goal in their last five and average 1.0 points per game. In chance creation and efficiency the visitors are markedly better — on the road they average 12 shots and 5 on target with a conversion rate of 15%, versus the hosts' 9.75 shots and 3.5 on target with a 5% conversion. The quality of chances is reflected in xG as well: Trakai have average xG for 1.19 and xG against 2.25 at home, while TransINVEST have xG for 1.41 and xG against 1.3 away, suggesting the hosts concede more dangerous situations. In light of these numbers I back the away win — TransINVEST 70%, draw 20% and Trakai win 10%.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Numbers support the 'no' scenario: Trakai have kept a clean sheet in 60% of their matches this season, the home side’s seasonal BTTS is 40%, and in the last 5 matches Trakai had 0% BTTS and averaged only 0.2 goals per game. TransINVEST shows strong offensive form — 18 goals in the last 5 matches (3.6 avg) and a seasonal average of 1.8 goals per game, with seasonal BTTS 60% and 80% BTTS in the last 5 fixtures. However, the league and home context favor defense: the league records 76% of matches with a clean sheet, and Trakai maintain 60% clean sheets this season, which reduces the likelihood of both teams scoring. xG analysis is mixed — hosts have xG_for 1.69 versus the visitors’ xG_against 1.30, but in the last 5 Trakai generated only 1.0 xG with xG_against 1.98, translating into low actual output (0.2 goals in the last 5). Considering the dominant defensive signal from the hosts and the high incidence of clean sheets in the league, I assess BTTS probability at 35% for 'Yes' and 65% for 'No', therefore I recommend a 'no' bet.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
xG analysis shows Trakai with xG_for 1.69 and TransINVEST 1.41; xG against 1.1 for the home side and 1.3 for the visitors, yielding average expected goals of 1.50 for Trakai and 1.26 for TransINVEST (total 2.76). Season stats indicate Trakai’s matches finished over 1.5 goals in 60% of cases, and TransINVEST’s in 100%, which is a strong argument for Over 1.5. In the last 5 matches TransINVEST scored 18 goals (avg 3.6), while Trakai scored 1 goal (avg 0.2) and conceded 9 (avg 1.8), so the visitors’ offense is in form to push the total up. Additionally, matches over 2.5 goals occurred in 60% for the home team and 80% for the away team (avg ~70%), and the projected 2.76 goals provides a moderate buffer above the 2.5 line. Therefore the best pick from the data is Over 1.5 as the strongest and most likely signal, while Over 2.5 remains a realistic but less certain option.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The most likely scenario is the away side leading at the break and winning the match (2/2); I assign this outcome the largest share at 38%. In their last five matches the visitors led at half-time in 60% of cases and won 60% of matches, and their average goals by half-time in those five games is 1.4 versus the hosts’ 0.2. Seasonally the visitors score on average 1.8 goals per match with an xG of 1.41, while the hosts have an xG of 1.69 but lower shot efficiency (conversion 15% for the visitors vs 10% for the hosts), which favors better finishing by the visitors. The hosts, however, have a strong first-half defensive record (clean sheet at HT in 80% of matches and a season clean sheet rate of 60%), so I still assign substantial probability to half-time draws and low-scoring halves. As a result I also give 22% to the scenario draw at half-time and away win (X/2) and 12% to draw-draw (X/X); the remaining scenarios receive smaller shares due to the visitors’ form and finishing.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Trakai | TransINVEST Vilnius | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 29% | 35% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.12 | 0.34 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
TransINVEST Vilnius is 133% better for: last-5 form.
0.6 pts / match - Trakai · 1.4 pts / match - TransINVEST Vilnius
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
TransINVEST Vilnius is 433% better for: goals scored per match.
0.3 goals / match - Trakai · 1.6 goals / match - TransINVEST Vilnius
TransINVEST Vilnius is 118% better for: goals conceded per match.
2.4 goals / match - Trakai · 1.1 goals / match - TransINVEST Vilnius
Trakai scores in 30% of matches (3 of 10 matches), while TransINVEST Vilnius keeps a clean sheet in 40% (4 of 10 matches).
TransINVEST Vilnius scores in 80% of matches (8 of 10 matches), while Trakai keeps a clean sheet in 20% (2 of 10 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Trakai
Over / Under - TransINVEST Vilnius
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
TransINVEST Vilnius is 114% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.7 pts / match - Trakai · 1.5 pts / match - TransINVEST Vilnius
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Trakai - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 10% of matches and wins 0%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
TransINVEST Vilnius - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 40% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.60 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 100% |
| Goal difference | -4 | -5 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (2 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -9 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (4 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Trakai
TransINVEST Vilnius
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (A Lyga).
Teams vs league
| Trakai | Liga | TransINVEST Vilnius | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 2.70 | 2.44 | ▲ 2.70 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 30% | 40% | ▲ 50% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 60% | 50% | ▲ 70% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 20% | 38% | ▲ 40% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 70% | 67% | ▲ 80% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 60% | 71% | ▲ 80% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Trakai 0 - 0 - 1 TransINVEST Vilnius. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Trakai vs TransINVEST Vilnius?
The A Lyga match finished Trakai 0:5 TransINVEST Vilnius. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Trakai vs TransINVEST Vilnius?
Trakai score 0.30 goals per game on average and TransINVEST Vilnius 1.60. The A Lyga average is 2.44 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 50% of games. Both teams score in 30% of Trakai's matches and 50% of TransINVEST Vilnius's.
What form are Trakai and TransINVEST Vilnius in?
Over the last 5 games Trakai have a 0-3-2 record (0.60 points per game) and TransINVEST Vilnius 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Trakai vs TransINVEST Vilnius?
The statistical background for Trakai vs TransINVEST Vilnius — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


