TransINVEST Vilnius vs Žalgiris: match statistics
TransINVEST Vilnius vs Žalgiris: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
TransINVEST Vilnius played Žalgiris in A Lyga (Lithuania). The match was played on 17 May 2026. Final score: 1:0.
Current form
TransINVEST Vilnius: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match. Žalgiris: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
TransINVEST Vilnius scores 1.85 and concedes 1.08 goals per match. Žalgiris scores 1.46 and concedes 1.08. League average: 2.54 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: TransINVEST Vilnius 54%, Žalgiris 54%. Over 2.5: TransINVEST Vilnius 69%, Žalgiris 54%. League level: BTTS 47%, Over 2.5 51%.
xG, shots and style
Žalgiris has higher xG: 1.60 vs 1.54. TransINVEST Vilnius: 13.3 shots per match, Žalgiris: 14.2.
Match halves
TransINVEST Vilnius: half-time lead 46%, second-half goals 1.08. Žalgiris: half-time lead 38%, second-half goals 0.77.
Goals by minute
TransINVEST Vilnius: 61-75 (6 goals). Žalgiris: 16-30 (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
A Lyga: 2.54 goals per match, BTTS 47%, Over 2.5 51%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
TransINVEST Vilnius is the favorite primarily due to form and offensive efficiency — they have scored 22 goals in their last 5 matches and average 2.2 points per game in that period, while Žalgiris have 9 goals and 1.4 points per game. This season the home side average 1.33 goals at home with xG 1.65 and record 4.0 shots on target per game, versus the visitors who average 1.17 goals away with xG 1.63 and 3.67 shots on target. Žalgiris compensate with a very solid away defence — they concede only 0.5 goals away and keep clean sheets in 67% of away matches, whereas TransINVEST concede 0.83 at home and have a 50% clean sheet rate. Additionally, the hosts finish matches goalless less often (17% of matches without scoring vs 33% for the visitors), giving them an edge in finishing efficiency despite similar xG (1.65 vs 1.63). Therefore I tip a home win, although given Žalgiris’s strong defence I expect a moderate number of goals and a real possibility of an equalizer from the visitors.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Considering the data, I tip 'yes' (BTTS - Yes) with a 62% probability versus 38% for No Goal. TransINVEST has averaged 4.4 goals in the last 5 matches (22 goals in 5 games) and has a season BTTS of 71%, while Žalgiris shows an 80% BTTS in the last 5 despite a season rate of 33%, indicating both sides have allowed goals more frequently recently than season numbers suggest. xG points to similar chance quality: TransINVEST xG_for 1.57 vs Žalgiris xG_for 1.63, with xG_against 1.46 for the home side and 1.14 for the visitors, so both teams generate ~1.5 xG per match and have goal potential. Although Žalgiris has a season 67% clean sheet expected (strong signal against BTTS), their last 5 matches show an average of 1.2 conceded goals, and the hosts have a higher shot conversion rate 13% vs Žalgiris 8%, which increases the likelihood of goals from both sides. Overall, given recent form (22 and 9 goals in the last 5) and similar xG and shooting activity, the Both Teams To Score scenario looks stronger; therefore I recommend the tip 'yes'.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
My model projects 1.35 expected goals for TransINVEST and 1.55 for Žalgiris, total 2.90, calculated as the average of home xG (1.57) with away xG conceded (1.14) and away xG (1.63) with home xG conceded (1.46). TransINVEST scores 1.71 and concedes 1.57 goals per game this season, and 71% of their matches are Over 2.5, indicating the hosts’ propensity for high-scoring games. Žalgiris concedes only 0.50 goals on the road and keeps 67% clean sheets, but generates xG 1.63 and averages 14.83 shots per match, so they can create scoring opportunities. Additionally, both teams had Over 2.5 in 80% of their last 5 matches, and the league average is 2.58 goals per match, which strengthens the Over 2.5 signal. Therefore the strongest and most likely pick is Over 2.5 (over).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Away side Žalgiris led at the break in 50% of their matches and did not concede before half-time (average 0.0, season first-half clean sheet rate 100%), giving them the advantage in the first half. Home side TransINVEST average 0.71 goals by half-time but are significantly stronger after the break: second-half goals average 1.86, and in their last five matches they have averaged 2.8 goals after the interval. In recent form over five matches the hosts are 'wwwdd' (3 wins, 2 draws) while the visitors are 'lwlwd' (2 wins, 2 losses, 1 draw), confirming TransINVEST are in better shape. Additionally, TransINVEST register on average 4.43 shots on target versus 3.67 for the visitors and have a higher chance conversion rate (13% vs 8%), which increases the likelihood of a turnaround after half-time. For these reasons the most probable scenario is the visitors leading at the break with the hosts overturning the result by full-time (HT/FT = 2/1).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| TransINVEST Vilnius | Žalgiris | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 35% | 29% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.39 | 0.36 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
TransINVEST Vilnius is 38% better for: last-5 form.
2.2 pts / match - TransINVEST Vilnius · 1.6 pts / match - Žalgiris
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
TransINVEST Vilnius is 27% better for: goals scored per match.
1.85 goals / match - TransINVEST Vilnius · 1.46 goals / match - Žalgiris
TransINVEST Vilnius scores in 85% of matches (11 of 13 matches), while Žalgiris keeps a clean sheet in 38% (5 of 13 matches).
Žalgiris scores in 77% of matches (10 of 13 matches), while TransINVEST Vilnius keeps a clean sheet in 38% (5 of 13 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - TransINVEST Vilnius
Over / Under - Žalgiris
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
TransINVEST Vilnius - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 46% of matches and wins 46%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Žalgiris - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 38% of matches and wins 38%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.60 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 2.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 20% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +5 | +5 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.00 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 1.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (6 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (4 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
TransINVEST Vilnius
Žalgiris
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (A Lyga).
Teams vs league
| TransINVEST Vilnius | Liga | Žalgiris | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 2.92 | 2.54 | • 2.54 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 54% | 47% | ▲ 54% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 69% | 51% | ▲ 54% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 38% | 33% | ▲ 38% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 77% | 68% | ▲ 77% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 85% | 75% | ▼ 69% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: TransINVEST Vilnius 1 - 0 - 0 Žalgiris. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of TransINVEST Vilnius vs Žalgiris?
The A Lyga match finished TransINVEST Vilnius 1:0 Žalgiris. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before TransINVEST Vilnius vs Žalgiris?
TransINVEST Vilnius score 1.85 goals per game on average and Žalgiris 1.46. The A Lyga average is 2.54 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 51% of games. Both teams score in 54% of TransINVEST Vilnius's matches and 54% of Žalgiris's.
What form are TransINVEST Vilnius and Žalgiris in?
Over the last 5 games TransINVEST Vilnius have a 3-2-0 record (2.20 points per game) and Žalgiris 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for TransINVEST Vilnius vs Žalgiris?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


