Wales - Welsh Premier LeagueData current as of 23 October 2026

Trefelin vs Penybont: match statistics

Trefelin crest
Trefelin
0 : 1half-time 0:0
Penybont crest
Penybont

Trefelin vs Penybont: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Trefelin played Penybont in Welsh Premier League (Wales). The match was played on 11 September 2026. Final score: 0:1.

Current form

Trefelin: 0-2-3, 0.40 points/match. Penybont: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Trefelin scores 0.43 and concedes 2.57 goals per match. Penybont scores 1.57 and concedes 0.71. League average: 3.14 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Trefelin 43%, Penybont 57%. Over 2.5: Trefelin 43%, Penybont 57%. League level: BTTS 48%, Over 2.5 57%.

xG, shots and style

Penybont has higher xG: 1.24 vs 1.06. Trefelin: 8.4 shots per match, Penybont: 9.1.

Match halves

Trefelin: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.43. Penybont: half-time lead 71%, second-half goals 0.43.

Goals by minute

Trefelin: 76-90+ (2 goals). Penybont: 31-45+ (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Welsh Premier League: 3.14 goals per match, BTTS 48%, Over 2.5 57%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Penybont remain unbeaten in the league after 7 matches, recording 4 wins and 3 draws, while Trefelin have failed to win any of their 7 games and have suffered 5 defeats. The visitors are significantly more clinical away from home, averaging 2.33 goals per match compared with Trefelin’s 0.33 at home, while their finishing accuracy stands at 21% versus 3%. Penybont’s superiority is also evident in chance creation, as they average 1.48 xG away from home and 6 shots on target per match, whereas the hosts manage just 2.33 shots on target on average. Trefelin’s defence concedes 2.33 goals per home match and have yet to keep a clean sheet, while Penybont allow opponents just 0.84 xG and concede an average of one goal. Recent form over the last five matchdays also favours the visitors, who have recorded 3 wins and 2 draws, while Trefelin have scored only 3 goals and conceded 12 during that period.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Penybont have very strong attacking potential: they average 2.33 goals, register 6 shots on target per match, and have scored 1.8 goals per game across their last five fixtures. Trefelin, meanwhile, have been less effective in attack, scoring only 3 goals in their last five matches—an average of 0.6—with an average xG of 1.18. The visitors are currently conceding just 0.8 goals per match, while their season-long xG against stands at only 0.84, limiting the hosts’ chances of scoring. Trefelin have kept a clean sheet in 50% of their league matches this season, but their defence has conceded as many as 12 goals in their last five outings, making a Penybont win with at least one team failing to score the most likely scenario. BTTS - Yes has landed in 60% of the last five matches for each side, but Trefelin’s poor recent finishing and the visitors’ solid defence give a slight edge to BTTS - No. BTTS - No means that at least one team fails to score; it does not automatically imply a 0-0 draw or that neither team will score.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Penybont clearly offer greater attacking potential: they score an average of 2.33 goals, register 6.0 shots on target per match, and have an xG of 1.48. In their last five matches, Trefelin conceded an average of 2.4 goals, with an xG conceded to opponents of 1.67, which supports the expectation of at least two goals for the away side. At the same time, the hosts create chances worth 1.06 xG, while Penybont have allowed 1.05 xG in their last five matches, making a Trefelin goal a realistic scenario. Over 1.5 goals landed in 100% of Penybont’s matches, while their games produced noticeably more chances on average than the hosts’ matches. The Over 1.5 line has the edge, as the projected total of 2.60 goals provides a greater safety margin than the more balanced 2.5 line.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest signal points to Penybont leading at the break and maintaining their advantage until full time: the visitors were ahead after 45 minutes in 80% of their last five matches, while Trefelin have not led at half-time on any occasion. Over the same period, the hosts scored no goals before the break and conceded an average of 1.0, whereas Penybont scored 1.2 goals and allowed their opponents just 0.2. The visitors have also been clearly superior across their last five matches, averaging 2.2 points per game, 1.8 goals scored and 0.8 conceded, compared with Trefelin’s 0.4 points, 0.6 goals scored and 2.4 conceded. Penybont’s offensive advantage is further supported by averages of 6.0 shots on target and an xG of 1.48, while the hosts record 3.0 shots on target and an xG of 1.06; therefore, the 2/2 scenario has the highest probability.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

30Possession (%)70
TrefelinPenybont
5Shots24
TrefelinPenybont
0Shots on target4
TrefelinPenybont
0.59xG2.38
TrefelinPenybont
1Corners11
TrefelinPenybont
37Dangerous attacks82
TrefelinPenybont
8Fouls11
TrefelinPenybont
3Cards4
TrefelinPenybont

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

0.43Goals scored / match1.57
TrefelinPenybont
2.57Goals conceded / match0.71
TrefelinPenybont
51%Average possession56%
TrefelinPenybont
2.86Shots on target / match4.14
TrefelinPenybont

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

8.43Shots per match9.14
TrefelinPenybont
2.86Shots on target4.14
TrefelinPenybont
5.1%Shot conversion17.2%
TrefelinPenybont
51%Possession56%
TrefelinPenybont
1.06xG for1.24
TrefelinPenybont
1.65xG against1.21
TrefelinPenybont

Shooting quality

Trefelin: BalancedPenybont: Efficient finishing
TrefelinPenybont
Accuracy (shots on target)34%45%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.14
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.150.38

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Penybont is 450% better for: last-5 form.

0.4 pts / match - Trefelin · 2.2 pts / match - Penybont

Trefelin
LLDLD
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
0% W29% D71% L
Season (W-D-L)
0-2-5
0.29 pts / match · goal difference -15
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-2-3
0.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-1-2
Last 5 at home
0-1-2
LLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 2.4xG: 1.21Opponent xG: 1.64BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%
Penybont
WWDDW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
57% W43% D0% L
Season (W-D-L)
4-3-0
2.14 pts / match · goal difference +6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-2-0
2.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-1-0
Last 5 away
2-1-0
WWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.37Opponent xG: 1.13BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Penybont is 265% better for: goals scored per match.

0.43 goals / match - Trefelin · 1.57 goals / match - Penybont

Penybont is 262% better for: goals conceded per match.

2.57 goals / match - Trefelin · 0.71 goals / match - Penybont

Trefelin scoring profile: mixed

Trefelin scores in 43% of matches (3 of 7 matches), while Penybont keeps a clean sheet in 43% (3 of 7 matches).

Penybont scoring profile: very strong

Penybont scores in 86% of matches (6 of 7 matches), while Trefelin keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 7 matches).

3Goals scored (season)11
TrefelinPenybont
18Goals conceded (season)5
TrefelinPenybont
3Average goals in match2.29
TrefelinPenybont
3Goals scored (last 5)9
TrefelinPenybont
12Goals conceded (last 5)4
TrefelinPenybont

How often they score at least...

43%1 goal86%
TrefelinPenybont
0%2 goals57%
TrefelinPenybont
0%3 goals14%
TrefelinPenybont
0%4 goals0%
TrefelinPenybont

How often they concede at least...

100%1 goal57%
TrefelinPenybont
71%2 goals14%
TrefelinPenybont
29%3 goals0%
TrefelinPenybont
29%4 goals0%
TrefelinPenybont

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time29%
TrefelinPenybont
0%BTTS in both halves14%
TrefelinPenybont
0%Scored in both halves43%
TrefelinPenybont

BTTS and goal count

14%Min. 3 goals and BTTS43%
TrefelinPenybont
29%Min. 3 goals without BTTS14%
TrefelinPenybont
60%BTTS - last 560%
TrefelinPenybont

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

71%Min. 1 goal before half-time86%
TrefelinPenybont
57%Min. 2 goals before half-time43%
TrefelinPenybont
14%Min. 3 goals before half-time14%
TrefelinPenybont

2nd half

57%Min. 1 goal after half-time57%
TrefelinPenybont
43%Min. 2 goals after half-time29%
TrefelinPenybont
29%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
TrefelinPenybont

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Penybont is 738% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.29 pts / match - Trefelin · 2.43 pts / match - Penybont

Trefelin - half-time state
0% leading29% draw71% trailing
Penybont - half-time state
71% leading29% draw0% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.29Points per match (1st half)2.43
TrefelinPenybont
0Goals scored (1st half)1.14
TrefelinPenybont
1.57Goals conceded (1st half)0.29
TrefelinPenybont
1.57Average goals (1st half)1.43
TrefelinPenybont
29%Clean sheet before half-time71%
TrefelinPenybont
100%No goal before half-time14%
TrefelinPenybont

After half-time (2nd half)

1Points per match (2nd half)1.14
TrefelinPenybont
0.43Goals scored (2nd half)0.43
TrefelinPenybont
1Goals conceded (2nd half)0.43
TrefelinPenybont
1.43Average goals (2nd half)0.86
TrefelinPenybont
57%Clean sheet after half-time57%
TrefelinPenybont
57%No goal after half-time57%
TrefelinPenybont

Trefelin - second-half results

14% W57% D29% L
2
Half-time points
0
Half-time goals
-11
Goal difference (1st half)
7
Second-half points
-4
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.29
PPG before half-time
Defence after half-time-0.6

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Penybont - second-half results

14% W71% D14% L
17
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
+6
Goal difference (1st half)
8
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.43
PPG before half-time
Lead holding80%

Leads at half-time in 71% of matches and wins 57%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Trefelin - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.401.00
Goals scored / match0.00.6
Goals conceded / match1.01.4
Average goals in match1.02.0
1 goal60%80%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal100%40%
Goal difference-5-4
Half-time: 0% leading - 40% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0
Penybont - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.601.20
Goals scored / match1.20.6
Goals conceded / match0.20.6
Average goals in match1.41.2
1 goal100%80%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal0%40%
Goal difference+50
Half-time: 80% leading - 20% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 6

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Trefelin
ScoredConceded
0
3
0-15
0
2
16-30
0
6
31-45
0
4
46-60
1
0
61-75
2
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (2 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Penybont
ScoredConceded
1
1
0-15
2
1
16-30
5
0
31-45
1
0
46-60
0
1
61-75
2
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.64
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.6 : 2.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
84%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
50%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
37%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
8%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 13 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Trefelin

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.59
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-1.55
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.63
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.92
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
25%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
177%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.11
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
67% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
67%

Penybont

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.03
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.83
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.33
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.50
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
108%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
42%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.06
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.7
Late goals
18% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 9% come in the first quarter-hour.
18%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Welsh Premier League).

Teams vs league

TrefelinLigaPenybont
Average goals in match▼ 3.003.14▼ 2.29
Both teams scored▼ 43%48%▲ 57%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 43%57%• 57%
Clean sheets▼ 0%27%▲ 43%
Goal before half-time▼ 71%79%▲ 86%
Goal after half-time▼ 57%84%▼ 57%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.14
Average goals per match
48%
Both teams scored
57%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
27%
Clean sheets
1.70
Home goals / match
1.45
Away goals / match
+17%
Home attack advantage
+15%
Home defence advantage
+12%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
79%
1 goal
39%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
7%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
84%
1 goal
52%
2 goals
23%
3 goals
11%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. PenybontSubstitutionOn: Jonathan LekoOff: Ashley Baker
  2. PenybontSubstitutionOn: Chris VenablesOff: Ethan Cann
  3. PenybontGoalTyler Walker

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of Trefelin vs Penybont?

The Welsh Premier League match finished Trefelin 0:1 Penybont. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Trefelin vs Penybont?

Trefelin score 0.43 goals per game on average and Penybont 1.57. The Welsh Premier League average is 3.14 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 57% of games. Both teams score in 43% of Trefelin's matches and 57% of Penybont's.

What form are Trefelin and Penybont in?

Over the last 5 games Trefelin have a 0-2-3 record (0.40 points per game) and Penybont 3-2-0 (2.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Trefelin vs Penybont?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Trefelin vs Penybont: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.