Trento vs Alcione: match statistics
Trento vs Alcione: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Trento played Alcione in Serie C Group A (Italy). The match was played on 4 April 2026. Final score: 1:0.
Current form
Trento: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. Alcione: 0-4-1, 0.80 points/match.
Goal statistics
Trento scores 1.52 and concedes 1.09 goals per match. Alcione scores 0.94 and concedes 0.68. League average: 2.31 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Trento 64%, Alcione 26%. Over 2.5: Trento 42%, Alcione 15%. League level: BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 42%.
xG, shots and style
Trento has higher xG: 1.73 vs 1.25. Trento: 14.0 shots per match, Alcione: 9.7.
Match halves
Trento: half-time lead 30%, second-half goals 1.00. Alcione: half-time lead 24%, second-half goals 0.65.
Goals by minute
Trento: 76-90+ (14 goals). Alcione: 61-75 (11 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Serie C Group A: 2.31 goals per match, BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 42%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I back the home win (Trento): their attack has scored 50 goals this season versus Alcione’s 32, and in the last 5 matches Trento have 9 goals compared to 3 for the visitors. At home Trento average 15.12 shots and 4.47 on target with 60% possession, while Alcione away average 10.12 shots, 3.47 on target and 49% possession, which translates into greater control and higher-quality chances for the hosts. Trento have higher home xG at 1.76 versus Alcione’s 1.28 xG away, and the visitors concede 1.57 xG per away match versus 1.23 xG conceded by Trento at home, so Alcione more frequently allows scoring opportunities. Form advantage also favors Trento: 1.6 points per game in the last 5 matches with a 2-2-1 record, while Alcione have only 0.8 points per game and are winless in their last 5 (0-4-1). Additionally, Trento have only 18% of matches without scoring versus 47% for Alcione and a superior home goal balance (+8 versus the visitors’ -2 on the road), hence a higher probability of a home triumph.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Season-long indicators argue against BTTS: Trento has BTTS only 24% and keeps a clean sheet in 59% of matches, while Alcione has BTTS 29% and averages 0.76 goals per match. Trento averages 1.12 scored and 0.47 conceded per match this season, whereas Alcione has 0.76 scored and 0.88 conceded, suggesting the home side frequently limits opponents to a clean sheet. In the short term (last 5 rounds) BTTS has risen: 80% for Trento and 60% for Alcione, but this is driven mainly by Trento’s offensive form (9 goals in 5 matches) rather than the visitors’ efficiency (3 goals in 5). Both sides’ xG are similar (1.22 vs 1.28), however Alcione’s low finishing (conversion 8% vs 12% for Trento) and the small share of matches over 2.5 goals (12% for the hosts, 18% for the visitors) lead me to choose 'No' (No Goal).
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Trento scores an average of 1.12 goals per match this season (xG 1.22), while Alcione averages 0.76 goals (xG 1.28); combined seasonal averages are 1.88 goals, but Trento’s form over the last 5 matches (9 goals, 1.8 avg) raises the projection to about 2.00 goals. In the last 5 fixtures Trento scored 1.8 and conceded 1.6 (9–8), whereas Alcione has 0.6 scored and 1.2 conceded (3–6), supporting an expected 1.35 goals for the home side and 0.65 for the visitors. Seasonal rates show only 12% of Trento’s matches and 18% of Alcione’s matches finished with three or more goals (unders at 88% and 82% respectively); Trento kept a clean sheet in 59% of games, and the percentage of matches where both teams scored is only 24–29%, all strongly arguing for the under. A Poisson model on total 2.00 goals gives roughly a 59% chance of Over 1.5 and about 27% for Over 2.5; given seasonal distributions and the home defensive edge I recommend Under 2.5 as the strongest signal.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
At half-time the most likely outcome is a draw: the hosts were level at the break in 47% of matches, while they led in 35% and trailed in 18%. Over full matches Trento win 47% of games compared with Alcione’s 35% wins, and seasonal averages show a home advantage — 1.12 goals scored per game for Trento versus 0.76 for Alcione, and 0.47 goals conceded by Trento versus 0.88 for the visitors. The second 45 minutes are decisive: Trento’s average goals scored after the break is 0.76 versus 0.53 for Alcione, and in the last 5 matches the hosts averaged 1.2 second-half goals versus 0.4 for their opponents, increasing the probability of a turnaround in the second half. Additionally, the hosts earn on average 1.65 points after the break compared to 1.47 for Alcione and have a higher percentage of second-half wins (41% vs 35%), which confirms that Trento more often settles matches after half-time. On this basis the most likely and strongest signal is X/1 (draw at half-time, Trento win); in my assessment the model assigns this scenario the largest share (27%), with alternatives being 1/1 (12%) and 1/X (13%).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Trento | Alcione | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 32% | 34% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.34 | 0.28 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Trento is 100% better for: last-5 form.
1.6 pts / match - Trento · 0.8 pts / match - Alcione
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Trento is 62% better for: goals scored per match.
1.52 goals / match - Trento · 0.94 goals / match - Alcione
Alcione is 60% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.09 goals / match - Trento · 0.68 goals / match - Alcione
Trento scores in 88% of matches (29 of 33 matches), while Alcione keeps a clean sheet in 44% (15 of 34 matches).
Alcione scores in 62% of matches (21 of 34 matches), while Trento keeps a clean sheet in 27% (9 of 33 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Trento
Over / Under - Alcione
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Trento is 8% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.36 pts / match - Trento · 1.26 pts / match - Alcione
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Trento - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 30% of matches and wins 42%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Alcione - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 24% of matches and wins 41%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 1.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -2 | +3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 0.4 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 20% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -3 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (14 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (11 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Trento
Alcione
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Serie C Group A).
Teams vs league
| Trento | Liga | Alcione | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 2.61 | 2.31 | ▼ 1.62 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 64% | 50% | ▼ 26% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | • 42% | 42% | ▼ 15% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 27% | 30% | ▲ 44% |
| Goal before half-time | • 67% | 67% | ▼ 50% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 82% | 72% | ▼ 65% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Trento 0 - 0 - 1 Alcione. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Trento vs Alcione?
The Serie C Group A match finished Trento 1:0 Alcione. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Trento vs Alcione?
Trento score 1.52 goals per game on average and Alcione 0.94. The Serie C Group A average is 2.31 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 42% of games. Both teams score in 64% of Trento's matches and 26% of Alcione's.
What form are Trento and Alcione in?
Over the last 5 games Trento have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Alcione 0-4-1 (0.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Trento vs Alcione?
The statistical background for Trento vs Alcione — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


