Triestina vs AlbinoLeffe: match statistics
Triestina vs AlbinoLeffe: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Triestina played AlbinoLeffe in Serie C Group A (Italy). The match was played on 14 December 2025. Final score: 5:2.
Current form
Triestina: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. AlbinoLeffe: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match.
Goal statistics
Triestina scores 0.88 and concedes 1.06 goals per match. AlbinoLeffe scores 1.35 and concedes 1.47. League average: 2.17 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Triestina 53%, AlbinoLeffe 71%. Over 2.5: Triestina 35%, AlbinoLeffe 65%. League level: BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 37%.
xG, shots and style
Triestina has higher xG: 1.50 vs 1.36. Triestina: 11.0 shots per match, AlbinoLeffe: 10.3.
Match halves
Triestina: half-time lead 12%, second-half goals 0.65. AlbinoLeffe: half-time lead 24%, second-half goals 0.71.
Goals by minute
Triestina: 61-75 (5 goals). AlbinoLeffe: 61-75 (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Serie C Group A: 2.17 goals per match, BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 37%.
Head-to-head
No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Triestina | AlbinoLeffe | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 34% | 35% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.14 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.23 | 0.38 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
AlbinoLeffe is 20% better for: last-5 form.
1 pts / match - Triestina · 1.2 pts / match - AlbinoLeffe
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
AlbinoLeffe is 53% better for: goals scored per match.
0.88 goals / match - Triestina · 1.35 goals / match - AlbinoLeffe
Triestina is 39% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.06 goals / match - Triestina · 1.47 goals / match - AlbinoLeffe
Triestina scores in 59% of matches (10 of 17 matches), while AlbinoLeffe keeps a clean sheet in 18% (3 of 17 matches).
AlbinoLeffe scores in 76% of matches (13 of 17 matches), while Triestina keeps a clean sheet in 18% (3 of 17 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Triestina
Over / Under - AlbinoLeffe
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
AlbinoLeffe is 13% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.94 pts / match - Triestina · 1.06 pts / match - AlbinoLeffe
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Triestina - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 12% of matches and wins 24%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
AlbinoLeffe - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 24% of matches and wins 24%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 0.6 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +1 | 0 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Triestina
AlbinoLeffe
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Serie C Group A).
Teams vs league
| Triestina | Liga | AlbinoLeffe | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 1.94 | 2.17 | ▲ 2.82 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 53% | 50% | ▲ 71% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 35% | 37% | ▲ 65% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 18% | 30% | ▼ 18% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 53% | 67% | ▲ 71% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 76% | 69% | ▲ 76% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
FAQ
What was the result of Triestina vs AlbinoLeffe?
The Serie C Group A match finished Triestina 5:2 AlbinoLeffe. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Triestina vs AlbinoLeffe?
Triestina score 0.88 goals per game on average and AlbinoLeffe 1.35. The Serie C Group A average is 2.17 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 37% of games. Both teams score in 53% of Triestina's matches and 71% of AlbinoLeffe's.
What form are Triestina and AlbinoLeffe in?
Over the last 5 games Triestina have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and AlbinoLeffe 1-3-1 (1.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Triestina vs AlbinoLeffe?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.