Italy - Serie C Group AData current as of 23 July 2026

Triestina vs Novara: match statistics

Triestina crest
Triestina
0 : 1half-time 0:0
Novara crest
Novara
155%(2.73)
X30%(2.61)
215%(2.84)

Triestina displays impressive home form with a 50% win rate and an average of 1.92 goals per match, making them the favorite for this fixture. The hosts demonstrate a significantly better shooting efficiency (15% conversion rate) and an advantage in expected goals (xG 1.69 vs 1.30), indicating higher quality of chances created. Novara is characterized by a defensive tactic with as many as 75% draws away from home, but their offense is weak – only 0.92 goals on average per away match and 33% of matches without a goal scored. The hosts' goal difference in home matches (+10) significantly surpasses Novara's away goal difference (-1), and both teams' form in the last five matches is identical (1.2 points per match), suggesting an overall balanced disposition. Considering Triestina's home advantage, their better offensive efficiency, and Novara's tendency to draw, the most probable scenario is a home win, although a draw remains a realistic alternative.

Triestina vs Novara: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Triestina play Novara in Serie C Group A (Italy). The match date is 15 February 2026 at 12:30. Final score: 0:1.

Current form

Triestina: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Novara: 1-0-4, 0.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Triestina scores 1.18 and concedes 1.55 goals per match. Novara scores 1.05 and concedes 1.03. League average: 2.34 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Triestina 53%, Novara 53%. Over 2.5: Triestina 50%, Novara 32%. League level: BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 43%.

xG, shots and style

Novara has higher xG: 1.45 vs 1.44. Triestina: 10.9 shots per match, Novara: 11.6.

Match halves

Triestina: half-time lead 18%, second-half goals 0.87. Novara: half-time lead 24%, second-half goals 0.50.

Goals by minute

Triestina: 61-75 (15 goals). Novara: 61-75 (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Serie C Group A: 2.34 goals per match, BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 43%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-1-0. Average goals 0.00, BTTS 0%.

Match description

Triestina displays impressive home form with a 50% win rate and an average of 1.92 goals per match, making them the favorite for this fixture. The hosts demonstrate a significantly better shooting efficiency (15% conversion rate) and an advantage in expected goals (xG 1.69 vs 1.30), indicating higher quality of chances created. Novara is characterized by a defensive tactic with as many as 75% draws away from home, but their offense is weak – only 0.92 goals on average per away match and 33% of matches without a goal scored. The hosts' goal difference in home matches (+10) significantly surpasses Novara's away goal difference (-1), and both teams' form in the last five matches is identical (1.2 points per match), suggesting an overall balanced disposition. Considering Triestina's home advantage, their better offensive efficiency, and Novara's tendency to draw, the most probable scenario is a home win, although a draw remains a realistic alternative.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

56Possession (%)44
TriestinaNovara
3Shots10
TriestinaNovara
1Shots on target4
TriestinaNovara
0.9xG1.66
TriestinaNovara
3Corners5
TriestinaNovara
87Dangerous attacks103
TriestinaNovara
17Fouls9
TriestinaNovara
3Cards1
TriestinaNovara

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.18Goals scored / match1.05
TriestinaNovara
1.55Goals conceded / match1.03
TriestinaNovara
53%Average possession52%
TriestinaNovara
3.82Shots on target / match3.97
TriestinaNovara

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10.87Shots per match11.63
TriestinaNovara
3.82Shots on target3.97
TriestinaNovara
10.9%Shot conversion9%
TriestinaNovara
53%Possession52%
TriestinaNovara
1.44xG for1.45
TriestinaNovara
1.6xG against1.31
TriestinaNovara

Shooting quality

Triestina: BalancedNovara: Balanced
TriestinaNovara
Accuracy (shots on target)35%34%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.310.26

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Triestina is 133% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / match - Triestina · 0.6 pts / match - Novara

Triestina
WDWLL
Season result split
24% W24% R53% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-9-20
0.95 pts / match · goal difference -14
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
8-4-7
Last 5 at home
2-0-3
LLWWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.11Opponent xG: 1.84BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%
Novara
LLLLW
Season result split
24% W53% R24% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-20-9
1.24 pts / match · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-4
0.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
4-11-4
Last 5 away
2-1-2
WDLLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.54Opponent xG: 1.40BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Triestina is 12% better for: goals scored per match.

1.18 goals / match - Triestina · 1.05 goals / match - Novara

Novara is 50% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.55 goals / match - Triestina · 1.03 goals / match - Novara

Triestina scoring profile: strong

Triestina scores in 61% of matches (23 of 38 matches), while Novara keeps a clean sheet in 34% (13 of 38 matches).

Novara scoring profile: very strong

Novara scores in 71% of matches (27 of 38 matches), while Triestina keeps a clean sheet in 16% (6 of 38 matches).

45Goals scored (season)40
TriestinaNovara
59Goals conceded (season)39
TriestinaNovara
2.74Average goals in match2.08
TriestinaNovara
9Goals scored (last 5)5
TriestinaNovara
10Goals conceded (last 5)10
TriestinaNovara

How often they score at least...

61%1 goal71%
TriestinaNovara
34%2 goals26%
TriestinaNovara
11%3 goals8%
TriestinaNovara
8%4 goals0%
TriestinaNovara

How often they concede at least...

84%1 goal66%
TriestinaNovara
37%2 goals24%
TriestinaNovara
21%3 goals13%
TriestinaNovara
8%4 goals0%
TriestinaNovara

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

50%
League average

Goal patterns

11%BTTS at half-time24%
TriestinaNovara
3%BTTS in both halves0%
TriestinaNovara
13%Scored in both halves16%
TriestinaNovara

BTTS and goal count

39%Min. 3 goals and BTTS26%
TriestinaNovara
11%Min. 3 goals without BTTS5%
TriestinaNovara
40%BTTS - last 560%
TriestinaNovara

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

61%Min. 1 goal before half-time66%
TriestinaNovara
21%Min. 2 goals before half-time32%
TriestinaNovara
8%Min. 3 goals before half-time8%
TriestinaNovara

2nd half

82%Min. 1 goal after half-time63%
TriestinaNovara
55%Min. 2 goals after half-time29%
TriestinaNovara
37%Min. 3 goals after half-time11%
TriestinaNovara

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Novara is 21% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1 pts / match - Triestina · 1.21 pts / match - Novara

Triestina - half-time state
18% leading45% draw37% trailing
Novara - half-time state
24% leading50% draw26% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1Points per match (1st half)1.21
TriestinaNovara
0.32Goals scored (1st half)0.55
TriestinaNovara
0.58Goals conceded (1st half)0.5
TriestinaNovara
0.89Average goals (1st half)1.05
TriestinaNovara
53%Clean sheet before half-time55%
TriestinaNovara
76%No goal before half-time55%
TriestinaNovara

After half-time (2nd half)

1.11Points per match (2nd half)1.37
TriestinaNovara
0.87Goals scored (2nd half)0.5
TriestinaNovara
0.97Goals conceded (2nd half)0.53
TriestinaNovara
1.84Average goals (2nd half)1.03
TriestinaNovara
34%Clean sheet after half-time66%
TriestinaNovara
50%No goal after half-time58%
TriestinaNovara

Triestina - second-half results

26% W32% R42% P
38
Half-time points
12
Half-time goals
-10
Goal difference (1st half)
42
Second-half points
-4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding133%

Leads at half-time in 18% of matches and wins 24%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Novara - second-half results

32% W42% R26% P
46
Half-time points
21
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
52
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.21
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 24% of matches and wins 24%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Triestina - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.601.40
Goals scored / match0.61.2
Goals conceded / match0.61.4
Average goals in match1.22.6
1 goal60%100%
2 goals40%80%
3 goals20%60%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference0-1
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3
Novara - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.800.40
Goals scored / match0.80.2
Goals conceded / match1.01.0
Average goals in match1.81.2
1 goal100%60%
2 goals60%40%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet20%40%
No goal40%80%
Goal difference-1-4
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 40% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Triestina
ScoredConceded
2
5
0-15
2
8
16-30
8
9
31-45
7
10
46-60
15
12
61-75
11
15
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (15 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (15). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

Novara
ScoredConceded
6
3
0-15
7
7
16-30
8
9
31-45
4
7
46-60
9
5
61-75
6
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (9 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.41
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.1 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
103%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
53%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
43%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
11%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 9 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Triestina

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.16
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.21
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.26
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.05
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
94%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
142%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.45
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.6
Late goals
24% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 4% come in the first quarter-hour.
24%

Novara

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.14
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.12
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-11.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.40
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.28
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
96%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
82%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.64
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
15% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 15% come in the first quarter-hour.
15%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Serie C Group A).

Teams vs league

TriestinaLigaNovara
Average goals in match 2.742.34 2.08
Both teams scored 53%50% 53%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 50%43% 32%
Clean sheets 16%30% 34%
Goal before half-time 61%66% 66%
Goal after half-time 82%73% 63%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.34
Average goals per match
50%
Both teams scored
43%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
30%
Clean sheets
1.25
Home goals / match
1.09
Away goals / match
+15%
Home attack advantage
+13%
Home defence advantage
+6%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
66%
1 goal
25%
2 goals
7%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
41%
2 goals
17%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Triestina 0 - 1 - 0 Novara. Average goals 0.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

Novara
0 : 0
Triestina

FAQ

What was the result of Triestina vs Novara?

The Serie C Group A match finished Triestina 0:1 Novara. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Triestina vs Novara?

Triestina score 1.18 goals per game on average and Novara 1.05. The Serie C Group A average is 2.34 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 43% of games. Both teams score in 53% of Triestina's matches and 53% of Novara's.

What form are Triestina and Novara in?

Over the last 5 games Triestina have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Novara 1-0-4 (0.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Triestina vs Novara?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Triestina vs Novara: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.