Match suspended or postponed
The match time may change. Statistics remain available as match context.
Triglav vs Brežice: match statistics
Triglav vs Brežice: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Triglav play Brežice in 2. SNL (Slovenia). The match time may change. Statistics remain available as match context. Venue: Športni Center Stanko Mlakar.
Current form
Triglav: 3-0-1, 2.25 points/match. Brežice: 0-1-3, 0.25 points/match.
Goal statistics
Triglav scores 1.50 and concedes 0.50 goals per match. Brežice scores 0.75 and concedes 1.50. League average: 2.85 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Triglav 25%, Brežice 75%. Over 2.5: Triglav 25%, Brežice 50%. League level: BTTS 41%, Over 2.5 54%.
xG, shots and style
Triglav has higher xG: 1.67 vs 1.40. Triglav: 13.0 shots per match, Brežice: 8.8.
Match halves
Triglav: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 1.25. Brežice: half-time lead 25%, second-half goals 0.50.
Goals by minute
Triglav: 61-75 (3 goals). Brežice: 46-60 (2 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
2. SNL: 2.85 goals per match, BTTS 41%, Over 2.5 54%.
Head-to-head
No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Triglav | Brežice | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 33% | 34% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.16 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.35 | 0.25 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Triglav is 800% better for: last-5 form.
2.25 pts / match - Triglav · 0.25 pts / match - Brežice
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Triglav is 100% better for: goals scored per match.
1.5 goals / match - Triglav · 0.75 goals / match - Brežice
Triglav is 200% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.5 goals / match - Triglav · 1.5 goals / match - Brežice
Triglav scores in 75% of matches (3 of 4 matches), while Brežice keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 4 matches).
Brežice scores in 75% of matches (3 of 4 matches), while Triglav keeps a clean sheet in 50% (2 of 4 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Triglav
Over / Under - Brežice
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Triglav - second-half results
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Brežice - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 25% of matches and wins 0%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 2.25 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.3 | 1.3 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.3 | 0.3 |
| Average goals in match | 0.5 | 1.5 |
| 1 goal | 25% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 25% | 25% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 25% |
| Clean sheet | 75% | 75% |
| No goal | 75% | 25% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +4 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 0.75 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.3 | 0.5 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.5 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 1.5 |
| 1 goal | 75% | 75% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 75% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 50% | 25% |
| No goal | 75% | 50% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (3 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (2 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Triglav
Brežice
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (2. SNL).
Teams vs league
| Triglav | Liga | Brežice | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.00 | 2.85 | ▼ 2.25 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 25% | 41% | ▲ 75% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 25% | 54% | ▼ 50% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 50% | 35% | ▼ 0% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 25% | 69% | ▲ 75% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 100% | 79% | ▼ 75% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.