Triglav vs Krško: match statistics
Triglav vs Krško: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Triglav play Krško in 2. SNL (Slovenia). The match date is 24 April 2026 at 18:00. Final score: 4:0.
Current form
Triglav: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. Krško: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.
Goal statistics
Triglav scores 2.40 and concedes 0.93 goals per match. Krško scores 0.80 and concedes 2.07. League average: 2.82 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Triglav 37%, Krško 43%. Over 2.5: Triglav 57%, Krško 57%. League level: BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 54%.
xG, shots and style
Triglav has higher xG: 1.85 vs 1.24. Triglav: 14.0 shots per match, Krško: 9.5.
Match halves
Triglav: half-time lead 50%, second-half goals 1.33. Krško: half-time lead 27%, second-half goals 0.47.
Goals by minute
Triglav: 76-90+ (17 goals). Krško: 76-90+ (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
2. SNL: 2.82 goals per match, BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 54%.
Head-to-head
1 H2H matches: 1-0-0. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 0%.
Match description
Triglav has a clear advantage in attack and form — they have scored 61 goals this season and average 2.92 goals per home match, while Krško have 20 goals this season and average 0.83 goals away. Defensively the hosts concede 0.92 goals at home on average, while the visitors concede 2.08 away; this gap is confirmed by expected goals (xG) — 2.08 xG for Triglav versus 1.12 xG for Krško. The hosts average 15.75 shots and 6.42 on target at home with a conversion rate of 19%, whereas Krško average 8.42 shots and 3.42 on target with a 10% conversion, indicating both higher quantity and quality of chances for Triglav. In the last 5 matches Triglav have won all 5 (9 scored, 2 conceded, averaging 3 points per game), while Krško are 1-2-2 in that period (6-9 in goals and 1 point per game); additionally Krško have recorded 0% clean sheets away. Therefore I tip the home win; the key advantages are shooting efficiency 2.92 vs 0.83, defensive record 0.92 vs 2.08 conceded and xG edge 2.08 vs 1.12.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Triglav | Krško | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 41% | 39% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.42 | 0.22 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Triglav is 150% better for: last-5 form.
2 pts / match - Triglav · 0.8 pts / match - Krško
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Triglav is 200% better for: goals scored per match.
2.4 goals / match - Triglav · 0.8 goals / match - Krško
Triglav is 123% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.93 goals / match - Triglav · 2.07 goals / match - Krško
Triglav scores in 83% of matches (25 of 30 matches), while Krško keeps a clean sheet in 10% (3 of 30 matches).
Krško scores in 53% of matches (16 of 30 matches), while Triglav keeps a clean sheet in 50% (15 of 30 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Triglav
Over / Under — Krško
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Triglav is 68% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.8 pts / match - Triglav · 1.07 pts / match - Krško
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Triglav - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 50% of matches and wins 67%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Krško - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 27% of matches and wins 23%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.
Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 0.6 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 1.4 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 20% |
| No goal | 80% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -4 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (17 goli). Concedes most in 16-30 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +9 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (17). Late-goal balance (76-90): -10 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Triglav
Krško
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (2. SNL).
Teams vs league
| Triglav | Liga | Krško | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 3.33 | 2.82 | • 2.87 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 37% | 50% | ▼ 43% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 57% | 54% | ▲ 57% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 50% | 28% | ▼ 10% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 80% | 74% | ▲ 80% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 93% | 81% | ▲ 93% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Triglav 1 - 0 - 0 Krško. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Triglav vs Krško?
The 2. SNL match finished Triglav 4:0 Krško. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Triglav vs Krško?
Triglav score 2.40 goals per game on average and Krško 0.80. The 2. SNL average is 2.82 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 54% of games. Both teams score in 37% of Triglav's matches and 43% of Krško's.
What form are Triglav and Krško in?
Over the last 5 games Triglav have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Krško 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Triglav vs Krško?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.