Triglav vs Rudar: match statistics
Triglav demonstrates significantly better form and statistics at their home stadium. The hosts have won 50% of their home matches with an impressive average of 3.1 goals per game and a goal difference of +21. In their last five overall matches, they remain undefeated (3 wins, 2 draws) with a PPG of 2.2. Rudar, on the other hand, struggles on the road – they lose half of their away matches, conceding an average of 1.6 goals and scoring only 1.5 goals per game. The visitors' form in their last five matches is very poor (PPG 0.8, only 1 win). Triglav's high efficiency (19% shot conversion), possession advantage (57%), and significantly better xG metrics (2.1 vs 1.19) further confirm the hosts' clear advantage.
Triglav vs Rudar: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Triglav played Rudar in 2. SNL (Slovenia). The match was played on 27 March 2026. Final score: 2:0.
Current form
Triglav: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match. Rudar: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Triglav scores 2.70 and concedes 1.10 goals per match. Rudar scores 1.60 and concedes 1.40. League average: 2.83 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Triglav 45%, Rudar 60%. Over 2.5: Triglav 65%, Rudar 65%. League level: BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 55%.
xG, shots and style
Triglav has higher xG: 1.98 vs 1.49. Triglav: 15.4 shots per match, Rudar: 10.5.
Match halves
Triglav: half-time lead 55%, second-half goals 1.35. Rudar: half-time lead 45%, second-half goals 0.55.
Goals by minute
Triglav: 16-30 (12 goals). Rudar: 31-45+ (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
2. SNL: 2.83 goals per match, BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 55%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Triglav demonstrates significantly better form and statistics at their home stadium. The hosts have won 50% of their home matches with an impressive average of 3.1 goals per game and a goal difference of +21. In their last five overall matches, they remain undefeated (3 wins, 2 draws) with a PPG of 2.2. Rudar, on the other hand, struggles on the road – they lose half of their away matches, conceding an average of 1.6 goals and scoring only 1.5 goals per game. The visitors' form in their last five matches is very poor (PPG 0.8, only 1 win). Triglav's high efficiency (19% shot conversion), possession advantage (57%), and significantly better xG metrics (2.1 vs 1.19) further confirm the hosts' clear advantage.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Triglav has strong arguments for scoring: averaging 1.7 goals per match and 1.57 xG, while Rudar concedes as many as 1.6 goals and 1.72 xG against. The visitors also show scoring potential (1.5 goals and 1.42 xG), and Triglav's defense allows 1.43 xG per match, which is not a level that guarantees a clean sheet. BTTS metrics support the scenario of both teams scoring: Rudar has a 70% BTTS rate this season, and in the last 5 matches, both teams are at a 60% BTTS rate. Additionally, Rudar rarely fails to score (FTS only 10%), which increases the chances of their goal despite poorer form. The counterargument is Triglav's defensive improvement in the last 5 matches (0.6 goals conceded on average), so the edge for BTTS 'yes' is moderate but still the most evident from the data.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Model-wise, I expect around 3.05 goals (1.90 for Triglav and 1.15 for Rudar), which stems from a combination of average goals and xG data: Triglav generates 1.57 xG/match, while Rudar concedes as much as 1.72 xG/match and loses on average 1.6 goals. The seasonal frequencies for Over 1.5 (Triglav 70%, Rudar 90%) and Over 2.5 (60% and 70%) are also high, supporting a high-scoring game scenario. The league averages 2.83 goals/match, and this matchup appears offensively above the league average mainly due to Rudar's weaker defense. Recent form from the last 5 matches further boosts the goal potential on the hosts' side (Triglav 17 goals in 5 matches, xG 2.18). Therefore, the strongest signal is Over 1.5, as even in a conservative match flow, the probability of at least 2 goals remains very high.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The strongest scenario is a draw at half-time and Triglav's win after the match, because Rudar is very strong in the first halves (56% lead at the break, 78% HT clean sheets, average only 0.44 goals conceded in the 1st half), which favors a level HT score. In the second halves, the advantage shifts to the hosts: Triglav has clearly better ppg_2hg (1.4 vs 0.67), positive gd_2hg (+2 vs -6) and much better cs_2hg (60% vs 22%). Rudar clearly loses control after the break (average 1.11 goals conceded in the 2nd half), while Triglav has better creativity and shot quality parameters (xG for 1.57 vs 1.42; shots on target 5.0 vs 3.9). Form from the last 5 matches further strengthens the case for the hosts (PPG 2.2 vs 0.8; losses 0% vs 60% and a very low concededAVG 0.6 on Triglav's side). Therefore, it is most likely that the match will remain tight for a long time, but the finale/second half will swing the result in Triglav's favor.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Triglav | Rudar | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 39% | 42% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.14 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.45 | 0.36 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Triglav is 120% better for: last-5 form.
2.2 pts / match - Triglav · 1 pts / match - Rudar
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Triglav is 69% better for: goals scored per match.
2.7 goals / match - Triglav · 1.6 goals / match - Rudar
Triglav is 27% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.1 goals / match - Triglav · 1.4 goals / match - Rudar
Triglav scores in 80% of matches (16 of 20 matches), while Rudar keeps a clean sheet in 25% (5 of 20 matches).
Rudar scores in 75% of matches (15 of 20 matches), while Triglav keeps a clean sheet in 40% (8 of 20 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Triglav
Over / Under - Rudar
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Triglav is 12% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.85 pts / match - Triglav · 1.65 pts / match - Rudar
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Triglav - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 55% of matches and wins 60%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Rudar - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 45% of matches and wins 30%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.00 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.6 | 1.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.8 | 2.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +7 | +7 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.20 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.2 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +5 | -2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (12 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +6 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (8 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Triglav
Rudar
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (2. SNL).
Teams vs league
| Triglav | Liga | Rudar | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 3.80 | 2.83 | ▲ 3.00 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 45% | 49% | ▲ 60% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 65% | 55% | ▲ 65% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 40% | 29% | ▼ 25% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 90% | 76% | ▼ 70% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 90% | 79% | ▼ 70% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Other recorded players
Away team
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Triglav 1 - 0 - 0 Rudar. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Triglav vs Rudar?
The 2. SNL match finished Triglav 2:0 Rudar. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Triglav vs Rudar?
Triglav score 2.70 goals per game on average and Rudar 1.60. The 2. SNL average is 2.83 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 55% of games. Both teams score in 45% of Triglav's matches and 60% of Rudar's.
What form are Triglav and Rudar in?
Over the last 5 games Triglav have a 3-2-0 record (2.20 points per game) and Rudar 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Triglav vs Rudar?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Triglav vs Rudar: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


