Slovenia - 2. SNLData current as of 12 September 2026

Triglav vs Rudar: match statistics

Triglav crest
Triglav
2 : 0half-time 0:0
Rudar crest
Rudar
165%(1.56)
X20%(3.90)
215%(5.20)

Triglav demonstrates significantly better form and statistics at their home stadium. The hosts have won 50% of their home matches with an impressive average of 3.1 goals per game and a goal difference of +21. In their last five overall matches, they remain undefeated (3 wins, 2 draws) with a PPG of 2.2. Rudar, on the other hand, struggles on the road – they lose half of their away matches, conceding an average of 1.6 goals and scoring only 1.5 goals per game. The visitors' form in their last five matches is very poor (PPG 0.8, only 1 win). Triglav's high efficiency (19% shot conversion), possession advantage (57%), and significantly better xG metrics (2.1 vs 1.19) further confirm the hosts' clear advantage.

Triglav vs Rudar: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Triglav played Rudar in 2. SNL (Slovenia). The match was played on 27 March 2026. Final score: 2:0.

Current form

Triglav: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match. Rudar: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Triglav scores 2.70 and concedes 1.10 goals per match. Rudar scores 1.60 and concedes 1.40. League average: 2.83 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Triglav 45%, Rudar 60%. Over 2.5: Triglav 65%, Rudar 65%. League level: BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 55%.

xG, shots and style

Triglav has higher xG: 1.98 vs 1.49. Triglav: 15.4 shots per match, Rudar: 10.5.

Match halves

Triglav: half-time lead 55%, second-half goals 1.35. Rudar: half-time lead 45%, second-half goals 0.55.

Goals by minute

Triglav: 16-30 (12 goals). Rudar: 31-45+ (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

2. SNL: 2.83 goals per match, BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 55%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 0%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Triglav demonstrates significantly better form and statistics at their home stadium. The hosts have won 50% of their home matches with an impressive average of 3.1 goals per game and a goal difference of +21. In their last five overall matches, they remain undefeated (3 wins, 2 draws) with a PPG of 2.2. Rudar, on the other hand, struggles on the road – they lose half of their away matches, conceding an average of 1.6 goals and scoring only 1.5 goals per game. The visitors' form in their last five matches is very poor (PPG 0.8, only 1 win). Triglav's high efficiency (19% shot conversion), possession advantage (57%), and significantly better xG metrics (2.1 vs 1.19) further confirm the hosts' clear advantage.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Triglav has strong arguments for scoring: averaging 1.7 goals per match and 1.57 xG, while Rudar concedes as many as 1.6 goals and 1.72 xG against. The visitors also show scoring potential (1.5 goals and 1.42 xG), and Triglav's defense allows 1.43 xG per match, which is not a level that guarantees a clean sheet. BTTS metrics support the scenario of both teams scoring: Rudar has a 70% BTTS rate this season, and in the last 5 matches, both teams are at a 60% BTTS rate. Additionally, Rudar rarely fails to score (FTS only 10%), which increases the chances of their goal despite poorer form. The counterargument is Triglav's defensive improvement in the last 5 matches (0.6 goals conceded on average), so the edge for BTTS 'yes' is moderate but still the most evident from the data.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Model-wise, I expect around 3.05 goals (1.90 for Triglav and 1.15 for Rudar), which stems from a combination of average goals and xG data: Triglav generates 1.57 xG/match, while Rudar concedes as much as 1.72 xG/match and loses on average 1.6 goals. The seasonal frequencies for Over 1.5 (Triglav 70%, Rudar 90%) and Over 2.5 (60% and 70%) are also high, supporting a high-scoring game scenario. The league averages 2.83 goals/match, and this matchup appears offensively above the league average mainly due to Rudar's weaker defense. Recent form from the last 5 matches further boosts the goal potential on the hosts' side (Triglav 17 goals in 5 matches, xG 2.18). Therefore, the strongest signal is Over 1.5, as even in a conservative match flow, the probability of at least 2 goals remains very high.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest scenario is a draw at half-time and Triglav's win after the match, because Rudar is very strong in the first halves (56% lead at the break, 78% HT clean sheets, average only 0.44 goals conceded in the 1st half), which favors a level HT score. In the second halves, the advantage shifts to the hosts: Triglav has clearly better ppg_2hg (1.4 vs 0.67), positive gd_2hg (+2 vs -6) and much better cs_2hg (60% vs 22%). Rudar clearly loses control after the break (average 1.11 goals conceded in the 2nd half), while Triglav has better creativity and shot quality parameters (xG for 1.57 vs 1.42; shots on target 5.0 vs 3.9). Form from the last 5 matches further strengthens the case for the hosts (PPG 2.2 vs 0.8; losses 0% vs 60% and a very low concededAVG 0.6 on Triglav's side). Therefore, it is most likely that the match will remain tight for a long time, but the finale/second half will swing the result in Triglav's favor.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
2 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

48Possession (%)52
TriglavRudar
15Shots10
TriglavRudar
7Shots on target1
TriglavRudar
2.38xG1.28
TriglavRudar
11Corners1
TriglavRudar
131Dangerous attacks79
TriglavRudar
14Fouls12
TriglavRudar
0Cards0
TriglavRudar

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

2.7Goals scored / match1.6
TriglavRudar
1.1Goals conceded / match1.4
TriglavRudar
58%Average possession51%
TriglavRudar
5.95Shots on target / match4.45
TriglavRudar

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

15.45Shots per match10.5
TriglavRudar
5.95Shots on target4.45
TriglavRudar
17.5%Shot conversion15.2%
TriglavRudar
58%Possession51%
TriglavRudar
1.98xG for1.49
TriglavRudar
1.31xG against1.57
TriglavRudar

Shooting quality

Triglav: DominantRudar: Efficient finishing
TriglavRudar
Accuracy (shots on target)39%42%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.14
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.450.36

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Triglav is 120% better for: last-5 form.

2.2 pts / match - Triglav · 1 pts / match - Rudar

Triglav
WDWDW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
60% W15% D25% L
Season (W-D-L)
12-3-5
1.95 pts / match · goal difference +32
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-2-0
2.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-2-3
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
LLWWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 3.4Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 2.18Opponent xG: 0.94BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Rudar
DDWLL
Season result split
30% W30% D40% L
Season (W-D-L)
6-6-8
1.20 pts / match · goal difference +4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
3-2-5
Last 5 away
2-1-2
LWWDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.49Opponent xG: 1.54BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Triglav is 69% better for: goals scored per match.

2.7 goals / match - Triglav · 1.6 goals / match - Rudar

Triglav is 27% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.1 goals / match - Triglav · 1.4 goals / match - Rudar

Triglav scoring profile: very strong

Triglav scores in 80% of matches (16 of 20 matches), while Rudar keeps a clean sheet in 25% (5 of 20 matches).

Rudar scoring profile: strong

Rudar scores in 75% of matches (15 of 20 matches), while Triglav keeps a clean sheet in 40% (8 of 20 matches).

54Goals scored (season)32
TriglavRudar
22Goals conceded (season)28
TriglavRudar
3.8Average goals in match3
TriglavRudar
17Goals scored (last 5)9
TriglavRudar
3Goals conceded (last 5)6
TriglavRudar

How often they score at least...

80%1 goal75%
TriglavRudar
65%2 goals50%
TriglavRudar
50%3 goals15%
TriglavRudar
35%4 goals10%
TriglavRudar

How often they concede at least...

60%1 goal75%
TriglavRudar
35%2 goals40%
TriglavRudar
10%3 goals20%
TriglavRudar
5%4 goals5%
TriglavRudar

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

25%BTTS at half-time20%
TriglavRudar
10%BTTS in both halves5%
TriglavRudar
55%Scored in both halves20%
TriglavRudar

BTTS and goal count

40%Min. 3 goals and BTTS50%
TriglavRudar
25%Min. 3 goals without BTTS15%
TriglavRudar
60%BTTS - last 560%
TriglavRudar

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

90%Min. 1 goal before half-time70%
TriglavRudar
60%Min. 2 goals before half-time50%
TriglavRudar
25%Min. 3 goals before half-time25%
TriglavRudar

2nd half

90%Min. 1 goal after half-time70%
TriglavRudar
40%Min. 2 goals after half-time50%
TriglavRudar
25%Min. 3 goals after half-time10%
TriglavRudar

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Triglav is 12% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.85 pts / match - Triglav · 1.65 pts / match - Rudar

Triglav - half-time state
55% leading20% draw25% trailing
Rudar - half-time state
45% leading30% draw25% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.85Points per match (1st half)1.65
TriglavRudar
1.35Goals scored (1st half)0.95
TriglavRudar
0.6Goals conceded (1st half)0.55
TriglavRudar
1.95Average goals (1st half)1.5
TriglavRudar
55%Clean sheet before half-time60%
TriglavRudar
30%No goal before half-time50%
TriglavRudar

After half-time (2nd half)

1.8Points per match (2nd half)1.05
TriglavRudar
1.35Goals scored (2nd half)0.55
TriglavRudar
0.5Goals conceded (2nd half)0.75
TriglavRudar
1.85Average goals (2nd half)1.3
TriglavRudar
55%Clean sheet after half-time45%
TriglavRudar
35%No goal after half-time60%
TriglavRudar

Triglav - second-half results

55% W15% D30% L
37
Half-time points
27
Half-time goals
+15
Goal difference (1st half)
36
Second-half points
+17
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.85
PPG before half-time
Lead holding109%

Leads at half-time in 55% of matches and wins 60%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Rudar - second-half results

20% W45% D35% L
33
Half-time points
19
Half-time goals
+8
Goal difference (1st half)
21
Second-half points
-4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.65
PPG before half-time
Lead holding67%

Leads at half-time in 45% of matches and wins 30%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Triglav - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.002.00
Goals scored / match1.61.8
Goals conceded / match0.20.4
Average goals in match1.82.2
1 goal80%80%
2 goals60%40%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+7+7
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 8
Rudar - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.201.00
Goals scored / match1.20.6
Goals conceded / match0.21.0
Average goals in match1.41.6
1 goal60%80%
2 goals40%80%
3 goals40%0%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference+5-2
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 6

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Triglav
ScoredConceded
4
2
0-15
12
8
16-30
11
2
31-45
6
3
46-60
9
1
61-75
12
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (12 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +6 - wins late phases.

Rudar
ScoredConceded
6
6
0-15
7
4
16-30
8
3
31-45
1
4
46-60
7
5
61-75
3
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (8 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.40
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
2.0 : 1.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
120%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
53%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-12%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
60%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
5%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 20 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Triglav

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.67
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.93
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-12.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.72
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.21
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
179%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
84%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.25
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
22% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 7% come in the first quarter-hour.
22%

Rudar

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.08
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.28
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-10.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.11
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.17
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
122%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
93%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.20
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.4
Late goals
9% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 19% come in the first quarter-hour.
9%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (2. SNL).

Teams vs league

TriglavLigaRudar
Average goals in match 3.802.83 3.00
Both teams scored 45%49% 60%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 65%55% 65%
Clean sheets 40%29% 25%
Goal before half-time 90%76% 70%
Goal after half-time 90%79% 70%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.83
Average goals per match
49%
Both teams scored
55%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
29%
Clean sheets
1.51
Home goals / match
1.31
Away goals / match
+15%
Home attack advantage
+13%
Home defence advantage
+3%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
39%
2 goals
13%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
79%
1 goal
45%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
4%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Away team

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. TriglavGoalOliver Kregar

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Božo KondićMatches officiated: 10
-Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 270%Home wins10%Draws20%Away wins

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Triglav 1 - 0 - 0 Rudar. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

NK Rudar Velenje
0 : 3
NK Triglav Kranj

FAQ

What was the result of Triglav vs Rudar?

The 2. SNL match finished Triglav 2:0 Rudar. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Triglav vs Rudar?

Triglav score 2.70 goals per game on average and Rudar 1.60. The 2. SNL average is 2.83 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 55% of games. Both teams score in 45% of Triglav's matches and 60% of Rudar's.

What form are Triglav and Rudar in?

Over the last 5 games Triglav have a 3-2-0 record (2.20 points per game) and Rudar 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Triglav vs Rudar?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Triglav vs Rudar: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.