Troszyn vs Swit: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Troszyn played Swit in 3 Liga Group 1 (Poland). The match was played on 29 November 2025. Final score: 5:0.

Current form

Troszyn: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. Swit: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Troszyn scores 2.22 and concedes 1.83 goals per match. Swit scores 1.72 and concedes 1.72. League average: 3.46 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Troszyn 83%, Swit 61%. Over 2.5: Troszyn 83%, Swit 72%. League level: BTTS 67%, Over 2.5 68%.

xG, shots and style

Troszyn has higher xG: 1.76 vs 1.29. Troszyn: 7.6 shots per match, Swit: 6.6.

Match halves

Troszyn: half-time lead 22%, second-half goals 1.33. Swit: half-time lead 28%, second-half goals 0.94.

Goals by minute

Troszyn: 76-90+ (11 goals). Swit: 76-90+ (11 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

3 Liga Group 1: 3.46 goals per match, BTTS 67%, Over 2.5 68%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 100%.

Half-by-half

2 : 0
1st half
3 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

-1Possession (%)-1
TroszynSwit
-1Shots-1
TroszynSwit
-1Shots on target-1
TroszynSwit
0xG0
TroszynSwit
-1Corners-1
TroszynSwit
0Dangerous attacks0
TroszynSwit
-1Fouls-1
TroszynSwit
-1Cards-1
TroszynSwit

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

2.22Goals scored / match1.72
TroszynSwit
1.83Goals conceded / match1.72
TroszynSwit
28%Average possession38%
TroszynSwit
3.22Shots on target / match2.72
TroszynSwit

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

7.61Shots per match6.61
TroszynSwit
3.22Shots on target2.72
TroszynSwit
29.2%Shot conversion26.1%
TroszynSwit
28%Possession38%
TroszynSwit
1.76xG for1.29
TroszynSwit
1.28xG against1.55
TroszynSwit

Shooting quality

Troszyn: Counter-attackingSwit: Counter-attacking
TroszynSwit
Accuracy (shots on target)42%41%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.230.20
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.690.63

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Troszyn is 100% better for: last-5 form.

2 pts / match - Troszyn · 1 pts / match - Swit

Troszyn
WDWWL
Season result split
33% W22% D44% L
Season (W-D-L)
6-4-8
1.22 pts / match · goal difference +7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-3-3
Last 5 at home
1-2-2
DLLDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.2Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.63Opponent xG: 1.66BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 80%
Swit
LDDLW
Season result split
44% W17% D39% L
Season (W-D-L)
8-3-7
1.50 pts / match · goal difference 0
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
3-2-4
Last 5 away
1-2-2
DLWLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.49Opponent xG: 1.57BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Troszyn is 29% better for: goals scored per match.

2.22 goals / match - Troszyn · 1.72 goals / match - Swit

Swit is 6% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.83 goals / match - Troszyn · 1.72 goals / match - Swit

Troszyn scoring profile: very strong

Troszyn scores in 94% of matches (17 of 18 matches), while Swit keeps a clean sheet in 22% (4 of 18 matches).

Swit scoring profile: very strong

Swit scores in 83% of matches (15 of 18 matches), while Troszyn keeps a clean sheet in 17% (3 of 18 matches).

40Goals scored (season)31
TroszynSwit
33Goals conceded (season)31
TroszynSwit
4.06Average goals in match3.44
TroszynSwit
11Goals scored (last 5)7
TroszynSwit
7Goals conceded (last 5)8
TroszynSwit

How often they score at least...

94%1 goal83%
TroszynSwit
61%2 goals44%
TroszynSwit
22%3 goals33%
TroszynSwit
17%4 goals11%
TroszynSwit

How often they concede at least...

83%1 goal78%
TroszynSwit
56%2 goals44%
TroszynSwit
28%3 goals28%
TroszynSwit
6%4 goals11%
TroszynSwit

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

28%BTTS at half-time33%
TroszynSwit
6%BTTS in both halves17%
TroszynSwit
28%Scored in both halves39%
TroszynSwit

BTTS and goal count

72%Min. 3 goals and BTTS44%
TroszynSwit
11%Min. 3 goals without BTTS28%
TroszynSwit
100%BTTS - last 560%
TroszynSwit

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

83%Min. 1 goal before half-time89%
TroszynSwit
50%Min. 2 goals before half-time67%
TroszynSwit
11%Min. 3 goals before half-time17%
TroszynSwit

2nd half

83%Min. 1 goal after half-time89%
TroszynSwit
61%Min. 2 goals after half-time39%
TroszynSwit
39%Min. 3 goals after half-time22%
TroszynSwit

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Swit is 10% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.06 pts / match - Troszyn · 1.17 pts / match - Swit

Troszyn - half-time state
22% leading39% draw39% trailing
Swit - half-time state
28% leading33% draw39% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.06Points per match (1st half)1.17
TroszynSwit
0.78Goals scored (1st half)0.78
TroszynSwit
0.78Goals conceded (1st half)1.06
TroszynSwit
1.56Average goals (1st half)1.83
TroszynSwit
39%Clean sheet before half-time33%
TroszynSwit
50%No goal before half-time44%
TroszynSwit

After half-time (2nd half)

1.56Points per match (2nd half)1.67
TroszynSwit
1.33Goals scored (2nd half)0.94
TroszynSwit
0.89Goals conceded (2nd half)0.67
TroszynSwit
2.22Average goals (2nd half)1.61
TroszynSwit
44%Clean sheet after half-time50%
TroszynSwit
33%No goal after half-time33%
TroszynSwit

Troszyn - second-half results

44% W22% D33% L
19
Half-time points
14
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
28
Second-half points
+8
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.06
PPG before half-time
Lead holding150%

Leads at half-time in 22% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Swit - second-half results

50% W17% D33% L
21
Half-time points
14
Half-time goals
-5
Goal difference (1st half)
30
Second-half points
+5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.17
PPG before half-time
Lead holding157%

Leads at half-time in 28% of matches and wins 44%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.4

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Troszyn - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.80
Goals scored / match0.81.4
Goals conceded / match0.60.8
Average goals in match1.42.2
1 goal100%100%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference+1+3
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 0% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4
Swit - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.40
Goals scored / match0.80.6
Goals conceded / match1.00.6
Average goals in match1.81.2
1 goal100%80%
2 goals80%20%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet20%60%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference-10
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Troszyn
ScoredConceded
10
8
0-15
2
2
16-30
4
7
31-45
8
7
46-60
5
6
61-75
11
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +8 - wins late phases.

Swit
ScoredConceded
4
4
0-15
4
5
16-30
6
10
31-45
3
3
46-60
3
2
61-75
11
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.75
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
2.0 : 1.8
Estimated goal split
home : away
108%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
72%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-20%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
78%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
1%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 100 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Troszyn

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.48
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.09
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-10.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.46
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.55
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
116%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
119%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.78
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.6
Late goals
28% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 25% come in the first quarter-hour.
28%

Swit

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.26
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.26
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
0.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.43
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.17
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
112%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
90%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.50
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
35% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
35%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (3 Liga Group 1).

Teams vs league

TroszynLigaSwit
Average goals in match▲ 4.063.46• 3.44
Both teams scored▲ 83%67%▼ 61%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 83%68%▲ 72%
Clean sheets• 17%18%▲ 22%
Goal before half-time▲ 83%75%▲ 89%
Goal after half-time▼ 83%87%▲ 89%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.46
Average goals per match
67%
Both teams scored
68%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
18%
Clean sheets
1.92
Home goals / match
1.54
Away goals / match
+25%
Home attack advantage
+20%
Home defence advantage
+9%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
44%
2 goals
16%
3 goals
6%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
87%
1 goal
59%
2 goals
34%
3 goals
12%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Troszyn 0 - 0 - 1 Swit. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

Swit
2 : 1
Troszyn

FAQ

What was the result of Troszyn vs Swit?

The 3 Liga Group 1 match finished Troszyn 5:0 Swit. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Troszyn vs Swit?

Troszyn score 2.22 goals per game on average and Swit 1.72. The 3 Liga Group 1 average is 3.46 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 68% of games. Both teams score in 83% of Troszyn's matches and 61% of Swit's.

What form are Troszyn and Swit in?

Over the last 5 games Troszyn have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Swit 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Troszyn vs Swit?

The statistical background for Troszyn vs Swit — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.