France - Ligue 2Data current as of 12 September 2026

Troyes vs Pau: match statistics

Troyes crest
Troyes
4 : 3half-time 2:2
Pau crest
Pau
155%(1.95)
X25%(3.30)
220%(3.40)

Troyes occupies the top spot in the table and displays impressive home form with 75% of matches won at home and a goal difference of +12 at their own stadium. The hosts score an average of 2 goals per match in home games, with only 8% of matches without a goal scored. Pau, despite a decent table position, has weaker away efficiency (45% wins) and a higher rate of goals conceded away (1.45 per match). Troyes boasts better expected goals (xG 1.81 vs 1.36 for Pau) and an advantage in ball possession (52% vs 50%). Troyes' recent form is weaker (0.2 PPG in the last 5 matches), but their home dominance and statistical superiority in home matches suggest their victory in this encounter.

Troyes vs Pau: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Troyes played Pau in Ligue 2 (France). The match was played on 21 February 2026. Final score: 4:3.

Current form

Troyes: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Pau: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Troyes scores 1.48 and concedes 0.96 goals per match. Pau scores 1.48 and concedes 1.52. League average: 2.46 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Troyes 52%, Pau 57%. Over 2.5: Troyes 48%, Pau 65%. League level: BTTS 51%, Over 2.5 47%.

xG, shots and style

Troyes has higher xG: 1.57 vs 1.45. Troyes: 13.6 shots per match, Pau: 13.2.

Match halves

Troyes: half-time lead 35%, second-half goals 0.83. Pau: half-time lead 35%, second-half goals 0.65.

Goals by minute

Troyes: 61-75 (8 goals). Pau: 31-45+ (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Ligue 2: 2.46 goals per match, BTTS 51%, Over 2.5 47%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Troyes occupies the top spot in the table and displays impressive home form with 75% of matches won at home and a goal difference of +12 at their own stadium. The hosts score an average of 2 goals per match in home games, with only 8% of matches without a goal scored. Pau, despite a decent table position, has weaker away efficiency (45% wins) and a higher rate of goals conceded away (1.45 per match). Troyes boasts better expected goals (xG 1.81 vs 1.36 for Pau) and an advantage in ball possession (52% vs 50%). Troyes' recent form is weaker (0.2 PPG in the last 5 matches), but their home dominance and statistical superiority in home matches suggest their victory in this encounter.

View the statistical overview

Half-by-half

2 : 2
1st half
2 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

64Possession (%)36
TroyesPau
22Shots11
TroyesPau
8Shots on target5
TroyesPau
2.54xG1.14
TroyesPau
5Corners2
TroyesPau
81Dangerous attacks13
TroyesPau
10Fouls13
TroyesPau
5Cards3
TroyesPau

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.48Goals scored / match1.48
TroyesPau
0.96Goals conceded / match1.52
TroyesPau
51%Average possession52%
TroyesPau
4.78Shots on target / match4.13
TroyesPau

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

13.57Shots per match13.22
TroyesPau
4.78Shots on target4.13
TroyesPau
10.9%Shot conversion11.2%
TroyesPau
51%Possession52%
TroyesPau
1.57xG for1.45
TroyesPau
1.16xG against1.19
TroyesPau

Shooting quality

Troyes: BalancedPau: Balanced
TroyesPau
Accuracy (shots on target)35%31%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.310.36

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Pau is 75% better for: last-5 form.

0.8 pts / match - Troyes · 1.4 pts / match - Pau

Troyes
WLLLD
Season result split
52% W26% D22% L
Season (W-D-L)
12-6-5
1.83 pts / match · goal difference +12
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
9-1-2
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
LDWWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.19Opponent xG: 1.31BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
Pau
LDWWL
Season result split
39% W30% D30% L
Season (W-D-L)
9-7-7
1.48 pts / match · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
5-4-2
Last 5 away
3-1-1
DWLWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.32Opponent xG: 1.23BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Troyes is 58% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.96 goals / match - Troyes · 1.52 goals / match - Pau

Troyes scoring profile: strong

Troyes scores in 74% of matches (17 of 23 matches), while Pau keeps a clean sheet in 30% (7 of 23 matches).

Pau scoring profile: very strong

Pau scores in 87% of matches (20 of 23 matches), while Troyes keeps a clean sheet in 35% (8 of 23 matches).

34Goals scored (season)34
TroyesPau
22Goals conceded (season)35
TroyesPau
2.43Average goals in match3
TroyesPau
3Goals scored (last 5)8
TroyesPau
6Goals conceded (last 5)7
TroyesPau

How often they score at least...

74%1 goal87%
TroyesPau
43%2 goals43%
TroyesPau
22%3 goals17%
TroyesPau
4%4 goals0%
TroyesPau

How often they concede at least...

65%1 goal70%
TroyesPau
26%2 goals48%
TroyesPau
4%3 goals22%
TroyesPau
0%4 goals4%
TroyesPau

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

22%BTTS at half-time22%
TroyesPau
4%BTTS in both halves4%
TroyesPau
26%Scored in both halves26%
TroyesPau

BTTS and goal count

43%Min. 3 goals and BTTS43%
TroyesPau
4%Min. 3 goals without BTTS22%
TroyesPau
40%BTTS - last 560%
TroyesPau

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

65%Min. 1 goal before half-time83%
TroyesPau
35%Min. 2 goals before half-time52%
TroyesPau
13%Min. 3 goals before half-time30%
TroyesPau

2nd half

70%Min. 1 goal after half-time78%
TroyesPau
35%Min. 2 goals after half-time35%
TroyesPau
17%Min. 3 goals after half-time13%
TroyesPau

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Troyes is 17% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.52 pts / match - Troyes · 1.3 pts / match - Pau

Troyes - half-time state
35% leading48% draw17% trailing
Pau - half-time state
35% leading26% draw39% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.52Points per match (1st half)1.3
TroyesPau
0.65Goals scored (1st half)0.83
TroyesPau
0.52Goals conceded (1st half)0.91
TroyesPau
1.17Average goals (1st half)1.74
TroyesPau
61%Clean sheet before half-time52%
TroyesPau
52%No goal before half-time43%
TroyesPau

After half-time (2nd half)

1.7Points per match (2nd half)1.3
TroyesPau
0.83Goals scored (2nd half)0.65
TroyesPau
0.43Goals conceded (2nd half)0.61
TroyesPau
1.26Average goals (2nd half)1.26
TroyesPau
65%Clean sheet after half-time52%
TroyesPau
48%No goal after half-time43%
TroyesPau

Troyes - second-half results

43% W39% D17% L
35
Half-time points
15
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
39
Second-half points
+9
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.52
PPG before half-time
Lead holding149%

Leads at half-time in 35% of matches and wins 52%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Pau - second-half results

30% W39% D30% L
30
Half-time points
19
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
30
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.30
PPG before half-time
Lead holding111%

Leads at half-time in 35% of matches and wins 39%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.3

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Troyes - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.200.40
Goals scored / match0.60.0
Goals conceded / match0.60.6
Average goals in match1.20.6
1 goal60%60%
2 goals60%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal60%100%
Goal difference0-3
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 40% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3
Pau - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.601.00
Goals scored / match0.41.2
Goals conceded / match0.41.0
Average goals in match0.82.2
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%80%
3 goals0%60%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference0+1
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Troyes
ScoredConceded
4
4
0-15
5
2
16-30
6
6
31-45
6
1
46-60
8
5
61-75
5
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (8 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Pau
ScoredConceded
5
7
0-15
6
9
16-30
8
5
31-45
6
3
46-60
2
3
61-75
7
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (8 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.72
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.5 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
111%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
55%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-26%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
64%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
3%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 33 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Troyes

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.41
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.11
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-6.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.09
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.20
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
117%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
80%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-1.03
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
15% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 12% come in the first quarter-hour.
15%

Pau

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.26
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.30
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.03
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.33
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
123%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
121%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.08
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
21% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 15% come in the first quarter-hour.
21%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ligue 2).

Teams vs league

TroyesLigaPau
Average goals in match 2.432.46 3.00
Both teams scored 52%51% 57%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 48%47% 65%
Clean sheets 35%29% 30%
Goal before half-time 65%65% 83%
Goal after half-time 70%73% 78%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.46
Average goals per match
51%
Both teams scored
47%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
29%
Clean sheets
1.26
Home goals / match
1.20
Away goals / match
+5%
Home attack advantage
+5%
Home defence advantage
+4%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
65%
1 goal
32%
2 goals
13%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
37%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
4%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. TroyesYellow cardAntoine Mille
  2. PauYellow cardAnthony Briançon
  3. TroyesYellow cardKandet Diawara
  4. TroyesGoalTawfik Bentayeb
  5. TroyesYellow cardAnis Ouzenadji
  6. PauYellow cardNoah Raveyre
  7. PauYellow cardJean Ruiz
  8. TroyesYellow cardTawfik Bentayeb
  9. TroyesYellow cardMounaim El Idrissy

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Alexandre Perreau NielMatches officiated: 14
3.57Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 250%Home wins14%Draws36%Away wins

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Troyes 0 - 1 - 0 Pau. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

Pau FC
1 : 1
Espérance Sportive Troyes Aube Champagne

FAQ

What was the result of Troyes vs Pau?

The Ligue 2 match finished Troyes 4:3 Pau. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Troyes vs Pau?

Troyes score 1.48 goals per game on average and Pau 1.48. The Ligue 2 average is 2.46 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 47% of games. Both teams score in 52% of Troyes's matches and 57% of Pau's.

What form are Troyes and Pau in?

Over the last 5 games Troyes have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Pau 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Troyes vs Pau?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Troyes vs Pau: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.