Tukums II vs JDFS Alberts: match statistics
Tukums II vs JDFS Alberts: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Tukums II played JDFS Alberts in 1. Liga (Latvia). The match was played on 3 August 2026. Final score: 1:1.
Current form
Tukums II: 1-0-4, 0.60 points/match. JDFS Alberts: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
Tukums II scores 1.29 and concedes 2.86 goals per match. JDFS Alberts scores 2.07 and concedes 1.57. League average: 3.50 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Tukums II 71%, JDFS Alberts 79%. Over 2.5: Tukums II 71%, JDFS Alberts 71%. League level: BTTS 63%, Over 2.5 70%.
xG, shots and style
JDFS Alberts has higher xG: 1.90 vs 1.48. Tukums II: 9.9 shots per match, JDFS Alberts: 14.4.
Match halves
Tukums II: half-time lead 14%, second-half goals 0.86. JDFS Alberts: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 1.36.
Goals by minute
Tukums II: 76-90+ (7 goals). JDFS Alberts: 76-90+ (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
1. Liga: 3.50 goals per match, BTTS 63%, Over 2.5 70%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-3. Average goals 5.67, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
JDFS Alberts appears to be the favorite: they sit 5th versus Tukums II in 12th and have 7 wins this season compared to the home side’s 3, as well as 29 goals scored versus 18 for their opponents. In the last five matches the visitors have scored 8 goals and average 1.4 points per game, while the hosts have scored 4 goals and manage only 0.6 PPG; additionally Tukums II conceded as many as 18 goals in those five matches (3.6 per game) versus 9 (1.8) for JDFS. Chance quality is similar (average xG 1.60 for the home side in home matches vs 1.69 for the visitors away), but the visitors are more efficient — conversion 16% vs 11% for the hosts and on average 2.0 goals away compared to 1.29 for the hosts at home. Defensively the data are mixed: overall Tukums II conceded 40 goals this season versus 22 for JDFS, however lower average xG against for the visitors away (1.05 vs 1.66 against the hosts) and the smaller number of goals conceded in the last 5 matches (9 vs 18) indicate greater defensive stability for JDFS. Considering the table advantage, better scoring efficiency (29–18) and more favorable recent-five-match trends, I predict a JDFS Alberts victory.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I back BTTS - Yes because JDFS Alberts has 100% BTTS this season and Tukums II 57% — combined well above the league average of 61%. Seasonal goal figures show Tukums II scores 2.14 and concedes 1.14 per game, while JDFS scores 2.00 and concedes 2.00; together this yields 4.14 goals per game between the teams. xG stats are 2.1 for Tukums and 1.69 for JDFS, with xG against 1.33 and 1.05 respectively — total expected xG around 3.79 and a high number of chances (on average 8.14 shots on target for the home side vs 4.43 for the away side). In the last 5 matches Tukums concedes 3.6 goals and scores 0.8 on average, while JDFS scores 1.6 and concedes 1.8, indicating the hosts are vulnerable at the back and the visitors regularly find the net. Considering JDFS 100% BTTS, Tukums 57% BTTS, high share of games over 2.5 goals (86% for JDFS) and a league average of 3.49 goals per match, I assign BTTS 78% (Yes) vs 22% (No).
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Both teams produce a high number of goals: Tukums II scores an average of 2.14 goals per game with xG 2.10, while JDFS Alberts averages 2.00 goals with xG 1.69; hosts concede 1.14 goals and visitors 2.00. Season metrics show 86% of Tukums II matches and 100% of JDFS matches finished over 1.5 goals, and the 2.5 line was exceeded in 57% of hosts’ games and 86% of visitors’ games (approximately 72% on average). Averaged xG (2.10 hosts vs 1.05 opponent defense; 1.69 visitors vs 1.33 opponent defense) produce expected goals of about 1.58 for the hosts and 1.51 for the visitors, total 3.09. Note, however, that in the last 5 games Tukums II scored only 0.8 goals and conceded 3.6 (4 scored and 18 conceded), which increases volatility and the likelihood of goals in the match. Based on this, I recommend Over 1.5 as the strongest signal (93%) at the 1.5 line; Over 2.5 is also probable (72%), while Over 3.5 is less certain (48%).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Tukums II holds the overall advantage: an average of 2.0 points per match versus JDFS Alberts’ 1.43, home xG 2.10 against 1.69 and more shots on target (8.14 vs 4.43), indicating greater chance creation. At half-time the stats favor a draw – hosts were level at the break in 43% of matches and kept a clean sheet to half-time in 71% of games, with average goals by half 0.57 (Tukums) versus 0.86 (JDFS), so 0-0 or a draw at the break is common. The second half clearly favors Tukums: on average 1.57 goals scored after the break and winning the second half in 71% of matches (vs 28% for JDFS), which gives a strong probability of a turnaround or of securing the win after the break. Additionally, JDFS has a season-long BTTS of 100%, but given Tukums’ xG edge and superior shots on target the most likely scenario is a draw at half-time and a home win at full-time, hence X/1 is the strongest signal.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Tukums II | JDFS Alberts | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 45% | 44% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.15 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.29 | 0.33 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
JDFS Alberts is 167% better for: last-5 form.
0.6 pts / match - Tukums II · 1.6 pts / match - JDFS Alberts
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
JDFS Alberts is 60% better for: goals scored per match.
1.29 goals / match - Tukums II · 2.07 goals / match - JDFS Alberts
JDFS Alberts is 82% better for: goals conceded per match.
2.86 goals / match - Tukums II · 1.57 goals / match - JDFS Alberts
Tukums II scores in 86% of matches (12 of 14 matches), while JDFS Alberts keeps a clean sheet in 14% (2 of 14 matches).
JDFS Alberts scores in 86% of matches (12 of 14 matches), while Tukums II keeps a clean sheet in 14% (2 of 14 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Tukums II
Over / Under - JDFS Alberts
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
JDFS Alberts is 70% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.71 pts / match - Tukums II · 1.21 pts / match - JDFS Alberts
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Tukums II - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 14% of matches and wins 21%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
JDFS Alberts - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.40 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.0 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.8 | 1.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.8 | 2.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 100% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 20% |
| No goal | 100% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -9 | -5 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 1.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -2 | +2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +9 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Tukums II
JDFS Alberts
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (1. Liga).
Teams vs league
| Tukums II | Liga | JDFS Alberts | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 4.14 | 3.50 | ▲ 3.64 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 71% | 63% | ▲ 79% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | • 71% | 70% | • 71% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 14% | 21% | ▼ 14% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 79% | 74% | ▼ 64% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 100% | 85% | • 86% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Away team
Other recorded players
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- JDFS AlbertsGoalMatīss Zēģele
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (3): Tukums II 0 - 0 - 3 JDFS Alberts. Average goals 5.67, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Tukums II vs JDFS Alberts?
The 1. Liga match finished Tukums II 1:1 JDFS Alberts. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Tukums II and JDFS Alberts?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches Tukums II won 0, JDFS Alberts won 3 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 5.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Tukums II vs JDFS Alberts?
Tukums II score 1.29 goals per game on average and JDFS Alberts 2.07. The 1. Liga average is 3.50 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 70% of games. Both teams score in 71% of Tukums II's matches and 79% of JDFS Alberts's.
What form are Tukums II and JDFS Alberts in?
Over the last 5 games Tukums II have a 1-0-4 record (0.60 points per game) and JDFS Alberts 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Tukums II vs JDFS Alberts?
The statistical background for Tukums II vs JDFS Alberts — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.