Latvia - 1. LigaData current as of 24 July 2026

Tukums II vs Metta - LU: match statistics

Tukums II crest
Tukums II
1 : 3half-time 1:2
Metta - LU crest
Metta - LU
135%(0.00)
X35%(0.00)
230%(0.00)

Analysis of the available data indicates very balanced chances for both teams. Tukums II and Metta-LU display identical form in their last five matches, averaging 1.4 points per game, with 2 wins, 1 draw, and 2 losses each. Both teams show similar offensive efficiency, scoring 12 and 9 goals in their last five games respectively, with a comparable number of goals conceded (13 vs. 11). The lack of detailed home and away statistics prevents a deeper analysis of the home team's advantage, which further suggests a draw as the likely outcome. A slight advantage for the hosts is given by their better goal-scoring efficiency in recent matches and the theoretical benefit of playing on home turf. Given the extremely balanced record of both sides, the most probable scenario appears to be a draw, although a narrow home win is also possible.

Tukums II vs Metta - LU: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Tukums II play Metta - LU in 1. Liga (Latvia). The match date is 21 March 2026 at 15:00. Final score: 1:3.

Current form

Tukums II: 1-0-4, 0.60 points/match. Metta - LU: 4-1-0, 2.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Tukums II scores 1.38 and concedes 2.38 goals per match. Metta - LU scores 3.54 and concedes 0.85. League average: 3.43 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Tukums II 77%, Metta - LU 54%. Over 2.5: Tukums II 69%, Metta - LU 85%. League level: BTTS 60%, Over 2.5 68%.

xG, shots and style

Metta - LU has higher xG: 2.83 vs 1.57. Tukums II: 10.5 shots per match, Metta - LU: 20.1.

Match halves

Tukums II: half-time lead 15%, second-half goals 0.92. Metta - LU: half-time lead 85%, second-half goals 1.54.

Goals by minute

Tukums II: 76-90+ (7 goals). Metta - LU: 31-45+ (10 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

1. Liga: 3.43 goals per match, BTTS 60%, Over 2.5 68%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Match description

Analysis of the available data indicates very balanced chances for both teams. Tukums II and Metta-LU display identical form in their last five matches, averaging 1.4 points per game, with 2 wins, 1 draw, and 2 losses each. Both teams show similar offensive efficiency, scoring 12 and 9 goals in their last five games respectively, with a comparable number of goals conceded (13 vs. 11). The lack of detailed home and away statistics prevents a deeper analysis of the home team's advantage, which further suggests a draw as the likely outcome. A slight advantage for the hosts is given by their better goal-scoring efficiency in recent matches and the theoretical benefit of playing on home turf. Given the extremely balanced record of both sides, the most probable scenario appears to be a draw, although a narrow home win is also possible.

Half-by-half

1 : 2
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

42Possession (%)58
Tukums IIMetta - LU
3Shots19
Tukums IIMetta - LU
3Shots on target10
Tukums IIMetta - LU
0.57xG2.58
Tukums IIMetta - LU
2Corners7
Tukums IIMetta - LU
21Dangerous attacks94
Tukums IIMetta - LU
-1Fouls-1
Tukums IIMetta - LU
-1Cards-1
Tukums IIMetta - LU

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Tukums IIMetta - LU
1.38Goals scored / match3.54
Tukums IIMetta - LU
2.38Goals conceded / match0.85
Tukums IIMetta - LU
42%Average possession56%
Tukums IIMetta - LU
4.69Shots on target / match10.69
Tukums IIMetta - LU

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10.46Shots per match20.15
Tukums IIMetta - LU
4.69Shots on target10.69
Tukums IIMetta - LU
13.2%Shot conversion17.6%
Tukums IIMetta - LU
42%Possession56%
Tukums IIMetta - LU
1.57xG for2.83
Tukums IIMetta - LU
1.79xG against0.73
Tukums IIMetta - LU

Shooting quality

Tukums II: Counter-attackingMetta - LU: Dominant
Tukums IIMetta - LU
Accuracy (shots on target)45%53%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.150.14
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.290.33

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Metta - LU is 333% better for: last-5 form.

0.6 pts / match - Tukums II · 2.6 pts / match - Metta - LU

Tukums II
LLLLW
Season result split
23% W15% R62% P
Season (W-D-L)
3-2-8
0.85 pts / match · goal difference -13
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-4
0.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-1-4
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
WLDLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 3.0xG: 1.85Opponent xG: 1.95BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Metta - LU
DWWWW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
85% W8% R8% P
Season (W-D-L)
11-1-1
2.62 pts / match · goal difference +35
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-1-0
2.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
5-1-0
Last 5 away
4-1-0
WWDWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 3.8Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 2.52Opponent xG: 0.87BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 100%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Metta - LU is 157% better for: goals scored per match.

1.38 goals / match - Tukums II · 3.54 goals / match - Metta - LU

Metta - LU is 180% better for: goals conceded per match.

2.38 goals / match - Tukums II · 0.85 goals / match - Metta - LU

Tukums II scoring profile: very strong

Tukums II scores in 92% of matches (12 of 13 matches), while Metta - LU keeps a clean sheet in 46% (6 of 13 matches).

Metta - LU scoring profile: very strong

Metta - LU scores in 100% of matches (13 of 13 matches), while Tukums II keeps a clean sheet in 15% (2 of 13 matches).

18Goals scored (season)46
Tukums IIMetta - LU
31Goals conceded (season)11
Tukums IIMetta - LU
3.77Average goals in match4.38
Tukums IIMetta - LU
5Goals scored (last 5)19
Tukums IIMetta - LU
15Goals conceded (last 5)7
Tukums IIMetta - LU

How often they score at least...

92%1 goal100%
Tukums IIMetta - LU
31%2 goals85%
Tukums IIMetta - LU
8%3 goals69%
Tukums IIMetta - LU
8%4 goals38%
Tukums IIMetta - LU

How often they concede at least...

85%1 goal54%
Tukums IIMetta - LU
69%2 goals23%
Tukums IIMetta - LU
46%3 goals8%
Tukums IIMetta - LU
23%4 goals0%
Tukums IIMetta - LU

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

60%
League average

Goal patterns

31%BTTS at half-time8%
Tukums IIMetta - LU
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Tukums IIMetta - LU
15%Scored in both halves77%
Tukums IIMetta - LU

BTTS and goal count

69%Min. 3 goals and BTTS54%
Tukums IIMetta - LU
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS31%
Tukums IIMetta - LU
60%BTTS - last 580%
Tukums IIMetta - LU

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

77%Min. 1 goal before half-time85%
Tukums IIMetta - LU
54%Min. 2 goals before half-time46%
Tukums IIMetta - LU
23%Min. 3 goals before half-time31%
Tukums IIMetta - LU

2nd half

100%Min. 1 goal after half-time85%
Tukums IIMetta - LU
69%Min. 2 goals after half-time69%
Tukums IIMetta - LU
31%Min. 3 goals after half-time46%
Tukums IIMetta - LU

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Metta - LU is 249% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.77 pts / match - Tukums II · 2.69 pts / match - Metta - LU

Tukums II - half-time state
15% leading31% draw54% trailing
Metta - LU - half-time state
85% leading15% draw0% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.77Points per match (1st half)2.69
Tukums IIMetta - LU
0.46Goals scored (1st half)1.85
Tukums IIMetta - LU
1.08Goals conceded (1st half)0.08
Tukums IIMetta - LU
1.54Average goals (1st half)1.92
Tukums IIMetta - LU
31%Clean sheet before half-time92%
Tukums IIMetta - LU
62%No goal before half-time15%
Tukums IIMetta - LU

After half-time (2nd half)

1.08Points per match (2nd half)1.92
Tukums IIMetta - LU
0.92Goals scored (2nd half)1.54
Tukums IIMetta - LU
1.31Goals conceded (2nd half)0.62
Tukums IIMetta - LU
2.23Average goals (2nd half)2.15
Tukums IIMetta - LU
31%Clean sheet after half-time62%
Tukums IIMetta - LU
31%No goal after half-time15%
Tukums IIMetta - LU

Tukums II - second-half results

31% W15% R54% P
10
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
-8
Goal difference (1st half)
14
Second-half points
-5
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.77
PPG before half-time
Lead holding153%

Leads at half-time in 15% of matches and wins 23%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Metta - LU - second-half results

54% W31% R15% P
35
Half-time points
24
Half-time goals
+23
Goal difference (1st half)
25
Second-half points
+12
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.69
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 85% of matches and wins 85%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Tukums II - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.400.80
Goals scored / match0.01.0
Goals conceded / match1.02.0
Average goals in match1.03.0
1 goal60%100%
2 goals40%100%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal100%20%
Goal difference-5-5
Half-time: 0% leading - 40% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0
Metta - LU - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.601.60
Goals scored / match1.81.6
Goals conceded / match0.01.0
Average goals in match1.82.6
1 goal80%80%
2 goals40%80%
3 goals20%60%
Clean sheet100%40%
No goal20%20%
Goal difference+9+3
Half-time: 80% leading - 20% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 9

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Tukums II
ScoredConceded
1
3
0-15
2
5
16-30
3
6
31-45
3
5
46-60
2
5
61-75
7
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Metta - LU
ScoredConceded
9
2
0-15
7
1
16-30
10
0
31-45
5
5
46-60
5
1
61-75
10
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (10 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +8 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

4.08
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.1 : 3.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
119%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
66%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
92%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
4+
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Tukums II

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.22
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.78
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.19
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.59
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
76%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
149%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.25
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
39% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 6% come in the first quarter-hour.
39%

Metta - LU

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+2.10
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.59
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.71
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.12
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
221%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
47%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.02
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.3
Late goals
22% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 20% come in the first quarter-hour.
22%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (1. Liga).

Teams vs league

Tukums IILigaMetta - LU
Average goals in match 3.773.43 4.38
Both teams scored 77%60% 54%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 69%68% 85%
Clean sheets 15%23% 46%
Goal before half-time 77%71% 85%
Goal after half-time 100%84% 85%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.43
Average goals per match
60%
Both teams scored
68%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
23%
Clean sheets
1.82
Home goals / match
1.60
Away goals / match
+14%
Home attack advantage
+12%
Home defence advantage
+7%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
71%
1 goal
35%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
84%
1 goal
64%
2 goals
35%
3 goals
14%
4 goals

FAQ

What was the result of Tukums II vs Metta - LU?

The 1. Liga match finished Tukums II 1:3 Metta - LU. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Tukums II vs Metta - LU?

Tukums II score 1.38 goals per game on average and Metta - LU 3.54. The 1. Liga average is 3.43 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 68% of games. Both teams score in 77% of Tukums II's matches and 54% of Metta - LU's.

What form are Tukums II and Metta - LU in?

Over the last 5 games Tukums II have a 1-0-4 record (0.60 points per game) and Metta - LU 4-1-0 (2.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Tukums II vs Metta - LU?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.