Latvia - 1. LigaData current as of 07 September 2026

Tukums II vs Rīgas FS II: match statistics

Tukums II crest
Tukums II
2 : 0half-time 0:0
Rīgas FS II crest
Rīgas FS II

Tukums II vs Rīgas FS II: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Tukums II played Rīgas FS II in 1. Liga (Latvia). The match was played on 20 July 2026. Final score: 2:0.

Current form

Tukums II: 0-1-4, 0.20 points/match. Rīgas FS II: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Tukums II scores 1.33 and concedes 2.58 goals per match. Rīgas FS II scores 1.33 and concedes 2.08. League average: 3.44 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Tukums II 83%, Rīgas FS II 58%. Over 2.5: Tukums II 75%, Rīgas FS II 75%. League level: BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 69%.

xG, shots and style

Tukums II has higher xG: 1.52 vs 1.40. Tukums II: 10.1 shots per match, Rīgas FS II: 9.2.

Match halves

Tukums II: half-time lead 17%, second-half goals 0.83. Rīgas FS II: half-time lead 42%, second-half goals 0.58.

Goals by minute

Tukums II: 76-90+ (6 goals). Rīgas FS II: 0-15 (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

1. Liga: 3.44 goals per match, BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 69%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-1. Average goals 4.50, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Rīgas FS II are the favorites for this match: in their last 5 fixtures the visitors scored 11 goals with a record of 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss, averaging 2.0 points per game, while Tukums II have scored just 4 goals and have 0 wins, 1 draw and 4 losses in their last 5 matches (average 0.2 points per game). The hosts concede on average 2.17 goals per home game and have shipped 16 goals in their last five matches (3.2 per game), whereas the visitors concede 1.75 goals on the road and have allowed 6 goals in their last 5 matches (1.2 per game). Tukums II generate more shots and shots on target at home (11.17 shots and 5.17 on target on average) and have a higher xG (1.53) than Rīgas FS II away (xG 1.15); however, the hosts’ conversion rate is only 10% and does not translate into points. Additionally, the visitors have improved offensively recently despite a season-long 75% of away matches without a goal — they have a season away conversion of 12% and in practice scored 11 goals in 5 matches, giving them an edge against the hosts’ weak defence. Considering the visitors’ better points average (2.0 vs 0.2), lower average goals conceded (1.75 vs 2.17) and clear advantage in recent output (11 vs 4 goals over five matches), I expect a Rīgas FS II victory.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Data analysis indicates an advantage for the BTTS - Yes scenario: the home side has a seasonal BTTS of 75% and 80% BTTS in the last 5 matches, while the visitors also record 80% BTTS in their last 5 fixtures. The hosts have conceded an average of 3.2 goals in the last 5 matches (16 goals conceded) and 2.25 goals per game seasonally, with xG against of 1.96 in the last 5 and 1.89 seasonally, indicating significant defensive vulnerability. The away team have scored 11 goals in their last 5 matches (2.2 per game) and produce an xG of 1.74 in the last 5 (seasonally 1.15), so they have realistic chances to score. The counterargument is the visitors’ low seasonal BTTS of only 25% and 25% clean sheets, which reduces confidence in the scenario, but the dominant form over the last 5 matches prevails. Considering recent form, the hosts’ defensive weakness and a league BTTS rate of 61%, I assess the probability of BTTS - Yes at 70% versus 30% for No.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

I project an Over bet because an xG- and season-trend-based model gives a total expected goals of ~2.98 (Tukums II 1.46, Rīgas FS II 1.52). Tukums II averages 1.5 goals scored and concedes 2.25 per match on the season, and has conceded 16 goals in the last 5 fixtures (3.2 per match), which significantly raises the risk of further goals. Rīgas FS II averages 1.0 goal on the season but has 11 goals in the last 5 matches (2.2 avg), and their attacking xG over that period was 1.74 versus a season xG of 1.15, confirming the visitors’ strong offensive form. Season percentages show home matches finished Over 2.5 in 88% of cases, guests in 50% (league average 69%), and both teams scored in 75% of the home fixtures, which favors Over 1.5 and provides a reasonable case for Over 2.5. Therefore the strongest signal is Over 1.5 (seasonally 100% of home matches and 75% of guests); I recommend the Over side at the 1.5 line; Over 2.5 also looks attractive (~74%), while Over 3.5 remains riskier (~41%).

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Form and statistical analysis indicate a draw at half-time and a Rīgas FS II victory at full-time: the visitors have won 3 of their last 5 matches (60%), while Tukums II have 0 wins, 1 draw and 4 losses in their last 5 (form: dllll). A draw at the break is more likely — Rīgas FS II have been level at half-time in 75% of their seasonal matches and over the last 5 games they averaged 1.0 goals by half-time versus 0.0 for the home side. The visitors’ superiority after the break stems from form and defensive differences: in the past 5 matches Rīgas FS II have averaged 2.0 points per game compared to just 0.2 for Tukums II, with the hosts conceding 3.2 goals per game on average versus 1.2 for the visitors. Additionally, Tukums II produce higher xG (1.54) and more on-target shots (4.71 on average) but concede a higher xG against (1.89 vs. 1.37 for Rīgas FS II), increasing the risk of conceding goals in the second half; therefore I assign the highest probability to the Half-Time/Full-Time scenario draw at half-time and away win (X/2) at 32%.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
2 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

45Possession (%)55
Tukums IIRīgas FS II
15Shots6
Tukums IIRīgas FS II
6Shots on target2
Tukums IIRīgas FS II
2.04xG1.03
Tukums IIRīgas FS II
9Corners7
Tukums IIRīgas FS II
93Dangerous attacks70
Tukums IIRīgas FS II
10Fouls13
Tukums IIRīgas FS II
0Cards0
Tukums IIRīgas FS II

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Tukums IIRīgas FS II
1.33Goals scored / match1.33
Tukums IIRīgas FS II
2.58Goals conceded / match2.08
Tukums IIRīgas FS II
42%Average possession43%
Tukums IIRīgas FS II
4.58Shots on target / match3.67
Tukums IIRīgas FS II

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10.08Shots per match9.17
Tukums IIRīgas FS II
4.58Shots on target3.67
Tukums IIRīgas FS II
13.2%Shot conversion14.5%
Tukums IIRīgas FS II
42%Possession43%
Tukums IIRīgas FS II
1.52xG for1.4
Tukums IIRīgas FS II
1.87xG against1.7
Tukums IIRīgas FS II

Shooting quality

Tukums II: Counter-attackingRīgas FS II: Counter-attacking
Tukums IIRīgas FS II
Accuracy (shots on target)45%40%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.150.15
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.290.36

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Rīgas FS II is 900% better for: last-5 form.

0.2 pts / match - Tukums II · 2 pts / match - Rīgas FS II

Tukums II
DLLLL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
17% W17% R67% P
Season (W-D-L)
2-2-8
0.67 pts / match · goal difference -15
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-1-4
0.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-1-4
Last 5 at home
1-1-3
LWLDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 3.2xG: 1.67Opponent xG: 1.96BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%
Rīgas FS II
WWWLD
Season result split
25% W25% R50% P
Season (W-D-L)
3-3-6
1.00 pts / match · goal difference -9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-1-2
Last 5 away
1-1-2
LDLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.2Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.74Opponent xG: 1.25BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Rīgas FS II is 24% better for: goals conceded per match.

2.58 goals / match - Tukums II · 2.08 goals / match - Rīgas FS II

Tukums II scoring profile: very strong

Tukums II scores in 92% of matches (11 of 12 matches), while Rīgas FS II keeps a clean sheet in 17% (2 of 12 matches).

Rīgas FS II scoring profile: very strong

Rīgas FS II scores in 67% of matches (8 of 12 matches), while Tukums II keeps a clean sheet in 8% (1 of 12 matches).

16Goals scored (season)16
Tukums IIRīgas FS II
31Goals conceded (season)25
Tukums IIRīgas FS II
3.92Average goals in match3.42
Tukums IIRīgas FS II
4Goals scored (last 5)11
Tukums IIRīgas FS II
16Goals conceded (last 5)6
Tukums IIRīgas FS II

How often they score at least...

92%1 goal67%
Tukums IIRīgas FS II
25%2 goals33%
Tukums IIRīgas FS II
8%3 goals25%
Tukums IIRīgas FS II
8%4 goals8%
Tukums IIRīgas FS II

How often they concede at least...

92%1 goal83%
Tukums IIRīgas FS II
75%2 goals58%
Tukums IIRīgas FS II
50%3 goals42%
Tukums IIRīgas FS II
25%4 goals17%
Tukums IIRīgas FS II

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

61%
League average

Goal patterns

33%BTTS at half-time17%
Tukums IIRīgas FS II
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Tukums IIRīgas FS II
17%Scored in both halves33%
Tukums IIRīgas FS II

BTTS and goal count

75%Min. 3 goals and BTTS50%
Tukums IIRīgas FS II
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS25%
Tukums IIRīgas FS II
80%BTTS - last 580%
Tukums IIRīgas FS II

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

83%Min. 1 goal before half-time67%
Tukums IIRīgas FS II
58%Min. 2 goals before half-time33%
Tukums IIRīgas FS II
25%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
Tukums IIRīgas FS II

2nd half

100%Min. 1 goal after half-time92%
Tukums IIRīgas FS II
67%Min. 2 goals after half-time83%
Tukums IIRīgas FS II
33%Min. 3 goals after half-time33%
Tukums IIRīgas FS II

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Rīgas FS II is 133% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.75 pts / match - Tukums II · 1.75 pts / match - Rīgas FS II

Tukums II - half-time state
17% leading25% draw58% trailing
Rīgas FS II - half-time state
42% leading50% draw8% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.75Points per match (1st half)1.75
Tukums IIRīgas FS II
0.5Goals scored (1st half)0.75
Tukums IIRīgas FS II
1.17Goals conceded (1st half)0.25
Tukums IIRīgas FS II
1.67Average goals (1st half)1
Tukums IIRīgas FS II
25%Clean sheet before half-time75%
Tukums IIRīgas FS II
58%No goal before half-time42%
Tukums IIRīgas FS II

After half-time (2nd half)

0.92Points per match (2nd half)0.92
Tukums IIRīgas FS II
0.83Goals scored (2nd half)0.58
Tukums IIRīgas FS II
1.42Goals conceded (2nd half)1.83
Tukums IIRīgas FS II
2.25Average goals (2nd half)2.42
Tukums IIRīgas FS II
25%Clean sheet after half-time25%
Tukums IIRīgas FS II
33%No goal after half-time58%
Tukums IIRīgas FS II

Tukums II - second-half results

25% W17% R58% P
9
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
-8
Goal difference (1st half)
11
Second-half points
-7
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.75
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 17% of matches and wins 17%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Rīgas FS II - second-half results

25% W17% R58% P
21
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
+6
Goal difference (1st half)
11
Second-half points
-15
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.75
PPG before half-time
Lead holding60%

Leads at half-time in 42% of matches and wins 25%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+1.6

Concedes 1.6 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Tukums II - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.400.40
Goals scored / match0.00.8
Goals conceded / match1.02.2
Average goals in match1.03.0
1 goal60%100%
2 goals40%100%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet40%0%
No goal100%20%
Goal difference-5-7
Half-time: 0% leading - 40% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 40% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0
Rīgas FS II - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.802.00
Goals scored / match1.01.2
Goals conceded / match0.40.8
Average goals in match1.42.0
1 goal80%100%
2 goals60%80%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal20%20%
Goal difference+3+2
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 5

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Tukums II
ScoredConceded
1
3
0-15
2
5
16-30
3
6
31-45
3
5
46-60
1
5
61-75
6
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Rīgas FS II
ScoredConceded
4
1
0-15
4
1
16-30
1
1
31-45
1
5
46-60
3
6
61-75
3
11
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -8 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.66
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.7 : 2.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
106%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
71%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+23%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
62%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
3%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 33 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Tukums II

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.35
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.90
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.19
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.71
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
73%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
159%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.47
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
38% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 6% come in the first quarter-hour.
38%

Rīgas FS II

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.30
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.45
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.07
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.38
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
82%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
114%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+1.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
19% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 25% come in the first quarter-hour.
19%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (1. Liga).

Teams vs league

Tukums IILigaRīgas FS II
Average goals in match 3.923.44 3.42
Both teams scored 83%61% 58%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 75%69% 75%
Clean sheets 8%22% 17%
Goal before half-time 83%72% 67%
Goal after half-time 100%83% 92%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.44
Average goals per match
61%
Both teams scored
69%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
22%
Clean sheets
1.82
Home goals / match
1.62
Away goals / match
+12%
Home attack advantage
+11%
Home defence advantage
+5%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
72%
1 goal
36%
2 goals
16%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
83%
1 goal
63%
2 goals
36%
3 goals
14%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Home team

Other recorded players

Ilja Atligins⚽ 1
Rūdolfs Meļķis⚽ 1
Tomo MatsubaraA 1

Away team

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Tukums IIGoalIlja AtliginsAssist: Tomo Matsubara
  2. Tukums IIGoalRūdolfs Meļķis

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Tukums II 0 - 1 - 1 Rīgas FS II. Average goals 4.50, both teams scored in 100% matches.

FK Tukums 2000 / TSS II
2 : 2
FK Rīgas Futbola skola II
FK Rīgas Futbola skola II
4 : 1
FK Tukums 2000 / TSS II

FAQ

What was the result of Tukums II vs Rīgas FS II?

The 1. Liga match finished Tukums II 2:0 Rīgas FS II. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Tukums II and Rīgas FS II?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Tukums II won 0, Rīgas FS II won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 4.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Tukums II vs Rīgas FS II?

Tukums II score 1.33 goals per game on average and Rīgas FS II 1.33. The 1. Liga average is 3.44 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 69% of games. Both teams score in 83% of Tukums II's matches and 58% of Rīgas FS II's.

What form are Tukums II and Rīgas FS II in?

Over the last 5 games Tukums II have a 0-1-4 record (0.20 points per game) and Rīgas FS II 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Tukums II vs Rīgas FS II?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Tukums II vs Rīgas FS II: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.