Tukums II vs Skanste: match statistics
Tukums II vs Skanste: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Tukums II played Skanste in 1. Liga (Latvia). The match was played on 27 April 2026. Final score: 2:0.
Current form
Tukums II: 0-1-2, 0.33 points/match. Skanste: 1-1-2, 1.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Tukums II scores 1.33 and concedes 2.67 goals per match. Skanste scores 2.00 and concedes 2.00. League average: 3.73 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Tukums II 100%, Skanste 75%. Over 2.5: Tukums II 100%, Skanste 75%. League level: BTTS 64%, Over 2.5 76%.
xG, shots and style
Tukums II has higher xG: 1.36 vs 1.19. Tukums II: 8.3 shots per match, Skanste: 6.8.
Match halves
Tukums II: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.33. Skanste: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.25.
Goals by minute
Tukums II: 31-45+ (2 goals). Skanste: 0-15 (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
1. Liga: 3.73 goals per match, BTTS 64%, Over 2.5 76%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-2. Average goals 5.50, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I back the away win. Skanste have scored 14 goals in their last 5 matches versus Tukums II’s 8, and over that span Skanste average 1.4 points per match compared to the hosts’ 0.8. Away, Skanste average 3.0 goals per game and show a +1 goal difference, while Tukums at home average 1.0 goal per game with a -4 goal difference and concede 3.0 goals at home. The hosts create significantly more chances (avg. 9 shots and 8.5 on target per game) and have an xG For of 1.43, but simultaneously an xG Against of 2.67 and 0% clean sheets at home. Skanste display a large discrepancy between away xG For (0.83) and the actual 3.0 goals, with 50% of away matches without scoring, indicating instability, yet overall their offensive efficiency and superior PPG predispose them to victory.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Tukums II has a seasonal BTTS rate of 100% and 100% in the last 5 matches, while Skanste shows 50% for the season and 80% in their last five, strongly favoring a both-teams-to-score scenario. League-wide BTTS occurs in 60% of matches, and both teams have 0% clean sheets this season, further increasing the likelihood of goals from both sides. Statistically Tukums II have scored 4 and conceded 8 this season (avg 1.0 scored and 1.5 conceded), and conceded an average of 3.0 goals in their last 5 matches; Skanste average 2.8 goals scored in their last 5 (14 goals in 5). xG comparison shows Tukums II with seasonal xG_for 1.37 vs xG_against 1.44, while Skanste despite a seasonal xG_for 0.83 has a last-5 xG_for of 1.93 versus 2.72 xG_against for Tukums II, indicating real scoring opportunities for both sides. For these reasons the strongest signal from the data points to BTTS = Yes.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
I project a total of 4.00 goals in the match: 1.75 for Tukums II and 2.25 for Skanste. The estimate is based on seasonal averages: the home team scores 1.0 goal on average and the away team concedes 2.5 goals on average (yielding 1.75), while Skanste scores 3.0 goals and Tukums II concedes 1.5 goals on average (yielding 2.25 for the away side). This is corroborated by form over the last 5 matches — the home side scored 8 and conceded 15 (avg 4.6 goals per game), the visitors scored 14 and conceded 10 (avg 4.8 per game). Recent xG reads 1.41 for the home team and 1.93 for the visitors, with xG against of 2.72 (home) and 1.59 (away), which indicates a high probability of goals. Over/under metrics support Over 2.5: the share of matches above 2.5 is 50% for Tukums II and 100% for Skanste; in the last 5 matches this is 100% and 80% respectively, and league-wide 73% of games finish over 2.5. For these reasons I recommend betting Over 2.5 as the strongest signal; Over 1.5 is almost certain, while Over 3.5 has a moderate chance because the home team has 0% of matches above 3.5 this season despite the visitors having 100%.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
I project a half-time draw and an away win (X/2). The visitors average 3.0 goals per season versus 1.0 for the home side and have won 50% of matches while the hosts have not won (0%), indicating an overall advantage for the away team. However, the home side create more chances and have a higher xG (1.37 vs 0.83) and average 11.5 shots compared to 5.0 for the visitors, and they score on average 0.5 goals by the break versus 0.0 for the opponents, which increases the likelihood of a HT draw. The second half is decisive: the visitors average 3.0 goals in the second half and have 100% of matches with at least one goal after the break, while the home team have an xG against of 1.44 and have been conceding on average 1.6 goals after the break in the last five matches, favoring a turnaround. Therefore X/2 is the most probable outcome, with 1/2 as an alternative scenario or X/X if either side shows poor finishing.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Tukums II | Skanste | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 88% | 22% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.16 | 0.18 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.18 | 1.33 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Skanste is 203% better for: last-5 form.
0.33 pts / match - Tukums II · 1 pts / match - Skanste
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Skanste is 50% better for: goals scored per match.
1.33 goals / match - Tukums II · 2 goals / match - Skanste
Skanste is 34% better for: goals conceded per match.
2.67 goals / match - Tukums II · 2 goals / match - Skanste
Tukums II scores in 100% of matches (3 of 3 matches), while Skanste keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 4 matches).
Skanste scores in 75% of matches (3 of 4 matches), while Tukums II keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 3 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Tukums II
Over / Under - Skanste
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Tukums II is 100% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1 pts / match - Tukums II · 0.5 pts / match - Skanste
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Tukums II - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 0%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Skanste - second-half results
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 0.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 0.3 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| Average goals in match | 2.3 | 1.7 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 67% | 33% |
| 3 goals | 67% | 33% |
| Clean sheet | 0% | 0% |
| No goal | 33% | 67% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.50 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.3 | 0.3 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.3 |
| 1 goal | 75% | 75% |
| 2 goals | 25% | 25% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 25% |
| Clean sheet | 25% | 50% |
| No goal | 75% | 75% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -3 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (2 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (6 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Tukums II
Skanste
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (1. Liga).
Teams vs league
| Tukums II | Liga | Skanste | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 4.00 | 3.73 | ▲ 4.00 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 100% | 64% | ▲ 75% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 100% | 76% | • 75% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 0% | 21% | ▼ 0% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 100% | 76% | • 75% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 100% | 85% | ▼ 75% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Other recorded players
Away team
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- Tukums IIGoalYushin Koki
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): Tukums II 0 - 0 - 2 Skanste. Average goals 5.50, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Tukums II vs Skanste?
The 1. Liga match finished Tukums II 2:0 Skanste. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Tukums II and Skanste?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Tukums II won 0, Skanste won 2 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 5.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Tukums II vs Skanste?
Tukums II score 1.33 goals per game on average and Skanste 2.00. The 1. Liga average is 3.73 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 76% of games. Both teams score in 100% of Tukums II's matches and 75% of Skanste's.
What form are Tukums II and Skanste in?
Over the last 5 games Tukums II have a 0-1-2 record (0.33 points per game) and Skanste 1-1-2 (1.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Tukums II vs Skanste?
The statistical background for Tukums II vs Skanste — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.