Tukums II vs Skanste: match statistics
Tukums II vs Skanste: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Tukums II play Skanste in 1. Liga (Latvia). The match date is 27 April 2026 at 17:00. Final score: 2:0.
Current form
Tukums II: 1-0-4, 0.60 points/match. Skanste: 1-0-4, 0.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
Tukums II scores 1.38 and concedes 2.38 goals per match. Skanste scores 1.54 and concedes 2.08. League average: 3.43 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Tukums II 77%, Skanste 46%. Over 2.5: Tukums II 69%, Skanste 69%. League level: BTTS 60%, Over 2.5 68%.
xG, shots and style
Tukums II has higher xG: 1.57 vs 1.44. Tukums II: 10.5 shots per match, Skanste: 9.8.
Match halves
Tukums II: half-time lead 15%, second-half goals 0.92. Skanste: half-time lead 8%, second-half goals 0.92.
Goals by minute
Tukums II: 76-90+ (7 goals). Skanste: 46-60 (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
1. Liga: 3.43 goals per match, BTTS 60%, Over 2.5 68%.
Head-to-head
2 H2H matches: 0-0-2. Average goals 5.50, BTTS 100%.
Match description
I back the away win. Skanste have scored 14 goals in their last 5 matches versus Tukums II’s 8, and over that span Skanste average 1.4 points per match compared to the hosts’ 0.8. Away, Skanste average 3.0 goals per game and show a +1 goal difference, while Tukums at home average 1.0 goal per game with a -4 goal difference and concede 3.0 goals at home. The hosts create significantly more chances (avg. 9 shots and 8.5 on target per game) and have an xG For of 1.43, but simultaneously an xG Against of 2.67 and 0% clean sheets at home. Skanste display a large discrepancy between away xG For (0.83) and the actual 3.0 goals, with 50% of away matches without scoring, indicating instability, yet overall their offensive efficiency and superior PPG predispose them to victory.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Tukums II | Skanste | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 45% | 44% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.15 | 0.15 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.29 | 0.36 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Skanste is 12% better for: goals scored per match.
1.38 goals / match - Tukums II · 1.54 goals / match - Skanste
Skanste is 14% better for: goals conceded per match.
2.38 goals / match - Tukums II · 2.08 goals / match - Skanste
Tukums II scores in 92% of matches (12 of 13 matches), while Skanste keeps a clean sheet in 15% (2 of 13 matches).
Skanste scores in 62% of matches (8 of 13 matches), while Tukums II keeps a clean sheet in 15% (2 of 13 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Tukums II
Over / Under — Skanste
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Tukums II is 43% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.77 pts / match - Tukums II · 0.54 pts / match - Skanste
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Tukums II - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 15% of matches and wins 23%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Skanste - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 8% of matches and wins 31%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.40 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.0 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 2.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 3.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 100% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 20% |
| No goal | 100% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -5 | -5 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.60 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.4 | 1.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -6 | -2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (8 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Tukums II
Skanste
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (1. Liga).
Teams vs league
| Tukums II | Liga | Skanste | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 3.77 | 3.43 | ▲ 3.62 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 77% | 60% | ▼ 46% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | • 69% | 68% | • 69% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 15% | 23% | ▼ 15% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 77% | 71% | ▲ 77% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 100% | 84% | ▼ 77% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): Tukums II 0 - 0 - 2 Skanste. Average goals 5.50, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Tukums II vs Skanste?
The 1. Liga match finished Tukums II 2:0 Skanste. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Tukums II and Skanste?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Tukums II won 0, Skanste won 2 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 5.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Tukums II vs Skanste?
Tukums II score 1.38 goals per game on average and Skanste 1.54. The 1. Liga average is 3.43 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 68% of games. Both teams score in 77% of Tukums II's matches and 46% of Skanste's.
What form are Tukums II and Skanste in?
Over the last 5 games Tukums II have a 1-0-4 record (0.60 points per game) and Skanste 1-0-4 (0.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Tukums II vs Skanste?
The statistical background for Tukums II vs Skanste — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.