Latvia - 1. LigaData current as of 23 July 2026

Tukums II vs Smiltene: match statistics

Tukums II crest
Tukums II
1 : 1half-time 0:0
Smiltene crest
Smiltene

Tukums II vs Smiltene: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Tukums II play Smiltene in 1. Liga (Latvia). The match date is 24 May 2026 at 15:00. Final score: 1:1.

Current form

Tukums II: 1-0-4, 0.60 points/match. Smiltene: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Tukums II scores 1.38 and concedes 2.38 goals per match. Smiltene scores 1.00 and concedes 2.54. League average: 3.43 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Tukums II 77%, Smiltene 46%. Over 2.5: Tukums II 69%, Smiltene 54%. League level: BTTS 60%, Over 2.5 68%.

xG, shots and style

Tukums II has higher xG: 1.57 vs 1.13. Tukums II: 10.5 shots per match, Smiltene: 8.2.

Match halves

Tukums II: half-time lead 15%, second-half goals 0.92. Smiltene: half-time lead 15%, second-half goals 0.77.

Goals by minute

Tukums II: 76-90+ (7 goals). Smiltene: 76-90+ (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

1. Liga: 3.43 goals per match, BTTS 60%, Over 2.5 68%.

Head-to-head

2 H2H matches: 1-0-1. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 50%.

Match description

I back the home win (1): Tukums II averages 1.25 goals per home match with an average xG of 1.51, while Smiltene scores only 0.75 goals away with xG 1.06. The visitors’ defense is markedly weaker — Smiltene concedes 4.0 goals on average away versus Tukums conceding 2.0 at home, which increases the hosts’ offensive prospects. Tukums generates more chances (10.5 shots and 6 on target at home) with a conversion rate of 12%, whereas Smiltene averages 8.25 shots and 4 on target with a 9% conversion. Additionally, Tukums have not had a goalless home game (0% such matches), while Smiltene failed to score in 75% of away fixtures; over the last 5 matches Tukums has 2 wins and averages 1.2 points, Smiltene has 0 wins and 0.2 points. Considering the xG advantage (1.51 vs 1.06), higher number of shots on target and the visitors’ poor defense, I assess probabilities as 70% home, 18% draw and 12% away.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
1 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

48Possession (%)52
Tukums IISmiltene
11Shots9
Tukums IISmiltene
2Shots on target2
Tukums IISmiltene
1.33xG1.06
Tukums IISmiltene
4Corners6
Tukums IISmiltene
68Dangerous attacks47
Tukums IISmiltene
14Fouls17
Tukums IISmiltene
0Cards0
Tukums IISmiltene

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.38Goals scored / match1
Tukums IISmiltene
2.38Goals conceded / match2.54
Tukums IISmiltene
42%Average possession43%
Tukums IISmiltene
4.69Shots on target / match3.62
Tukums IISmiltene

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10.46Shots per match8.15
Tukums IISmiltene
4.69Shots on target3.62
Tukums IISmiltene
13.2%Shot conversion12.3%
Tukums IISmiltene
42%Possession43%
Tukums IISmiltene
1.57xG for1.13
Tukums IISmiltene
1.79xG against2.05
Tukums IISmiltene

Shooting quality

Tukums II: Counter-attackingSmiltene: Counter-attacking
Tukums IISmiltene
Accuracy (shots on target)45%44%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.150.14
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.290.28

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Smiltene is 33% better for: last-5 form.

0.6 pts / match - Tukums II · 0.8 pts / match - Smiltene

Tukums II
LLLLW
Season result split
23% W15% R62% P
Season (W-D-L)
3-2-8
0.85 pts / match · goal difference -13
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-4
0.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-1-4
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
WLDLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 3.0xG: 1.85Opponent xG: 1.95BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Smiltene
DLLLW
Season result split
8% W31% R62% P
Season (W-D-L)
1-4-8
0.54 pts / match · goal difference -20
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-2-5
Last 5 away
0-1-4
LLDLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.22Opponent xG: 1.54BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Tukums II is 38% better for: goals scored per match.

1.38 goals / match - Tukums II · 1 goals / match - Smiltene

Tukums II is 7% better for: goals conceded per match.

2.38 goals / match - Tukums II · 2.54 goals / match - Smiltene

Tukums II scoring profile: very strong

Tukums II scores in 92% of matches (12 of 13 matches), while Smiltene keeps a clean sheet in 15% (2 of 13 matches).

Smiltene scoring profile: strong

Smiltene scores in 54% of matches (7 of 13 matches), while Tukums II keeps a clean sheet in 15% (2 of 13 matches).

18Goals scored (season)13
Tukums IISmiltene
31Goals conceded (season)33
Tukums IISmiltene
3.77Average goals in match3.54
Tukums IISmiltene
5Goals scored (last 5)5
Tukums IISmiltene
15Goals conceded (last 5)9
Tukums IISmiltene

How often they score at least...

92%1 goal54%
Tukums IISmiltene
31%2 goals31%
Tukums IISmiltene
8%3 goals15%
Tukums IISmiltene
8%4 goals0%
Tukums IISmiltene

How often they concede at least...

85%1 goal85%
Tukums IISmiltene
69%2 goals69%
Tukums IISmiltene
46%3 goals46%
Tukums IISmiltene
23%4 goals23%
Tukums IISmiltene

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

60%
League average

Goal patterns

31%BTTS at half-time8%
Tukums IISmiltene
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Tukums IISmiltene
15%Scored in both halves8%
Tukums IISmiltene

BTTS and goal count

69%Min. 3 goals and BTTS38%
Tukums IISmiltene
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS15%
Tukums IISmiltene
60%BTTS - last 560%
Tukums IISmiltene

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

77%Min. 1 goal before half-time69%
Tukums IISmiltene
54%Min. 2 goals before half-time23%
Tukums IISmiltene
23%Min. 3 goals before half-time15%
Tukums IISmiltene

2nd half

100%Min. 1 goal after half-time85%
Tukums IISmiltene
69%Min. 2 goals after half-time62%
Tukums IISmiltene
31%Min. 3 goals after half-time38%
Tukums IISmiltene

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Tukums II - half-time state
15% leading31% draw54% trailing
Smiltene - half-time state
15% leading31% draw54% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.77Points per match (1st half)0.77
Tukums IISmiltene
0.46Goals scored (1st half)0.23
Tukums IISmiltene
1.08Goals conceded (1st half)1.08
Tukums IISmiltene
1.54Average goals (1st half)1.31
Tukums IISmiltene
31%Clean sheet before half-time46%
Tukums IISmiltene
62%No goal before half-time77%
Tukums IISmiltene

After half-time (2nd half)

1.08Points per match (2nd half)0.92
Tukums IISmiltene
0.92Goals scored (2nd half)0.77
Tukums IISmiltene
1.31Goals conceded (2nd half)1.46
Tukums IISmiltene
2.23Average goals (2nd half)2.23
Tukums IISmiltene
31%Clean sheet after half-time23%
Tukums IISmiltene
31%No goal after half-time62%
Tukums IISmiltene

Tukums II - second-half results

31% W15% R54% P
10
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
-8
Goal difference (1st half)
14
Second-half points
-5
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.77
PPG before half-time
Lead holding153%

Leads at half-time in 15% of matches and wins 23%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Smiltene - second-half results

23% W23% R54% P
10
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
-11
Goal difference (1st half)
12
Second-half points
-9
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.77
PPG before half-time
Lead holding53%

Leads at half-time in 15% of matches and wins 8%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Tukums II - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.400.80
Goals scored / match0.01.0
Goals conceded / match1.02.0
Average goals in match1.03.0
1 goal60%100%
2 goals40%100%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal100%20%
Goal difference-5-5
Half-time: 0% leading - 40% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0
Smiltene - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.400.40
Goals scored / match0.40.6
Goals conceded / match0.41.4
Average goals in match0.82.0
1 goal80%80%
2 goals0%60%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference0-4
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 40% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Tukums II
ScoredConceded
1
3
0-15
2
5
16-30
3
6
31-45
3
5
46-60
2
5
61-75
7
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Smiltene
ScoredConceded
0
4
0-15
1
4
16-30
2
6
31-45
4
9
46-60
1
4
61-75
5
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.65
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
2.0 : 1.7
Estimated goal split
home : away
106%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
62%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-18%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
50%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
4%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 25 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Tukums II

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.22
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.78
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.19
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.59
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
76%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
149%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.25
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
39% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 6% come in the first quarter-hour.
39%

Smiltene

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.92
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.62
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.13
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.49
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
63%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
140%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.26
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
38% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
38%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (1. Liga).

Teams vs league

Tukums IILigaSmiltene
Average goals in match 3.773.43 3.54
Both teams scored 77%60% 46%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 69%68% 54%
Clean sheets 15%23% 15%
Goal before half-time 77%71% 69%
Goal after half-time 100%84% 85%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.43
Average goals per match
60%
Both teams scored
68%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
23%
Clean sheets
1.82
Home goals / match
1.60
Away goals / match
+14%
Home attack advantage
+12%
Home defence advantage
+7%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
71%
1 goal
35%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
84%
1 goal
64%
2 goals
35%
3 goals
14%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Tukums II 1 - 0 - 1 Smiltene. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 50% matches.

FK Smiltene BJSS
0 : 3
FK Tukums 2000 / TSS II
FK Tukums 2000 / TSS II
1 : 2
FK Smiltene BJSS

FAQ

What was the result of Tukums II vs Smiltene?

The 1. Liga match finished Tukums II 1:1 Smiltene. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Tukums II and Smiltene?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Tukums II won 1, Smiltene won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Tukums II vs Smiltene?

Tukums II score 1.38 goals per game on average and Smiltene 1.00. The 1. Liga average is 3.43 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 68% of games. Both teams score in 77% of Tukums II's matches and 46% of Smiltene's.

What form are Tukums II and Smiltene in?

Over the last 5 games Tukums II have a 1-0-4 record (0.60 points per game) and Smiltene 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Tukums II vs Smiltene?

The statistical background for Tukums II vs Smiltene — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.