Latvia - VirsligaTukuma pilsētas stadionsData current as of 06 September 2026

Tukums vs Auda: match statistics

Tukums crest
Tukums
2 : 1half-time 1:1
Auda crest
Auda

Tukums vs Auda: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Tukums played Auda in Virsliga (Latvia). The match was played on 17 June 2026. Venue: Tukuma pilsētas stadions. Final score: 2:1.

Current form

Tukums: 0-2-3, 0.40 points/match. Auda: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Tukums scores 1.76 and concedes 1.82 goals per match. Auda scores 1.94 and concedes 1.24. League average: 2.98 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Tukums 88%, Auda 65%. Over 2.5: Tukums 71%, Auda 65%. League level: BTTS 60%, Over 2.5 54%.

xG, shots and style

Auda has higher xG: 1.61 vs 1.39. Tukums: 11.4 shots per match, Auda: 12.9.

Match halves

Tukums: half-time lead 24%, second-half goals 0.94. Auda: half-time lead 47%, second-half goals 1.00.

Goals by minute

Tukums: 76-90+ (10 goals). Auda: 31-45+ (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Virsliga: 2.98 goals per match, BTTS 60%, Over 2.5 54%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 5 previous H2H matches were available: 2-0-3. Average goals 2.60, BTTS 40%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Auda is the clear favorite: they have 11 wins this season versus only 2 for Tukums and sit 3rd in the table compared to the hosts’ 8th, indicating a qualitative edge. The visitors’ form confirms this numerically — in the last 5 matches Auda are 3-1-1 (W-D-L) averaging 2.0 points per game, while Tukums are 0-2-3 with just 0.4 points per game. In game control Auda dominate (57% possession away vs 42% possession for the hosts), registering on average 12.5 shots with xG 1.51 versus Tukums’ 11.44 shots and xG 1.41, which translates to higher-quality chance creation. Tukums have an advantage in home finishing efficiency (2.11 goals per game with 18% conversion vs 1.63 and 13% for Auda), but concede more goals at home (1.44 vs 1.13) and have only 11% clean sheets compared to 38% for the visitors. Considering Auda’s superiority in form, control and defensive stability, I forecast an away win; I estimate the probability distribution as Home 16%, Draw 22% and Away 62%.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Both teams have high seasonal BTTS rates: Tukums 67% and Auda 63%, versus a league average of 61%, which pre-disposes the match to a BTTS - Yes scenario. Tukums averages 2.22 goals scored and concedes 1.33 per match (30 goals for, 31 against); Auda scores 1.63 and concedes 1.13 (33 for, 21 against). In the last 5 matches hosts conceded 13 goals (2.6 per match) compared to 5 for Auda (1.0 per match), increasing the likelihood of a visiting goal. xG are 1.70 for Tukums and 1.51 for Auda, with xG against 1.27 and 1.10 — both teams are creating roughly 1.5 xG per game, which favors a goal exchange. Additionally, Tukums averages 13.33 shots with 5.22 on target and a conversion rate of 17%; Auda 12.5 shots with 4.25 on target and 13% conversion. Hosts have 78% of matches over 2.5 goals versus 50% for Auda, supporting BTTS and a higher goal count. Although Auda has a higher clean sheet rate (38% vs 22% for Tukums), combining these figures and current form I assign a 70% probability to the 'both teams to score' scenario versus 30% against.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Tukums scores an average of 2.22 goals at home, Auda 1.63 away; their xG are 1.70 (Tukums) and 1.51 (Auda), with xG conceded of 1.27 and 1.10 respectively. After balancing attack and defense I obtained expected goals of 1.54 for Tukums and 1.44 for Auda, totaling 2.98 goals, which is close to the league average of 3.04. Additionally, Tukums have conceded 13 goals in their last 5 matches (2.6 per game), while Auda have conceded 5 (1.0 per game), which increases the likelihood of goals in this fixture. Seasonal indicators support the Over: Tukums have 100% of matches over 1.5 goals and 78% over 2.5, Auda 75% and 50% respectively, and both teams record BTTS in 67% and 63% of games. A Poisson model based on expected goals gives approximately an 80% chance of Over 1.5, 57% for Over 2.5 and 35% for Over 3.5, therefore I recommend Over 1.5 as the strongest signal.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

I forecast the home side will hold a lead at the break, but ultimately the visitors will complete a turnaround, hence the selection 1/2. Hosts score on average 1.11 goals by Half-Time versus 0.75 for the visitors and led at the break in 56% of matches; additionally, 100% of their home games have seen at least one goal before Half-Time. At the same time the visitors perform better over the Full-Time and in late phases: they average 2.38 points per season versus 1.78 for the hosts, have won 60% of their last 5 matches, and their average points in second halves is 1.88 versus 1.44 for the hosts. xG and shot numbers indicate comparable quality (xG 1.70 versus 1.51, average shots on target 5.22 vs 4.25), so the visitors’ edge stems more from form and second-half play than from a large offensive gap. The visitors have scored 4 goals in minutes 76–90 versus 2 for the hosts, which increases the probability of a post-break turnaround; therefore I assign 30% to 1/2, with smaller shares for 1/1 (18%) and 1/X (12%).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 1
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

38Possession (%)62
TukumsAuda
11Shots18
TukumsAuda
5Shots on target5
TukumsAuda
1.24xG1.89
TukumsAuda
2Corners6
TukumsAuda
26Dangerous attacks57
TukumsAuda
15Fouls17
TukumsAuda
3Cards3
TukumsAuda

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.76Goals scored / match1.94
TukumsAuda
1.82Goals conceded / match1.24
TukumsAuda
43%Average possession59%
TukumsAuda
4.88Shots on target / match4.76
TukumsAuda

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.41Shots per match12.94
TukumsAuda
4.88Shots on target4.76
TukumsAuda
15.5%Shot conversion15%
TukumsAuda
43%Possession59%
TukumsAuda
1.39xG for1.61
TukumsAuda
1.63xG against1.19
TukumsAuda

Shooting quality

Tukums: Counter-attackingAuda: Efficient finishing
TukumsAuda
Accuracy (shots on target)43%37%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.360.41

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Auda is 400% better for: last-5 form.

0.4 pts / match - Tukums · 2 pts / match - Auda

Tukums
DLLLD
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
12% W47% R41% P
Season (W-D-L)
2-8-7
0.82 pts / match · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-2-3
0.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-4-3
Last 5 at home
2-2-1
DWWLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 2.6xG: 1.35Opponent xG: 1.77BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%
Auda
LWWWD
Season result split
65% W12% R24% P
Season (W-D-L)
11-2-4
2.06 pts / match · goal difference +12
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
6-1-1
Last 5 away
3-1-1
DWWLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.60Opponent xG: 1.27BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Auda is 10% better for: goals scored per match.

1.76 goals / match - Tukums · 1.94 goals / match - Auda

Auda is 47% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.82 goals / match - Tukums · 1.24 goals / match - Auda

Tukums scoring profile: very strong

Tukums scores in 94% of matches (16 of 17 matches), while Auda keeps a clean sheet in 29% (5 of 17 matches).

Auda scoring profile: very strong

Auda scores in 94% of matches (16 of 17 matches), while Tukums keeps a clean sheet in 6% (1 of 17 matches).

30Goals scored (season)33
TukumsAuda
31Goals conceded (season)21
TukumsAuda
3.59Average goals in match3.18
TukumsAuda
6Goals scored (last 5)7
TukumsAuda
13Goals conceded (last 5)5
TukumsAuda

How often they score at least...

94%1 goal94%
TukumsAuda
29%2 goals59%
TukumsAuda
24%3 goals18%
TukumsAuda
12%4 goals6%
TukumsAuda

How often they concede at least...

94%1 goal71%
TukumsAuda
59%2 goals29%
TukumsAuda
29%3 goals18%
TukumsAuda
0%4 goals6%
TukumsAuda

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

35%BTTS at half-time29%
TukumsAuda
12%BTTS in both halves0%
TukumsAuda
29%Scored in both halves47%
TukumsAuda

BTTS and goal count

59%Min. 3 goals and BTTS53%
TukumsAuda
12%Min. 3 goals without BTTS12%
TukumsAuda
80%BTTS - last 540%
TukumsAuda

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

88%Min. 1 goal before half-time88%
TukumsAuda
65%Min. 2 goals before half-time47%
TukumsAuda
29%Min. 3 goals before half-time24%
TukumsAuda

2nd half

88%Min. 1 goal after half-time88%
TukumsAuda
53%Min. 2 goals after half-time47%
TukumsAuda
18%Min. 3 goals after half-time12%
TukumsAuda

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Auda is 65% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1 pts / match - Tukums · 1.65 pts / match - Auda

Tukums - half-time state
24% leading29% draw47% trailing
Auda - half-time state
47% leading24% draw29% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1Points per match (1st half)1.65
TukumsAuda
0.82Goals scored (1st half)0.94
TukumsAuda
1.06Goals conceded (1st half)0.65
TukumsAuda
1.88Average goals (1st half)1.59
TukumsAuda
35%Clean sheet before half-time53%
TukumsAuda
41%No goal before half-time29%
TukumsAuda

After half-time (2nd half)

1.29Points per match (2nd half)1.65
TukumsAuda
0.94Goals scored (2nd half)1
TukumsAuda
0.76Goals conceded (2nd half)0.59
TukumsAuda
1.71Average goals (2nd half)1.59
TukumsAuda
29%Clean sheet after half-time53%
TukumsAuda
35%No goal after half-time29%
TukumsAuda

Tukums - second-half results

29% W41% R29% P
17
Half-time points
14
Half-time goals
-4
Goal difference (1st half)
22
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding50%

Leads at half-time in 24% of matches and wins 12%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time-0.3

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Auda - second-half results

41% W41% R18% P
28
Half-time points
16
Half-time goals
+5
Goal difference (1st half)
28
Second-half points
+7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.65
PPG before half-time
Lead holding138%

Leads at half-time in 47% of matches and wins 65%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Tukums - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.400.60
Goals scored / match0.60.6
Goals conceded / match1.61.0
Average goals in match2.21.6
1 goal80%100%
2 goals80%60%
3 goals40%0%
Clean sheet20%0%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference-5-2
Half-time: 0% leading - 40% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 60% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3
Auda - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.402.00
Goals scored / match0.60.8
Goals conceded / match0.60.4
Average goals in match1.21.2
1 goal80%100%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference0+2
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Tukums
ScoredConceded
4
4
0-15
2
10
16-30
8
4
31-45
4
5
46-60
2
5
61-75
10
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): +7 - wins late phases.

Auda
ScoredConceded
3
2
0-15
5
4
16-30
8
5
31-45
8
4
46-60
3
2
61-75
6
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (8 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.38
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.5 : 1.9
Estimated goal split
home : away
113%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
77%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-23%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
88%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Tukums

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.24
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.18
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-10.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.37
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.19
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
109%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
134%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.42
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
33% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
33%

Auda

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.42
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.28
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.33
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.05
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
143%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
77%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.06
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
18% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 9% come in the first quarter-hour.
18%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Virsliga).

Teams vs league

TukumsLigaAuda
Average goals in match 3.592.98 3.18
Both teams scored 88%60% 65%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 71%54% 65%
Clean sheets 6%21% 29%
Goal before half-time 88%77% 88%
Goal after half-time 88%84% 88%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.98
Average goals per match
60%
Both teams scored
54%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
21%
Clean sheets
1.62
Home goals / match
1.36
Away goals / match
+19%
Home attack advantage
+16%
Home defence advantage
+-1%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
45%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
84%
1 goal
44%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
7%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. AudaYellow cardEdvin Bongemba
  2. TukumsYellow cardAllan Enyou
  3. TukumsYellow cardRudolfs Reingolcs
  4. TukumsSubstitutionOn: Jun TobaOff: Bogdans Samoilovs
  5. TukumsSubstitutionOn: Kristaps KļaviņšOff: Maksym Derkach
  6. AudaYellow cardTin Hrvoj
  7. AudaYellow cardJosé Mendieta

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (5): Tukums 2 - 0 - 3 Auda. Average goals 2.60, both teams scored in 40% matches.

Auda
2 : 1
Tukums
FK Auda Riga
0 : 1
FK Tukums 2000
FK Tukums 2000
1 : 0
FK Auda Riga
FK Tukums 2000
2 : 4
FK Auda Riga
FK Auda Riga
2 : 0
FK Tukums 2000

FAQ

What was the result of Tukums vs Auda?

The Virsliga match finished Tukums 2:1 Auda. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Tukums and Auda?

In the last 5 head-to-head matches Tukums won 2, Auda won 3 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.60 goals, with both teams scoring in 40% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Tukums vs Auda?

Tukums score 1.76 goals per game on average and Auda 1.94. The Virsliga average is 2.98 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 54% of games. Both teams score in 88% of Tukums's matches and 65% of Auda's.

What form are Tukums and Auda in?

Over the last 5 games Tukums have a 0-2-3 record (0.40 points per game) and Auda 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Tukums vs Auda?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Tukums vs Auda: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.