Tukums vs Auda: match statistics
Tukums vs Auda: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Tukums played Auda in Virsliga (Latvia). The match was played on 17 June 2026. Venue: Tukuma pilsētas stadions. Final score: 2:1.
Current form
Tukums: 0-2-3, 0.40 points/match. Auda: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Tukums scores 1.76 and concedes 1.82 goals per match. Auda scores 1.94 and concedes 1.24. League average: 2.98 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Tukums 88%, Auda 65%. Over 2.5: Tukums 71%, Auda 65%. League level: BTTS 60%, Over 2.5 54%.
xG, shots and style
Auda has higher xG: 1.61 vs 1.39. Tukums: 11.4 shots per match, Auda: 12.9.
Match halves
Tukums: half-time lead 24%, second-half goals 0.94. Auda: half-time lead 47%, second-half goals 1.00.
Goals by minute
Tukums: 76-90+ (10 goals). Auda: 31-45+ (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Virsliga: 2.98 goals per match, BTTS 60%, Over 2.5 54%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 5 previous H2H matches were available: 2-0-3. Average goals 2.60, BTTS 40%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Auda is the clear favorite: they have 11 wins this season versus only 2 for Tukums and sit 3rd in the table compared to the hosts’ 8th, indicating a qualitative edge. The visitors’ form confirms this numerically — in the last 5 matches Auda are 3-1-1 (W-D-L) averaging 2.0 points per game, while Tukums are 0-2-3 with just 0.4 points per game. In game control Auda dominate (57% possession away vs 42% possession for the hosts), registering on average 12.5 shots with xG 1.51 versus Tukums’ 11.44 shots and xG 1.41, which translates to higher-quality chance creation. Tukums have an advantage in home finishing efficiency (2.11 goals per game with 18% conversion vs 1.63 and 13% for Auda), but concede more goals at home (1.44 vs 1.13) and have only 11% clean sheets compared to 38% for the visitors. Considering Auda’s superiority in form, control and defensive stability, I forecast an away win; I estimate the probability distribution as Home 16%, Draw 22% and Away 62%.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Both teams have high seasonal BTTS rates: Tukums 67% and Auda 63%, versus a league average of 61%, which pre-disposes the match to a BTTS - Yes scenario. Tukums averages 2.22 goals scored and concedes 1.33 per match (30 goals for, 31 against); Auda scores 1.63 and concedes 1.13 (33 for, 21 against). In the last 5 matches hosts conceded 13 goals (2.6 per match) compared to 5 for Auda (1.0 per match), increasing the likelihood of a visiting goal. xG are 1.70 for Tukums and 1.51 for Auda, with xG against 1.27 and 1.10 — both teams are creating roughly 1.5 xG per game, which favors a goal exchange. Additionally, Tukums averages 13.33 shots with 5.22 on target and a conversion rate of 17%; Auda 12.5 shots with 4.25 on target and 13% conversion. Hosts have 78% of matches over 2.5 goals versus 50% for Auda, supporting BTTS and a higher goal count. Although Auda has a higher clean sheet rate (38% vs 22% for Tukums), combining these figures and current form I assign a 70% probability to the 'both teams to score' scenario versus 30% against.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Tukums scores an average of 2.22 goals at home, Auda 1.63 away; their xG are 1.70 (Tukums) and 1.51 (Auda), with xG conceded of 1.27 and 1.10 respectively. After balancing attack and defense I obtained expected goals of 1.54 for Tukums and 1.44 for Auda, totaling 2.98 goals, which is close to the league average of 3.04. Additionally, Tukums have conceded 13 goals in their last 5 matches (2.6 per game), while Auda have conceded 5 (1.0 per game), which increases the likelihood of goals in this fixture. Seasonal indicators support the Over: Tukums have 100% of matches over 1.5 goals and 78% over 2.5, Auda 75% and 50% respectively, and both teams record BTTS in 67% and 63% of games. A Poisson model based on expected goals gives approximately an 80% chance of Over 1.5, 57% for Over 2.5 and 35% for Over 3.5, therefore I recommend Over 1.5 as the strongest signal.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
I forecast the home side will hold a lead at the break, but ultimately the visitors will complete a turnaround, hence the selection 1/2. Hosts score on average 1.11 goals by Half-Time versus 0.75 for the visitors and led at the break in 56% of matches; additionally, 100% of their home games have seen at least one goal before Half-Time. At the same time the visitors perform better over the Full-Time and in late phases: they average 2.38 points per season versus 1.78 for the hosts, have won 60% of their last 5 matches, and their average points in second halves is 1.88 versus 1.44 for the hosts. xG and shot numbers indicate comparable quality (xG 1.70 versus 1.51, average shots on target 5.22 vs 4.25), so the visitors’ edge stems more from form and second-half play than from a large offensive gap. The visitors have scored 4 goals in minutes 76–90 versus 2 for the hosts, which increases the probability of a post-break turnaround; therefore I assign 30% to 1/2, with smaller shares for 1/1 (18%) and 1/X (12%).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Tukums | Auda | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 43% | 37% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.36 | 0.41 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Auda is 400% better for: last-5 form.
0.4 pts / match - Tukums · 2 pts / match - Auda
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Auda is 10% better for: goals scored per match.
1.76 goals / match - Tukums · 1.94 goals / match - Auda
Auda is 47% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.82 goals / match - Tukums · 1.24 goals / match - Auda
Tukums scores in 94% of matches (16 of 17 matches), while Auda keeps a clean sheet in 29% (5 of 17 matches).
Auda scores in 94% of matches (16 of 17 matches), while Tukums keeps a clean sheet in 6% (1 of 17 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Tukums
Over / Under - Auda
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Auda is 65% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1 pts / match - Tukums · 1.65 pts / match - Auda
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Tukums - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 24% of matches and wins 12%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Auda - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 47% of matches and wins 65%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.40 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.6 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 2.2 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 0% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -5 | -2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 20% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): +7 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (8 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Tukums
Auda
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Virsliga).
Teams vs league
| Tukums | Liga | Auda | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 3.59 | 2.98 | ▲ 3.18 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 88% | 60% | ▲ 65% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 71% | 54% | ▲ 65% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 6% | 21% | ▲ 29% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 88% | 77% | ▲ 88% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 88% | 84% | ▲ 88% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (5): Tukums 2 - 0 - 3 Auda. Average goals 2.60, both teams scored in 40% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Tukums vs Auda?
The Virsliga match finished Tukums 2:1 Auda. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Tukums and Auda?
In the last 5 head-to-head matches Tukums won 2, Auda won 3 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.60 goals, with both teams scoring in 40% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Tukums vs Auda?
Tukums score 1.76 goals per game on average and Auda 1.94. The Virsliga average is 2.98 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 54% of games. Both teams score in 88% of Tukums's matches and 65% of Auda's.
What form are Tukums and Auda in?
Over the last 5 games Tukums have a 0-2-3 record (0.40 points per game) and Auda 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Tukums vs Auda?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Tukums vs Auda: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


