Latvia - VirsligaData current as of 23 July 2026

Tukums vs FS Jelgava: match statistics

Tukums crest
Tukums
5 : 0half-time 3:0
FS Jelgava crest
FS Jelgava

Tukums vs FS Jelgava: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Tukums play FS Jelgava in Virsliga (Latvia). The match date is 1 May 2026 at 15:00. Final score: 5:0.

Current form

Tukums: 0-0-5, 0.00 points/match. FS Jelgava: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Tukums scores 1.65 and concedes 2.04 goals per match. FS Jelgava scores 1.04 and concedes 1.70. League average: 2.98 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Tukums 91%, FS Jelgava 43%. Over 2.5: Tukums 78%, FS Jelgava 39%. League level: BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 55%.

xG, shots and style

Tukums has higher xG: 1.42 vs 1.30. Tukums: 11.9 shots per match, FS Jelgava: 10.6.

Match halves

Tukums: half-time lead 26%, second-half goals 0.83. FS Jelgava: half-time lead 39%, second-half goals 0.43.

Goals by minute

Tukums: 76-90+ (12 goals). FS Jelgava: 16-30 (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Virsliga: 2.98 goals per match, BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 55%.

Head-to-head

6 H2H matches: 0-3-3. Average goals 2.83, BTTS 100%.

Match description

I forecast a draw because both teams generate a similar number of expected chances — Tukums averages 1.2 xG at home while FS Jelgava posts 1.38 xG away, indicating balanced goal-scoring potential. Defensively Jelgava has the edge: as visitors they concede only 0.75 goals per game on average and keep clean sheets in 25% of matches, whereas Tukums concedes 1.6 goals at home and has recorded no clean sheets (0%). Offensively the hosts are more efficient — Tukums scores 1.2 goals at home on average, records 4 shots on target per match and has a 13% conversion rate, and they have no goalless home games (0%), while Jelgava scores 0.75 goals away with just a 7% conversion. In the last 5 matches Tukums has scored 8 and conceded 10, yielding 0.6 points per game, while Jelgava has 4 scored and 6 conceded with 0.8 points per game; this shows a slight advantage to the visitors in points but not clear dominance. Considering the high draw rate for the home side (60% draws for Tukums) and 50% draws for Jelgava away, the most likely outcome is a share of points: draw 50%, home win 30%, away win 20%.

Half-by-half

3 : 0
1st half
2 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

48Possession (%)52
TukumsFS Jelgava
15Shots7
TukumsFS Jelgava
6Shots on target2
TukumsFS Jelgava
1.87xG1.24
TukumsFS Jelgava
5Corners5
TukumsFS Jelgava
70Dangerous attacks92
TukumsFS Jelgava
18Fouls13
TukumsFS Jelgava
2Cards1
TukumsFS Jelgava

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.65Goals scored / match1.04
TukumsFS Jelgava
2.04Goals conceded / match1.7
TukumsFS Jelgava
43%Average possession43%
TukumsFS Jelgava
4.7Shots on target / match3.48
TukumsFS Jelgava

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.91Shots per match10.61
TukumsFS Jelgava
4.7Shots on target3.48
TukumsFS Jelgava
13.9%Shot conversion9.8%
TukumsFS Jelgava
43%Possession43%
TukumsFS Jelgava
1.42xG for1.3
TukumsFS Jelgava
1.69xG against1.73
TukumsFS Jelgava

Shooting quality

Tukums: Counter-attackingFS Jelgava: Balanced
TukumsFS Jelgava
Accuracy (shots on target)39%33%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.350.30

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Tukums
LLLLL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
13% W35% R52% P
Season (W-D-L)
3-8-12
0.74 pts / match · goal difference -9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-0-5
0.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-4-4
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
WLDWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 3.0xG: 1.54Opponent xG: 1.88BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 100%
FS Jelgava
WWWLL
Season result split
26% W30% R43% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-7-10
1.09 pts / match · goal difference -15
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-5-4
Last 5 away
1-2-2
DLDWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.2Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.52Opponent xG: 1.72BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Tukums is 59% better for: goals scored per match.

1.65 goals / match - Tukums · 1.04 goals / match - FS Jelgava

FS Jelgava is 20% better for: goals conceded per match.

2.04 goals / match - Tukums · 1.7 goals / match - FS Jelgava

Tukums scoring profile: very strong

Tukums scores in 96% of matches (22 of 23 matches), while FS Jelgava keeps a clean sheet in 17% (4 of 23 matches).

FS Jelgava scoring profile: very strong

FS Jelgava scores in 57% of matches (13 of 23 matches), while Tukums keeps a clean sheet in 4% (1 of 23 matches).

38Goals scored (season)24
TukumsFS Jelgava
47Goals conceded (season)39
TukumsFS Jelgava
3.7Average goals in match2.74
TukumsFS Jelgava
6Goals scored (last 5)11
TukumsFS Jelgava
15Goals conceded (last 5)6
TukumsFS Jelgava

How often they score at least...

96%1 goal57%
TukumsFS Jelgava
30%2 goals26%
TukumsFS Jelgava
17%3 goals9%
TukumsFS Jelgava
9%4 goals9%
TukumsFS Jelgava

How often they concede at least...

96%1 goal83%
TukumsFS Jelgava
65%2 goals30%
TukumsFS Jelgava
39%3 goals22%
TukumsFS Jelgava
4%4 goals13%
TukumsFS Jelgava

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

56%
League average

Goal patterns

39%BTTS at half-time13%
TukumsFS Jelgava
9%BTTS in both halves0%
TukumsFS Jelgava
26%Scored in both halves17%
TukumsFS Jelgava

BTTS and goal count

70%Min. 3 goals and BTTS22%
TukumsFS Jelgava
9%Min. 3 goals without BTTS17%
TukumsFS Jelgava
100%BTTS - last 540%
TukumsFS Jelgava

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

91%Min. 1 goal before half-time78%
TukumsFS Jelgava
65%Min. 2 goals before half-time26%
TukumsFS Jelgava
26%Min. 3 goals before half-time13%
TukumsFS Jelgava

2nd half

91%Min. 1 goal after half-time83%
TukumsFS Jelgava
57%Min. 2 goals after half-time39%
TukumsFS Jelgava
22%Min. 3 goals after half-time13%
TukumsFS Jelgava

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

FS Jelgava is 31% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.09 pts / match - Tukums · 1.43 pts / match - FS Jelgava

Tukums - half-time state
26% leading30% draw43% trailing
FS Jelgava - half-time state
39% leading26% draw35% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.09Points per match (1st half)1.43
TukumsFS Jelgava
0.83Goals scored (1st half)0.61
TukumsFS Jelgava
1.04Goals conceded (1st half)0.61
TukumsFS Jelgava
1.87Average goals (1st half)1.22
TukumsFS Jelgava
30%Clean sheet before half-time52%
TukumsFS Jelgava
39%No goal before half-time57%
TukumsFS Jelgava

After half-time (2nd half)

1.13Points per match (2nd half)1
TukumsFS Jelgava
0.83Goals scored (2nd half)0.43
TukumsFS Jelgava
1Goals conceded (2nd half)1.09
TukumsFS Jelgava
1.83Average goals (2nd half)1.52
TukumsFS Jelgava
26%Clean sheet after half-time39%
TukumsFS Jelgava
39%No goal after half-time70%
TukumsFS Jelgava

Tukums - second-half results

26% W35% R39% P
25
Half-time points
19
Half-time goals
-5
Goal difference (1st half)
26
Second-half points
-4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.09
PPG before half-time
Lead holding50%

Leads at half-time in 26% of matches and wins 13%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time-0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

FS Jelgava - second-half results

26% W22% R52% P
33
Half-time points
14
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
23
Second-half points
-15
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.43
PPG before half-time
Lead holding67%

Leads at half-time in 39% of matches and wins 26%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Tukums - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.400.20
Goals scored / match0.80.4
Goals conceded / match1.02.0
Average goals in match1.82.4
1 goal100%100%
2 goals60%80%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet20%0%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference-1-8
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 20% draw - 80% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 4
FS Jelgava - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.802.00
Goals scored / match1.01.2
Goals conceded / match0.60.6
Average goals in match1.61.8
1 goal100%80%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+2+3
Half-time: 60% leading - 0% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 5

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Tukums
ScoredConceded
4
5
0-15
4
11
16-30
11
8
31-45
4
8
46-60
3
8
61-75
12
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (12 goli). Concedes most in 16-30 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.

FS Jelgava
ScoredConceded
4
5
0-15
5
6
16-30
5
3
31-45
1
6
46-60
5
6
61-75
4
13
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (5 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -9 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.21
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.7 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
108%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
67%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-12%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
55%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
2%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 50 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Tukums

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.27
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.12
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-10.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.23
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.35
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
99%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
155%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.74
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
32% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
32%

FS Jelgava

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.43
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.23
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+6.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.26
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.03
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
79%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
102%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.71
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Virsliga).

Teams vs league

TukumsLigaFS Jelgava
Average goals in match 3.702.98 2.74
Both teams scored 91%56% 43%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 78%55% 39%
Clean sheets 4%24% 17%
Goal before half-time 91%75% 78%
Goal after half-time 91%84% 83%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.98
Average goals per match
56%
Both teams scored
55%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
24%
Clean sheets
1.67
Home goals / match
1.32
Away goals / match
+27%
Home attack advantage
+21%
Home defence advantage
+4%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
43%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
84%
1 goal
46%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
6%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (6): Tukums 0 - 3 - 3 FS Jelgava. Average goals 2.83, both teams scored in 100% matches.

FS Jelgava
4 : 1
Tukums
FS Jelgava
2 : 1
Tukums
FK Tukums 2000
1 : 1
FS Jelgava
FS Jelgava
1 : 1
FK Tukums 2000
FK Tukums 2000
1 : 1
FS Jelgava
FS Jelgava
2 : 1
FK Tukums 2000

FAQ

What was the result of Tukums vs FS Jelgava?

The Virsliga match finished Tukums 5:0 FS Jelgava. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Tukums and FS Jelgava?

In the last 6 head-to-head matches Tukums won 0, FS Jelgava won 3 and 3 ended level. These games averaged 2.83 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Tukums vs FS Jelgava?

Tukums score 1.65 goals per game on average and FS Jelgava 1.04. The Virsliga average is 2.98 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 55% of games. Both teams score in 91% of Tukums's matches and 43% of FS Jelgava's.

What form are Tukums and FS Jelgava in?

Over the last 5 games Tukums have a 0-0-5 record (0.00 points per game) and FS Jelgava 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Tukums vs FS Jelgava?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.