Latvia - VirsligaData current as of 06 September 2026

Tukums vs Grobiņa: match statistics

Tukums crest
Tukums
1 : 1half-time 1:1
Grobiņa crest
Grobiņa

Tukums vs Grobiņa: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Tukums played Grobiņa in Virsliga (Latvia). The match was played on 5 April 2026. Final score: 1:1.

Current form

Tukums: 0-1-2, 0.33 points/match. Grobiņa: 2-0-1, 2.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Tukums scores 1.00 and concedes 1.67 goals per match. Grobiņa scores 0.67 and concedes 0.67. League average: 2.74 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Tukums 100%, Grobiņa 0%. Over 2.5: Tukums 67%, Grobiņa 0%. League level: BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 47%.

xG, shots and style

Tukums has higher xG: 1.49 vs 0.93. Tukums: 13.0 shots per match, Grobiņa: 7.7.

Match halves

Tukums: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.33. Grobiņa: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.33.

Goals by minute

Tukums: 16-30 (1 goals). Grobiņa: 0-15 (1 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Virsliga: 2.74 goals per match, BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 47%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 4 previous H2H matches were available: 2-0-2. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 25%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Grobiņa shows better form: 3 wins in the last 5 matches and an average of 2 points per game in that period, while Tukums has 1 win in the last 5 and averages 1 point per game. At home Tukums has 65% possession, averages 11 shots (6 on target) and converts at 9%, but scores only 1 goal and concedes 2 goals per game. Grobiņa away averages 8.5 shots (3 on target) with 12% efficiency and records 1 goal with 0 conceded, keeping 100% clean sheets on the road. xG indicates the home side generates 1.5 xG at home with 1.64 xG against, whereas the visitors have 1.07 xG away with 1.33 xG against, suggesting greater defensive vulnerability for Tukums. Considering 0 home wins for the hosts, superior efficiency of the visitors and Grobiņa’s defensive edge (3 wins in the last 5 and 0 goals conceded away), I predict an away victory.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

I back No Goal with 70% probability because Grobiņa has 100% clean sheets this season and a seasonal goals conceded average of 0.0, the strongest defensive signal in the dataset. Seasonal BTTS rates for both teams are 0% (Tukums 0%, Grobiņa 0%), versus a league average BTTS of 59%, so both sides deviate from the league trend. Tukums have BTTS 80% in the last 5 matches, scoring 5 goals (1.0 avg) and conceding 6 (1.2 avg), but seasonally they have low xG_for 0.67, only 1.0 shots on target per match and a 0% conversion, limiting their ability to score against a tight defense. Grobiņa concede 0.4 goals on average in the last 5 matches (2 conceded total), register 3.0 shots on target and have a seasonal xG_for 1.07, so it’s more likely that only they might score rather than both teams (BTTS - Yes).

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

xG analysis shows offensive xG of 0.67 for Tukums and 1.07 for Grobiņa, while conceded xG are 2.39 (Tukums) and 1.33 (Grobiņa). A simple average (0.67+1.33)/2 = 1.00 for the home side and (1.07+2.39)/2 = 1.73 for the away side yields a total of 2.73 expected goals. In the last 5 matches Tukums scored 5 and conceded 6 goals, while Grobiņa scored 3 and conceded 2, which together with xG data confirms realistic chances of at least two goals. Additionally, Grobiņa averages 3.0 shots on target and has a 12% conversion rate versus Tukums’ 1.0 shots on target and 0% conversion, so the visitors are more likely to turn chances into goals. For these reasons the strongest signal is backing Over 1.5, as the expected 2.73 goals give a clear edge for Over 1.5.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Statistics clearly favor the away side: Grobiņa has a 100.0% win rate and averages 3.0 points per match, scoring 1.0 goals with xG = 1.07, while Tukums has a 0.0% win rate, 0.0 goals scored per match and concedes on average 2.0 goals. At half-time the home team were trailing in 100.0% of matches (trailingAtHTPercentage_home = 100.0), whereas the away team were leading or drawing at the break in 50.0% each (leadingAtHTPercentage_away 50.0, drawingAtHTPercentage_away 50.0), suggesting Grobiņa’s advantage already before the break. The disparity in attacking and defensive quality is supported by xG and shots: xG_for_home = 0.67 vs xG_for_away = 1.07, xG_against_home = 2.39 vs xG_against_away = 1.33, and average shots on target 1.0 for the home side vs 3.0 for the away side with conversion rates 0.0% vs 12.0%. Additionally, Grobiņa has 100.0% season clean sheets (seasonCSPercentage_away = 100.0) and Tukums 0.0% (seasonCSPercentage_home = 0.0), so the strongest signal is an away lead at the break and an away win at full-time (HT/FT 2/2).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 1
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

46Possession (%)54
TukumsGrobiņa
9Shots8
TukumsGrobiņa
4Shots on target4
TukumsGrobiņa
1.26xG1.25
TukumsGrobiņa
6Corners9
TukumsGrobiņa
57Dangerous attacks63
TukumsGrobiņa
11Fouls16
TukumsGrobiņa
2Cards2
TukumsGrobiņa

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1Goals scored / match0.67
TukumsGrobiņa
1.67Goals conceded / match0.67
TukumsGrobiņa
53%Average possession38%
TukumsGrobiņa
3.67Shots on target / match2.33
TukumsGrobiņa

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

13Shots per match7.67
TukumsGrobiņa
3.67Shots on target2.33
TukumsGrobiņa
7.7%Shot conversion8.7%
TukumsGrobiņa
53%Possession38%
TukumsGrobiņa
1.49xG for0.93
TukumsGrobiņa
1.52xG against1.68
TukumsGrobiņa

Shooting quality

Tukums: BalancedGrobiņa: Balanced
TukumsGrobiņa
Accuracy (shots on target)28%30%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.270.29

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Grobiņa is 506% better for: last-5 form.

0.33 pts / match - Tukums · 2 pts / match - Grobiņa

Tukums
LDL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
0% W33% R67% P
Season (W-D-L)
0-1-2
0.33 pts / match · goal difference -2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-1-2
0.33 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-0-1
Last 5 at home
0-0-1
L
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.7xG: 1.49Opponent xG: 1.52BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 67%
Grobiņa
WLW
Season result split
67% W0% R33% P
Season (W-D-L)
2-0-1
2.00 pts / match · goal difference 0
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-1
2.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-0-0
Last 5 away
2-0-0
WW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.7Goals conceded: 0.7xG: 0.93Opponent xG: 1.68BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 0%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Tukums is 49% better for: goals scored per match.

1 goals / match - Tukums · 0.67 goals / match - Grobiņa

Grobiņa is 149% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.67 goals / match - Tukums · 0.67 goals / match - Grobiņa

Tukums scoring profile: strong

Tukums scores in 100% of matches (3 of 3 matches), while Grobiņa keeps a clean sheet in 67% (2 of 3 matches).

Grobiņa scoring profile: very strong

Grobiņa scores in 67% of matches (2 of 3 matches), while Tukums keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 3 matches).

3Goals scored (season)2
TukumsGrobiņa
5Goals conceded (season)2
TukumsGrobiņa
2.67Average goals in match1.33
TukumsGrobiņa
3Goals scored (last 5)2
TukumsGrobiņa
5Goals conceded (last 5)2
TukumsGrobiņa

How often they score at least...

100%1 goal67%
TukumsGrobiņa
0%2 goals0%
TukumsGrobiņa
0%3 goals0%
TukumsGrobiņa
0%4 goals0%
TukumsGrobiņa

How often they concede at least...

100%1 goal33%
TukumsGrobiņa
67%2 goals33%
TukumsGrobiņa
0%3 goals0%
TukumsGrobiņa
0%4 goals0%
TukumsGrobiņa

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

33%BTTS at half-time0%
TukumsGrobiņa
0%BTTS in both halves0%
TukumsGrobiņa
0%Scored in both halves0%
TukumsGrobiņa

BTTS and goal count

67%Min. 3 goals and BTTS0%
TukumsGrobiņa
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
TukumsGrobiņa
100%BTTS - last 50%
TukumsGrobiņa

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

100%Min. 1 goal before half-time67%
TukumsGrobiņa
67%Min. 2 goals before half-time0%
TukumsGrobiņa
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
TukumsGrobiņa

2nd half

100%Min. 1 goal after half-time67%
TukumsGrobiņa
0%Min. 2 goals after half-time0%
TukumsGrobiņa
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
TukumsGrobiņa

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Tukums - half-time state
33% leading33% draw33% trailing
Grobiņa - half-time state
33% leading33% draw33% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.33Points per match (1st half)1.33
TukumsGrobiņa
0.67Goals scored (1st half)0.33
TukumsGrobiņa
1Goals conceded (1st half)0.33
TukumsGrobiņa
1.67Average goals (1st half)0.67
TukumsGrobiņa
33%Clean sheet before half-time67%
TukumsGrobiņa
33%No goal before half-time67%
TukumsGrobiņa

After half-time (2nd half)

1Points per match (2nd half)1.33
TukumsGrobiņa
0.33Goals scored (2nd half)0.33
TukumsGrobiņa
0.67Goals conceded (2nd half)0.33
TukumsGrobiņa
1Average goals (2nd half)0.67
TukumsGrobiņa
33%Clean sheet after half-time67%
TukumsGrobiņa
67%No goal after half-time67%
TukumsGrobiņa

Tukums - second-half results

33% W0% R67% P
4
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
3
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.33
PPG before half-time
Lead holding0%

Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 0%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time-0.3

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Grobiņa - second-half results

33% W33% R33% P
4
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
4
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.33
PPG before half-time
Lead holding203%

Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 67%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Tukums - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.331.00
Goals scored / match0.70.3
Goals conceded / match1.00.7
Average goals in match1.71.0
1 goal100%100%
2 goals67%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet33%33%
No goal33%67%
Goal difference-1-1
Half-time: 33% leading - 33% draw - 33% trailing
2nd half: 33% won - 0% draw - 67% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 33% - Half-time goals total: 2
Grobiņa - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.331.33
Goals scored / match0.30.3
Goals conceded / match0.30.3
Average goals in match0.70.7
1 goal67%67%
2 goals0%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet67%67%
No goal67%67%
Goal difference00
Half-time: 33% leading - 33% draw - 33% trailing
2nd half: 33% won - 33% draw - 33% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Tukums
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
1
3
16-30
1
0
31-45
0
1
46-60
0
1
61-75
1
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (1 goal). Concedes most in 16-30 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Grobiņa
ScoredConceded
1
0
0-15
0
0
16-30
0
1
31-45
1
0
46-60
0
1
61-75
0
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (1 goal). Concedes most in 31-45 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.00
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.8 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
73%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
50%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
0%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
67%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Tukums

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.03
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.64
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.49
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.15
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
83%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
109%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.3
Late goals
33% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
33%

Grobiņa

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.75
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.75
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.26
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+1.01
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
44%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
55%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 50% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Virsliga).

Teams vs league

TukumsLigaGrobiņa
Average goals in match 2.672.74 1.33
Both teams scored 100%53% 0%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 67%47% 0%
Clean sheets 0%24% 67%
Goal before half-time 100%84% 67%
Goal after half-time 100%84% 67%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.74
Average goals per match
53%
Both teams scored
47%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
24%
Clean sheets
1.21
Home goals / match
1.53
Away goals / match
+-21%
Home attack advantage
+-26%
Home defence advantage
+-16%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
84%
1 goal
37%
2 goals
0%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
84%
1 goal
32%
2 goals
16%
3 goals
11%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. TukumsYellow cardAllan Enyou
  2. TukumsYellow cardKaspars Anmanis
  3. GrobiņaYellow cardMaksims Sidorovs
  4. TukumsSubstitutionOn: Rudolfs ReingolcsOff: Dāvis Mārcis Valmiers
  5. GrobiņaYellow cardDāvids Družiņins
  6. GrobiņaSubstitutionOn: Glebs KļuškinsOff: Maksims Fjodorovs

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (4): Tukums 2 - 0 - 2 Grobiņa. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 25% matches.

Grobinas Sporta Centrs
1 : 0
FK Tukums 2000
FK Tukums 2000
2 : 1
Grobinas Sporta Centrs
Grobinas Sporta Centrs
2 : 0
FK Tukums 2000
FK Tukums 2000
2 : 0
Grobinas Sporta Centrs

FAQ

What was the result of Tukums vs Grobiņa?

The Virsliga match finished Tukums 1:1 Grobiņa. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Tukums and Grobiņa?

In the last 4 head-to-head matches Tukums won 2, Grobiņa won 2 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 25% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Tukums vs Grobiņa?

Tukums score 1.00 goals per game on average and Grobiņa 0.67. The Virsliga average is 2.74 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 47% of games. Both teams score in 100% of Tukums's matches and 0% of Grobiņa's.

What form are Tukums and Grobiņa in?

Over the last 5 games Tukums have a 0-1-2 record (0.33 points per game) and Grobiņa 2-0-1 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Tukums vs Grobiņa?

The statistical background for Tukums vs Grobiņa — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.