Latvia - VirsligaData current as of 06 September 2026

Tukums vs Rīgas FS: match statistics

Tukums crest
Tukums
1 : 2half-time 0:1
Rīgas FS crest
Rīgas FS

Tukums vs Rīgas FS: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Tukums played Rīgas FS in Virsliga (Latvia). The match was played on 13 April 2026. Final score: 1:2.

Current form

Tukums: 0-3-2, 0.60 points/match. Rīgas FS: 4-0-1, 2.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Tukums scores 1.40 and concedes 1.80 goals per match. Rīgas FS scores 1.60 and concedes 0.40. League average: 2.78 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Tukums 100%, Rīgas FS 20%. Over 2.5: Tukums 60%, Rīgas FS 20%. League level: BTTS 59%, Over 2.5 48%.

xG, shots and style

Rīgas FS has higher xG: 1.98 vs 1.30. Tukums: 10.6 shots per match, Rīgas FS: 16.2.

Match halves

Tukums: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 0.60. Rīgas FS: half-time lead 40%, second-half goals 1.00.

Goals by minute

Tukums: 31-45+ (3 goals). Rīgas FS: 16-30 (2 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Virsliga: 2.78 goals per match, BTTS 59%, Over 2.5 48%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 4 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-4. Average goals 5.75, BTTS 75%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Rīgas FS are the clear favorites in this matchup: the visitors have won 4 of their last 5 matches and average 2.4 points per game over that span, while Tukums have 0 wins, 3 draws and 2 losses in their last 5 with only 0.6 points per game. At home Tukums average 1.0 goals scored and concede 1.5 goals (xG for 1.39, xG against 1.45), have not yet won at home (0% wins) and have kept 0% clean sheets. Rīgas FS in away matches average 1.0 goals scored and 0.0 conceded (xG for 1.77 vs xG against 0.75), recording 100% clean sheets and 100% wins on the road. The visitors register more shots and on-target attempts (13.5 shots and 6 on target vs the hosts’ 10 shots and 5 on target) and create better chances, despite similar possession (55% vs 56%). Considering the hosts’ 0% win rate, the visitors’ 100% away wins and the advantage in goals conceded and xG, I expect a Rīgas FS victory.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Data analysis shows mixed signals, but the defensive edge belongs to Rīgas FS: Tukums has a strong attacking season (avg. 2.0 goals and xG 2.12 with 18 shots, 7 on target), which increases the chance they score. Rīgas FS, however, has a season clean sheet rate of 100% and a seasonal average of 0.0 goals conceded, and in the last 5 matches they conceded just 0.4 goals on average, indicating a high ability to keep a clean sheet. In the last 5 meetings Tukums had BTTS in 100% of cases, while Rīgas FS only in 20%, meaning Tukums often concedes/permits goals while Rīgas usually do not. xG confirms both teams create chances (Tukums xG_for 2.12 vs Rīgas xG_against 0.75; Rīgas xG_for 1.77 vs Tukums xG_against 0.67), but Rīgas’s practical defensive effectiveness (0.4 goals conceded in the last 5) reduces the probability of BTTS. For these reasons I assign a higher probability to the 'No' scenario (at least one team to keep a clean sheet) — 65% versus 35% for 'Yes' (BTTS - Yes).

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Based on opponents' average attacking and defensive xG (Tukums xG_for 2.12 vs Rīgas FS defense 0.75; Rīgas FS xG_for 1.77 vs Tukums defense 0.67) I calculated expected goals: 1.44 for Tukums and 1.22 for Rīgas FS, total 2.66. Tukums at home scores on average 2.0 goals per match, averages 18.0 shots with 7.0 on target (conversion 11%), while Rīgas FS away records 1.0 goal with 13.5 shots and 6.0 on target (conversion 7%), indicating a home offensive edge. This season Tukums had 33% of matches over 2.5 goals and 60% in the last 5 matches, whereas Rīgas FS has 0% season-over-2.5 and only 20% in the last 5; the league averages 2.72 goals per match. A Poisson model for a total of 2.66 goals gives about a 74% probability of at least 2 goals (Over 1.5), ~50% for at least 3 goals (Over 2.5) and ~28% for 4+ goals (Over 3.5). For these reasons the strongest signal is Over 1.5 (74%), which I recommend as the main position.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Rīgas FS led at half-time in 100% of their matches and average 1.0 goals before the break, while Tukums scores only 0.33 goals by half-time and has not led at the break (0%). However, Tukums is strong after the break: they average 1.67 goals in the second half; the data show 5 goals in minutes 46–90 (1 + 2 + 2) and an average of 2.33 points in matches in which they score after the break, with a 67% success rate in that subgroup. Rīgas FS show good overall form — winning 80% of their last 5 matches and averaging 3.0 points per match this season, with 0.0 goals conceded this season, which increases the likelihood of holding an early lead. Combining Rīgas FS’s 100% half-time leads with Tukums’s strong second half, the most consistent scenario is HT: Rīgas FS leading, FT: Tukums turns it around, so I rate '2/1' as the strongest signal; I assign a 35% probability to this outcome, while I assess Rīgas FS holding the lead at 22%.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
1 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

28Possession (%)72
TukumsRīgas FS
4Shots20
TukumsRīgas FS
2Shots on target3
TukumsRīgas FS
0.62xG2.05
TukumsRīgas FS
0Corners7
TukumsRīgas FS
30Dangerous attacks82
TukumsRīgas FS
19Fouls10
TukumsRīgas FS
2Cards2
TukumsRīgas FS

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.4Goals scored / match1.6
TukumsRīgas FS
1.8Goals conceded / match0.4
TukumsRīgas FS
47%Average possession62%
TukumsRīgas FS
3.8Shots on target / match6.6
TukumsRīgas FS

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10.6Shots per match16.2
TukumsRīgas FS
3.8Shots on target6.6
TukumsRīgas FS
13.2%Shot conversion9.9%
TukumsRīgas FS
47%Possession62%
TukumsRīgas FS
1.3xG for1.98
TukumsRīgas FS
1.71xG against0.7
TukumsRīgas FS

Shooting quality

Tukums: Counter-attackingRīgas FS: Dominant
TukumsRīgas FS
Accuracy (shots on target)36%41%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.370.24

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Rīgas FS is 300% better for: last-5 form.

0.6 pts / match - Tukums · 2.4 pts / match - Rīgas FS

Tukums
LDLDD
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
0% W60% R40% P
Season (W-D-L)
0-3-2
0.60 pts / match · goal difference -2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-3-2
0.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-1-1
Last 5 at home
0-1-1
LD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.30Opponent xG: 1.71BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 60%
Rīgas FS
WWWLW
Season result split
80% W0% R20% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-0-1
2.40 pts / match · goal difference +6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-0-1
2.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-0-0
Last 5 away
2-0-0
WW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 0.4xG: 1.98Opponent xG: 0.70BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Rīgas FS is 14% better for: goals scored per match.

1.4 goals / match - Tukums · 1.6 goals / match - Rīgas FS

Rīgas FS is 350% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.8 goals / match - Tukums · 0.4 goals / match - Rīgas FS

Tukums scoring profile: strong

Tukums scores in 100% of matches (5 of 5 matches), while Rīgas FS keeps a clean sheet in 60% (3 of 5 matches).

Rīgas FS scoring profile: very strong

Rīgas FS scores in 80% of matches (4 of 5 matches), while Tukums keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 5 matches).

7Goals scored (season)8
TukumsRīgas FS
9Goals conceded (season)2
TukumsRīgas FS
3.2Average goals in match2
TukumsRīgas FS
7Goals scored (last 5)8
TukumsRīgas FS
9Goals conceded (last 5)2
TukumsRīgas FS

How often they score at least...

100%1 goal80%
TukumsRīgas FS
20%2 goals40%
TukumsRīgas FS
20%3 goals20%
TukumsRīgas FS
0%4 goals20%
TukumsRīgas FS

How often they concede at least...

100%1 goal40%
TukumsRīgas FS
60%2 goals0%
TukumsRīgas FS
20%3 goals0%
TukumsRīgas FS
0%4 goals0%
TukumsRīgas FS

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

60%BTTS at half-time20%
TukumsRīgas FS
20%BTTS in both halves0%
TukumsRīgas FS
20%Scored in both halves20%
TukumsRīgas FS

BTTS and goal count

60%Min. 3 goals and BTTS20%
TukumsRīgas FS
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
TukumsRīgas FS
100%BTTS - last 520%
TukumsRīgas FS

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

100%Min. 1 goal before half-time80%
TukumsRīgas FS
80%Min. 2 goals before half-time20%
TukumsRīgas FS
20%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
TukumsRīgas FS

2nd half

80%Min. 1 goal after half-time40%
TukumsRīgas FS
20%Min. 2 goals after half-time40%
TukumsRīgas FS
20%Min. 3 goals after half-time20%
TukumsRīgas FS

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Rīgas FS is 60% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1 pts / match - Tukums · 1.6 pts / match - Rīgas FS

Tukums - half-time state
20% leading40% draw40% trailing
Rīgas FS - half-time state
40% leading40% draw20% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1Points per match (1st half)1.6
TukumsRīgas FS
0.8Goals scored (1st half)0.6
TukumsRīgas FS
1.2Goals conceded (1st half)0.4
TukumsRīgas FS
2Average goals (1st half)1
TukumsRīgas FS
20%Clean sheet before half-time60%
TukumsRīgas FS
20%No goal before half-time40%
TukumsRīgas FS

After half-time (2nd half)

1.4Points per match (2nd half)1.8
TukumsRīgas FS
0.6Goals scored (2nd half)1
TukumsRīgas FS
0.6Goals conceded (2nd half)0
TukumsRīgas FS
1.2Average goals (2nd half)1
TukumsRīgas FS
40%Clean sheet after half-time100%
TukumsRīgas FS
60%No goal after half-time60%
TukumsRīgas FS

Tukums - second-half results

40% W20% R40% P
5
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
7
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding0%

Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 0%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time-0.6

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Rīgas FS - second-half results

40% W60% R0% P
8
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
9
Second-half points
+5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.60
PPG before half-time
Lead holding200%

Leads at half-time in 40% of matches and wins 80%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.4

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Tukums - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.40
Goals scored / match0.80.6
Goals conceded / match1.20.6
Average goals in match2.01.2
1 goal100%80%
2 goals80%20%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet20%40%
No goal20%60%
Goal difference-20
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 60% - Half-time goals total: 4
Rīgas FS - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.601.80
Goals scored / match0.61.0
Goals conceded / match0.40.0
Average goals in match1.01.0
1 goal80%40%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%100%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference+1+5
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 60% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Tukums
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
1
4
16-30
3
2
31-45
1
1
46-60
0
2
61-75
2
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (3 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

Rīgas FS
ScoredConceded
1
0
0-15
2
0
16-30
0
2
31-45
1
0
46-60
2
0
61-75
2
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (2 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.60
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.9 : 1.7
Estimated goal split
home : away
94%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
60%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+121%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
80%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Tukums

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.41
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.01
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.10
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.09
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
115%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
115%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
29% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
29%

Rīgas FS

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+1.28
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.08
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.38
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.30
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
103%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
33%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Virsliga).

Teams vs league

TukumsLigaRīgas FS
Average goals in match 3.202.78 2.00
Both teams scored 100%59% 20%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 60%48% 20%
Clean sheets 0%20% 60%
Goal before half-time 100%85% 80%
Goal after half-time 80%81% 40%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.78
Average goals per match
59%
Both teams scored
48%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
20%
Clean sheets
1.22
Home goals / match
1.56
Away goals / match
+-22%
Home attack advantage
+-28%
Home defence advantage
+-22%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
85%
1 goal
37%
2 goals
4%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
81%
1 goal
33%
2 goals
19%
3 goals
11%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Rīgas FSYellow cardIsmael Diomandé
  2. Rīgas FSSubstitutionOn: Dmitrijs ZelenkovsOff: Alain Cedric Herve Kouadio
  3. Rīgas FSYellow cardHerdi Prenga
  4. TukumsYellow cardRudolfs Reingolcs
  5. Rīgas FSSubstitutionOn: Haruna Rasid NjieOff: Roberts Savaļnieks
  6. TukumsSubstitutionOn: Jun TobaOff: Bogdans Samoilovs
  7. TukumsYellow cardJoseph Oloko Ede
  8. TukumsGoalMartins Štāls

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (4): Tukums 0 - 0 - 4 Rīgas FS. Average goals 5.75, both teams scored in 75% matches.

FK Tukums 2000
2 : 4
FK Rīgas Futbola skola
FK Rīgas Futbola skola
6 : 2
FK Tukums 2000
FK Tukums 2000
2 : 5
FK Rīgas Futbola skola
FK Rīgas Futbola skola
2 : 0
FK Tukums 2000

FAQ

What was the result of Tukums vs Rīgas FS?

The Virsliga match finished Tukums 1:2 Rīgas FS. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Tukums and Rīgas FS?

In the last 4 head-to-head matches Tukums won 0, Rīgas FS won 4 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 5.75 goals, with both teams scoring in 75% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Tukums vs Rīgas FS?

Tukums score 1.40 goals per game on average and Rīgas FS 1.60. The Virsliga average is 2.78 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 48% of games. Both teams score in 100% of Tukums's matches and 20% of Rīgas FS's.

What form are Tukums and Rīgas FS in?

Over the last 5 games Tukums have a 0-3-2 record (0.60 points per game) and Rīgas FS 4-0-1 (2.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Tukums vs Rīgas FS?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Tukums vs Rīgas FS: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.