United States - USL ChampionshipONEOK FieldData current as of 23 July 2026

Tulsa Roughnecks vs Colorado Springs: match statistics

Tulsa Roughnecks vs Colorado Springs: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Tulsa Roughnecks play Colorado Springs in USL Championship (United States). The match date is 21 June 2026 at 02:30. Venue: ONEOK Field. Final score: 1:2.

Current form

Tulsa Roughnecks: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Colorado Springs: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Tulsa Roughnecks scores 1.29 and concedes 1.14 goals per match. Colorado Springs scores 1.71 and concedes 1.57. League average: 2.79 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Tulsa Roughnecks 50%, Colorado Springs 71%. Over 2.5: Tulsa Roughnecks 36%, Colorado Springs 64%. League level: BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 52%.

xG, shots and style

Colorado Springs has higher xG: 1.66 vs 1.29. Tulsa Roughnecks: 10.9 shots per match, Colorado Springs: 14.5.

Match halves

Tulsa Roughnecks: half-time lead 36%, second-half goals 0.79. Colorado Springs: half-time lead 14%, second-half goals 1.14.

Goals by minute

Tulsa Roughnecks: 31-45+ (5 goals). Colorado Springs: 46-60 (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

USL Championship: 2.79 goals per match, BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 52%.

Head-to-head

6 H2H matches: 3-0-3. Average goals 2.17, BTTS 17%.

Match description

Tulsa are favorites at home: they concede only 0.67 goals per game at home on average, have 50% clean sheets and 50% wins, while Colorado concede 1.83 goals on the road and have only 17% wins and 17% clean sheets. Both teams score 1.33 goals per game on average, but Tulsa register more shots on target (3.17 per game) and have a higher home conversion rate (13%) versus the visitors' 2.33 shots on target and 11% conversion. Colorado have better form over the last 5 matches (3 wins and 1.8 pts per game) compared to Tulsa (2 wins and 1.4 pts per game); additionally, in the last 5 fixtures Tulsa conceded 7 goals and scored 6, while Colorado scored 7 and conceded 4. xG presents a balanced picture (Tulsa xG at home 1.26 vs Colorado xG away 1.35), however the hosts’ defensive advantage (0.67 vs 1.83) and superior conversion give Tulsa greater chances to win, hence the 60%/20%/20% rating.

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
0 : 2
2nd half

Match statistics

45Possession (%)55
Tulsa RoughnecksColorado Springs
12Shots11
Tulsa RoughnecksColorado Springs
2Shots on target2
Tulsa RoughnecksColorado Springs
1.39xG1.33
Tulsa RoughnecksColorado Springs
0Corners3
Tulsa RoughnecksColorado Springs
68Dangerous attacks68
Tulsa RoughnecksColorado Springs
19Fouls13
Tulsa RoughnecksColorado Springs
3Cards1
Tulsa RoughnecksColorado Springs

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Tulsa RoughnecksColorado Springs
1.29Goals scored / match1.71
Tulsa RoughnecksColorado Springs
1.14Goals conceded / match1.57
Tulsa RoughnecksColorado Springs
Tulsa RoughnecksColorado Springs
45%Average possession54%
Tulsa RoughnecksColorado Springs
3.36Shots on target / match3.93
Tulsa RoughnecksColorado Springs

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10.93Shots per match14.5
Tulsa RoughnecksColorado Springs
3.36Shots on target3.93
Tulsa RoughnecksColorado Springs
11.8%Shot conversion11.8%
Tulsa RoughnecksColorado Springs
45%Possession54%
Tulsa RoughnecksColorado Springs
1.29xG for1.66
Tulsa RoughnecksColorado Springs
1.29xG against1.09
Tulsa RoughnecksColorado Springs

Shooting quality

Tulsa Roughnecks: BalancedColorado Springs: Attacking
Tulsa RoughnecksColorado Springs
Accuracy (shots on target)31%27%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.380.44

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Colorado Springs is 29% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / match - Tulsa Roughnecks · 1.8 pts / match - Colorado Springs

Tulsa Roughnecks
DLWLW
Season result split
43% W29% R29% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-4-4
1.57 pts / match · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-2-2
Last 5 at home
3-0-2
LWWLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.17Opponent xG: 1.41BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
Colorado Springs
WLWLW
Season result split
36% W29% R36% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-4-5
1.36 pts / match · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-2-3
Last 5 away
2-1-2
LDLWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.75Opponent xG: 0.91BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Colorado Springs is 33% better for: goals scored per match.

1.29 goals / match - Tulsa Roughnecks · 1.71 goals / match - Colorado Springs

Tulsa Roughnecks is 38% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.14 goals / match - Tulsa Roughnecks · 1.57 goals / match - Colorado Springs

Tulsa Roughnecks scoring profile: very strong

Tulsa Roughnecks scores in 71% of matches (10 of 14 matches), while Colorado Springs keeps a clean sheet in 7% (1 of 14 matches).

Colorado Springs scoring profile: strong

Colorado Springs scores in 79% of matches (11 of 14 matches), while Tulsa Roughnecks keeps a clean sheet in 36% (5 of 14 matches).

18Goals scored (season)24
Tulsa RoughnecksColorado Springs
16Goals conceded (season)22
Tulsa RoughnecksColorado Springs
2.43Average goals in match3.29
Tulsa RoughnecksColorado Springs
5Goals scored (last 5)7
Tulsa RoughnecksColorado Springs
7Goals conceded (last 5)5
Tulsa RoughnecksColorado Springs

How often they score at least...

71%1 goal79%
Tulsa RoughnecksColorado Springs
36%2 goals57%
Tulsa RoughnecksColorado Springs
14%3 goals29%
Tulsa RoughnecksColorado Springs
7%4 goals7%
Tulsa RoughnecksColorado Springs

How often they concede at least...

64%1 goal93%
Tulsa RoughnecksColorado Springs
29%2 goals50%
Tulsa RoughnecksColorado Springs
7%3 goals14%
Tulsa RoughnecksColorado Springs
7%4 goals0%
Tulsa RoughnecksColorado Springs

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

71%
Colorado Springs - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.10 of 14 matches
58%
League average

Goal patterns

14%BTTS at half-time36%
Tulsa RoughnecksColorado Springs
7%BTTS in both halves21%
Tulsa RoughnecksColorado Springs
29%Scored in both halves36%
Tulsa RoughnecksColorado Springs

BTTS and goal count

36%Min. 3 goals and BTTS64%
Tulsa RoughnecksColorado Springs
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Tulsa RoughnecksColorado Springs
40%BTTS - last 560%
Tulsa RoughnecksColorado Springs

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

Full match - team comparison (Over)

1st half

64%Min. 1 goal before half-time71%
Tulsa RoughnecksColorado Springs
14%Min. 2 goals before half-time43%
Tulsa RoughnecksColorado Springs
7%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
Tulsa RoughnecksColorado Springs

2nd half

79%Min. 1 goal after half-time93%
Tulsa RoughnecksColorado Springs
50%Min. 2 goals after half-time57%
Tulsa RoughnecksColorado Springs
14%Min. 3 goals after half-time29%
Tulsa RoughnecksColorado Springs

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Tulsa Roughnecks is 40% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.5 pts / match - Tulsa Roughnecks · 1.07 pts / match - Colorado Springs

Tulsa Roughnecks - half-time state
36% leading43% draw21% trailing
Colorado Springs - half-time state
14% leading64% draw21% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.5Points per match (1st half)1.07
Tulsa RoughnecksColorado Springs
0.5Goals scored (1st half)0.57
Tulsa RoughnecksColorado Springs
0.43Goals conceded (1st half)0.57
Tulsa RoughnecksColorado Springs
0.93Average goals (1st half)1.14
Tulsa RoughnecksColorado Springs
71%Clean sheet before half-time43%
Tulsa RoughnecksColorado Springs
50%No goal before half-time50%
Tulsa RoughnecksColorado Springs

After half-time (2nd half)

1.57Points per match (2nd half)1.36
Tulsa RoughnecksColorado Springs
0.79Goals scored (2nd half)1.14
Tulsa RoughnecksColorado Springs
0.71Goals conceded (2nd half)1
Tulsa RoughnecksColorado Springs
1.5Average goals (2nd half)2.14
Tulsa RoughnecksColorado Springs
50%Clean sheet after half-time29%
Tulsa RoughnecksColorado Springs
50%No goal after half-time36%
Tulsa RoughnecksColorado Springs

Tulsa Roughnecks - second-half results

43% W29% R29% P
21
Half-time points
7
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
22
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.50
PPG before half-time
Lead holding119%

Leads at half-time in 36% of matches and wins 43%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Colorado Springs - second-half results

36% W29% R36% P
15
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
19
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.07
PPG before half-time
Lead holding257%

Leads at half-time in 14% of matches and wins 36%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Tulsa Roughnecks - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.001.00
Goals scored / match0.80.2
Goals conceded / match0.60.8
Average goals in match1.41.0
1 goal80%60%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal20%80%
Goal difference+1-3
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4
Colorado Springs - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.40
Goals scored / match0.60.8
Goals conceded / match0.60.4
Average goals in match1.21.2
1 goal80%80%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference0+2
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Tulsa Roughnecks
ScoredConceded
1
1
0-15
1
3
16-30
5
2
31-45
5
4
46-60
4
3
61-75
2
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (5 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Colorado Springs
ScoredConceded
3
2
0-15
2
3
16-30
3
3
31-45
6
3
46-60
4
6
61-75
6
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (6 goli). Concedes most in 61-75 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.85
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.4 : 1.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
102%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
61%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-24%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
56%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
6%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 17 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Tulsa Roughnecks

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
0.00
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.15
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
0.00
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.15
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
84%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
91%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.17
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
11% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 6% come in the first quarter-hour.
11%

Colorado Springs

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.57
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.43
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.05
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.48
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
137%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
102%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.44
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.6
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (USL Championship).

Teams vs league

Tulsa RoughnecksLigaColorado Springs
Average goals in match 2.432.79 3.29
Both teams scored 50%58% 71%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 36%52% 64%
Clean sheets 36%26% 7%
Goal before half-time 64%67% 71%
Goal after half-time 79%80% 93%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.79
Average goals per match
58%
Both teams scored
52%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
26%
Clean sheets
1.54
Home goals / match
1.25
Away goals / match
+23%
Home attack advantage
+19%
Home defence advantage
+17%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
67%
1 goal
36%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
80%
1 goal
50%
2 goals
22%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (6): Tulsa Roughnecks 3 - 0 - 3 Colorado Springs. Average goals 2.17, both teams scored in 17% matches.

Tulsa Roughnecks FC
1 : 0
Colorado Springs Switchbacks FC
Tulsa Roughnecks FC
1 : 0
Colorado Springs Switchbacks FC
Tulsa Roughnecks FC
3 : 0
Colorado Springs Switchbacks FC
Colorado Springs Switchbacks FC
2 : 0
Tulsa Roughnecks FC
Tulsa Roughnecks
1 : 4
Colorado Springs
Colorado Springs
1 : 0
Tulsa Roughnecks

FAQ

What was the result of Tulsa Roughnecks vs Colorado Springs?

The USL Championship match finished Tulsa Roughnecks 1:2 Colorado Springs. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Tulsa Roughnecks and Colorado Springs?

In the last 6 head-to-head matches Tulsa Roughnecks won 3, Colorado Springs won 3 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.17 goals, with both teams scoring in 17% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Tulsa Roughnecks vs Colorado Springs?

Tulsa Roughnecks score 1.29 goals per game on average and Colorado Springs 1.71. The USL Championship average is 2.79 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 52% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Tulsa Roughnecks's matches and 71% of Colorado Springs's.

What form are Tulsa Roughnecks and Colorado Springs in?

Over the last 5 games Tulsa Roughnecks have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Colorado Springs 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Tulsa Roughnecks vs Colorado Springs?

The statistical background for Tulsa Roughnecks vs Colorado Springs — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.