Tulsa Roughnecks vs Detroit City FC: match statistics
Tulsa Roughnecks vs Detroit City FC: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Tulsa Roughnecks played Detroit City FC in USL Championship (United States). The match was played on 9 August 2026. Final score: 0:1.
Current form
Tulsa Roughnecks: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Detroit City FC: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Tulsa Roughnecks scores 1.29 and concedes 1.14 goals per match. Detroit City FC scores 1.53 and concedes 0.93. League average: 2.79 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Tulsa Roughnecks 50%, Detroit City FC 53%. Over 2.5: Tulsa Roughnecks 36%, Detroit City FC 53%. League level: BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 52%.
xG, shots and style
Detroit City FC has higher xG: 1.64 vs 1.29. Tulsa Roughnecks: 10.9 shots per match, Detroit City FC: 14.1.
Match halves
Tulsa Roughnecks: half-time lead 36%, second-half goals 0.79. Detroit City FC: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 1.00.
Goals by minute
Tulsa Roughnecks: 31-45+ (5 goals). Detroit City FC: 76-90+ (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
USL Championship: 2.79 goals per match, BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 52%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Detroit City FC sit higher in the table, fifth compared with ninth, and have collected 10 points in their last five matches, while Tulsa have earned 7. The visitors are significantly more active offensively away from home, averaging 13 shots and 4.78 shots on target per match, compared with 10.44 and 2.67 for the hosts, while their xG stands at 1.55 versus 1.24. Tulsa defend very well at home, however, conceding just 0.67 goals per game and keeping a clean sheet in 56% of matches, whereas Detroit concede an average of 1.44 goals away from home. The hosts draw 33% of their home matches, identical to Detroit’s away record, and both teams fail to score in 33% of such fixtures. The quality of chances gives the visitors an edge, but Tulsa’s solid defence and Detroit’s weaker away record, with just 22% wins, point to a draw as the most likely outcome.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Tulsa has recorded BTTS in only 38% of its matches this season, significantly below Detroit City’s 67% and the league average of 55%, while also keeping a clean sheet in 50% of games. The hosts concede just 0.50 goals per match on average, while their defensive xG stands at 1.00, providing a solid basis for limiting the visitors’ attacking threat. Detroit City is in good offensive form, averaging 1.60 goals and 2.03 xG across its last five appearances, so their goal remains likely. However, the key risk to BTTS is Tulsa’s attack: it has scored only 4 goals in its last five matches, averaging 0.80 per game, with an xG of 1.11. The No Goal scenario for at least one team therefore holds a slight edge, primarily due to the hosts’ solid defense and Tulsa’s recent lack of finishing efficiency.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The strongest signal is the Under 3.5 goals bet: Tulsa have not recorded a single match with at least 4 goals, while this outcome occurred in only 22% of Detroit’s matches. The hosts concede just 0.50 goals per game on average and keep a clean sheet in 50% of their appearances, which clearly limits the opponent’s scoring ceiling. Detroit have solid offensive potential, supported by an average xG of 1.55 for the season and 2.03 over their last five matches, which is why the visitors’ expected goals tally stands at 1.28. Tulsa have scored only 0.8 goals per game over their last five fixtures, despite Detroit conceding an average of 1.0 goal during this period, giving the hosts a projected total of 1.22 goals. The combined projection of 2.50 goals, along with season-long Under 3.5 goals rates of 100% for Tulsa and 78% for Detroit, supports the Under 3.5 selection.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Tulsa has a clearly superior season record: they win 75% of their matches, average 2.38 points per game, and concede just 0.50 goals, while Detroit win 22% of their matches and concede an average of 1.44 goals. The hosts also have an edge in chance quality, with an xG of 1.76 compared with the opponents’ 1.55, while their defence allows an xG of 1.00 versus Detroit’s 1.43. The first half should be cautious, as both teams have recorded a high number of half-time draws—50% and 44% of matches, respectively. However, Tulsa have been leading at the break in 60% of their last five appearances and have not been trailing at half-time on any occasion. The second phase of the match is also crucial: Tulsa have won the second half in 75% of matches and kept a clean sheet during it in 88% of cases, supporting the HT/FT 1/1 option. Detroit’s stronger recent run, with three wins in their last five matches, nevertheless increases the probability of draw and away-win alternatives.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Tulsa Roughnecks | Detroit City FC | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 31% | 34% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.38 | 0.31 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Detroit City FC is 43% better for: last-5 form.
1.4 pts / match - Tulsa Roughnecks · 2 pts / match - Detroit City FC
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Detroit City FC is 19% better for: goals scored per match.
1.29 goals / match - Tulsa Roughnecks · 1.53 goals / match - Detroit City FC
Detroit City FC is 23% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.14 goals / match - Tulsa Roughnecks · 0.93 goals / match - Detroit City FC
Tulsa Roughnecks scores in 71% of matches (10 of 14 matches), while Detroit City FC keeps a clean sheet in 40% (6 of 15 matches).
Detroit City FC scores in 80% of matches (12 of 15 matches), while Tulsa Roughnecks keeps a clean sheet in 36% (5 of 14 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Tulsa Roughnecks
Over / Under - Detroit City FC
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Tulsa Roughnecks is 33% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.5 pts / match - Tulsa Roughnecks · 1.13 pts / match - Detroit City FC
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Tulsa Roughnecks - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 36% of matches and wins 43%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Detroit City FC - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 53%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.00 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 20% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 2.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 1.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.8 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 80% |
| No goal | 60% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +6 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (5 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Tulsa Roughnecks
Detroit City FC
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (USL Championship).
Teams vs league
| Tulsa Roughnecks | Liga | Detroit City FC | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.43 | 2.79 | ▼ 2.47 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 50% | 58% | ▼ 53% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 36% | 52% | • 53% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 36% | 26% | ▲ 40% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 64% | 67% | ▼ 60% |
| Goal after half-time | • 79% | 80% | ▼ 73% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Tulsa Roughnecks 1 - 0 - 0 Detroit City FC. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Tulsa Roughnecks vs Detroit City FC?
The USL Championship match finished Tulsa Roughnecks 0:1 Detroit City FC. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Tulsa Roughnecks vs Detroit City FC?
Tulsa Roughnecks score 1.29 goals per game on average and Detroit City FC 1.53. The USL Championship average is 2.79 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 52% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Tulsa Roughnecks's matches and 53% of Detroit City FC's.
What form are Tulsa Roughnecks and Detroit City FC in?
Over the last 5 games Tulsa Roughnecks have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Detroit City FC 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Tulsa Roughnecks vs Detroit City FC?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


