United States - USL ChampionshipData current as of 21 September 2026

Tulsa Roughnecks vs Detroit City FC: match statistics

Tulsa Roughnecks vs Detroit City FC: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Tulsa Roughnecks played Detroit City FC in USL Championship (United States). The match was played on 9 August 2026. Final score: 0:1.

Current form

Tulsa Roughnecks: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Detroit City FC: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Tulsa Roughnecks scores 1.29 and concedes 1.14 goals per match. Detroit City FC scores 1.53 and concedes 0.93. League average: 2.79 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Tulsa Roughnecks 50%, Detroit City FC 53%. Over 2.5: Tulsa Roughnecks 36%, Detroit City FC 53%. League level: BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 52%.

xG, shots and style

Detroit City FC has higher xG: 1.64 vs 1.29. Tulsa Roughnecks: 10.9 shots per match, Detroit City FC: 14.1.

Match halves

Tulsa Roughnecks: half-time lead 36%, second-half goals 0.79. Detroit City FC: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 1.00.

Goals by minute

Tulsa Roughnecks: 31-45+ (5 goals). Detroit City FC: 76-90+ (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

USL Championship: 2.79 goals per match, BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 52%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Detroit City FC sit higher in the table, fifth compared with ninth, and have collected 10 points in their last five matches, while Tulsa have earned 7. The visitors are significantly more active offensively away from home, averaging 13 shots and 4.78 shots on target per match, compared with 10.44 and 2.67 for the hosts, while their xG stands at 1.55 versus 1.24. Tulsa defend very well at home, however, conceding just 0.67 goals per game and keeping a clean sheet in 56% of matches, whereas Detroit concede an average of 1.44 goals away from home. The hosts draw 33% of their home matches, identical to Detroit’s away record, and both teams fail to score in 33% of such fixtures. The quality of chances gives the visitors an edge, but Tulsa’s solid defence and Detroit’s weaker away record, with just 22% wins, point to a draw as the most likely outcome.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Tulsa has recorded BTTS in only 38% of its matches this season, significantly below Detroit City’s 67% and the league average of 55%, while also keeping a clean sheet in 50% of games. The hosts concede just 0.50 goals per match on average, while their defensive xG stands at 1.00, providing a solid basis for limiting the visitors’ attacking threat. Detroit City is in good offensive form, averaging 1.60 goals and 2.03 xG across its last five appearances, so their goal remains likely. However, the key risk to BTTS is Tulsa’s attack: it has scored only 4 goals in its last five matches, averaging 0.80 per game, with an xG of 1.11. The No Goal scenario for at least one team therefore holds a slight edge, primarily due to the hosts’ solid defense and Tulsa’s recent lack of finishing efficiency.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The strongest signal is the Under 3.5 goals bet: Tulsa have not recorded a single match with at least 4 goals, while this outcome occurred in only 22% of Detroit’s matches. The hosts concede just 0.50 goals per game on average and keep a clean sheet in 50% of their appearances, which clearly limits the opponent’s scoring ceiling. Detroit have solid offensive potential, supported by an average xG of 1.55 for the season and 2.03 over their last five matches, which is why the visitors’ expected goals tally stands at 1.28. Tulsa have scored only 0.8 goals per game over their last five fixtures, despite Detroit conceding an average of 1.0 goal during this period, giving the hosts a projected total of 1.22 goals. The combined projection of 2.50 goals, along with season-long Under 3.5 goals rates of 100% for Tulsa and 78% for Detroit, supports the Under 3.5 selection.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Tulsa has a clearly superior season record: they win 75% of their matches, average 2.38 points per game, and concede just 0.50 goals, while Detroit win 22% of their matches and concede an average of 1.44 goals. The hosts also have an edge in chance quality, with an xG of 1.76 compared with the opponents’ 1.55, while their defence allows an xG of 1.00 versus Detroit’s 1.43. The first half should be cautious, as both teams have recorded a high number of half-time draws—50% and 44% of matches, respectively. However, Tulsa have been leading at the break in 60% of their last five appearances and have not been trailing at half-time on any occasion. The second phase of the match is also crucial: Tulsa have won the second half in 75% of matches and kept a clean sheet during it in 88% of cases, supporting the HT/FT 1/1 option. Detroit’s stronger recent run, with three wins in their last five matches, nevertheless increases the probability of draw and away-win alternatives.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

-1Possession (%)-1
Tulsa RoughnecksDetroit City FC
-1Shots-1
Tulsa RoughnecksDetroit City FC
-1Shots on target-1
Tulsa RoughnecksDetroit City FC
0xG0
Tulsa RoughnecksDetroit City FC
-1Corners-1
Tulsa RoughnecksDetroit City FC
0Dangerous attacks0
Tulsa RoughnecksDetroit City FC
-1Fouls-1
Tulsa RoughnecksDetroit City FC
-1Cards-1
Tulsa RoughnecksDetroit City FC

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Tulsa RoughnecksDetroit City FC
1.29Goals scored / match1.53
Tulsa RoughnecksDetroit City FC
1.14Goals conceded / match0.93
Tulsa RoughnecksDetroit City FC
Tulsa RoughnecksDetroit City FC
45%Average possession53%
Tulsa RoughnecksDetroit City FC
3.36Shots on target / match4.87
Tulsa RoughnecksDetroit City FC

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10.93Shots per match14.13
Tulsa RoughnecksDetroit City FC
3.36Shots on target4.87
Tulsa RoughnecksDetroit City FC
11.8%Shot conversion10.8%
Tulsa RoughnecksDetroit City FC
45%Possession53%
Tulsa RoughnecksDetroit City FC
1.29xG for1.64
Tulsa RoughnecksDetroit City FC
1.29xG against1.26
Tulsa RoughnecksDetroit City FC

Shooting quality

Tulsa Roughnecks: BalancedDetroit City FC: Attacking
Tulsa RoughnecksDetroit City FC
Accuracy (shots on target)31%34%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.380.31

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Detroit City FC is 43% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / match - Tulsa Roughnecks · 2 pts / match - Detroit City FC

Tulsa Roughnecks
DLWLW
Season result split
43% W29% D29% L
Season (W-D-L)
6-4-4
1.57 pts / match · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-2-2
Last 5 at home
3-0-2
LWWLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.17Opponent xG: 1.41BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
Detroit City FC
LDWWW
Season result split
53% W20% D27% L
Season (W-D-L)
8-3-4
1.80 pts / match · goal difference +9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-2-4
Last 5 away
2-1-2
LDLWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.2Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.94Opponent xG: 1.34BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Detroit City FC is 19% better for: goals scored per match.

1.29 goals / match - Tulsa Roughnecks · 1.53 goals / match - Detroit City FC

Detroit City FC is 23% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.14 goals / match - Tulsa Roughnecks · 0.93 goals / match - Detroit City FC

Tulsa Roughnecks scoring profile: strong

Tulsa Roughnecks scores in 71% of matches (10 of 14 matches), while Detroit City FC keeps a clean sheet in 40% (6 of 15 matches).

Detroit City FC scoring profile: strong

Detroit City FC scores in 80% of matches (12 of 15 matches), while Tulsa Roughnecks keeps a clean sheet in 36% (5 of 14 matches).

18Goals scored (season)23
Tulsa RoughnecksDetroit City FC
16Goals conceded (season)14
Tulsa RoughnecksDetroit City FC
2.43Average goals in match2.47
Tulsa RoughnecksDetroit City FC
5Goals scored (last 5)11
Tulsa RoughnecksDetroit City FC
7Goals conceded (last 5)6
Tulsa RoughnecksDetroit City FC

How often they score at least...

71%1 goal80%
Tulsa RoughnecksDetroit City FC
36%2 goals40%
Tulsa RoughnecksDetroit City FC
14%3 goals13%
Tulsa RoughnecksDetroit City FC
7%4 goals7%
Tulsa RoughnecksDetroit City FC

How often they concede at least...

64%1 goal60%
Tulsa RoughnecksDetroit City FC
29%2 goals33%
Tulsa RoughnecksDetroit City FC
7%3 goals0%
Tulsa RoughnecksDetroit City FC
7%4 goals0%
Tulsa RoughnecksDetroit City FC

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

58%
League average

Goal patterns

14%BTTS at half-time20%
Tulsa RoughnecksDetroit City FC
7%BTTS in both halves7%
Tulsa RoughnecksDetroit City FC
29%Scored in both halves27%
Tulsa RoughnecksDetroit City FC

BTTS and goal count

36%Min. 3 goals and BTTS47%
Tulsa RoughnecksDetroit City FC
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS7%
Tulsa RoughnecksDetroit City FC
40%BTTS - last 560%
Tulsa RoughnecksDetroit City FC

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

64%Min. 1 goal before half-time60%
Tulsa RoughnecksDetroit City FC
14%Min. 2 goals before half-time33%
Tulsa RoughnecksDetroit City FC
7%Min. 3 goals before half-time7%
Tulsa RoughnecksDetroit City FC

2nd half

79%Min. 1 goal after half-time73%
Tulsa RoughnecksDetroit City FC
50%Min. 2 goals after half-time40%
Tulsa RoughnecksDetroit City FC
14%Min. 3 goals after half-time20%
Tulsa RoughnecksDetroit City FC

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Tulsa Roughnecks is 33% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.5 pts / match - Tulsa Roughnecks · 1.13 pts / match - Detroit City FC

Tulsa Roughnecks - half-time state
36% leading43% draw21% trailing
Detroit City FC - half-time state
20% leading53% draw27% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.5Points per match (1st half)1.13
Tulsa RoughnecksDetroit City FC
0.5Goals scored (1st half)0.53
Tulsa RoughnecksDetroit City FC
0.43Goals conceded (1st half)0.53
Tulsa RoughnecksDetroit City FC
0.93Average goals (1st half)1.07
Tulsa RoughnecksDetroit City FC
71%Clean sheet before half-time53%
Tulsa RoughnecksDetroit City FC
50%No goal before half-time67%
Tulsa RoughnecksDetroit City FC

After half-time (2nd half)

1.57Points per match (2nd half)2
Tulsa RoughnecksDetroit City FC
0.79Goals scored (2nd half)1
Tulsa RoughnecksDetroit City FC
0.71Goals conceded (2nd half)0.4
Tulsa RoughnecksDetroit City FC
1.5Average goals (2nd half)1.4
Tulsa RoughnecksDetroit City FC
50%Clean sheet after half-time67%
Tulsa RoughnecksDetroit City FC
50%No goal after half-time27%
Tulsa RoughnecksDetroit City FC

Tulsa Roughnecks - second-half results

43% W29% D29% L
21
Half-time points
7
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
22
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.50
PPG before half-time
Lead holding119%

Leads at half-time in 36% of matches and wins 43%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Detroit City FC - second-half results

53% W40% D7% L
17
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
30
Second-half points
+9
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.13
PPG before half-time
Lead holding265%

Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 53%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Tulsa Roughnecks - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.001.00
Goals scored / match0.80.2
Goals conceded / match0.60.8
Average goals in match1.41.0
1 goal80%60%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal20%80%
Goal difference+1-3
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4
Detroit City FC - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.002.60
Goals scored / match0.81.4
Goals conceded / match1.00.2
Average goals in match1.81.6
1 goal80%80%
2 goals60%40%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet20%80%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference-1+6
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 80% won - 20% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Tulsa Roughnecks
ScoredConceded
1
1
0-15
1
3
16-30
5
2
31-45
5
4
46-60
4
3
61-75
2
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (5 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Detroit City FC
ScoredConceded
4
3
0-15
1
2
16-30
3
3
31-45
6
1
46-60
2
2
61-75
7
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.45
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.1 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
88%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
52%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-59%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
57%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
6%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 17 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Tulsa Roughnecks

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
0.00
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.15
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
0.00
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.15
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
84%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
91%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.17
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
11% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 6% come in the first quarter-hour.
11%

Detroit City FC

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.38
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.22
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.11
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.33
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
122%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
60%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.20
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
30% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
30%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (USL Championship).

Teams vs league

Tulsa RoughnecksLigaDetroit City FC
Average goals in match 2.432.79 2.47
Both teams scored 50%58% 53%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 36%52% 53%
Clean sheets 36%26% 40%
Goal before half-time 64%67% 60%
Goal after half-time 79%80% 73%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.79
Average goals per match
58%
Both teams scored
52%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
26%
Clean sheets
1.54
Home goals / match
1.25
Away goals / match
+23%
Home attack advantage
+19%
Home defence advantage
+17%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
67%
1 goal
36%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
80%
1 goal
50%
2 goals
22%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Tulsa RoughnecksYellow cardLucas Stauffer
  2. Detroit City FCYellow cardHaruki Yamazaki
  3. Tulsa RoughnecksYellow cardLamar Batista
  4. Detroit City FCGoalDarren SmithAssist: Aedan Stanley
  5. Detroit City FCYellow cardCallum Montgomery
  6. Tulsa RoughnecksSubstitutionOn: Stefan LukicOff: Bailey Sparks
  7. Tulsa RoughnecksSubstitutionOn: Kalil ElmedkharOff: Arquimides Ordonez
  8. Detroit City FCSubstitutionOn: Benjamin MorrisOff: Darren Smith
  9. Tulsa RoughnecksSubstitutionOn: Giordano ColliOff: Lamar Batista
  10. Detroit City FCSubstitutionOn: Chisom Charles EgbuchulamOff: Abdoulaye Diop

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Tulsa Roughnecks 1 - 0 - 0 Detroit City FC. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

Detroit City FC
0 : 1
Tulsa Roughnecks

FAQ

What was the result of Tulsa Roughnecks vs Detroit City FC?

The USL Championship match finished Tulsa Roughnecks 0:1 Detroit City FC. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Tulsa Roughnecks vs Detroit City FC?

Tulsa Roughnecks score 1.29 goals per game on average and Detroit City FC 1.53. The USL Championship average is 2.79 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 52% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Tulsa Roughnecks's matches and 53% of Detroit City FC's.

What form are Tulsa Roughnecks and Detroit City FC in?

Over the last 5 games Tulsa Roughnecks have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Detroit City FC 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Tulsa Roughnecks vs Detroit City FC?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.