United States - USL ChampionshipONEOK FieldData current as of 06 September 2026

Tulsa Roughnecks vs Hartford Athletic: match statistics

Tulsa Roughnecks vs Hartford Athletic: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Tulsa Roughnecks played Hartford Athletic in USL Championship (United States). The match was played on 23 May 2026. Venue: ONEOK Field. Final score: 2:0.

Current form

Tulsa Roughnecks: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. Hartford Athletic: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Tulsa Roughnecks scores 1.38 and concedes 1.13 goals per match. Hartford Athletic scores 1.13 and concedes 1.00. League average: 2.72 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Tulsa Roughnecks 63%, Hartford Athletic 38%. Over 2.5: Tulsa Roughnecks 38%, Hartford Athletic 63%. League level: BTTS 57%, Over 2.5 55%.

xG, shots and style

Tulsa Roughnecks has higher xG: 1.42 vs 1.35. Tulsa Roughnecks: 12.0 shots per match, Hartford Athletic: 11.0.

Match halves

Tulsa Roughnecks: half-time lead 13%, second-half goals 1.13. Hartford Athletic: half-time lead 38%, second-half goals 0.63.

Goals by minute

Tulsa Roughnecks: 46-60 (4 goals). Hartford Athletic: 76-90+ (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

USL Championship: 2.72 goals per match, BTTS 57%, Over 2.5 55%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-1. Average goals 2.50, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

I predict a home win (Tulsa). The hosts have scored 9 goals in their last 5 matches with a 3 wins and 2 draws record, equating to an average of 2.2 points per match, while Hartford in the same period scored 4 goals with a 2-2-1 record and an average of 1.6 points per match. Tulsa at home averages 1.00 goals and xG 1.36 with 11.75 shots, 3.25 on target and 53% possession, whereas Hartford away averages 1.25 goals, xG 1.18, 11 shots and only 38% possession. Defensively Hartford officially concedes just 0.25 goals per away game and has 75% clean sheets, but their average away xG against is 1.63 — this suggests the low 0.25 goals conceded may be due to luck or strong goalkeeping rather than a lack of chances. Considering Tulsa’s superior offensive momentum (9 vs 4 goals in the last 5) and home control of the game, I assess probabilities of 55% for the hosts, 25% for a draw and 20% for the visitors.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

I lean towards 'No' (no BTTS) as more likely. Hartford has 75% clean sheets away and concedes only 0.25 goals per away match on average, with a seasonal BTTS rate of just 25%. Tulsa shows offensive indicators — seasonal xG 1.52, 4.25 shots on target on average and 9 goals in the last 5 matches (1.8 avg), translating to 80% BTTS in that form window. However, seasonally Tulsa scores only 1.0 goal and has 25% clean sheets at home, while xG against Hartford away is 1.63 — visitors allow chances but still only concede 0.25 goals on average, suggesting Hartford’s strong defensive efficiency or high variance. Additionally, home BTTS is 50% vs guests’ 25%, and league BTTS is 56%, indicating this matchup favors the visitors’ defensive edge over the hosts’ offense. I assign 70% probability to the No BTTS scenario and 30% to BTTS (Yes).

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The xG-based model (Tulsa attack xG 1.52 vs Hartford conceded xG 1.63; Hartford attack xG 1.18 vs Tulsa conceded xG 1.33) yields 1.58 expected goals for Tulsa and 1.26 for Hartford, totaling 2.84 goals. Seasonal metrics support a higher outcome: Tulsa at home have 75% of matches over 2.5 goals, Hartford away 50%, and the league averages 2.72 goals per match. In the last 5 matches Tulsa scored 9 goals (1.8 avg) and conceded 4 (0.8), while Hartford scored 4 (0.8) and conceded 5 (1.0), indicating a home advantage in tempo and goal production. Since the expected total of 2.84 is above the 2.5 line, I assign a 65% probability to Over 2.5 (Under 35%); Over 1.5 is rated highly at 90%/10%, and Over 3.5 is low at 25%/75%. Recommendation: play Over 2.5 as the strongest signal, noting that Hartford have 75% clean sheets away, which advises caution regarding odds.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The most likely scenario is 2/2: the away team leads at Half-Time and wins the match. The away side score on average 0.75 goals by the break versus 0.25 for the home side, and they concede on average 0.0 goals by Half-Time compared to 0.75 for the hosts; away teams lead at the break in 50% of matches versus 25% for the home team. After the full match the away team also shows better defense: they concede an average of 0.25 goals per game versus 1.75 for the hosts, and the away win rate is 50% compared to 25% for the home side. Although the home team has higher xG (1.52 vs 1.18) and more shots on target (4.25 vs 3.25), the away team’s efficiency and clean sheets (75% clean sheets this season vs 25% for the hosts) support maintaining the lead. Therefore I assign 45% to 2/2 as the strongest signal; alternatives are X/2 (20%) and 2/X (10%).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

31Possession (%)69
Tulsa RoughnecksHartford Athletic
6Shots17
Tulsa RoughnecksHartford Athletic
3Shots on target5
Tulsa RoughnecksHartford Athletic
0.87xG2.01
Tulsa RoughnecksHartford Athletic
3Corners5
Tulsa RoughnecksHartford Athletic
38Dangerous attacks82
Tulsa RoughnecksHartford Athletic
15Fouls13
Tulsa RoughnecksHartford Athletic
3Cards7
Tulsa RoughnecksHartford Athletic

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Tulsa RoughnecksHartford Athletic
1.38Goals scored / match1.13
Tulsa RoughnecksHartford Athletic
1.13Goals conceded / match1
Tulsa RoughnecksHartford Athletic
Tulsa RoughnecksHartford Athletic
50%Average possession45%
Tulsa RoughnecksHartford Athletic
4Shots on target / match3.75
Tulsa RoughnecksHartford Athletic
Tulsa RoughnecksHartford Athletic

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12Shots per match11
Tulsa RoughnecksHartford Athletic
4Shots on target3.75
Tulsa RoughnecksHartford Athletic
11.5%Shot conversion10.2%
Tulsa RoughnecksHartford Athletic
50%Possession45%
Tulsa RoughnecksHartford Athletic
1.42xG for1.35
Tulsa RoughnecksHartford Athletic
1.13xG against1.48
Tulsa RoughnecksHartford Athletic

Shooting quality

Tulsa Roughnecks: BalancedHartford Athletic: Balanced
Tulsa RoughnecksHartford Athletic
Accuracy (shots on target)33%34%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.340.30

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Tulsa Roughnecks is 33% better for: last-5 form.

1.6 pts / match - Tulsa Roughnecks · 1.2 pts / match - Hartford Athletic

Tulsa Roughnecks
DLDWW
Season result split
38% W38% R25% P
Season (W-D-L)
3-3-2
1.50 pts / match · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-2-1
Last 5 at home
1-2-1
DWDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.44Opponent xG: 1.13BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 40%
Hartford Athletic
DDLDW
Season result split
38% W50% R13% P
Season (W-D-L)
3-4-1
1.63 pts / match · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-2-0
Last 5 away
2-2-0
WDWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.44Opponent xG: 1.29BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Tulsa Roughnecks is 22% better for: goals scored per match.

1.38 goals / match - Tulsa Roughnecks · 1.13 goals / match - Hartford Athletic

Hartford Athletic is 13% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.13 goals / match - Tulsa Roughnecks · 1 goals / match - Hartford Athletic

Tulsa Roughnecks scoring profile: mixed

Tulsa Roughnecks scores in 63% of matches (5 of 8 matches), while Hartford Athletic keeps a clean sheet in 50% (4 of 8 matches).

Hartford Athletic scoring profile: strong

Hartford Athletic scores in 50% of matches (4 of 8 matches), while Tulsa Roughnecks keeps a clean sheet in 13% (1 of 8 matches).

11Goals scored (season)9
Tulsa RoughnecksHartford Athletic
9Goals conceded (season)8
Tulsa RoughnecksHartford Athletic
2.5Average goals in match2.13
Tulsa RoughnecksHartford Athletic
8Goals scored (last 5)4
Tulsa RoughnecksHartford Athletic
5Goals conceded (last 5)7
Tulsa RoughnecksHartford Athletic

How often they score at least...

63%1 goal50%
Tulsa RoughnecksHartford Athletic
38%2 goals50%
Tulsa RoughnecksHartford Athletic
25%3 goals13%
Tulsa RoughnecksHartford Athletic
13%4 goals0%
Tulsa RoughnecksHartford Athletic

How often they concede at least...

88%1 goal50%
Tulsa RoughnecksHartford Athletic
25%2 goals25%
Tulsa RoughnecksHartford Athletic
0%3 goals13%
Tulsa RoughnecksHartford Athletic
0%4 goals13%
Tulsa RoughnecksHartford Athletic

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

57%
League average

Goal patterns

13%BTTS at half-time0%
Tulsa RoughnecksHartford Athletic
13%BTTS in both halves0%
Tulsa RoughnecksHartford Athletic
25%Scored in both halves25%
Tulsa RoughnecksHartford Athletic

BTTS and goal count

38%Min. 3 goals and BTTS38%
Tulsa RoughnecksHartford Athletic
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS25%
Tulsa RoughnecksHartford Athletic
80%BTTS - last 540%
Tulsa RoughnecksHartford Athletic

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

Full match - team comparison (Over)

1st half

50%Min. 1 goal before half-time50%
Tulsa RoughnecksHartford Athletic
13%Min. 2 goals before half-time25%
Tulsa RoughnecksHartford Athletic
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time13%
Tulsa RoughnecksHartford Athletic

2nd half

88%Min. 1 goal after half-time63%
Tulsa RoughnecksHartford Athletic
63%Min. 2 goals after half-time38%
Tulsa RoughnecksHartford Athletic
25%Min. 3 goals after half-time25%
Tulsa RoughnecksHartford Athletic

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Hartford Athletic is 63% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1 pts / match - Tulsa Roughnecks · 1.63 pts / match - Hartford Athletic

Tulsa Roughnecks - half-time state
13% leading63% draw25% trailing
Hartford Athletic - half-time state
38% leading50% draw13% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1Points per match (1st half)1.63
Tulsa RoughnecksHartford Athletic
0.25Goals scored (1st half)0.5
Tulsa RoughnecksHartford Athletic
0.38Goals conceded (1st half)0.38
Tulsa RoughnecksHartford Athletic
0.63Average goals (1st half)0.88
Tulsa RoughnecksHartford Athletic
63%Clean sheet before half-time88%
Tulsa RoughnecksHartford Athletic
75%No goal before half-time63%
Tulsa RoughnecksHartford Athletic

After half-time (2nd half)

1.75Points per match (2nd half)1.13
Tulsa RoughnecksHartford Athletic
1.13Goals scored (2nd half)0.63
Tulsa RoughnecksHartford Athletic
0.75Goals conceded (2nd half)0.63
Tulsa RoughnecksHartford Athletic
1.88Average goals (2nd half)1.25
Tulsa RoughnecksHartford Athletic
38%Clean sheet after half-time50%
Tulsa RoughnecksHartford Athletic
38%No goal after half-time63%
Tulsa RoughnecksHartford Athletic

Tulsa Roughnecks - second-half results

50% W25% R25% P
8
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
14
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding292%

Leads at half-time in 13% of matches and wins 38%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Hartford Athletic - second-half results

25% W38% R38% P
13
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
9
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.63
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 38% of matches and wins 38%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Tulsa Roughnecks - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.002.00
Goals scored / match0.21.4
Goals conceded / match0.40.6
Average goals in match0.62.0
1 goal60%100%
2 goals0%60%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal80%20%
Goal difference-1+4
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1
Hartford Athletic - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.00
Goals scored / match0.20.6
Goals conceded / match0.60.8
Average goals in match0.81.4
1 goal40%60%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference-2-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Tulsa Roughnecks
ScoredConceded
0
1
0-15
0
1
16-30
2
1
31-45
4
2
46-60
3
3
61-75
2
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (4 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Hartford Athletic
ScoredConceded
0
1
0-15
1
1
16-30
3
1
31-45
1
1
46-60
0
3
61-75
4
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (4 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.32
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.2 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
85%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
51%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+8%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
32%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
19%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 5 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Tulsa Roughnecks

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.29
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.04
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.04
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
0.00
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
91%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
95%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.10
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.9
Late goals
18% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
18%

Hartford Athletic

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.13
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.26
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.22
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.48
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
95%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
66%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.43
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
44% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
44%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (USL Championship).

Teams vs league

Tulsa RoughnecksLigaHartford Athletic
Average goals in match 2.502.72 2.13
Both teams scored 63%57% 38%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 38%55% 63%
Clean sheets 13%27% 50%
Goal before half-time 50%68% 50%
Goal after half-time 88%81% 63%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.72
Average goals per match
57%
Both teams scored
55%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
27%
Clean sheets
1.52
Home goals / match
1.19
Away goals / match
+28%
Home attack advantage
+22%
Home defence advantage
+20%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
68%
1 goal
34%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
81%
1 goal
49%
2 goals
20%
3 goals
7%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Tulsa RoughnecksSubstitutionOn: Grant RobinsonOff: Delentz Pierre
  2. Tulsa RoughnecksYellow cardIan Carlo Souza Daniel
  3. Hartford AthleticYellow cardBarry Coffey
  4. Hartford AthleticYellow cardBeverly Makangila
  5. Tulsa RoughnecksYellow cardNelson Pierre
  6. Tulsa RoughnecksGoalJamie Craig Webber
  7. Tulsa RoughnecksYellow cardAlonzo Clarke
  8. Tulsa RoughnecksGoalAlonzo ClarkeAssist: Bruno Lapa
  9. Hartford AthleticSubstitutionOn: Emmanuel SamadiaOff: Thomas John Presthus
  10. Hartford AthleticSubstitutionOn: Sadat Happy AnakuOff: Barry Coffey
  11. Hartford AthleticSubstitutionOn: Andrés HernándezOff: Beverly Makangila
  12. Hartford AthleticYellow cardAdrián Diz Pe
  13. Tulsa RoughnecksSubstitutionOn: Giordano ColliOff: Nelson Pierre
  14. Hartford AthleticYellow cardJordan Scarlett
  15. Tulsa RoughnecksSubstitutionOn: Zion SirangaOff: Bailey Sparks
  16. Hartford AthleticYellow cardMichee Ngalina
  17. Hartford AthleticRed cardSamuel Alejandro Careaga

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Tulsa Roughnecks 0 - 1 - 1 Hartford Athletic. Average goals 2.50, both teams scored in 100% matches.

Hartford Athletic
1 : 1
Tulsa Roughnecks FC
Tulsa Roughnecks
1 : 2
Hartford Athletic

FAQ

What was the result of Tulsa Roughnecks vs Hartford Athletic?

The USL Championship match finished Tulsa Roughnecks 2:0 Hartford Athletic. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Tulsa Roughnecks and Hartford Athletic?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Tulsa Roughnecks won 0, Hartford Athletic won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Tulsa Roughnecks vs Hartford Athletic?

Tulsa Roughnecks score 1.38 goals per game on average and Hartford Athletic 1.13. The USL Championship average is 2.72 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 55% of games. Both teams score in 63% of Tulsa Roughnecks's matches and 38% of Hartford Athletic's.

What form are Tulsa Roughnecks and Hartford Athletic in?

Over the last 5 games Tulsa Roughnecks have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Hartford Athletic 1-3-1 (1.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Tulsa Roughnecks vs Hartford Athletic?

The statistical background for Tulsa Roughnecks vs Hartford Athletic — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.