Tulsa Roughnecks vs Lexington: match statistics
Tulsa Roughnecks vs Lexington: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Tulsa Roughnecks played Lexington in USL Championship (United States). The match was played on 26 July 2026. Final score: 0:0.
Current form
Tulsa Roughnecks: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Lexington: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match.
Goal statistics
Tulsa Roughnecks scores 1.29 and concedes 1.14 goals per match. Lexington scores 1.57 and concedes 1.43. League average: 2.79 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Tulsa Roughnecks 50%, Lexington 64%. Over 2.5: Tulsa Roughnecks 36%, Lexington 64%. League level: BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 52%.
xG, shots and style
Lexington has higher xG: 1.43 vs 1.29. Tulsa Roughnecks: 10.9 shots per match, Lexington: 12.2.
Match halves
Tulsa Roughnecks: half-time lead 36%, second-half goals 0.79. Lexington: half-time lead 36%, second-half goals 0.86.
Goals by minute
Tulsa Roughnecks: 31-45+ (5 goals). Lexington: 0-15 (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
USL Championship: 2.79 goals per match, BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 52%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 2-0-0. Average goals 2.50, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I back a home win (1): Tulsa has strong defensive metrics at home — conceding just 0.75 goals per game and keeping a clean sheet in 50% of home matches, with a 50% home win rate. Lexington is more dangerous offensively on the road — scoring 1.57 goals per away game on average, registering 4 shots on target per game and a conversion rate of 14% versus Tulsa’s 12%; in the last 5 matches the visitors scored 9 goals while Tulsa scored 6. However, the hosts control defensive risk better: the visitors concede 1.43 goals on average away and have only 14% clean sheets on the road, whereas Tulsa concedes 0.75 at home. Additionally Tulsa sits 9th in the table vs Lexington in 19th. Considering xG (Tulsa 1.24 at home vs Lexington 1.37 away) and recent form (Tulsa conceded 10 goals in the last 5 matches and averages 1.2 points per game, Lexington conceded 9 and averages 1.4 points per game), I expect a narrow home victory and estimate probabilities of approximately 52% for Tulsa, 25% for a draw and 23% for Lexington.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Seasonal statistics strongly support BTTS: Tulsa has 57% of matches with both teams scoring, Lexington as high as 71%, and the league average is 57%. In the last 5 matches both teams had BTTS in 60%; over that period Tulsa averaged 1.2 goals scored and 2.0 conceded, while Lexington averaged 1.8 scored and 1.8 conceded, indicating both sides regularly concede. xG and shot analysis confirm offensive potential: xG for Tulsa 1.49 versus 1.37 for Lexington, xG against 1.19 versus 1.50, and average shots 13.14 (Tulsa) and 11.29 (Lexington) with 4.71 and 4.00 shots on target. Additionally, clean sheet percentage is 43% for Tulsa and only 14% for Lexington, and over 2.5 occurs for the home team in 71% and the away team in 57% of cases; the combination of over2.5 and BTTS is 56% for both teams, further indicating goal-heavy matches. Considering these figures (57% vs 71% BTTS, 60% in last 5, xG around 1.4–1.5 and defensive susceptibility), I assess the probability of BTTS at 72% vs 28% and recommend the 'BTTS - Yes' selection.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Seasonal data indicate Over 1.5 occurs extremely often: both teams have 86% of matches over 1.5 goals, and the league average is 2.79 goals per match, suggesting a goals edge. xG for Tulsa is 1.49, for Lexington 1.37; combining the home xG with the away xG conceded yields expected ~1.50 goals for Tulsa and ~1.28 for Lexington, i.e. roughly 2.78 goals total. Shooting stats (Tulsa 13.14 shots, 4.71 on target; Lexington 11.29 shots, 4.00 on target) and conversion rates (12% vs 14%) support these values, and BTTS is 57% for hosts and 71% for visitors, indicating both teams likely to score. Over 2.5 occurs for Tulsa in 71% of matches and for Lexington in 57%, and in the last 5 meetings both teams have 60% Over 2.5, so I estimate Over 2.5 probability at ~66%, while Over 3.5 is less likely (~43%). Based on this, the strongest signal is Over 1.5 (86% seasonally and combined xG ~2.78), therefore I recommend betting the Over line at 1.5.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Overall analysis gives a slight edge to the home side: Tulsa has a higher xG 1.49 versus 1.37, a better average points per game 1.43 vs 1.14, and a higher win rate 43% vs 29%. First-half data are mixed – on the season the visitors have scored more goals by half-time (11 vs 7) and have a higher HT goals average 1.00 vs 0.43, although in the last 5 matches Tulsa has led at the break in 60% of games. Crucially, Tulsa is significantly stronger after the break: they average 1.14 goals in the second half versus 0.57 for the visitors and have 86% of matches with at least one goal after the break (vs 71% for the visitors). Given the higher xG, greater shooting activity (4.71 on target vs 4.0) and dominance in second halves, the most reliable signal is Half-Time/Full-Time: draw at the break and home win (X/1).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Tulsa Roughnecks | Lexington | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 31% | 36% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.38 | 0.36 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Lexington is 29% better for: last-5 form.
1.4 pts / match - Tulsa Roughnecks · 1.8 pts / match - Lexington
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Lexington is 22% better for: goals scored per match.
1.29 goals / match - Tulsa Roughnecks · 1.57 goals / match - Lexington
Tulsa Roughnecks is 25% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.14 goals / match - Tulsa Roughnecks · 1.43 goals / match - Lexington
Tulsa Roughnecks scores in 71% of matches (10 of 14 matches), while Lexington keeps a clean sheet in 29% (4 of 14 matches).
Lexington scores in 79% of matches (11 of 14 matches), while Tulsa Roughnecks keeps a clean sheet in 36% (5 of 14 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Tulsa Roughnecks
Over / Under - Lexington
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Tulsa Roughnecks is 10% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.5 pts / match - Tulsa Roughnecks · 1.36 pts / match - Lexington
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Tulsa Roughnecks - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 36% of matches and wins 43%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Lexington - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 36% of matches and wins 36%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.00 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 20% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 1.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 1.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 2.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 100% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 0% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (5 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (5 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Tulsa Roughnecks
Lexington
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (USL Championship).
Teams vs league
| Tulsa Roughnecks | Liga | Lexington | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.43 | 2.79 | ▲ 3.00 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 50% | 58% | ▲ 64% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 36% | 52% | ▲ 64% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 36% | 26% | ▲ 29% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 64% | 67% | ▲ 71% |
| Goal after half-time | • 79% | 80% | • 79% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): Tulsa Roughnecks 2 - 0 - 0 Lexington. Average goals 2.50, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Tulsa Roughnecks vs Lexington?
The USL Championship match finished Tulsa Roughnecks 0:0 Lexington. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Tulsa Roughnecks and Lexington?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Tulsa Roughnecks won 2, Lexington won 0 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Tulsa Roughnecks vs Lexington?
Tulsa Roughnecks score 1.29 goals per game on average and Lexington 1.57. The USL Championship average is 2.79 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 52% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Tulsa Roughnecks's matches and 64% of Lexington's.
What form are Tulsa Roughnecks and Lexington in?
Over the last 5 games Tulsa Roughnecks have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Lexington 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Tulsa Roughnecks vs Lexington?
The statistical background for Tulsa Roughnecks vs Lexington — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


