United States - USL ChampionshipONEOK FieldData current as of 21 October 2026

Tulsa Roughnecks vs Oakland Roots: match statistics

Tulsa Roughnecks vs Oakland Roots: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Tulsa Roughnecks played Oakland Roots in USL Championship (United States). The match was played on 18 October 2026. Venue: ONEOK Field. Final score: 2:4.

Current form

Tulsa Roughnecks: 1-4-0, 1.40 points/match. Oakland Roots: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Tulsa Roughnecks scores 1.14 and concedes 0.89 goals per match. Oakland Roots scores 1.18 and concedes 1.25. League average: 2.70 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Tulsa Roughnecks 43%, Oakland Roots 54%. Over 2.5: Tulsa Roughnecks 29%, Oakland Roots 43%. League level: BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 49%.

xG, shots and style

Oakland Roots has higher xG: 1.35 vs 1.28. Tulsa Roughnecks: 10.5 shots per match, Oakland Roots: 11.1.

Match halves

Tulsa Roughnecks: half-time lead 39%, second-half goals 0.57. Oakland Roots: half-time lead 25%, second-half goals 0.64.

Goals by minute

Tulsa Roughnecks: 61-75 (7 goals). Oakland Roots: 76-90+ (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

USL Championship: 2.70 goals per match, BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 49%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 5 previous H2H matches were available: 1-2-2. Average goals 1.80, BTTS 60%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Tulsa Roughnecks sit 8th and have won 50% of their home matches, while 19th-placed Oakland Roots have won 31% of their away games. The hosts’ biggest advantage is their defensive strength: at home, they concede an average of 0.57 goals and keep a clean sheet in 57% of matches, whereas Oakland concede 1.31 goals away and keep 38% clean sheets. The visitors create slightly better attacking chances on the road, recording an xG of 1.35 compared with the hosts’ 1.26 at home, but they also allow opponents chances worth an xG of 1.65, versus 1.25 for Tulsa. Tulsa are unbeaten in their last five matches, although they have drawn four of them, while Oakland have won twice, increasing the likelihood of a closely contested game. However, the hosts’ stronger defence and better home record point to a Tulsa win, with a draw remaining a significant possibility.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

I’m backing BTTS - No, although the edge for this outcome is slight: both teams scored in 60% of Tulsa’s matches this season and 46% of Oakland’s. Over their last five games, however, those figures were 60% and just 20%, respectively, with each team conceding an average of 0.8 goals. Both sides scored 1.0 goal per game over that span, so neither offers a strong indication that they are certain to find the net. In addition, Tulsa failed to score in 33% of its matches this season, compared with 31% for Oakland, while the visitors kept a clean sheet in 38% of their games. Equal attacking xG averages of 1.35 point to chances at both ends, but recent finishing and defensive form slightly increase the likelihood that at least one team will fail to score.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The strongest signal points to Under 3.5 goals: 80% of Tulsa’s matches and 62% of Oakland’s finished below this line. In their last 5 games, both teams averaged 1.0 goals scored and 0.8 conceded, making for 1.8 goals per match and supporting a cautious forecast. The season averages for total goals in their matches are 2.33 and 2.54, respectively, both below the league average of 2.71. The hosts’ higher xG of 1.35, compared with the 1.65 xG from chances conceded by the visitors, gives Tulsa a chance to score, but does not outweigh the evidence against four goals in the match.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

A draw at half-time and full-time is the most likely outcome: Oakland were level at the break in 69% of their matches and kept a first-half clean sheet in four of their last five. Tulsa, however, have made stronger starts—leading at half-time in three of their last five matches—so a half-time lead for them remains a significant alternative. A draw at full-time is supported by the fact that Tulsa have drawn four of their last five matches, while the teams’ draw rates for the season are similar, at 40% and 38%. Oakland are more dangerous after the break, averaging 0.85 goals in the second half compared with Tulsa’s 0.47; Tulsa have failed to score after half-time in each of their last five matches. This visitors’ advantage increases the risk of an X/2 outcome, but with both teams averaging 1.8 goals per match across their last five appearances, X/X remains the strongest single pick.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 1
1st half
1 : 3
2nd half

Match statistics

53Possession (%)47
Tulsa RoughnecksOakland Roots
16Shots10
Tulsa RoughnecksOakland Roots
3Shots on target6
Tulsa RoughnecksOakland Roots
1.54xG1.38
Tulsa RoughnecksOakland Roots
4Corners2
Tulsa RoughnecksOakland Roots
45Dangerous attacks45
Tulsa RoughnecksOakland Roots
14Fouls19
Tulsa RoughnecksOakland Roots
0Cards0
Tulsa RoughnecksOakland Roots

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Tulsa RoughnecksOakland Roots
1.14Goals scored / match1.18
Tulsa RoughnecksOakland Roots
0.89Goals conceded / match1.25
Tulsa RoughnecksOakland Roots
44%Average possession54%
Tulsa RoughnecksOakland Roots
3.36Shots on target / match3.43
Tulsa RoughnecksOakland Roots

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10.54Shots per match11.14
Tulsa RoughnecksOakland Roots
3.36Shots on target3.43
Tulsa RoughnecksOakland Roots
10.8%Shot conversion10.6%
Tulsa RoughnecksOakland Roots
44%Possession54%
Tulsa RoughnecksOakland Roots
1.28xG for1.35
Tulsa RoughnecksOakland Roots
1.33xG against1.46
Tulsa RoughnecksOakland Roots

Shooting quality

Tulsa Roughnecks: BalancedOakland Roots: Balanced
Tulsa RoughnecksOakland Roots
Accuracy (shots on target)32%31%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.340.34

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Oakland Roots is 14% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / match - Tulsa Roughnecks · 1.6 pts / match - Oakland Roots

Tulsa Roughnecks
DDWDD
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
39% W36% D25% L
Season (W-D-L)
11-10-7
1.54 pts / match · goal difference +7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-4-0
1.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
7-4-3
Last 5 at home
3-1-1
WLWWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.26Opponent xG: 1.39BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 20%
Oakland Roots
LWWDD
Season result split
29% W39% D32% L
Season (W-D-L)
8-11-9
1.25 pts / match · goal difference -2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
4-5-4
Last 5 away
2-2-1
DLWWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.28Opponent xG: 1.61BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 40%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Tulsa Roughnecks is 40% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.89 goals / match - Tulsa Roughnecks · 1.25 goals / match - Oakland Roots

Tulsa Roughnecks scoring profile: strong

Tulsa Roughnecks scores in 68% of matches (19 of 28 matches), while Oakland Roots keeps a clean sheet in 29% (8 of 28 matches).

Oakland Roots scoring profile: strong

Oakland Roots scores in 68% of matches (19 of 28 matches), while Tulsa Roughnecks keeps a clean sheet in 43% (12 of 28 matches).

32Goals scored (season)33
Tulsa RoughnecksOakland Roots
25Goals conceded (season)35
Tulsa RoughnecksOakland Roots
2.04Average goals in match2.43
Tulsa RoughnecksOakland Roots
5Goals scored (last 5)5
Tulsa RoughnecksOakland Roots
4Goals conceded (last 5)4
Tulsa RoughnecksOakland Roots

How often they score at least...

68%1 goal68%
Tulsa RoughnecksOakland Roots
25%2 goals32%
Tulsa RoughnecksOakland Roots
11%3 goals11%
Tulsa RoughnecksOakland Roots
7%4 goals7%
Tulsa RoughnecksOakland Roots

How often they concede at least...

57%1 goal71%
Tulsa RoughnecksOakland Roots
21%2 goals36%
Tulsa RoughnecksOakland Roots
4%3 goals14%
Tulsa RoughnecksOakland Roots
4%4 goals4%
Tulsa RoughnecksOakland Roots

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

43%
Tulsa Roughnecks - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.12 of 28 matches
55%
League average

Goal patterns

11%BTTS at half-time18%
Tulsa RoughnecksOakland Roots
4%BTTS in both halves7%
Tulsa RoughnecksOakland Roots
18%Scored in both halves25%
Tulsa RoughnecksOakland Roots

BTTS and goal count

29%Min. 3 goals and BTTS39%
Tulsa RoughnecksOakland Roots
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS4%
Tulsa RoughnecksOakland Roots
60%BTTS - last 520%
Tulsa RoughnecksOakland Roots

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

61%Min. 1 goal before half-time64%
Tulsa RoughnecksOakland Roots
18%Min. 2 goals before half-time32%
Tulsa RoughnecksOakland Roots
4%Min. 3 goals before half-time4%
Tulsa RoughnecksOakland Roots

2nd half

64%Min. 1 goal after half-time75%
Tulsa RoughnecksOakland Roots
36%Min. 2 goals after half-time32%
Tulsa RoughnecksOakland Roots
11%Min. 3 goals after half-time14%
Tulsa RoughnecksOakland Roots

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Tulsa Roughnecks is 31% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.64 pts / match - Tulsa Roughnecks · 1.25 pts / match - Oakland Roots

Tulsa Roughnecks - half-time state
39% leading46% draw14% trailing
Oakland Roots - half-time state
25% leading50% draw25% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.64Points per match (1st half)1.25
Tulsa RoughnecksOakland Roots
0.57Goals scored (1st half)0.54
Tulsa RoughnecksOakland Roots
0.29Goals conceded (1st half)0.46
Tulsa RoughnecksOakland Roots
0.86Average goals (1st half)1
Tulsa RoughnecksOakland Roots
79%Clean sheet before half-time61%
Tulsa RoughnecksOakland Roots
50%No goal before half-time57%
Tulsa RoughnecksOakland Roots

After half-time (2nd half)

1.29Points per match (2nd half)1.32
Tulsa RoughnecksOakland Roots
0.57Goals scored (2nd half)0.64
Tulsa RoughnecksOakland Roots
0.61Goals conceded (2nd half)0.79
Tulsa RoughnecksOakland Roots
1.18Average goals (2nd half)1.43
Tulsa RoughnecksOakland Roots
54%Clean sheet after half-time54%
Tulsa RoughnecksOakland Roots
64%No goal after half-time50%
Tulsa RoughnecksOakland Roots

Tulsa Roughnecks - second-half results

29% W43% D29% L
46
Half-time points
16
Half-time goals
+8
Goal difference (1st half)
36
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.64
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 39% of matches and wins 39%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Oakland Roots - second-half results

32% W36% D32% L
35
Half-time points
15
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
37
Second-half points
-4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.25
PPG before half-time
Lead holding116%

Leads at half-time in 25% of matches and wins 29%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Tulsa Roughnecks - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.200.60
Goals scored / match1.00.0
Goals conceded / match0.20.6
Average goals in match1.20.6
1 goal80%40%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal20%100%
Goal difference+4-3
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 60% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 5
Oakland Roots - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.60
Goals scored / match0.40.6
Goals conceded / match0.20.6
Average goals in match0.61.2
1 goal40%60%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%80%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference+10
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Tulsa Roughnecks
ScoredConceded
6
2
0-15
4
4
16-30
6
2
31-45
6
6
46-60
7
4
61-75
3
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

Oakland Roots
ScoredConceded
4
7
0-15
6
3
16-30
5
3
31-45
7
4
46-60
3
7
61-75
8
11
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.23
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.2 : 1.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
83%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
49%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-19%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
46%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
10%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 10 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Tulsa Roughnecks

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.05
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.30
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-9.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.14
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.44
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
76%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
74%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.14
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
9% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 19% come in the first quarter-hour.
9%

Oakland Roots

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.11
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.04
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.17
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.21
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
98%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
83%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.35
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
24% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 12% come in the first quarter-hour.
24%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (USL Championship).

Teams vs league

Tulsa RoughnecksLigaOakland Roots
Average goals in match▼ 2.042.70▼ 2.43
Both teams scored▼ 43%55%• 54%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 29%49%▼ 43%
Clean sheets▲ 43%27%▲ 29%
Goal before half-time▼ 61%66%▼ 64%
Goal after half-time▼ 64%78%▼ 75%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.70
Average goals per match
55%
Both teams scored
49%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
27%
Clean sheets
1.50
Home goals / match
1.20
Away goals / match
+25%
Home attack advantage
+20%
Home defence advantage
+16%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
66%
1 goal
33%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
47%
2 goals
20%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Tulsa RoughnecksGoalLogan DorseyAssist: Owen Damm
  2. Oakland RootsGoalWolfgang PrenticeAssist: Peter Wilson
  3. Tulsa RoughnecksSubstitutionOn: Delentz PierreOff: Lamar Batista
  4. Tulsa RoughnecksGoalLogan DorseyAssist: William Wilson
  5. Oakland RootsGoalWolfgang PrenticeAssist: Bertin Jacquesson
  6. Tulsa RoughnecksSubstitutionOn: Remi CabralOff: Logan Dorsey
  7. Oakland RootsGoalPeter Wilson
  8. Tulsa RoughnecksSubstitutionOn: Marcos Vinicius SerratoOff: Owen Damm
  9. Oakland RootsGoalBertin Jacquesson

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (5): Tulsa Roughnecks 1 - 2 - 2 Oakland Roots. Average goals 1.80, both teams scored in 60% matches.

Oakland Roots
1 : 1
Tulsa Roughnecks
Oakland Roots SC
1 : 1
Tulsa Roughnecks FC
Tulsa Roughnecks FC
1 : 2
Oakland Roots SC
Oakland Roots
0 : 1
Tulsa Roughnecks
Tulsa Roughnecks
0 : 1
Oakland Roots

FAQ

What was the result of Tulsa Roughnecks vs Oakland Roots?

The USL Championship match finished Tulsa Roughnecks 2:4 Oakland Roots. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Tulsa Roughnecks and Oakland Roots?

In the last 5 head-to-head matches Tulsa Roughnecks won 1, Oakland Roots won 2 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 1.80 goals, with both teams scoring in 60% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Tulsa Roughnecks vs Oakland Roots?

Tulsa Roughnecks score 1.14 goals per game on average and Oakland Roots 1.18. The USL Championship average is 2.70 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 49% of games. Both teams score in 43% of Tulsa Roughnecks's matches and 54% of Oakland Roots's.

What form are Tulsa Roughnecks and Oakland Roots in?

Over the last 5 games Tulsa Roughnecks have a 1-4-0 record (1.40 points per game) and Oakland Roots 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Tulsa Roughnecks vs Oakland Roots?

The statistical background for Tulsa Roughnecks vs Oakland Roots — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.