Tunari vs CSM Reşiţa: match statistics
Tunari vs CSM Reşiţa: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Tunari play CSM Reşiţa in Liga II (Romania). The match date is 9 May 2026 at 10:00. Final score: 3:1.
Current form
Tunari: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match. CSM Reşiţa: 0-1-4, 0.20 points/match.
Goal statistics
Tunari scores 1.00 and concedes 1.64 goals per match. CSM Reşiţa scores 1.46 and concedes 1.39. League average: 2.71 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Tunari 64%, CSM Reşiţa 50%. Over 2.5: Tunari 50%, CSM Reşiţa 46%. League level: BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 49%.
xG, shots and style
CSM Reşiţa has higher xG: 1.78 vs 1.22. Tunari: 9.3 shots per match, CSM Reşiţa: 14.3.
Match halves
Tunari: half-time lead 14%, second-half goals 0.68. CSM Reşiţa: half-time lead 39%, second-half goals 0.54.
Goals by minute
Tunari: 76-90+ (12 goals). CSM Reşiţa: 16-30 (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Liga II: 2.71 goals per match, BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 49%.
Head-to-head
1 H2H matches: 0-0-1. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.
Match description
CSM Reşiţa holds a clear advantage in seasonal attacking metrics: 40 goals scored versus Tunari’s 25, and an away scoring rate of 1.25 goals per game compared to the home side’s 0.92. Visitors average 1.72 xG on the road, while Tunari register 1.4 xG at home and concede 2.05 xG, indicating greater defensive vulnerability for Tunari. Shot metrics reinforce CSM Reşiţa’s edge — 13.5 average shots and 4.92 on target per away match versus Tunari’s 10.31 and 3.69, with a similar conversion rate around 9%. In the short term Tunari show a better run (6 goals and 1.6 points per game in the last 5) versus 3 goals and 0.8 pts for CSM Reşiţa, but Tunari suffer 62% home defeats and only 8% clean sheets, weakening the home advantage. Considering the quality of created chances and the visitors’ more stable defense (1.5 goals conceded away vs 1.85 at home), I favor a CSM Reşiţa win and propose a probability split of 20%-25%-55% (home-draw-away).
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Tunari | CSM Reşiţa | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 34% | 36% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.32 | 0.28 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Tunari is 1000% better for: last-5 form.
2.2 pts / match - Tunari · 0.2 pts / match - CSM Reşiţa
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
CSM Reşiţa is 46% better for: goals scored per match.
1 goals / match - Tunari · 1.46 goals / match - CSM Reşiţa
CSM Reşiţa is 18% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.64 goals / match - Tunari · 1.39 goals / match - CSM Reşiţa
Tunari scores in 68% of matches (19 of 28 matches), while CSM Reşiţa keeps a clean sheet in 32% (9 of 28 matches).
CSM Reşiţa scores in 79% of matches (22 of 28 matches), while Tunari keeps a clean sheet in 7% (2 of 28 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Tunari
Over / Under — CSM Reşiţa
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
CSM Reşiţa is 91% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.86 pts / match - Tunari · 1.64 pts / match - CSM Reşiţa
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Tunari - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 14% of matches and wins 21%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
CSM Reşiţa - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 39% of matches and wins 43%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 1.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 0.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 1.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 100% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -6 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (12 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (14). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (9 goli). Concedes most in 61-75 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Tunari
CSM Reşiţa
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga II).
Teams vs league
| Tunari | Liga | CSM Reşiţa | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 2.64 | 2.71 | ▲ 2.86 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 64% | 49% | • 50% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | • 50% | 49% | ▼ 46% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 7% | 29% | ▲ 32% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 68% | 72% | ▲ 79% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 96% | 82% | ▼ 75% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Tunari 0 - 0 - 1 CSM Reşiţa. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Tunari vs CSM Reşiţa?
The Liga II match finished Tunari 3:1 CSM Reşiţa. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Tunari vs CSM Reşiţa?
Tunari score 1.00 goals per game on average and CSM Reşiţa 1.46. The Liga II average is 2.71 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 49% of games. Both teams score in 64% of Tunari's matches and 50% of CSM Reşiţa's.
What form are Tunari and CSM Reşiţa in?
Over the last 5 games Tunari have a 3-2-0 record (2.20 points per game) and CSM Reşiţa 0-1-4 (0.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Tunari vs CSM Reşiţa?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.