Romania - Liga IIData current as of 08 September 2026

Tunari vs CSM Reşiţa: match statistics

Tunari crest
Tunari
3 : 1half-time 0:1
CSM Reşiţa crest
CSM Reşiţa

Tunari vs CSM Reşiţa: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Tunari played CSM Reşiţa in Liga II (Romania). The match was played on 9 May 2026. Final score: 3:1.

Current form

Tunari: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. CSM Reşiţa: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Tunari scores 0.93 and concedes 1.67 goals per match. CSM Reşiţa scores 1.48 and concedes 1.33. League average: 2.69 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Tunari 63%, CSM Reşiţa 48%. Over 2.5: Tunari 48%, CSM Reşiţa 44%. League level: BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 49%.

xG, shots and style

CSM Reşiţa has higher xG: 1.78 vs 1.22. Tunari: 9.3 shots per match, CSM Reşiţa: 14.1.

Match halves

Tunari: half-time lead 15%, second-half goals 0.59. CSM Reşiţa: half-time lead 37%, second-half goals 0.56.

Goals by minute

Tunari: 76-90+ (10 goals). CSM Reşiţa: 16-30 (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Liga II: 2.69 goals per match, BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 49%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

CSM Reşiţa holds a clear advantage in seasonal attacking metrics: 40 goals scored versus Tunari’s 25, and an away scoring rate of 1.25 goals per game compared to the home side’s 0.92. Visitors average 1.72 xG on the road, while Tunari register 1.4 xG at home and concede 2.05 xG, indicating greater defensive vulnerability for Tunari. Shot metrics reinforce CSM Reşiţa’s edge — 13.5 average shots and 4.92 on target per away match versus Tunari’s 10.31 and 3.69, with a similar conversion rate around 9%. In the short term Tunari show a better run (6 goals and 1.6 points per game in the last 5) versus 3 goals and 0.8 pts for CSM Reşiţa, but Tunari suffer 62% home defeats and only 8% clean sheets, weakening the home advantage. Considering the quality of created chances and the visitors’ more stable defense (1.5 goals conceded away vs 1.85 at home), I favor a CSM Reşiţa win and propose a probability split of 20%-25%-55% (home-draw-away).

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Tunari and CSM Reşiţa average 1.67 and 1.25 goals scored per match this season while conceding 1.2 and 1.5 respectively, indicating both teams tend to score and concede. xG reinforces this: Tunari 1.83 xG vs 1.23 xG against, CSM 1.72 xG vs 1.54 xG against — both sides create chances and are vulnerable defensively. In the last 5 matches Tunari had BTTS in 80% (4/5) and conceded on average 1.6 goals, whereas CSM recorded BTTS in 40% (2/5) and scored on average 0.6 goals, which supports a Goal/Goal scenario. Season BTTS rates are 40% for Tunari and 58% for CSM against a league average of 49%; additionally, shots on target 5.47 vs 4.92 and conversion 12% vs 9% favor the hosts having sufficient quality to force a response. Consequently I back BTTS - Yes with a probability of 64% versus 36% for No.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Based on xG I expect about 1.69 goals for Tunari (xG for 1.83 vs xG conceded by CSM Reşiţa 1.54) and 1.48 for CSM Reşiţa (away xG 1.72 vs xG conceded by hosts 1.23), i.e. ~3.17 goals total. With lambda=3.17 the Poisson distribution gives ~83% chance for Over 1.5 goals, ~61% for Over 2.5 and ~39% for Over 3.5; this aligns with seasonal Over 1.5 rates (Tunari 80%, CSM Reşiţa 83%) and high Over 0.5 (100% vs 92%). Additionally, in the last 5 matches Tunari have conceded/produced 14 goals total (avg 2.8), and Reşiţa 10 goals (avg 2.0), which supports an expectation of more than 1–2 goals. The strongest signal is Over 1.5 (estimated 83%), therefore I recommend playing the over at the 1.5 line.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Tunari holds a statistical edge: average goals per game 1.67 versus 1.25 for CSM Reşiţa and higher xG 1.83 vs 1.72, while the home side’s shot conversion rate of 12% compared to the visitors’ 9% increases the likelihood of chances being turned into goals. At Half-Time Tunari scores on average 1.07 goals and led at the break in 6 matches (40%), whereas CSM Reşiţa averages 0.75 goals by Half-Time and led only in 33% of matches, which strongly supports the hosts having the lead at the break. 87% of Tunari’s matches featured over 0.5 goals in the first half, and in the second half CSM Reşiţa concedes on average 1.0 goal versus only 0.6 conceded by Tunari, so the hosts have a greater chance of maintaining or extending a lead. Seasonal win rates—53% for the home side versus 33% for the visitors—and average points gained by Half-Time 1.6 for Tunari vs 1.58 for CSM Reşiţa confirm the 1/1 scenario as the strongest HT/FT signal.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
3 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

45Possession (%)55
TunariCSM Reşiţa
8Shots19
TunariCSM Reşiţa
4Shots on target2
TunariCSM Reşiţa
1.12xG1.9
TunariCSM Reşiţa
2Corners11
TunariCSM Reşiţa
45Dangerous attacks78
TunariCSM Reşiţa
9Fouls9
TunariCSM Reşiţa
0Cards0
TunariCSM Reşiţa

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

TunariCSM Reşiţa
0.93Goals scored / match1.48
TunariCSM Reşiţa
1.67Goals conceded / match1.33
TunariCSM Reşiţa
48%Average possession53%
TunariCSM Reşiţa
3.11Shots on target / match5.26
TunariCSM Reşiţa

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

9.3Shots per match14.11
TunariCSM Reşiţa
3.11Shots on target5.26
TunariCSM Reşiţa
10%Shot conversion10.5%
TunariCSM Reşiţa
48%Possession53%
TunariCSM Reşiţa
1.22xG for1.78
TunariCSM Reşiţa
1.88xG against1.37
TunariCSM Reşiţa

Shooting quality

Tunari: BalancedCSM Reşiţa: Attacking
TunariCSM Reşiţa
Accuracy (shots on target)33%37%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.300.28

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Tunari is 100% better for: last-5 form.

1.6 pts / match - Tunari · 0.8 pts / match - CSM Reşiţa

Tunari
LDWWD
Season result split
19% W33% R48% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-9-13
0.89 pts / match · goal difference -20
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-2-8
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
LWDLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.34Opponent xG: 1.95BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%
CSM Reşiţa
WDLLL
Season result split
44% W15% R41% P
Season (W-D-L)
12-4-11
1.48 pts / match · goal difference +4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
4-4-4
Last 5 away
1-2-2
WLDDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.53Opponent xG: 1.34BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

CSM Reşiţa is 59% better for: goals scored per match.

0.93 goals / match - Tunari · 1.48 goals / match - CSM Reşiţa

CSM Reşiţa is 26% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.67 goals / match - Tunari · 1.33 goals / match - CSM Reşiţa

Tunari scoring profile: strong

Tunari scores in 67% of matches (18 of 27 matches), while CSM Reşiţa keeps a clean sheet in 33% (9 of 27 matches).

CSM Reşiţa scoring profile: very strong

CSM Reşiţa scores in 78% of matches (21 of 27 matches), while Tunari keeps a clean sheet in 7% (2 of 27 matches).

25Goals scored (season)40
TunariCSM Reşiţa
45Goals conceded (season)36
TunariCSM Reşiţa
2.59Average goals in match2.81
TunariCSM Reşiţa
6Goals scored (last 5)3
TunariCSM Reşiţa
8Goals conceded (last 5)7
TunariCSM Reşiţa

How often they score at least...

67%1 goal78%
TunariCSM Reşiţa
22%2 goals44%
TunariCSM Reşiţa
4%3 goals11%
TunariCSM Reşiţa
0%4 goals4%
TunariCSM Reşiţa

How often they concede at least...

93%1 goal67%
TunariCSM Reşiţa
44%2 goals41%
TunariCSM Reşiţa
22%3 goals19%
TunariCSM Reşiţa
7%4 goals4%
TunariCSM Reşiţa

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

49%
League average

Goal patterns

11%BTTS at half-time33%
TunariCSM Reşiţa
4%BTTS in both halves11%
TunariCSM Reşiţa
11%Scored in both halves26%
TunariCSM Reşiţa

BTTS and goal count

37%Min. 3 goals and BTTS37%
TunariCSM Reşiţa
11%Min. 3 goals without BTTS7%
TunariCSM Reşiţa
80%BTTS - last 540%
TunariCSM Reşiţa

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

67%Min. 1 goal before half-time78%
TunariCSM Reşiţa
33%Min. 2 goals before half-time44%
TunariCSM Reşiţa
4%Min. 3 goals before half-time15%
TunariCSM Reşiţa

2nd half

96%Min. 1 goal after half-time74%
TunariCSM Reşiţa
33%Min. 2 goals after half-time37%
TunariCSM Reşiţa
19%Min. 3 goals after half-time15%
TunariCSM Reşiţa

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

CSM Reşiţa is 79% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.89 pts / match - Tunari · 1.59 pts / match - CSM Reşiţa

Tunari - half-time state
15% leading44% draw41% trailing
CSM Reşiţa - half-time state
37% leading48% draw15% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.89Points per match (1st half)1.59
TunariCSM Reşiţa
0.33Goals scored (1st half)0.93
TunariCSM Reşiţa
0.7Goals conceded (1st half)0.56
TunariCSM Reşiţa
1.04Average goals (1st half)1.48
TunariCSM Reşiţa
48%Clean sheet before half-time56%
TunariCSM Reşiţa
74%No goal before half-time33%
TunariCSM Reşiţa

After half-time (2nd half)

1.19Points per match (2nd half)1.19
TunariCSM Reşiţa
0.59Goals scored (2nd half)0.56
TunariCSM Reşiţa
0.96Goals conceded (2nd half)0.78
TunariCSM Reşiţa
1.56Average goals (2nd half)1.33
TunariCSM Reşiţa
33%Clean sheet after half-time52%
TunariCSM Reşiţa
48%No goal after half-time63%
TunariCSM Reşiţa

Tunari - second-half results

33% W19% R48% P
24
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
-10
Goal difference (1st half)
32
Second-half points
-10
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.89
PPG before half-time
Lead holding127%

Leads at half-time in 15% of matches and wins 19%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

CSM Reşiţa - second-half results

30% W30% R41% P
43
Half-time points
25
Half-time goals
+10
Goal difference (1st half)
32
Second-half points
-6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.59
PPG before half-time
Lead holding119%

Leads at half-time in 37% of matches and wins 44%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Tunari - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.601.20
Goals scored / match0.60.6
Goals conceded / match0.61.0
Average goals in match1.21.6
1 goal80%100%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference0-2
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 0% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3
CSM Reşiţa - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.400.60
Goals scored / match0.60.0
Goals conceded / match0.80.6
Average goals in match1.40.6
1 goal100%40%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal40%100%
Goal difference-1-3
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 60% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Tunari
ScoredConceded
3
1
0-15
5
8
16-30
1
10
31-45
2
5
46-60
4
7
61-75
10
14
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (14). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

CSM Reşiţa
ScoredConceded
7
8
0-15
9
3
16-30
9
4
31-45
3
6
46-60
5
8
61-75
7
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (9 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.71
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.1 : 1.6
Estimated goal split
home : away
101%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
56%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-63%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
52%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
7%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 14 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Tunari

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.66
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.08
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+4.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.29
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.21
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
61%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
144%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.71
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
40% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 12% come in the first quarter-hour.
40%

CSM Reşiţa

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.41
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.26
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.30
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.04
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
128%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
87%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.68
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.4
Late goals
18% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 18% come in the first quarter-hour.
18%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga II).

Teams vs league

TunariLigaCSM Reşiţa
Average goals in match 2.592.69 2.81
Both teams scored 63%49% 48%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 48%49% 44%
Clean sheets 7%29% 33%
Goal before half-time 67%72% 78%
Goal after half-time 96%82% 74%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.69
Average goals per match
49%
Both teams scored
49%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
29%
Clean sheets
1.53
Home goals / match
1.16
Away goals / match
+32%
Home attack advantage
+24%
Home defence advantage
+13%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
72%
1 goal
33%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
82%
1 goal
41%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Away team

Other recorded players

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. CSM ReşiţaGoalNicu Modan

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Tunari 0 - 0 - 1 CSM Reşiţa. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

Tunari
0 : 1
CSM Reşiţa

FAQ

What was the result of Tunari vs CSM Reşiţa?

The Liga II match finished Tunari 3:1 CSM Reşiţa. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Tunari vs CSM Reşiţa?

Tunari score 0.93 goals per game on average and CSM Reşiţa 1.48. The Liga II average is 2.69 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 49% of games. Both teams score in 63% of Tunari's matches and 48% of CSM Reşiţa's.

What form are Tunari and CSM Reşiţa in?

Over the last 5 games Tunari have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and CSM Reşiţa 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Tunari vs CSM Reşiţa?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.