Kenya - Kenyan Premier LeagueData current as of 23 July 2026

Tusker vs Bandari: match statistics

Tusker crest
Tusker
1 : 2half-time 0:0
Bandari crest
Bandari
155%(2.45)
X30%(2.63)
215%(3.21)

Tusker has displayed significantly better form over their last five matches, averaging 2.4 points per match with four victories, compared to Bandari's 1.2 points per match. The hosts hold a clear advantage in offensive efficiency, scoring an average of 0.71 goals per home match against Bandari's mere 0.25 goals on the road. xG statistics also favor Tusker (0.85 vs 0.58), indicating superior quality in chance creation. Bandari has not recorded a single away win this season, drawing 75% of their matches, which confirms their defensive setup. Although the hosts have a weaker home record compared to their overall form, their recent run of four wins and just one loss in five matches gives them a tangible edge. Considering all factors, I expect a victory for Tusker, though Bandari's defensive approach could make for a tight contest.

Tusker vs Bandari: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Tusker play Bandari in Kenyan Premier League (Kenya). The match date is 16 January 2026 at 13:00. Final score: 1:2.

Current form

Tusker: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Bandari: 1-4-0, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Tusker scores 0.83 and concedes 0.93 goals per match. Bandari scores 0.76 and concedes 0.66. League average: 2.01 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Tusker 34%, Bandari 38%. Over 2.5: Tusker 28%, Bandari 17%. League level: BTTS 43%, Over 2.5 33%.

xG, shots and style

Tusker has higher xG: 1.42 vs 1.37. Tusker: 10.9 shots per match, Bandari: 9.4.

Match halves

Tusker: half-time lead 14%, second-half goals 0.21. Bandari: half-time lead 10%, second-half goals 0.17.

Goals by minute

Tusker: 0-15 (14 goals). Bandari: 0-15 (12 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Kenyan Premier League: 2.01 goals per match, BTTS 43%, Over 2.5 33%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Match description

Tusker has displayed significantly better form over their last five matches, averaging 2.4 points per match with four victories, compared to Bandari's 1.2 points per match. The hosts hold a clear advantage in offensive efficiency, scoring an average of 0.71 goals per home match against Bandari's mere 0.25 goals on the road. xG statistics also favor Tusker (0.85 vs 0.58), indicating superior quality in chance creation. Bandari has not recorded a single away win this season, drawing 75% of their matches, which confirms their defensive setup. Although the hosts have a weaker home record compared to their overall form, their recent run of four wins and just one loss in five matches gives them a tangible edge. Considering all factors, I expect a victory for Tusker, though Bandari's defensive approach could make for a tight contest.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

51Possession (%)49
TuskerBandari
11Shots10
TuskerBandari
5Shots on target3
TuskerBandari
1.86xG1.56
TuskerBandari
3Corners2
TuskerBandari
114Dangerous attacks101
TuskerBandari
-1Fouls-1
TuskerBandari
-1Cards-1
TuskerBandari

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

0.83Goals scored / match0.76
TuskerBandari
0.93Goals conceded / match0.66
TuskerBandari
51%Average possession50%
TuskerBandari
3.79Shots on target / match3.28
TuskerBandari

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10.93Shots per match9.38
TuskerBandari
3.79Shots on target3.28
TuskerBandari
7.6%Shot conversion8.1%
TuskerBandari
51%Possession50%
TuskerBandari
1.42xG for1.37
TuskerBandari
1.4xG against1.52
TuskerBandari

Shooting quality

Tusker: BalancedBandari: Balanced
TuskerBandari
Accuracy (shots on target)35%35%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.15
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.220.23

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Bandari is 75% better for: last-5 form.

0.8 pts / match - Tusker · 1.4 pts / match - Bandari

Tusker
LWLDL
Season result split
41% W17% R41% P
Season (W-D-L)
12-5-12
1.41 pts / match · goal difference -3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-4-5
Last 5 at home
3-2-0
DWWWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.2Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.11Opponent xG: 1.54BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 0%
Bandari
DWDDD
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
28% W55% R17% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-16-5
1.38 pts / match · goal difference +3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-4-0
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-9-4
Last 5 away
1-3-1
LWDDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 0.4xG: 1.51Opponent xG: 1.61BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 0%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Tusker is 9% better for: goals scored per match.

0.83 goals / match - Tusker · 0.76 goals / match - Bandari

Bandari is 41% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.93 goals / match - Tusker · 0.66 goals / match - Bandari

Tusker scoring profile: mixed

Tusker scores in 66% of matches (19 of 29 matches), while Bandari keeps a clean sheet in 48% (14 of 29 matches).

Bandari scoring profile: mixed

Bandari scores in 52% of matches (15 of 29 matches), while Tusker keeps a clean sheet in 38% (11 of 29 matches).

24Goals scored (season)22
TuskerBandari
27Goals conceded (season)19
TuskerBandari
1.76Average goals in match1.41
TuskerBandari
1Goals scored (last 5)3
TuskerBandari
3Goals conceded (last 5)2
TuskerBandari

How often they score at least...

66%1 goal52%
TuskerBandari
17%2 goals17%
TuskerBandari
0%3 goals7%
TuskerBandari
0%4 goals0%
TuskerBandari

How often they concede at least...

62%1 goal52%
TuskerBandari
21%2 goals10%
TuskerBandari
7%3 goals3%
TuskerBandari
3%4 goals0%
TuskerBandari

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

3%BTTS at half-time7%
TuskerBandari
0%BTTS in both halves0%
TuskerBandari
3%Scored in both halves3%
TuskerBandari

BTTS and goal count

24%Min. 3 goals and BTTS17%
TuskerBandari
3%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
TuskerBandari
0%BTTS - last 540%
TuskerBandari

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

31%Min. 1 goal before half-time17%
TuskerBandari
10%Min. 2 goals before half-time10%
TuskerBandari
3%Min. 3 goals before half-time3%
TuskerBandari

2nd half

21%Min. 1 goal after half-time24%
TuskerBandari
7%Min. 2 goals after half-time10%
TuskerBandari
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time3%
TuskerBandari

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Bandari is 6% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.1 pts / match - Tusker · 1.17 pts / match - Bandari

Tusker - half-time state
14% leading69% draw17% trailing
Bandari - half-time state
10% leading86% draw3% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.1Points per match (1st half)1.17
TuskerBandari
0.17Goals scored (1st half)0.21
TuskerBandari
0.28Goals conceded (1st half)0.1
TuskerBandari
0.45Average goals (1st half)0.31
TuskerBandari
83%Clean sheet before half-time90%
TuskerBandari
83%No goal before half-time86%
TuskerBandari

After half-time (2nd half)

1.28Points per match (2nd half)1.1
TuskerBandari
0.21Goals scored (2nd half)0.17
TuskerBandari
0.07Goals conceded (2nd half)0.21
TuskerBandari
0.28Average goals (2nd half)0.38
TuskerBandari
93%Clean sheet after half-time83%
TuskerBandari
79%No goal after half-time86%
TuskerBandari

Tusker - second-half results

14% W86% R0% P
32
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
37
Second-half points
+4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.10
PPG before half-time
Lead holding293%

Leads at half-time in 14% of matches and wins 41%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.2

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Bandari - second-half results

10% W79% R10% P
34
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
32
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.17
PPG before half-time
Lead holding280%

Leads at half-time in 10% of matches and wins 28%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Tusker - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.00
Goals scored / match0.00.0
Goals conceded / match0.00.0
Average goals in match0.00.0
1 goal0%0%
2 goals0%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet100%100%
No goal100%100%
Goal difference00
Half-time: 0% leading - 100% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 100% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0
Bandari - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.00
Goals scored / match0.00.0
Goals conceded / match0.00.0
Average goals in match0.00.0
1 goal0%0%
2 goals0%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet100%100%
No goal100%100%
Goal difference00
Half-time: 0% leading - 100% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 100% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Tusker
ScoredConceded
14
20
0-15
1
4
16-30
2
1
31-45
1
0
46-60
1
0
61-75
5
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (14 goli). Concedes most in 0-15 (20). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

Bandari
ScoredConceded
12
12
0-15
3
0
16-30
2
1
31-45
1
2
46-60
0
2
61-75
4
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (12 goli). Concedes most in 0-15 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.59
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.7 : 0.8
Estimated goal split
home : away
79%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
36%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
34%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
16%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 6 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Tusker

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.02
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.12
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+2.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.59
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.47
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
81%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
94%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.61
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.0
Late goals
21% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 58% come in the first quarter-hour.
21%

Bandari

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.15
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.25
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-9.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.61
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.86
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
77%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
65%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.02
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.0
Late goals
18% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 55% come in the first quarter-hour.
18%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Kenyan Premier League).

Teams vs league

TuskerLigaBandari
Average goals in match 1.762.01 1.41
Both teams scored 34%43% 38%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 28%33% 17%
Clean sheets 38%36% 48%
Goal before half-time 31%21% 17%
Goal after half-time 21%22% 24%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.01
Average goals per match
43%
Both teams scored
33%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
36%
Clean sheets
1.02
Home goals / match
0.99
Away goals / match
+3%
Home attack advantage
+3%
Home defence advantage
+-2%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
21%
1 goal
8%
2 goals
2%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
22%
1 goal
11%
2 goals
2%
3 goals
0%
4 goals

FAQ

What was the result of Tusker vs Bandari?

The Kenyan Premier League match finished Tusker 1:2 Bandari. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Tusker vs Bandari?

Tusker score 0.83 goals per game on average and Bandari 0.76. The Kenyan Premier League average is 2.01 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 33% of games. Both teams score in 34% of Tusker's matches and 38% of Bandari's.

What form are Tusker and Bandari in?

Over the last 5 games Tusker have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Bandari 1-4-0 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Tusker vs Bandari?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Tusker vs Bandari: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.