Kenya - Kenyan Premier LeagueData current as of 06 September 2026

Tusker vs Leopards: match statistics

Tusker crest
Tusker
0 : 4half-time 0:0
Leopards crest
Leopards
130%(0.00)
X35%(0.00)
235%(0.00)

Leopards are showing significantly better form and stability this season. The visitors possess an impressive away record with 43% wins and just 14% losses, while Tusker only wins 29% of home games and loses 43%. Form over the last five matches also favors Leopards – the team has earned 2.2 points per match and remains unbeaten (3W-2D-0L), whereas Tusker, despite a good overall run, has a weaker streak at home (29% CS, negative goal difference -2). Leopards are further characterized by a better away defense (0.86 goals conceded per match vs 1.0 for Tusker at home) and higher offensive efficiency (1.0 goals scored per match away). Considering all statistics, Leopards are the favorites for this match, although the high percentage of draws in their away games (43%) makes a sharing of points very likely as well.

Tusker vs Leopards: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Tusker played Leopards in Kenyan Premier League (Kenya). The match was played on 10 January 2026. Final score: 0:4.

Current form

Tusker: 4-0-1, 2.40 points/match. Leopards: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Tusker scores 0.87 and concedes 0.73 goals per match. Leopards scores 1.07 and concedes 0.67. League average: 1.92 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Tusker 33%, Leopards 40%. Over 2.5: Tusker 20%, Leopards 27%. League level: BTTS 41%, Over 2.5 30%.

xG, shots and style

Tusker has higher xG: 1.55 vs 1.28. Tusker: 12.3 shots per match, Leopards: 7.9.

Match halves

Tusker: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 0.40. Leopards: half-time lead 7%, second-half goals 0.47.

Goals by minute

Tusker: 76-90+ (5 goals). Leopards: 0-15 (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Kenyan Premier League: 1.92 goals per match, BTTS 41%, Over 2.5 30%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Leopards are showing significantly better form and stability this season. The visitors possess an impressive away record with 43% wins and just 14% losses, while Tusker only wins 29% of home games and loses 43%. Form over the last five matches also favors Leopards – the team has earned 2.2 points per match and remains unbeaten (3W-2D-0L), whereas Tusker, despite a good overall run, has a weaker streak at home (29% CS, negative goal difference -2). Leopards are further characterized by a better away defense (0.86 goals conceded per match vs 1.0 for Tusker at home) and higher offensive efficiency (1.0 goals scored per match away). Considering all statistics, Leopards are the favorites for this match, although the high percentage of draws in their away games (43%) makes a sharing of points very likely as well.

View the statistical overview

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

56Possession (%)44
TuskerLeopards
7Shots6
TuskerLeopards
1Shots on target4
TuskerLeopards
0.99xG1.01
TuskerLeopards
6Corners2
TuskerLeopards
67Dangerous attacks48
TuskerLeopards
-1Fouls-1
TuskerLeopards
-1Cards-1
TuskerLeopards

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

0.87Goals scored / match1.07
TuskerLeopards
0.73Goals conceded / match0.67
TuskerLeopards
50%Average possession48%
TuskerLeopards
4.27Shots on target / match2.47
TuskerLeopards

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12.27Shots per match7.93
TuskerLeopards
4.27Shots on target2.47
TuskerLeopards
7.1%Shot conversion13.4%
TuskerLeopards
50%Possession48%
TuskerLeopards
1.55xG for1.28
TuskerLeopards
1.48xG against1.24
TuskerLeopards

Shooting quality

Tusker: BalancedLeopards: Efficient finishing
TuskerLeopards
Accuracy (shots on target)35%31%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.16
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.200.43

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Tusker is 20% better for: last-5 form.

2.4 pts / match - Tusker · 2 pts / match - Leopards

Tusker
WWWLW
Season result split
47% W20% R33% P
Season (W-D-L)
7-3-5
1.60 pts / match · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-0-1
2.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-2-3
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
DWLWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 0.2xG: 1.30Opponent xG: 1.38BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 0%
Leopards
WLDWW
Season result split
47% W40% R13% P
Season (W-D-L)
7-6-2
1.80 pts / match · goal difference +6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
4-3-1
Last 5 away
2-2-1
LDWDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 0.4xG: 1.02Opponent xG: 1.23BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Leopards is 23% better for: goals scored per match.

0.87 goals / match - Tusker · 1.07 goals / match - Leopards

Leopards is 9% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.73 goals / match - Tusker · 0.67 goals / match - Leopards

Tusker scoring profile: strong

Tusker scores in 73% of matches (11 of 15 matches), while Leopards keeps a clean sheet in 47% (7 of 15 matches).

Leopards scoring profile: mixed

Leopards scores in 67% of matches (10 of 15 matches), while Tusker keeps a clean sheet in 47% (7 of 15 matches).

13Goals scored (season)16
TuskerLeopards
11Goals conceded (season)10
TuskerLeopards
1.6Average goals in match1.73
TuskerLeopards
5Goals scored (last 5)4
TuskerLeopards
1Goals conceded (last 5)2
TuskerLeopards

How often they score at least...

73%1 goal67%
TuskerLeopards
13%2 goals40%
TuskerLeopards
0%3 goals0%
TuskerLeopards
0%4 goals0%
TuskerLeopards

How often they concede at least...

53%1 goal53%
TuskerLeopards
20%2 goals13%
TuskerLeopards
0%3 goals0%
TuskerLeopards
0%4 goals0%
TuskerLeopards

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

7%BTTS at half-time13%
TuskerLeopards
0%BTTS in both halves7%
TuskerLeopards
7%Scored in both halves13%
TuskerLeopards

BTTS and goal count

20%Min. 3 goals and BTTS27%
TuskerLeopards
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
TuskerLeopards
0%BTTS - last 520%
TuskerLeopards

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

53%Min. 1 goal before half-time33%
TuskerLeopards
20%Min. 2 goals before half-time13%
TuskerLeopards
7%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
TuskerLeopards

2nd half

40%Min. 1 goal after half-time40%
TuskerLeopards
13%Min. 2 goals after half-time33%
TuskerLeopards
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
TuskerLeopards

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Tusker is 7% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.07 pts / match - Tusker · 1 pts / match - Leopards

Tusker - half-time state
20% leading47% draw33% trailing
Leopards - half-time state
7% leading80% draw13% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.07Points per match (1st half)1
TuskerLeopards
0.27Goals scored (1st half)0.2
TuskerLeopards
0.53Goals conceded (1st half)0.27
TuskerLeopards
0.8Average goals (1st half)0.47
TuskerLeopards
67%Clean sheet before half-time73%
TuskerLeopards
73%No goal before half-time80%
TuskerLeopards

After half-time (2nd half)

1.53Points per match (2nd half)1.33
TuskerLeopards
0.4Goals scored (2nd half)0.47
TuskerLeopards
0.13Goals conceded (2nd half)0.27
TuskerLeopards
0.53Average goals (2nd half)0.73
TuskerLeopards
87%Clean sheet after half-time80%
TuskerLeopards
60%No goal after half-time67%
TuskerLeopards

Tusker - second-half results

27% W73% R0% P
16
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
-4
Goal difference (1st half)
23
Second-half points
+4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.07
PPG before half-time
Lead holding235%

Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 47%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.4

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Leopards - second-half results

20% W73% R7% P
15
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
20
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding671%

Leads at half-time in 7% of matches and wins 47%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Tusker - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.40
Goals scored / match0.20.2
Goals conceded / match0.00.0
Average goals in match0.20.2
1 goal20%20%
2 goals0%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet100%100%
No goal80%80%
Goal difference+1+1
Half-time: 20% leading - 80% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 80% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1
Leopards - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.00
Goals scored / match0.00.0
Goals conceded / match0.00.0
Average goals in match0.00.0
1 goal0%0%
2 goals0%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet100%100%
No goal100%100%
Goal difference00
Half-time: 0% leading - 100% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 100% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Tusker
ScoredConceded
4
4
0-15
0
4
16-30
2
1
31-45
1
0
46-60
1
0
61-75
5
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

Leopards
ScoredConceded
7
5
0-15
2
0
16-30
0
1
31-45
2
1
46-60
3
0
61-75
2
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (7 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.67
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.8 : 0.9
Estimated goal split
home : away
87%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
37%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
49%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
9%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 11 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Tusker

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.07
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.07
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.68
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.75
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
97%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
72%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.80
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
38% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 31% come in the first quarter-hour.
38%

Leopards

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.04
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.36
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.21
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.57
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
105%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
74%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.20
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
13% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 44% come in the first quarter-hour.
13%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Kenyan Premier League).

Teams vs league

TuskerLigaLeopards
Average goals in match 1.601.92 1.73
Both teams scored 33%41% 40%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 20%30% 27%
Clean sheets 47%37% 47%
Goal before half-time 53%34% 33%
Goal after half-time 40%36% 40%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

1.92
Average goals per match
41%
Both teams scored
30%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
37%
Clean sheets
0.90
Home goals / match
1.02
Away goals / match
+-12%
Home attack advantage
+-13%
Home defence advantage
+-12%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
34%
1 goal
13%
2 goals
3%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
36%
1 goal
18%
2 goals
3%
3 goals
1%
4 goals

FAQ

What was the result of Tusker vs Leopards?

The Kenyan Premier League match finished Tusker 0:4 Leopards. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Tusker vs Leopards?

Tusker score 0.87 goals per game on average and Leopards 1.07. The Kenyan Premier League average is 1.92 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 30% of games. Both teams score in 33% of Tusker's matches and 40% of Leopards's.

What form are Tusker and Leopards in?

Over the last 5 games Tusker have a 4-0-1 record (2.40 points per game) and Leopards 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Tusker vs Leopards?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.