Kenya - Kenyan Premier LeagueData current as of 06 September 2026

Tusker vs Posta Rangers: match statistics

Tusker crest
Tusker
1 : 1half-time 0:0
Posta Rangers crest
Posta Rangers
155%(0.00)
X30%(0.00)
215%(0.00)

Tusker is exhibiting clearly superior form over the last five fixtures, securing 2.4 points per match with four victories, whereas Posta Rangers manages only 1.6 points per match. The hosts hold an advantage in offensive efficiency at home, averaging 4.57 shots on target per match compared to just 2.67 for the visitors on the road. Posta Rangers faces severe attacking struggles away, failing to score in 67% of away games, which, combined with a -7 away goal difference, places them in a precarious position. Furthermore, the visitors concede an average of 1.33 goals per away match; this, coupled with a lower xG (0.7 vs 0.85 for the hosts), points to a Tusker advantage. Despite the hosts having a weaker home record than anticipated, their current momentum and offensive metrics favor a home victory in this encounter.

Tusker vs Posta Rangers: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Tusker played Posta Rangers in Kenyan Premier League (Kenya). The match was played on 24 January 2026. Final score: 1:1.

Current form

Tusker: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match. Posta Rangers: 0-3-2, 0.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Tusker scores 0.89 and concedes 1.00 goals per match. Posta Rangers scores 0.89 and concedes 1.17. League average: 1.98 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Tusker 39%, Posta Rangers 44%. Over 2.5: Tusker 33%, Posta Rangers 39%. League level: BTTS 43%, Over 2.5 32%.

xG, shots and style

Tusker has higher xG: 1.49 vs 1.30. Tusker: 11.6 shots per match, Posta Rangers: 9.4.

Match halves

Tusker: half-time lead 17%, second-half goals 0.33. Posta Rangers: half-time lead 22%, second-half goals 0.22.

Goals by minute

Tusker: 0-15 (7 goals). Posta Rangers: 0-15 (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Kenyan Premier League: 1.98 goals per match, BTTS 43%, Over 2.5 32%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Tusker is exhibiting clearly superior form over the last five fixtures, securing 2.4 points per match with four victories, whereas Posta Rangers manages only 1.6 points per match. The hosts hold an advantage in offensive efficiency at home, averaging 4.57 shots on target per match compared to just 2.67 for the visitors on the road. Posta Rangers faces severe attacking struggles away, failing to score in 67% of away games, which, combined with a -7 away goal difference, places them in a precarious position. Furthermore, the visitors concede an average of 1.33 goals per away match; this, coupled with a lower xG (0.7 vs 0.85 for the hosts), points to a Tusker advantage. Despite the hosts having a weaker home record than anticipated, their current momentum and offensive metrics favor a home victory in this encounter.

View the statistical overview

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

53Possession (%)47
TuskerPosta Rangers
18Shots6
TuskerPosta Rangers
5Shots on target5
TuskerPosta Rangers
2.05xG1.15
TuskerPosta Rangers
2Corners2
TuskerPosta Rangers
78Dangerous attacks56
TuskerPosta Rangers
-1Fouls-1
TuskerPosta Rangers
-1Cards-1
TuskerPosta Rangers

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

TuskerPosta Rangers
0.89Goals scored / match0.89
TuskerPosta Rangers
1Goals conceded / match1.17
TuskerPosta Rangers
50%Average possession48%
TuskerPosta Rangers
4Shots on target / match3.28
TuskerPosta Rangers

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.56Shots per match9.39
TuskerPosta Rangers
4Shots on target3.28
TuskerPosta Rangers
7.7%Shot conversion9.5%
TuskerPosta Rangers
50%Possession48%
TuskerPosta Rangers
1.49xG for1.3
TuskerPosta Rangers
1.43xG against1.64
TuskerPosta Rangers

Shooting quality

Tusker: BalancedPosta Rangers: Balanced
TuskerPosta Rangers
Accuracy (shots on target)35%35%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.14
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.220.27

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Tusker is 100% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / match - Tusker · 0.6 pts / match - Posta Rangers

Tusker
LWLLW
Season result split
44% W17% R39% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-3-7
1.50 pts / match · goal difference -2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-2-5
Last 5 at home
1-0-4
LWLLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.26Opponent xG: 1.26BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%
Posta Rangers
DLDLD
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
28% W44% R28% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-8-5
1.28 pts / match · goal difference -5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-3-2
0.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
3-2-4
Last 5 away
1-1-3
LLWDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.4Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.34Opponent xG: 1.61BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Tusker is 17% better for: goals conceded per match.

1 goals / match - Tusker · 1.17 goals / match - Posta Rangers

Tusker scoring profile: strong

Tusker scores in 72% of matches (13 of 18 matches), while Posta Rangers keeps a clean sheet in 28% (5 of 18 matches).

Posta Rangers scoring profile: mixed

Posta Rangers scores in 56% of matches (10 of 18 matches), while Tusker keeps a clean sheet in 39% (7 of 18 matches).

16Goals scored (season)16
TuskerPosta Rangers
18Goals conceded (season)21
TuskerPosta Rangers
1.89Average goals in match2.06
TuskerPosta Rangers
4Goals scored (last 5)2
TuskerPosta Rangers
8Goals conceded (last 5)6
TuskerPosta Rangers

How often they score at least...

72%1 goal56%
TuskerPosta Rangers
17%2 goals33%
TuskerPosta Rangers
0%3 goals0%
TuskerPosta Rangers
0%4 goals0%
TuskerPosta Rangers

How often they concede at least...

61%1 goal72%
TuskerPosta Rangers
28%2 goals33%
TuskerPosta Rangers
6%3 goals11%
TuskerPosta Rangers
6%4 goals0%
TuskerPosta Rangers

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

43%
League average

Goal patterns

6%BTTS at half-time11%
TuskerPosta Rangers
0%BTTS in both halves6%
TuskerPosta Rangers
6%Scored in both halves11%
TuskerPosta Rangers

BTTS and goal count

28%Min. 3 goals and BTTS28%
TuskerPosta Rangers
6%Min. 3 goals without BTTS11%
TuskerPosta Rangers
40%BTTS - last 540%
TuskerPosta Rangers

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

44%Min. 1 goal before half-time39%
TuskerPosta Rangers
17%Min. 2 goals before half-time17%
TuskerPosta Rangers
6%Min. 3 goals before half-time6%
TuskerPosta Rangers

2nd half

33%Min. 1 goal after half-time39%
TuskerPosta Rangers
11%Min. 2 goals after half-time28%
TuskerPosta Rangers
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time6%
TuskerPosta Rangers

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Posta Rangers is 25% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.06 pts / match - Tusker · 1.33 pts / match - Posta Rangers

Tusker - half-time state
17% leading56% draw28% trailing
Posta Rangers - half-time state
22% leading67% draw11% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.06Points per match (1st half)1.33
TuskerPosta Rangers
0.22Goals scored (1st half)0.39
TuskerPosta Rangers
0.44Goals conceded (1st half)0.22
TuskerPosta Rangers
0.67Average goals (1st half)0.61
TuskerPosta Rangers
72%Clean sheet before half-time78%
TuskerPosta Rangers
78%No goal before half-time72%
TuskerPosta Rangers

After half-time (2nd half)

1.44Points per match (2nd half)0.89
TuskerPosta Rangers
0.33Goals scored (2nd half)0.22
TuskerPosta Rangers
0.11Goals conceded (2nd half)0.5
TuskerPosta Rangers
0.44Average goals (2nd half)0.72
TuskerPosta Rangers
89%Clean sheet after half-time67%
TuskerPosta Rangers
67%No goal after half-time83%
TuskerPosta Rangers

Tusker - second-half results

22% W78% R0% P
19
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
-4
Goal difference (1st half)
26
Second-half points
+4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.06
PPG before half-time
Lead holding259%

Leads at half-time in 17% of matches and wins 44%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.3

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Posta Rangers - second-half results

6% W72% R22% P
24
Half-time points
7
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
16
Second-half points
-5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.33
PPG before half-time
Lead holding127%

Leads at half-time in 22% of matches and wins 28%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Tusker - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.40
Goals scored / match0.00.2
Goals conceded / match0.00.0
Average goals in match0.00.2
1 goal0%20%
2 goals0%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet100%100%
No goal100%80%
Goal difference0+1
Half-time: 0% leading - 100% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 80% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0
Posta Rangers - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.00
Goals scored / match0.00.0
Goals conceded / match0.00.0
Average goals in match0.00.0
1 goal0%0%
2 goals0%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet100%100%
No goal100%100%
Goal difference00
Half-time: 0% leading - 100% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 100% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Tusker
ScoredConceded
7
11
0-15
0
4
16-30
2
1
31-45
1
0
46-60
1
0
61-75
5
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (7 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

Posta Rangers
ScoredConceded
6
8
0-15
2
2
16-30
3
2
31-45
0
2
46-60
1
4
61-75
4
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (6 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.98
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.0 : 0.9
Estimated goal split
home : away
100%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
42%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+52%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
40%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
12%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 8 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Tusker

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.06
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.17
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+3.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.60
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.43
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
95%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
96%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.30
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
31% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 44% come in the first quarter-hour.
31%

Posta Rangers

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.34
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.06
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+3.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.41
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.47
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
86%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
124%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.68
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 38% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Kenyan Premier League).

Teams vs league

TuskerLigaPosta Rangers
Average goals in match 1.891.98 2.06
Both teams scored 39%43% 44%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 33%32% 39%
Clean sheets 39%36% 28%
Goal before half-time 44%31% 39%
Goal after half-time 33%34% 39%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

1.98
Average goals per match
43%
Both teams scored
32%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
36%
Clean sheets
0.94
Home goals / match
1.04
Away goals / match
+-10%
Home attack advantage
+-11%
Home defence advantage
+-10%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
31%
1 goal
12%
2 goals
2%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
34%
1 goal
17%
2 goals
4%
3 goals
1%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Tusker 0 - 0 - 1 Posta Rangers. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

Posta Rangers
2 : 1
Tusker

FAQ

What was the result of Tusker vs Posta Rangers?

The Kenyan Premier League match finished Tusker 1:1 Posta Rangers. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Tusker vs Posta Rangers?

Tusker score 0.89 goals per game on average and Posta Rangers 0.89. The Kenyan Premier League average is 1.98 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 32% of games. Both teams score in 39% of Tusker's matches and 44% of Posta Rangers's.

What form are Tusker and Posta Rangers in?

Over the last 5 games Tusker have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and Posta Rangers 0-3-2 (0.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Tusker vs Posta Rangers?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Tusker vs Posta Rangers: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.