Udinese vs Cremonese: match statistics
Udinese vs Cremonese: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Udinese played Cremonese in Serie A (Italy). The match was played on 17 May 2026. Venue: Dacia Arena. Final score: 0:1.
Current form
Udinese: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. Cremonese: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.
Goal statistics
Udinese scores 1.25 and concedes 1.28 goals per match. Cremonese scores 0.83 and concedes 1.47. League average: 2.41 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Udinese 47%, Cremonese 42%. Over 2.5: Udinese 47%, Cremonese 44%. League level: BTTS 45%, Over 2.5 46%.
xG, shots and style
Udinese has higher xG: 1.29 vs 1.07. Udinese: 11.6 shots per match, Cremonese: 9.3.
Match halves
Udinese: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.72. Cremonese: half-time lead 19%, second-half goals 0.53.
Goals by minute
Udinese: 46-60 (10 goals). Cremonese: 76-90+ (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Serie A: 2.41 goals per match, BTTS 45%, Over 2.5 46%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I back Udinese to win — the home side holds a clear statistical edge: 45 goals scored this season vs 30 for Cremonese and 10th in the table vs the visitors’ 18th. At home Udinese averages 1.0 goals per game and xG 1.41, while Cremonese on the road records 0.72 goals and xG 0.94, indicating the hosts’ greater ability to generate high-quality chances. Hosts average 13 shots and 4 on target at home vs Cremonese’s 7.94 shots and 2.83 on target; although the visitors’ conversion rate is 9% vs the hosts’ 8%, the lower volume of attempts limits their realistic chances. Defensively Cremonese concedes 1.56 goals away with xG against 1.97, while Udinese concede 1.11 at home with xG against 1.21; additionally Udinese average 2.0 points in the last 5 matches vs 0.8 points for Cremonese. Considering chance creation (13 vs 7.94), higher xG (1.41 vs 0.94), better form (2.0 vs 0.8) and the fact Cremonese fail to score in 56% of away games vs Udinese’s 33% at home, I assess the probabilities as 65% for the hosts, 20% for a draw and 15% for the visitors.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Udinese at home have a seasonal BTTS rate of 50%, while Cremonese have BTTS 33%, and the Serie A average BTTS is 45%. Cremonese have failed to score in 56% of their matches this season, and both teams produced BTTS in only 20% of their last 5 fixtures, which argues against a 'BTTS - Yes' outcome. Udinese have kept a clean sheet in 33% of matches this season, and Cremonese in 22%, so a home clean sheet is more likely. In the last 5 matches Udinese averaged 2.0 goals scored and 0.8 conceded, while Cremonese averaged 0.8 scored and 1.4 conceded, showing a clear offensive advantage for Udinese (2.0 vs 0.8). xG confirms this gap: Udinese generate 1.21 xG versus Cremonese 0.94 xG, with xG against 1.47 vs 1.97, and the hosts register more shots on target (3.83 vs 2.83). Considering the 56% probability that Cremonese will not score and the low 20% BTTS in the last 5 matches, I recommend 'No Goal' with a probability of 70% versus 30% for 'Goal/Goal'.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Udinese has a seasonal xG_for of 1.21 and an xG_for of 1.63 in the last 5 matches, scoring 10 goals in those 5 games (2.0 per match on average), while Cremonese has a seasonal xG_against of 1.97 and an xG_against of 1.20 in the last 5. Seasonal percentages show Over1.5 in 78% of Udinese matches and in 61% of Cremonese matches, which together provide a strong signal for at least 2 goals in the game — hence a high probability for Over1.5 (85%). The 2.5 line is less convincing: seasonal Over2.5 is 44% for both teams, and the league average is 46% Over2.5; my expected goals of 1.45 for Udinese and 0.95 for Cremonese sum to 2.40, so I rate Over2.5 at 46% vs Under2.5 at 54%. Over3.5 remains unlikely (seasonal Over3.5 22% for both), despite Udinese’s form, so I assess Over3.5 at 25% and Under3.5 at 75%. In summary, the best line to play is Over 1.5 (side: over, line: 1.5) due to Udinese’s 78% seasonal matches above 1.5 and their last 5 matches averaging 2.0 goals per game.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
I back 1/1 (Udinese leading at Half-Time and winning Full-Time) because Udinese led at the break in 3 of their last 5 matches (60%) and averaged 0.8 goals by half-time in those five games, while Cremonese conceded an average of 0.6 goals by half-time across their last 5 away matches. Season-to-date the home side have led at the break in 28% of matches (5 times) versus the visitors only 11% (2 times), and at home Udinese have an xG of 1.21 compared to Cremonese’s 0.94, indicating higher quality chances. Udinese average 10.56 shots and 3.83 on target per match versus Cremonese’s 7.94 shots and 2.83 on target, while the visitors concede 1.56 goals per away game with an xG against of 1.97, so Cremonese’s defense looks vulnerable. Although Udinese have just a 17% home win rate this season and many draws (39%), their recent form (3 wins in 5) combined with superiority in xG and shot metrics gives the strongest signal for the hosts to take a lead at the break and maintain it, therefore 1/1 is assigned the highest probability.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Udinese | Cremonese | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 34% | 36% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.32 | 0.25 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Udinese is 150% better for: last-5 form.
2 pts / match - Udinese · 0.8 pts / match - Cremonese
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Udinese is 51% better for: goals scored per match.
1.25 goals / match - Udinese · 0.83 goals / match - Cremonese
Udinese is 15% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.28 goals / match - Udinese · 1.47 goals / match - Cremonese
Udinese scores in 75% of matches (27 of 36 matches), while Cremonese keeps a clean sheet in 28% (10 of 36 matches).
Cremonese scores in 53% of matches (19 of 36 matches), while Udinese keeps a clean sheet in 31% (11 of 36 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Udinese
Over / Under - Cremonese
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Udinese is 39% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.39 pts / match - Udinese · 1 pts / match - Cremonese
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Udinese - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 39%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Cremonese - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 19% of matches and wins 19%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.20 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 1.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.0 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +4 | +2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (10 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Udinese
Cremonese
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Serie A).
Teams vs league
| Udinese | Liga | Cremonese | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 2.53 | 2.41 | ▼ 2.31 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 47% | 45% | ▼ 42% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | • 47% | 46% | ▼ 44% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 31% | 33% | ▼ 28% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 69% | 65% | ▼ 61% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 81% | 77% | ▼ 72% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Udinese 0 - 1 - 0 Cremonese. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Udinese vs Cremonese?
The Serie A match finished Udinese 0:1 Cremonese. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Udinese vs Cremonese?
Udinese score 1.25 goals per game on average and Cremonese 0.83. The Serie A average is 2.41 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 46% of games. Both teams score in 47% of Udinese's matches and 42% of Cremonese's.
What form are Udinese and Cremonese in?
Over the last 5 games Udinese have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Cremonese 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Udinese vs Cremonese?
The statistical background for Udinese vs Cremonese — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


