Germany - 3. LigaData current as of 23 July 2026

Ulm vs Verl: match statistics

Ulm crest
Ulm
1 : 0half-time 1:0
Verl crest
Verl

Ulm vs Verl: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Ulm play Verl in 3. Liga (Germany). The match date is 5 April 2026 at 13:30. Final score: 1:0.

Current form

Ulm: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Verl: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Ulm scores 1.29 and concedes 2.05 goals per match. Verl scores 2.16 and concedes 1.26. League average: 3.21 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Ulm 74%, Verl 66%. Over 2.5: Ulm 66%, Verl 74%. League level: BTTS 64%, Over 2.5 64%.

xG, shots and style

Verl has higher xG: 1.76 vs 1.43. Ulm: 11.8 shots per match, Verl: 14.6.

Match halves

Ulm: half-time lead 16%, second-half goals 0.79. Verl: half-time lead 47%, second-half goals 1.18.

Goals by minute

Ulm: 76-90+ (14 goals). Verl: 76-90+ (18 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

3. Liga: 3.21 goals per match, BTTS 64%, Over 2.5 64%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-0-1. Average goals 5.00, BTTS 0%.

Match description

Verl is the paper favorite: the visitors average 2.00 goals per away match (70 this season) versus Ulm’s 1.27 at home (39 this season), and in the last 5 games Verl has scored 10 and conceded only 3 while Ulm has 7 scored and 10 conceded. The quality gap is also evident in possession and shots: Verl averages 65% possession and 5.4 shots on target per away game, Ulm 52% possession and 4.13 shots on target at home. Defensively Ulm concedes 2.07 goals per home match, Verl 1.67 away, and xG also favors the visitors (xG 1.71 for Verl vs 1.43 for Ulm). Efficiency further supports the visitors: Verl’s conversion rate is 14% versus Ulm’s 11%, and Ulm fail to score in 20% of home games compared to Verl’s 13% scoreless away matches. Ulm have only a 27% home-win rate and a -12 home goal differential, while Verl have a 40% away-win rate and a +5 differential, so I predict an away win.

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

33Possession (%)67
UlmVerl
13Shots12
UlmVerl
7Shots on target6
UlmVerl
1.57xG1.73
UlmVerl
3Corners5
UlmVerl
36Dangerous attacks77
UlmVerl
8Fouls4
UlmVerl
1Cards2
UlmVerl

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.29Goals scored / match2.16
UlmVerl
2.05Goals conceded / match1.26
UlmVerl
50%Average possession65%
UlmVerl
4.05Shots on target / match5.58
UlmVerl

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.82Shots per match14.63
UlmVerl
4.05Shots on target5.58
UlmVerl
10.9%Shot conversion14.7%
UlmVerl
50%Possession65%
UlmVerl
1.43xG for1.76
UlmVerl
1.67xG against1.2
UlmVerl

Shooting quality

Ulm: BalancedVerl: Dominant
UlmVerl
Accuracy (shots on target)34%38%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.320.39

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Verl is 125% better for: last-5 form.

0.8 pts / match - Ulm · 1.8 pts / match - Verl

Ulm
WLLDL
Season result split
24% W16% R61% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-6-23
0.87 pts / match · goal difference -29
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
6-1-12
Last 5 at home
2-0-3
LWWLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.43Opponent xG: 2.00BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%
Verl
WLWLW
Season result split
47% W26% R26% P
Season (W-D-L)
18-10-10
1.68 pts / match · goal difference +34
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
6-6-7
Last 5 away
1-1-3
WLDLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.46Opponent xG: 1.06BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Verl is 67% better for: goals scored per match.

1.29 goals / match - Ulm · 2.16 goals / match - Verl

Verl is 63% better for: goals conceded per match.

2.05 goals / match - Ulm · 1.26 goals / match - Verl

Ulm scoring profile: very strong

Ulm scores in 87% of matches (33 of 38 matches), while Verl keeps a clean sheet in 26% (10 of 38 matches).

Verl scoring profile: very strong

Verl scores in 87% of matches (33 of 38 matches), while Ulm keeps a clean sheet in 13% (5 of 38 matches).

49Goals scored (season)82
UlmVerl
78Goals conceded (season)48
UlmVerl
3.34Average goals in match3.42
UlmVerl
7Goals scored (last 5)10
UlmVerl
10Goals conceded (last 5)3
UlmVerl

How often they score at least...

87%1 goal87%
UlmVerl
26%2 goals66%
UlmVerl
11%3 goals32%
UlmVerl
3%4 goals24%
UlmVerl

How often they concede at least...

87%1 goal74%
UlmVerl
55%2 goals42%
UlmVerl
39%3 goals8%
UlmVerl
13%4 goals3%
UlmVerl

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

29%BTTS at half-time24%
UlmVerl
5%BTTS in both halves13%
UlmVerl
11%Scored in both halves47%
UlmVerl

BTTS and goal count

58%Min. 3 goals and BTTS58%
UlmVerl
8%Min. 3 goals without BTTS16%
UlmVerl
80%BTTS - last 520%
UlmVerl

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

74%Min. 1 goal before half-time76%
UlmVerl
42%Min. 2 goals before half-time45%
UlmVerl
16%Min. 3 goals before half-time21%
UlmVerl

2nd half

79%Min. 1 goal after half-time89%
UlmVerl
63%Min. 2 goals after half-time61%
UlmVerl
37%Min. 3 goals after half-time34%
UlmVerl

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Verl is 91% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.92 pts / match - Ulm · 1.76 pts / match - Verl

Ulm - half-time state
16% leading45% draw39% trailing
Verl - half-time state
47% leading34% draw18% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.92Points per match (1st half)1.76
UlmVerl
0.5Goals scored (1st half)0.97
UlmVerl
0.87Goals conceded (1st half)0.47
UlmVerl
1.37Average goals (1st half)1.45
UlmVerl
39%Clean sheet before half-time66%
UlmVerl
58%No goal before half-time34%
UlmVerl

After half-time (2nd half)

0.84Points per match (2nd half)1.66
UlmVerl
0.79Goals scored (2nd half)1.18
UlmVerl
1.18Goals conceded (2nd half)0.79
UlmVerl
1.97Average goals (2nd half)1.97
UlmVerl
34%Clean sheet after half-time42%
UlmVerl
45%No goal after half-time32%
UlmVerl

Ulm - second-half results

16% W37% R47% P
35
Half-time points
19
Half-time goals
-14
Goal difference (1st half)
32
Second-half points
-15
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.92
PPG before half-time
Lead holding150%

Leads at half-time in 16% of matches and wins 24%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Verl - second-half results

47% W24% R29% P
67
Half-time points
37
Half-time goals
+19
Goal difference (1st half)
63
Second-half points
+15
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.76
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 47% of matches and wins 47%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Ulm - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.000.80
Goals scored / match0.60.8
Goals conceded / match0.61.4
Average goals in match1.22.2
1 goal40%80%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference0-3
Half-time: 0% leading - 100% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3
Verl - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.201.80
Goals scored / match1.01.0
Goals conceded / match0.00.6
Average goals in match1.01.6
1 goal60%100%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet100%60%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+5+2
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 0% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 5

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Ulm
ScoredConceded
2
10
0-15
8
13
16-30
9
10
31-45
11
11
46-60
5
13
61-75
14
21
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (14 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (21). Late-goal balance (76-90): -7 - late phases are a weakness.

Verl
ScoredConceded
15
7
0-15
9
3
16-30
13
8
31-45
14
12
46-60
13
5
61-75
18
13
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (18 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.38
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.3 : 2.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
105%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
70%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+48%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
76%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
2%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 50 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Ulm

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.24
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.52
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.14
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.38
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
73%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
141%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.07
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
29% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 4% come in the first quarter-hour.
29%

Verl

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.56
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.34
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-20.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.40
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.06
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
149%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
72%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.12
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
22% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 18% come in the first quarter-hour.
22%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (3. Liga).

Teams vs league

UlmLigaVerl
Average goals in match 3.343.21 3.42
Both teams scored 74%64% 66%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 66%64% 74%
Clean sheets 13%21% 26%
Goal before half-time 74%77% 76%
Goal after half-time 79%83% 89%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.21
Average goals per match
64%
Both teams scored
64%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
21%
Clean sheets
1.76
Home goals / match
1.45
Away goals / match
+21%
Home attack advantage
+18%
Home defence advantage
+15%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
43%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
83%
1 goal
54%
2 goals
29%
3 goals
13%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Ulm 0 - 0 - 1 Verl. Average goals 5.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

SC Verl 1924
5 : 0
SSV Ulm 1846

FAQ

What was the result of Ulm vs Verl?

The 3. Liga match finished Ulm 1:0 Verl. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Ulm vs Verl?

Ulm score 1.29 goals per game on average and Verl 2.16. The 3. Liga average is 3.21 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 64% of games. Both teams score in 74% of Ulm's matches and 66% of Verl's.

What form are Ulm and Verl in?

Over the last 5 games Ulm have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Verl 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Ulm vs Verl?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.