South Korea - K League 1Data current as of 07 September 2026

Ulsan vs Jeju United: match statistics

Ulsan crest
Ulsan
2 : 1half-time 2:0
Jeju United crest
Jeju United

Ulsan vs Jeju United: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Ulsan played Jeju United in K League 1 (South Korea). The match was played on 13 May 2026. Final score: 2:1.

Current form

Ulsan: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Jeju United: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Ulsan scores 1.54 and concedes 1.31 goals per match. Jeju United scores 0.85 and concedes 0.92. League average: 2.25 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Ulsan 62%, Jeju United 38%. Over 2.5: Ulsan 54%, Jeju United 23%. League level: BTTS 47%, Over 2.5 36%.

xG, shots and style

Ulsan has higher xG: 1.86 vs 1.31. Ulsan: 16.2 shots per match, Jeju United: 10.6.

Match halves

Ulsan: half-time lead 38%, second-half goals 0.92. Jeju United: half-time lead 38%, second-half goals 0.38.

Goals by minute

Ulsan: 76-90+ (6 goals). Jeju United: 16-30 (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

K League 1: 2.25 goals per match, BTTS 47%, Over 2.5 36%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 5 previous H2H matches were available: 4-0-1. Average goals 1.80, BTTS 20%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

I back the home win (1): Ulsan sit 2nd in the table while Jeju are 7th, with Ulsan scoring 20 goals this season versus 11 for the visitors. Looking at home/away splits, Ulsan average 1.57 goals and 2.00 xG per home match, whereas Jeju average 1.00 goal and 1.13 xG on the road, indicating a clear home advantage in the quality of created chances. Ulsan register 17.86 shots per match (5.43 on target) with a conversion rate around 9%, while Jeju manage only 8.83 shots (3.33 on target) with conversion near 11% — the visitors are efficient but generate far fewer opportunities. Defensively Jeju have the edge — they concede just 0.67 goals away on average and keep clean sheets in 50% of away matches, whereas Ulsan concede 1.57 at home with a 29% clean sheet rate; additionally Jeju average 1.8 points over the last 5 matches with 3 wins, compared to Ulsan’s 1.4 points and 2 wins. Considering Ulsan’s advantage in xG and shot volume versus Jeju’s defensive solidity, I assign 55% to a home win, 25% to a draw and 20% to an away win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

I forecast No BTTS with a 62% probability versus 38% for BTTS. The strongest argument is Jeju — seasonal clean sheet rate 50% and only 0.67 goals conceded per match on average with a seasonal BTTS of 33%, indicating a high chance of a clean sheet. Ulsan averages 0.71 goals this season, has a low shot conversion rate of 6% and only 29% clean sheets, and in the last 5 matches scored an average of 1.0 goal with 60% BTTS, providing a mixed offensive signal. Although recent 5-match xG is balanced (Ulsan 1.66 vs Jeju 1.74) and Ulsan registers more shots on target (4.86 vs 3.33), Jeju’s defensive stability (50% CS seasonally, 0.8 goals conceded in L5) outweighs that, hence the pick: No (No BTTS).

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

I forecast Under 2.5 as the best pick; expected goals are Ulsan 0.71, Jeju 1.00, total 1.71. Although xG indicates higher potential (Ulsan xG_for 1.46, Jeju xG_for 1.13), actual outcomes reflect low finishing: Ulsan has a conversion rate of 6% on 12.14 shots (yielding ~0.73 goals), Jeju 11% on 8.83 shots (~0.97 goals). Seasonally only 29% of Ulsan’s matches and 17% of Jeju’s matches finish over 2.5 goals (respectively 71% and 83% under 2.5), and over 3.5 occurs in 0% of matches for both teams, making Over 3.5 extremely unlikely. In the last 5 games both teams combined have averaged 1.8 goals (Ulsan 1.0, Jeju 0.8), and BTTS appears in only 43% and 33% of fixtures, so I expect a low tempo and defence deciding the outcome. Based on these numbers I assign 65% to Over 1.5 (35% Under), 22% to Over 2.5 (78% Under) and 1% to Over 3.5 (99% Under), therefore the strongest and best tip is Under on the 2.5 line.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Jeju appears the favorite: they have a 50% win rate versus Ulsan’s 29% and a 60% win rate in the last five matches compared to the home side’s 40%. At Half-Time Jeju led in 50% of games, averaging 0.67 goals by the break, while Ulsan led in only 29% and averages 0.29 goals at Half-Time; additionally Jeju concedes 0.0 goals on average before the break. Ulsan produces higher xG (1.46 vs 1.13) and more shots (12.14 vs 8.83) and shots on target (4.86 vs 3.33), but has lower finishing efficiency (6% vs 11%), so the creative edge does not convert into first-half goals. The Second Half is often decisive: over 0.5 second-half goals occur for the home team in 71% and for the visitors in 67% of matches, which increases the likelihood that a draw at the break will be resolved in favor of the more efficient team. Consequently the most likely scenario is a draw at Half-Time and a Jeju win at Full-Time (X/2).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

2 : 0
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

35Possession (%)65
UlsanJeju United
15Shots15
UlsanJeju United
6Shots on target6
UlsanJeju United
1.74xG2
UlsanJeju United
6Corners7
UlsanJeju United
52Dangerous attacks87
UlsanJeju United
12Fouls8
UlsanJeju United
0Cards1
UlsanJeju United

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.54Goals scored / match0.85
UlsanJeju United
1.31Goals conceded / match0.92
UlsanJeju United
47%Average possession40%
UlsanJeju United
5.15Shots on target / match4.15
UlsanJeju United

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

16.23Shots per match10.62
UlsanJeju United
5.15Shots on target4.15
UlsanJeju United
9.5%Shot conversion8%
UlsanJeju United
47%Possession40%
UlsanJeju United
1.86xG for1.31
UlsanJeju United
1.53xG against1.41
UlsanJeju United

Shooting quality

Ulsan: AttackingJeju United: Balanced
UlsanJeju United
Accuracy (shots on target)32%39%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.300.20

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Jeju United is 29% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / match - Ulsan · 1.8 pts / match - Jeju United

Ulsan
DLLWW
Season result split
54% W15% R31% P
Season (W-D-L)
7-2-4
1.77 pts / match · goal difference +3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-1-3
Last 5 at home
2-0-3
LWLLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.80Opponent xG: 1.59BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%
Jeju United
WLLWW
Season result split
38% W23% R38% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-3-5
1.38 pts / match · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
3-1-2
Last 5 away
3-1-1
DWWLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.77Opponent xG: 1.39BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Ulsan is 81% better for: goals scored per match.

1.54 goals / match - Ulsan · 0.85 goals / match - Jeju United

Jeju United is 42% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.31 goals / match - Ulsan · 0.92 goals / match - Jeju United

Ulsan scoring profile: strong

Ulsan scores in 77% of matches (10 of 13 matches), while Jeju United keeps a clean sheet in 38% (5 of 13 matches).

Jeju United scoring profile: very strong

Jeju United scores in 69% of matches (9 of 13 matches), while Ulsan keeps a clean sheet in 23% (3 of 13 matches).

20Goals scored (season)11
UlsanJeju United
17Goals conceded (season)12
UlsanJeju United
2.85Average goals in match1.77
UlsanJeju United
5Goals scored (last 5)4
UlsanJeju United
7Goals conceded (last 5)4
UlsanJeju United

How often they score at least...

77%1 goal69%
UlsanJeju United
46%2 goals15%
UlsanJeju United
15%3 goals0%
UlsanJeju United
8%4 goals0%
UlsanJeju United

How often they concede at least...

77%1 goal62%
UlsanJeju United
23%2 goals31%
UlsanJeju United
15%3 goals0%
UlsanJeju United
15%4 goals0%
UlsanJeju United

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

15%BTTS at half-time0%
UlsanJeju United
0%BTTS in both halves0%
UlsanJeju United
38%Scored in both halves8%
UlsanJeju United

BTTS and goal count

54%Min. 3 goals and BTTS23%
UlsanJeju United
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
UlsanJeju United
60%BTTS - last 520%
UlsanJeju United

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

77%Min. 1 goal before half-time54%
UlsanJeju United
38%Min. 2 goals before half-time8%
UlsanJeju United
23%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
UlsanJeju United

2nd half

85%Min. 1 goal after half-time69%
UlsanJeju United
54%Min. 2 goals after half-time31%
UlsanJeju United
8%Min. 3 goals after half-time15%
UlsanJeju United

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Jeju United is 11% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.46 pts / match - Ulsan · 1.62 pts / match - Jeju United

Ulsan - half-time state
38% leading31% draw31% trailing
Jeju United - half-time state
38% leading46% draw15% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.46Points per match (1st half)1.62
UlsanJeju United
0.62Goals scored (1st half)0.46
UlsanJeju United
0.77Goals conceded (1st half)0.15
UlsanJeju United
1.38Average goals (1st half)0.62
UlsanJeju United
54%Clean sheet before half-time85%
UlsanJeju United
54%No goal before half-time62%
UlsanJeju United

After half-time (2nd half)

1.46Points per match (2nd half)0.85
UlsanJeju United
0.92Goals scored (2nd half)0.38
UlsanJeju United
0.54Goals conceded (2nd half)0.77
UlsanJeju United
1.46Average goals (2nd half)1.15
UlsanJeju United
46%Clean sheet after half-time46%
UlsanJeju United
31%No goal after half-time62%
UlsanJeju United

Ulsan - second-half results

31% W54% R15% P
19
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
19
Second-half points
+5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.46
PPG before half-time
Lead holding142%

Leads at half-time in 38% of matches and wins 54%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.2

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Jeju United - second-half results

15% W38% R46% P
21
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
+4
Goal difference (1st half)
11
Second-half points
-5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.62
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 38% of matches and wins 38%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.6

Concedes 0.6 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Ulsan - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.20
Goals scored / match0.40.6
Goals conceded / match0.80.6
Average goals in match1.21.2
1 goal80%80%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference-20
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2
Jeju United - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.601.00
Goals scored / match0.40.4
Goals conceded / match0.20.6
Average goals in match0.61.0
1 goal60%80%
2 goals0%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference+1-1
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Ulsan
ScoredConceded
0
5
0-15
5
3
16-30
3
2
31-45
2
2
46-60
4
2
61-75
6
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

Jeju United
ScoredConceded
1
0
0-15
4
1
16-30
1
1
31-45
2
3
46-60
1
2
61-75
2
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.31
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.2 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
103%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
50%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-22%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
53%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
7%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 14 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Ulsan

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.33
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.10
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.32
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.22
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
152%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
107%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.37
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
30% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
30%

Jeju United

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.10
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.03
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.46
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.49
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
69%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
91%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.42
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
18% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 9% come in the first quarter-hour.
18%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (K League 1).

Teams vs league

UlsanLigaJeju United
Average goals in match 2.852.25 1.77
Both teams scored 62%47% 38%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 54%36% 23%
Clean sheets 23%31% 38%
Goal before half-time 77%62% 54%
Goal after half-time 85%75% 69%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.25
Average goals per match
47%
Both teams scored
36%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
31%
Clean sheets
1.01
Home goals / match
1.23
Away goals / match
+-18%
Home attack advantage
+-22%
Home defence advantage
+-17%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
62%
1 goal
27%
2 goals
6%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
38%
2 goals
14%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Jeju UnitedYellow cardJae-Woo Kim
  2. Jeju UnitedSubstitutionOn: Geon-Woong KimOff: Min-kyu Jang
  3. Jeju UnitedSubstitutionOn: Shin-Jin KimOff: Jun-Ha Kim
  4. UlsanSubstitutionOn: Gyu-Seong LeeOff: Darijan Bojanic

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (5): Ulsan 4 - 0 - 1 Jeju United. Average goals 1.80, both teams scored in 20% matches.

Jeju United
0 : 2
Ulsan
Ulsan Hyundai Horang-i
0 : 1
Jeju United FC
Ulsan Hyundai Horang-i
1 : 0
Jeju United FC
Jeju United FC
1 : 2
Ulsan Hyundai Horang-i
Ulsan Hyundai Horang-i
2 : 0
Jeju United FC

FAQ

What was the result of Ulsan vs Jeju United?

The K League 1 match finished Ulsan 2:1 Jeju United. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Ulsan and Jeju United?

In the last 5 head-to-head matches Ulsan won 4, Jeju United won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 1.80 goals, with both teams scoring in 20% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Ulsan vs Jeju United?

Ulsan score 1.54 goals per game on average and Jeju United 0.85. The K League 1 average is 2.25 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 36% of games. Both teams score in 62% of Ulsan's matches and 38% of Jeju United's.

What form are Ulsan and Jeju United in?

Over the last 5 games Ulsan have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Jeju United 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Ulsan vs Jeju United?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.