Ulsan vs Jeju United: match statistics
Ulsan vs Jeju United: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Ulsan played Jeju United in K League 1 (South Korea). The match was played on 13 May 2026. Final score: 2:1.
Current form
Ulsan: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Jeju United: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match.
Goal statistics
Ulsan scores 1.54 and concedes 1.31 goals per match. Jeju United scores 0.85 and concedes 0.92. League average: 2.25 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Ulsan 62%, Jeju United 38%. Over 2.5: Ulsan 54%, Jeju United 23%. League level: BTTS 47%, Over 2.5 36%.
xG, shots and style
Ulsan has higher xG: 1.86 vs 1.31. Ulsan: 16.2 shots per match, Jeju United: 10.6.
Match halves
Ulsan: half-time lead 38%, second-half goals 0.92. Jeju United: half-time lead 38%, second-half goals 0.38.
Goals by minute
Ulsan: 76-90+ (6 goals). Jeju United: 16-30 (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
K League 1: 2.25 goals per match, BTTS 47%, Over 2.5 36%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 5 previous H2H matches were available: 4-0-1. Average goals 1.80, BTTS 20%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I back the home win (1): Ulsan sit 2nd in the table while Jeju are 7th, with Ulsan scoring 20 goals this season versus 11 for the visitors. Looking at home/away splits, Ulsan average 1.57 goals and 2.00 xG per home match, whereas Jeju average 1.00 goal and 1.13 xG on the road, indicating a clear home advantage in the quality of created chances. Ulsan register 17.86 shots per match (5.43 on target) with a conversion rate around 9%, while Jeju manage only 8.83 shots (3.33 on target) with conversion near 11% — the visitors are efficient but generate far fewer opportunities. Defensively Jeju have the edge — they concede just 0.67 goals away on average and keep clean sheets in 50% of away matches, whereas Ulsan concede 1.57 at home with a 29% clean sheet rate; additionally Jeju average 1.8 points over the last 5 matches with 3 wins, compared to Ulsan’s 1.4 points and 2 wins. Considering Ulsan’s advantage in xG and shot volume versus Jeju’s defensive solidity, I assign 55% to a home win, 25% to a draw and 20% to an away win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I forecast No BTTS with a 62% probability versus 38% for BTTS. The strongest argument is Jeju — seasonal clean sheet rate 50% and only 0.67 goals conceded per match on average with a seasonal BTTS of 33%, indicating a high chance of a clean sheet. Ulsan averages 0.71 goals this season, has a low shot conversion rate of 6% and only 29% clean sheets, and in the last 5 matches scored an average of 1.0 goal with 60% BTTS, providing a mixed offensive signal. Although recent 5-match xG is balanced (Ulsan 1.66 vs Jeju 1.74) and Ulsan registers more shots on target (4.86 vs 3.33), Jeju’s defensive stability (50% CS seasonally, 0.8 goals conceded in L5) outweighs that, hence the pick: No (No BTTS).
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
I forecast Under 2.5 as the best pick; expected goals are Ulsan 0.71, Jeju 1.00, total 1.71. Although xG indicates higher potential (Ulsan xG_for 1.46, Jeju xG_for 1.13), actual outcomes reflect low finishing: Ulsan has a conversion rate of 6% on 12.14 shots (yielding ~0.73 goals), Jeju 11% on 8.83 shots (~0.97 goals). Seasonally only 29% of Ulsan’s matches and 17% of Jeju’s matches finish over 2.5 goals (respectively 71% and 83% under 2.5), and over 3.5 occurs in 0% of matches for both teams, making Over 3.5 extremely unlikely. In the last 5 games both teams combined have averaged 1.8 goals (Ulsan 1.0, Jeju 0.8), and BTTS appears in only 43% and 33% of fixtures, so I expect a low tempo and defence deciding the outcome. Based on these numbers I assign 65% to Over 1.5 (35% Under), 22% to Over 2.5 (78% Under) and 1% to Over 3.5 (99% Under), therefore the strongest and best tip is Under on the 2.5 line.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Jeju appears the favorite: they have a 50% win rate versus Ulsan’s 29% and a 60% win rate in the last five matches compared to the home side’s 40%. At Half-Time Jeju led in 50% of games, averaging 0.67 goals by the break, while Ulsan led in only 29% and averages 0.29 goals at Half-Time; additionally Jeju concedes 0.0 goals on average before the break. Ulsan produces higher xG (1.46 vs 1.13) and more shots (12.14 vs 8.83) and shots on target (4.86 vs 3.33), but has lower finishing efficiency (6% vs 11%), so the creative edge does not convert into first-half goals. The Second Half is often decisive: over 0.5 second-half goals occur for the home team in 71% and for the visitors in 67% of matches, which increases the likelihood that a draw at the break will be resolved in favor of the more efficient team. Consequently the most likely scenario is a draw at Half-Time and a Jeju win at Full-Time (X/2).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Ulsan | Jeju United | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 32% | 39% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.30 | 0.20 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Jeju United is 29% better for: last-5 form.
1.4 pts / match - Ulsan · 1.8 pts / match - Jeju United
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Ulsan is 81% better for: goals scored per match.
1.54 goals / match - Ulsan · 0.85 goals / match - Jeju United
Jeju United is 42% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.31 goals / match - Ulsan · 0.92 goals / match - Jeju United
Ulsan scores in 77% of matches (10 of 13 matches), while Jeju United keeps a clean sheet in 38% (5 of 13 matches).
Jeju United scores in 69% of matches (9 of 13 matches), while Ulsan keeps a clean sheet in 23% (3 of 13 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Ulsan
Over / Under - Jeju United
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Jeju United is 11% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.46 pts / match - Ulsan · 1.62 pts / match - Jeju United
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Ulsan - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 38% of matches and wins 54%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Jeju United - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 38% of matches and wins 38%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.6 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -2 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Ulsan
Jeju United
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (K League 1).
Teams vs league
| Ulsan | Liga | Jeju United | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 2.85 | 2.25 | ▼ 1.77 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 62% | 47% | ▼ 38% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 54% | 36% | ▼ 23% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 23% | 31% | ▲ 38% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 77% | 62% | ▼ 54% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 85% | 75% | ▼ 69% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (5): Ulsan 4 - 0 - 1 Jeju United. Average goals 1.80, both teams scored in 20% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Ulsan vs Jeju United?
The K League 1 match finished Ulsan 2:1 Jeju United. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Ulsan and Jeju United?
In the last 5 head-to-head matches Ulsan won 4, Jeju United won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 1.80 goals, with both teams scoring in 20% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Ulsan vs Jeju United?
Ulsan score 1.54 goals per game on average and Jeju United 0.85. The K League 1 average is 2.25 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 36% of games. Both teams score in 62% of Ulsan's matches and 38% of Jeju United's.
What form are Ulsan and Jeju United in?
Over the last 5 games Ulsan have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Jeju United 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Ulsan vs Jeju United?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


