South Korea - K League 1Data current as of 23 July 2026

Ulsan vs Sangju Sangmu: match statistics

Ulsan crest
Ulsan
0 : 0half-time 0:0
Sangju Sangmu crest
Sangju Sangmu
165%(0.00)
X25%(0.00)
210%(0.00)

Ulsan are in significantly better form, sitting top of the table with a perfect home win record (100% efficiency). The hosts are undefeated at home and score an average of 3 goals per game, demonstrating high efficiency (27% shot conversion rate). On the other hand, Sangju Sangmu have not won any away match this season, drawing all their away fixtures, which gives them just 1 point per game. The visitors' away goal difference is 0, and their form in the last five matches is poor (0.8 points per game). Considering Ulsan's home dominance and Sangju's lack of away wins, I strongly favor the hosts, although a draw is also in play due to the visitors' tendency to share points.

Ulsan vs Sangju Sangmu: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Ulsan play Sangju Sangmu in K League 1 (South Korea). The match date is 22 March 2026 at 06:00. Final score: 0:0.

Current form

Ulsan: 0-2-3, 0.40 points/match. Sangju Sangmu: 0-3-2, 0.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Ulsan scores 1.42 and concedes 1.47 goals per match. Sangju Sangmu scores 0.95 and concedes 1.37. League average: 2.31 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Ulsan 68%, Sangju Sangmu 68%. Over 2.5: Ulsan 58%, Sangju Sangmu 32%. League level: BTTS 51%, Over 2.5 39%.

xG, shots and style

Ulsan has higher xG: 1.80 vs 1.48. Ulsan: 15.4 shots per match, Sangju Sangmu: 12.4.

Match halves

Ulsan: half-time lead 32%, second-half goals 0.79. Sangju Sangmu: half-time lead 21%, second-half goals 0.58.

Goals by minute

Ulsan: 76-90+ (7 goals). Sangju Sangmu: 61-75 (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

K League 1: 2.31 goals per match, BTTS 51%, Over 2.5 39%.

Head-to-head

4 H2H matches: 2-0-2. Average goals 3.25, BTTS 50%.

Match description

Ulsan are in significantly better form, sitting top of the table with a perfect home win record (100% efficiency). The hosts are undefeated at home and score an average of 3 goals per game, demonstrating high efficiency (27% shot conversion rate). On the other hand, Sangju Sangmu have not won any away match this season, drawing all their away fixtures, which gives them just 1 point per game. The visitors' away goal difference is 0, and their form in the last five matches is poor (0.8 points per game). Considering Ulsan's home dominance and Sangju's lack of away wins, I strongly favor the hosts, although a draw is also in play due to the visitors' tendency to share points.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

37Possession (%)63
UlsanSangju Sangmu
19Shots10
UlsanSangju Sangmu
4Shots on target1
UlsanSangju Sangmu
1.99xG1.16
UlsanSangju Sangmu
4Corners2
UlsanSangju Sangmu
71Dangerous attacks62
UlsanSangju Sangmu
9Fouls19
UlsanSangju Sangmu
0Cards4
UlsanSangju Sangmu

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

UlsanSangju Sangmu
1.42Goals scored / match0.95
UlsanSangju Sangmu
1.47Goals conceded / match1.37
UlsanSangju Sangmu
47%Average possession57%
UlsanSangju Sangmu
5.21Shots on target / match3.53
UlsanSangju Sangmu

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

15.37Shots per match12.37
UlsanSangju Sangmu
5.21Shots on target3.53
UlsanSangju Sangmu
9.2%Shot conversion7.7%
UlsanSangju Sangmu
47%Possession57%
UlsanSangju Sangmu
1.8xG for1.48
UlsanSangju Sangmu
1.64xG against1.35
UlsanSangju Sangmu

Shooting quality

Ulsan: AttackingSangju Sangmu: Balanced
UlsanSangju Sangmu
Accuracy (shots on target)34%29%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.270.27

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Sangju Sangmu is 50% better for: last-5 form.

0.4 pts / match - Ulsan · 0.6 pts / match - Sangju Sangmu

Ulsan
LDLDL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
42% W21% R37% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-4-7
1.47 pts / match · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-2-3
0.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-1-5
Last 5 at home
2-0-3
LWWLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.63Opponent xG: 1.85BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%
Sangju Sangmu
LDDLD
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
11% W58% R32% P
Season (W-D-L)
2-11-6
0.89 pts / match · goal difference -8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-3-2
0.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-5-3
Last 5 away
1-2-2
WDLLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.42Opponent xG: 1.32BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 0%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Ulsan is 49% better for: goals scored per match.

1.42 goals / match - Ulsan · 0.95 goals / match - Sangju Sangmu

Sangju Sangmu is 7% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.47 goals / match - Ulsan · 1.37 goals / match - Sangju Sangmu

Ulsan scoring profile: very strong

Ulsan scores in 79% of matches (15 of 19 matches), while Sangju Sangmu keeps a clean sheet in 11% (2 of 19 matches).

Sangju Sangmu scoring profile: very strong

Sangju Sangmu scores in 74% of matches (14 of 19 matches), while Ulsan keeps a clean sheet in 16% (3 of 19 matches).

27Goals scored (season)18
UlsanSangju Sangmu
28Goals conceded (season)26
UlsanSangju Sangmu
2.89Average goals in match2.32
UlsanSangju Sangmu
5Goals scored (last 5)3
UlsanSangju Sangmu
10Goals conceded (last 5)6
UlsanSangju Sangmu

How often they score at least...

79%1 goal74%
UlsanSangju Sangmu
42%2 goals16%
UlsanSangju Sangmu
11%3 goals5%
UlsanSangju Sangmu
5%4 goals0%
UlsanSangju Sangmu

How often they concede at least...

84%1 goal89%
UlsanSangju Sangmu
37%2 goals37%
UlsanSangju Sangmu
16%3 goals11%
UlsanSangju Sangmu
11%4 goals0%
UlsanSangju Sangmu

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

51%
League average

Goal patterns

21%BTTS at half-time16%
UlsanSangju Sangmu
0%BTTS in both halves5%
UlsanSangju Sangmu
32%Scored in both halves11%
UlsanSangju Sangmu

BTTS and goal count

58%Min. 3 goals and BTTS21%
UlsanSangju Sangmu
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS11%
UlsanSangju Sangmu
80%BTTS - last 560%
UlsanSangju Sangmu

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

79%Min. 1 goal before half-time68%
UlsanSangju Sangmu
47%Min. 2 goals before half-time37%
UlsanSangju Sangmu
21%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
UlsanSangju Sangmu

2nd half

84%Min. 1 goal after half-time79%
UlsanSangju Sangmu
47%Min. 2 goals after half-time37%
UlsanSangju Sangmu
11%Min. 3 goals after half-time11%
UlsanSangju Sangmu

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Ulsan is 14% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.26 pts / match - Ulsan · 1.11 pts / match - Sangju Sangmu

Ulsan - half-time state
32% leading32% draw37% trailing
Sangju Sangmu - half-time state
21% leading47% draw32% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.26Points per match (1st half)1.11
UlsanSangju Sangmu
0.63Goals scored (1st half)0.37
UlsanSangju Sangmu
0.84Goals conceded (1st half)0.68
UlsanSangju Sangmu
1.47Average goals (1st half)1.05
UlsanSangju Sangmu
47%Clean sheet before half-time53%
UlsanSangju Sangmu
53%No goal before half-time63%
UlsanSangju Sangmu

After half-time (2nd half)

1.26Points per match (2nd half)1.11
UlsanSangju Sangmu
0.79Goals scored (2nd half)0.58
UlsanSangju Sangmu
0.63Goals conceded (2nd half)0.68
UlsanSangju Sangmu
1.42Average goals (2nd half)1.26
UlsanSangju Sangmu
42%Clean sheet after half-time32%
UlsanSangju Sangmu
37%No goal after half-time53%
UlsanSangju Sangmu

Ulsan - second-half results

26% W47% R26% P
24
Half-time points
12
Half-time goals
-4
Goal difference (1st half)
24
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.26
PPG before half-time
Lead holding131%

Leads at half-time in 32% of matches and wins 42%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.2

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Sangju Sangmu - second-half results

21% W47% R32% P
21
Half-time points
7
Half-time goals
-6
Goal difference (1st half)
21
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.11
PPG before half-time
Lead holding52%

Leads at half-time in 21% of matches and wins 11%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Ulsan - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.401.00
Goals scored / match0.40.6
Goals conceded / match1.20.8
Average goals in match1.61.4
1 goal80%80%
2 goals60%40%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet20%40%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference-4-1
Half-time: 0% leading - 40% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 2
Sangju Sangmu - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.800.80
Goals scored / match0.40.2
Goals conceded / match0.80.4
Average goals in match1.20.6
1 goal60%40%
2 goals60%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference-2-1
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 80% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Ulsan
ScoredConceded
0
6
0-15
6
6
16-30
6
4
31-45
3
3
46-60
5
3
61-75
7
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goli). Concedes most in 0-15 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Sangju Sangmu
ScoredConceded
2
3
0-15
4
2
16-30
1
8
31-45
2
5
46-60
5
4
61-75
4
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (5 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.60
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.4 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
113%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
68%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+25%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
58%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
5%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 20 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Ulsan

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.16
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.21
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.38
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.17
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
130%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
120%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-1.07
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
26% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
26%

Sangju Sangmu

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.13
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.55
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.53
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.02
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
78%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
126%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.29
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
22% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
22%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (K League 1).

Teams vs league

UlsanLigaSangju Sangmu
Average goals in match 2.892.31 2.32
Both teams scored 68%51% 68%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 58%39% 32%
Clean sheets 16%30% 11%
Goal before half-time 79%63% 68%
Goal after half-time 84%73% 79%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.31
Average goals per match
51%
Both teams scored
39%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
30%
Clean sheets
1.09
Home goals / match
1.22
Away goals / match
+-11%
Home attack advantage
+-12%
Home defence advantage
+-12%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
63%
1 goal
29%
2 goals
5%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
42%
2 goals
16%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (4): Ulsan 2 - 0 - 2 Sangju Sangmu. Average goals 3.25, both teams scored in 50% matches.

Sangju Sangmu
1 : 2
Ulsan
Sangju Sangmu Phoenix FC
3 : 0
Ulsan Hyundai Horang-i
Ulsan Hyundai Horang-i
3 : 2
Sangju Sangmu Phoenix FC
Sangju Sangmu Phoenix FC
2 : 0
Ulsan Hyundai Horang-i

FAQ

What was the result of Ulsan vs Sangju Sangmu?

The K League 1 match finished Ulsan 0:0 Sangju Sangmu. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Ulsan and Sangju Sangmu?

In the last 4 head-to-head matches Ulsan won 2, Sangju Sangmu won 2 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.25 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Ulsan vs Sangju Sangmu?

Ulsan score 1.42 goals per game on average and Sangju Sangmu 0.95. The K League 1 average is 2.31 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 39% of games. Both teams score in 68% of Ulsan's matches and 68% of Sangju Sangmu's.

What form are Ulsan and Sangju Sangmu in?

Over the last 5 games Ulsan have a 0-2-3 record (0.40 points per game) and Sangju Sangmu 0-3-2 (0.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Ulsan vs Sangju Sangmu?

The statistical background for Ulsan vs Sangju Sangmu — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.