Ulytau vs Aktobe: match statistics
Ulytau vs Aktobe: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Ulytau play Aktobe in Kazakhstan Premier League (Kazakhstan). The match date is 5 April 2026 at 12:00. Final score: 1:1.
Current form
Ulytau: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Aktobe: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match.
Goal statistics
Ulytau scores 0.83 and concedes 0.89 goals per match. Aktobe scores 1.44 and concedes 1.11. League average: 2.31 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Ulytau 44%, Aktobe 44%. Over 2.5: Ulytau 28%, Aktobe 39%. League level: BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 42%.
xG, shots and style
Aktobe has higher xG: 1.45 vs 1.29. Ulytau: 11.1 shots per match, Aktobe: 12.9.
Match halves
Ulytau: half-time lead 22%, second-half goals 0.44. Aktobe: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.94.
Goals by minute
Ulytau: 76-90+ (4 goals). Aktobe: 46-60 (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Kazakhstan Premier League: 2.31 goals per match, BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 42%.
Head-to-head
2 H2H matches: 1-0-1. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 50%.
Match description
Ulytau has a clear home advantage: 100% home wins and 100% clean sheets, averaging 1 goal scored and 0 conceded per home match. Aktobe are very poor away: 0% wins, 100% losses and 100% of away games without scoring, averaging 0 goals scored and 1 conceded on the road. In terms of quality of chances xG are similar (Ulytau 1.02 xG at home vs Aktobe 1.1 xG away), but Ulytau convert better — 13% conversion rate and 3 shots on target per game versus Aktobe’s 0% away conversion despite 5 shots on target. Additionally, Aktobe have conceded 13 goals in the last 5 matches while Ulytau only 5, indicating greater defensive vulnerability of the visitors; therefore I predict a home win.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Ulytau | Aktobe | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 32% | 38% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.24 | 0.29 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Aktobe is 80% better for: last-5 form.
1 pts / match - Ulytau · 1.8 pts / match - Aktobe
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Aktobe is 73% better for: goals scored per match.
0.83 goals / match - Ulytau · 1.44 goals / match - Aktobe
Ulytau is 25% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.89 goals / match - Ulytau · 1.11 goals / match - Aktobe
Ulytau scores in 67% of matches (12 of 18 matches), while Aktobe keeps a clean sheet in 33% (6 of 18 matches).
Aktobe scores in 72% of matches (13 of 18 matches), while Ulytau keeps a clean sheet in 33% (6 of 18 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Ulytau
Over / Under — Aktobe
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Aktobe is 23% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.22 pts / match - Ulytau · 1.5 pts / match - Aktobe
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Ulytau - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 22% of matches and wins 39%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Aktobe - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 44%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 80% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.00 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 20% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +3 | 0 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (4 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (6 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Ulytau
Aktobe
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Kazakhstan Premier League).
Teams vs league
| Ulytau | Liga | Aktobe | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 1.72 | 2.31 | ▲ 2.56 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 44% | 52% | ▼ 44% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 28% | 42% | ▼ 39% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 33% | 29% | ▲ 33% |
| Goal before half-time | • 61% | 62% | • 61% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 67% | 70% | ▲ 78% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): Ulytau 1 - 0 - 1 Aktobe. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 50% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Ulytau vs Aktobe?
The Kazakhstan Premier League match finished Ulytau 1:1 Aktobe. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Ulytau and Aktobe?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Ulytau won 1, Aktobe won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Ulytau vs Aktobe?
Ulytau score 0.83 goals per game on average and Aktobe 1.44. The Kazakhstan Premier League average is 2.31 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 42% of games. Both teams score in 44% of Ulytau's matches and 44% of Aktobe's.
What form are Ulytau and Aktobe in?
Over the last 5 games Ulytau have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Aktobe 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Ulytau vs Aktobe?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Ulytau vs Aktobe: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.