Ulytau vs Kairat: match statistics
Ulytau vs Kairat: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Ulytau played Kairat in Kazakhstan Premier League (Kazakhstan). The match was played on 10 May 2026. Final score: 1:1.
Current form
Ulytau: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. Kairat: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match.
Goal statistics
Ulytau scores 1.00 and concedes 0.88 goals per match. Kairat scores 1.56 and concedes 0.44. League average: 2.07 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Ulytau 50%, Kairat 33%. Over 2.5: Ulytau 38%, Kairat 33%. League level: BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 34%.
xG, shots and style
Kairat has higher xG: 1.70 vs 1.39. Ulytau: 12.4 shots per match, Kairat: 16.1.
Match halves
Ulytau: half-time lead 25%, second-half goals 0.38. Kairat: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.78.
Goals by minute
Ulytau: 31-45+ (3 goals). Kairat: 16-30 (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Kazakhstan Premier League: 2.07 goals per match, BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 34%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-2. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 50%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Kairat is a slight favorite: they sit 1st and have 14 goals this season versus Ulytau’s 8, and away they generate 1.72 xG on average compared to the hosts’ 1.41 xG at home. The visitors control the game more (59% possession vs 46%), average 16.2 shots and 5 on target per match versus the hosts’ 12.25 shots and 4.5 on target, and have a higher PPG in the last 5 matches (2.0 vs 1.8). In the last 5 fixtures both teams scored 8 goals each, but Ulytau conceded 8 in those five games while Kairat conceded only 5, highlighting the visitors’ defensive edge in form. Still, Ulytau are very solid at home: 75% home win rate, no home losses (Loss% 0), FTS 0% (score in every home game), only 0.5 goals conceded on average and 50% clean sheets, which can make life difficult for Kairat. Considering Kairat’s higher xG and quality of chances but Ulytau’s resilience and effectiveness at home, I give a slight edge to the visitors, hence the probability split 30/30/40.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Season-long metrics point to lower BTTS: Ulytau has a season BTTS rate of 25% and 75% clean sheets, while Kairat has 40% BTTS and 60% clean sheets, which argues for 'No'. However, in the last 5 matches both teams have BTTS at 60% and have scored an average of 1.6 goals each (8 goals in the last five matches each), and Ulytau concedes on average 1.6 goals in those five games, increasing the chance of Kairat scoring. xG and chances are balanced: xG for Ulytau 1.69 vs 1.72 for Kairat, with xG against 1.10 (Ulytau) and 0.82 (Kairat), and similar shot counts 16.0 vs 16.2 and 5.0 shots on target each, which favors goals from both sides. Additionally Ulytau has a higher conversion rate 14% vs 6% for Kairat, so the hosts convert chances more often, but season averages of goals conceded are low (0.5 and 0.4), which limits confidence in the BTTS scenario. Considering the strong recent 60% trend in the last 5 matches and the balanced xG and shots, I assess BTTS as more likely and assign it 60% vs 40% for 'No'.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
I forecast a total of 2.67 goals (Ulytau 1.26, Kairat 1.41) based on average xG: Ulytau xG_for 1.69 and Kairat defense xG_against 0.82 yield ~1.26 for the home side, while Kairat xG_for 1.72 and Ulytau defense xG_against 1.10 yield ~1.41 for the away side. Ulytau score 2.25 goals at home on average and keep a clean sheet in 75% of home matches, while Kairat score 1.00 away and concede 0.4 goals, indicating a mix of a strong home attack and a solid away defense. Ulytau’s shot conversion rate is 14% versus Kairat’s 6%, suggesting better finishing by the home team despite similar xG. In the last 5 matches both teams averaged 1.6 goals per game and recorded 60% of matches over 2.5, which supports the likelihood of at least 2 goals. A distribution model with an expected total of 2.67 yields roughly 75% for Over 1.5, ~50% for Over 2.5 and ~28% for Over 3.5; therefore I recommend playing Over 1.5 as the strongest signal.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
I forecast Ulytau to lead at the break and win the match (1/1) as the most likely scenario. Ulytau averages 1.0 goals by Half-Time versus Kairat’s 0.6 and concedes only 0.25 goals by Half-Time (away side 0.20); in the last five matches the home side had 7 first-half goals versus 4 for their opponents, and in those five fixtures Ulytau recorded first-half goals in 100% of games. Over Full-Time Ulytau averages 2.25 goals per match versus Kairat’s 1.00 and demonstrates a higher shot conversion rate (14% vs 6%), with very similar xG figures (1.69 versus 1.72), which indicates better finishing by the hosts. The hosts also have a higher average points per game (2.5 vs 2.2) and a superior win rate (75% vs 60%), and they score on average 1.5 goals after the break versus the visitors’ 0.6, supporting the likelihood of closing out the victory after Half-Time. Despite low average goals conceded (seasonal averages 0.5 for Ulytau and 0.4 for Kairat) and a high proportion of Half-Time clean sheets (75% and 80%), the advantage in goals scored and conversion gives greatest probability to the 1/1 Half-Time/Full-Time outcome.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Ulytau | Kairat | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 30% | 31% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.27 | 0.31 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Kairat is 10% better for: last-5 form.
2 pts / match - Ulytau · 2.2 pts / match - Kairat
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Kairat is 56% better for: goals scored per match.
1 goals / match - Ulytau · 1.56 goals / match - Kairat
Kairat is 100% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.88 goals / match - Ulytau · 0.44 goals / match - Kairat
Ulytau scores in 75% of matches (6 of 8 matches), while Kairat keeps a clean sheet in 67% (6 of 9 matches).
Kairat scores in 89% of matches (8 of 9 matches), while Ulytau keeps a clean sheet in 38% (3 of 8 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Ulytau
Over / Under - Kairat
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Kairat is 13% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.38 pts / match - Ulytau · 1.56 pts / match - Kairat
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Ulytau - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 25% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Kairat - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 67%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +3 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (3 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (3 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Ulytau
Kairat
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Kazakhstan Premier League).
Teams vs league
| Ulytau | Liga | Kairat | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 1.88 | 2.07 | • 2.00 |
| Both teams scored | • 50% | 49% | ▼ 33% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 38% | 34% | • 33% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 38% | 31% | ▲ 67% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 75% | 59% | ▼ 56% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 63% | 69% | ▼ 56% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): Ulytau 0 - 0 - 2 Kairat. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 50% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Ulytau vs Kairat?
The Kazakhstan Premier League match finished Ulytau 1:1 Kairat. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Ulytau and Kairat?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Ulytau won 0, Kairat won 2 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Ulytau vs Kairat?
Ulytau score 1.00 goals per game on average and Kairat 1.56. The Kazakhstan Premier League average is 2.07 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 34% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Ulytau's matches and 33% of Kairat's.
What form are Ulytau and Kairat in?
Over the last 5 games Ulytau have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Kairat 3-2-0 (2.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Ulytau vs Kairat?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Ulytau vs Kairat: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


