Unia Skierniewice vs Pogoń Grod. Mazowiecki: match statistics
Unia Skierniewice vs Pogoń Grod. Mazowiecki: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Unia Skierniewice played Pogoń Grod. Mazowiecki in 1. Liga (Poland). The match was played on 13 September 2026. Final score: 3:2.
Current form
Unia Skierniewice: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match. Pogoń Grod. Mazowiecki: 2-3-0, 1.80 points/match.
Goal statistics
Unia Skierniewice scores 0.86 and concedes 1.71 goals per match. Pogoń Grod. Mazowiecki scores 1.57 and concedes 0.71. League average: 2.69 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Unia Skierniewice 43%, Pogoń Grod. Mazowiecki 43%. Over 2.5: Unia Skierniewice 57%, Pogoń Grod. Mazowiecki 43%. League level: BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 49%.
xG, shots and style
Pogoń Grod. Mazowiecki has higher xG: 1.61 vs 1.45. Unia Skierniewice: 13.3 shots per match, Pogoń Grod. Mazowiecki: 13.3.
Match halves
Unia Skierniewice: half-time lead 43%, second-half goals 0.29. Pogoń Grod. Mazowiecki: half-time lead 43%, second-half goals 0.86.
Goals by minute
Unia Skierniewice: 16-30 (3 goals). Pogoń Grod. Mazowiecki: 76-90+ (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
1. Liga: 2.69 goals per match, BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 49%.
Head-to-head
No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Pogoń Grodzisk Mazowiecki remain unbeaten this season, with a record of 4 wins and 3 draws, while Unia Skierniewice have won just 2 of their 7 matches and sit in 18th place. Away from home, the visitors average 2.00 goals per match, register 7.67 shots on target and have failed to score in none of their games, whereas Unia score just 0.75 goals at home and have failed to find the net in 50% of their matches. Pogoń’s away defensive record is also impressive, conceding just 0.67 goals per match and keeping a clean sheet in 67% of their appearances, compared with Unia’s 1.50 goals conceded at home. The hosts have slightly better average possession, 54% versus 47%, but the visitors’ advantage in chance quality is evident in the xG figures: 1.87 versus 1.64. Pogoń’s form, with three draws in their last five matches, increases the risk of a stalemate, but their away efficiency and more consistent defence support a victory for the visitors.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The BTTS pick is not primarily based on Pogon’s highly solid defense, which concedes only 0.67 goals per match on average and keeps a clean sheet in 67% of its games. Unia averages 1.25 goals per season, but has scored just 0.8 goals across its last five matches, with BTTS occurring in only 20% of its games during that period. Pogon has a significantly higher offensive potential, averaging 2.0 goals, 1.87 xG, and 7.67 shots on target per match, making a goal from them likely. However, Pogon’s season BTTS rate is only 33%, compared with 55% for the league as a whole, suggesting that they often win without conceding. The more likely scenario is therefore a match in which at least one team—primarily Unia—fails to score, supporting a BTTS - No / No Goal outcome. This does not automatically mean a 0:0 draw; it simply indicates that at least one team is expected to keep a clean sheet.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Pogoń score an average of 2.00 goals per match, while Unia average 1.25; however, both teams have conceded relatively few goals this season: 0.67 and 0.75, respectively. Their defensive profile is confirmed by clean sheets, with Pogoń keeping a clean sheet in 67% of matches and Unia in 50%. The 3.5-goal line was exceeded in only 25% of Unia’s matches and 33% of Pogoń’s, while 75% and 67% of their respective games finished under this line. The last five matches suggest slightly higher scoring potential, as the teams conceded an average of 1.40 and 1.60 goals, but the projected total of 2.50 goals still leaves a clear margin to four goals. Therefore, the safest signal is Under 3.5 goals, although Pogoń’s attacking activity, with an average of 7.67 shots on target, reduces confidence in lower lines.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The strongest scenario is a draw at half-time followed by a Pogoń win at full-time, as the visitors have been level at the break in 4 of their last 5 matches, while Unia have been drawing at half-time in 3 of their 4 home games this season. However, Pogoń create significantly more chances: their average xG is 1.87 compared with Unia’s 1.41, while their average number of shots on target stands at 7.67 versus just 3.00 for the hosts. After the break, the visitors score an average of 1.00 goals and concede none, whereas Unia have scored just 0.20 goals after half-time and conceded 1.00 over their last five matches. Pogoń’s superiority across the season is also reflected in their average of 2.00 goals scored per match compared with Unia’s 1.25, as well as in their 67% win rate versus 50% for the hosts. Although neither team has lost a league match so far, Unia’s current form includes 3 defeats in their last 5 outings, increasing the likelihood that an evenly matched first half will turn into a Pogoń advantage after the break.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Unia Skierniewice | Pogoń Grod. Mazowiecki | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 29% | 38% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.22 | 0.31 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Pogoń Grod. Mazowiecki is 50% better for: last-5 form.
1.2 pts / match - Unia Skierniewice · 1.8 pts / match - Pogoń Grod. Mazowiecki
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Pogoń Grod. Mazowiecki is 83% better for: goals scored per match.
0.86 goals / match - Unia Skierniewice · 1.57 goals / match - Pogoń Grod. Mazowiecki
Pogoń Grod. Mazowiecki is 141% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.71 goals / match - Unia Skierniewice · 0.71 goals / match - Pogoń Grod. Mazowiecki
Unia Skierniewice scores in 71% of matches (5 of 7 matches), while Pogoń Grod. Mazowiecki keeps a clean sheet in 57% (4 of 7 matches).
Pogoń Grod. Mazowiecki scores in 100% of matches (7 of 7 matches), while Unia Skierniewice keeps a clean sheet in 29% (2 of 7 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Unia Skierniewice
Over / Under - Pogoń Grod. Mazowiecki
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Pogoń Grod. Mazowiecki is 20% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.43 pts / match - Unia Skierniewice · 1.71 pts / match - Pogoń Grod. Mazowiecki
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Unia Skierniewice - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 43% of matches and wins 29%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 0.9 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Pogoń Grod. Mazowiecki - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 43% of matches and wins 57%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 0.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -4 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 20% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (3 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (3 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Unia Skierniewice
Pogoń Grod. Mazowiecki
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (1. Liga).
Teams vs league
| Unia Skierniewice | Liga | Pogoń Grod. Mazowiecki | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.57 | 2.69 | ▼ 2.29 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 43% | 55% | ▼ 43% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 57% | 49% | ▼ 43% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 29% | 25% | ▲ 57% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 86% | 76% | ▼ 71% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 71% | 76% | ▼ 71% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
FAQ
What was the result of Unia Skierniewice vs Pogoń Grod. Mazowiecki?
The 1. Liga match finished Unia Skierniewice 3:2 Pogoń Grod. Mazowiecki. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Unia Skierniewice vs Pogoń Grod. Mazowiecki?
Unia Skierniewice score 0.86 goals per game on average and Pogoń Grod. Mazowiecki 1.57. The 1. Liga average is 2.69 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 49% of games. Both teams score in 43% of Unia Skierniewice's matches and 43% of Pogoń Grod. Mazowiecki's.
What form are Unia Skierniewice and Pogoń Grod. Mazowiecki in?
Over the last 5 games Unia Skierniewice have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and Pogoń Grod. Mazowiecki 2-3-0 (1.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Unia Skierniewice vs Pogoń Grod. Mazowiecki?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


