Unión La Calera vs Coquimbo Unido: match statistics
Unión La Calera vs Coquimbo Unido: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Unión La Calera played Coquimbo Unido in Primera División (Chile). The match was played on 24 April 2026. Final score: 1:2.
Current form
Unión La Calera: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Coquimbo Unido: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
Unión La Calera scores 1.30 and concedes 1.40 goals per match. Coquimbo Unido scores 1.33 and concedes 1.22. League average: 2.64 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Unión La Calera 30%, Coquimbo Unido 56%. Over 2.5: Unión La Calera 60%, Coquimbo Unido 44%. League level: BTTS 44%, Over 2.5 49%.
xG, shots and style
Coquimbo Unido has higher xG: 1.54 vs 1.16. Unión La Calera: 10.8 shots per match, Coquimbo Unido: 14.4.
Match halves
Unión La Calera: half-time lead 30%, second-half goals 0.80. Coquimbo Unido: half-time lead 44%, second-half goals 0.67.
Goals by minute
Unión La Calera: 76-90+ (5 goals). Coquimbo Unido: 61-75 (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Primera División: 2.64 goals per match, BTTS 44%, Over 2.5 49%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-2. Average goals 1.50, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Unión La Calera are favorites based on strong home metrics: at home they score 2.00 goals per game on average with xG 1.36, average 12.8 shots (4.4 on target), 53% possession and a +5 goal differential. Coquimbo Unido have scored 7 goals in their last 5 matches and hold a better point return in that period (1.6 pts vs 1.4 for the hosts), but away they average only 1.25 goals with xG 1.24 and a lower shot efficiency (11%). The main short-term risk for La Calera is their defence — the hosts conceded 11 goals in their last 5 matches, while Coquimbo conceded 5, which increases the likelihood of away goals. Nevertheless, the edge in quality of chances and finishing efficiency (conversion rate 16% vs 11%, 4.4 shots on target vs 3.75 shots on target) and a higher share of clean sheets for the hosts (40% vs 25%) gives them the greater probability of winning.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Statistical analysis favors BTTS: Unión La Calera has a seasonal BTTS rate of 60%, Coquimbo Unido 50%, both above the league average of 44%, supporting the "both teams to score" outcome. A key signal is clean sheets — the home side have a seasonal 0% clean sheets, the visitors 25%, so the risk of Unión conceding is effectively 100%, and Coquimbo about 75% (100% − 25%); the product of these rates gives 100% × 75% = 75% as a starting point. Looking at xG, Unión produce 1.79 xG versus 1.17 xG allowed by the visitors’ defense, while Coquimbo generate 1.24 xG against a Unión defense allowing 1.36 xG — both pairs indicate a realistic chance of at least 1 goal for each side. In the last 5 matches Unión scored 6 and conceded 11 (1.2 scored and 2.2 conceded per game), and Coquimbo 7 and 5 (1.4 scored and 1.0 conceded), additionally shot conversion is 8% for the hosts and 11% for the visitors, which partly justifies a slight adjustment of the baseline. Therefore I tip BTTS 'Yes' with probability 72% versus 28% for 'No'.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The model combines offensive xG and opponents' defensive values: I project 1.48 goals for Unión La Calera (attacking xG 1.79 and opponent defensive xG 1.17 average to 1.48) and 1.30 for Coquimbo Unido (attacking xG 1.24 and home defensive xG 1.36 give 1.30), totaling 2.78 goals. With lambda=2.78 the Poisson distribution indicates about a 77% chance of at least 2 goals (Over 1.5) and about 53% for 3+ goals (Over 2.5), while Over 3.5 I estimate at ~31%. Shooting metrics support this view: the home side averages 16.8 shots and 4.8 shots on target with xG 1.79, the visitors 11.5 shots and 3.75 shots on target with xG 1.24, and additionally the hosts conceded 11 goals in their last 5 matches (2.2 per game). Season-long indicators show both teams scored in 60% of the home side’s matches and 50% of the visitors’ matches, which increases the likelihood of goals at both ends. Consequently I recommend betting Over 2.5 (side: Over) as the strongest signal from the available data.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The strongest signal concerns the lead at the break: in the last 5 matches Unión La Calera led at half-time in 0 of 5 (0%), while Coquimbo Unido led in 3 of 5 (60%), suggesting an away advantage in the first half. Over the full match the statistics also favor Coquimbo — the visitors have a 50% win rate versus 40% for the home side and average 1.5 points per game compared to 1.4 for Unión La Calera. Although the home team generates higher xG (1.79 vs 1.24) and more shots (16.8 vs 11.5), shot efficiency is on the visitors’ side (11% vs 8%) and the visitors score earlier more often (1 goal in minutes 0–15 versus 0 for the hosts). Additionally, the hosts have been losing leads at half-time in their last 5 outings (last 5: led at half-time 0%, were trailing at half-time in 80%), therefore the strongest scenario I forecast is the visitors to lead and win (2/2) with an estimated probability of about 39%, with alternatives such as half-time draw/full-time away win (~10%) or draw/draw (~14%).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Unión La Calera | Coquimbo Unido | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 31% | 30% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.39 | 0.31 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Coquimbo Unido is 15% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.4 goals / match - Unión La Calera · 1.22 goals / match - Coquimbo Unido
Unión La Calera scores in 60% of matches (6 of 10 matches), while Coquimbo Unido keeps a clean sheet in 11% (1 of 9 matches).
Coquimbo Unido scores in 67% of matches (6 of 9 matches), while Unión La Calera keeps a clean sheet in 30% (3 of 10 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Unión La Calera
Over / Under - Coquimbo Unido
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Coquimbo Unido is 48% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.2 pts / match - Unión La Calera · 1.78 pts / match - Coquimbo Unido
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Unión La Calera - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 30% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Coquimbo Unido - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 44% of matches and wins 44%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.8 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.20 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.0 | 1.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.2 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 2.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 40% |
| No goal | 100% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -6 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.00 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 20% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +2 | -1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (4 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Unión La Calera
Coquimbo Unido
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Primera División).
Teams vs league
| Unión La Calera | Liga | Coquimbo Unido | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 2.70 | 2.64 | • 2.56 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 30% | 44% | ▲ 56% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 60% | 49% | ▼ 44% |
| Clean sheets | • 30% | 31% | ▼ 11% |
| Goal before half-time | • 70% | 70% | ▼ 67% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 80% | 78% | ▲ 89% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): Unión La Calera 0 - 0 - 2 Coquimbo Unido. Average goals 1.50, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Unión La Calera vs Coquimbo Unido?
The Primera División match finished Unión La Calera 1:2 Coquimbo Unido. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Unión La Calera and Coquimbo Unido?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Unión La Calera won 0, Coquimbo Unido won 2 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 1.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Unión La Calera vs Coquimbo Unido?
Unión La Calera score 1.30 goals per game on average and Coquimbo Unido 1.33. The Primera División average is 2.64 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 49% of games. Both teams score in 30% of Unión La Calera's matches and 56% of Coquimbo Unido's.
What form are Unión La Calera and Coquimbo Unido in?
Over the last 5 games Unión La Calera have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Coquimbo Unido 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Unión La Calera vs Coquimbo Unido?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


