Union Omaha vs Chattanooga Red Wolves: match statistics
Union Omaha vs Chattanooga Red Wolves: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Union Omaha played Chattanooga Red Wolves in USL League One (United States). The match was played on 24 May 2026. Final score: 2:0.
Current form
Union Omaha: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. Chattanooga Red Wolves: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
Union Omaha scores 1.78 and concedes 1.11 goals per match. Chattanooga Red Wolves scores 1.80 and concedes 1.40. League average: 2.75 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Union Omaha 67%, Chattanooga Red Wolves 80%. Over 2.5: Union Omaha 67%, Chattanooga Red Wolves 80%. League level: BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 57%.
xG, shots and style
Union Omaha has higher xG: 1.73 vs 1.42. Union Omaha: 14.7 shots per match, Chattanooga Red Wolves: 11.0.
Match halves
Union Omaha: half-time lead 22%, second-half goals 1.11. Chattanooga Red Wolves: half-time lead 40%, second-half goals 0.80.
Goals by minute
Union Omaha: 76-90+ (7 goals). Chattanooga Red Wolves: 46-60 (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
USL League One: 2.75 goals per match, BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 57%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 1-1-0. Average goals 3.50, BTTS 50%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Union Omaha is the clear favorite: they sit 1st in the table and have won 80% of home matches with 0% defeats, averaging 2 goals per home game and an average xG of 2.01 at home. They hold a pronounced advantage in control and chance creation — average possession 61% vs 30% for Chattanooga, 17 shots and 6 on target per match vs 10.67 shots and 3.67 on target for the visitors, translating into higher xG (2.01 vs 1.26). Defensively the hosts concede 1 goal per home game and keep 40% clean sheets, while Chattanooga concedes 1.67 goals away and has 0% clean sheets. The visitors, however, are efficient with limited opportunities — shot conversion 16% vs 12% for the hosts and an average 1.67 goals away indicates they can capitalise on chances. Considering Union’s 9 goals in the last 5 matches vs Chattanooga’s 6 and recent form points per game (last 5) 2 for the hosts vs 0.8 for the visitors, I predict a Union Omaha win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The strongest signal for BTTS - Yes is that the visitors have a seasonal BTTS rate of 100%, while the hosts show 80% BTTS in the last 5 matches (50% across the season). Both teams consistently score and concede: Union Omaha averages 2.0 goals scored and 1.0 conceded per match, and Chattanooga 1.67 scored and 1.67 conceded. Chance quality also favors goals — hosts xG 1.66 vs visitors 1.26, with an average of 5.0 shots on target for Union Omaha and 3.67 for Chattanooga, indicating realistic scoring opportunities on both ends. Additionally, both teams have 0% clean sheets this season, the league records BTTS at 57%, and the visitors have 100% of matches over 2.5 goals; therefore the most likely scenario is 'both teams to score' (BTTS - Yes).
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
xG analysis indicates a combined expected total of 2.83 goals: Union Omaha has an expected xG of 1.61 (attacking xG 1.66 vs Chattanooga’s defensive average 1.56), and Chattanooga 1.22 (attacking xG 1.26 vs Union’s defense 1.18). Across the season the league averages 2.77 goals per match, Chattanooga has 100% of matches over 2.5 this season, and Union 50% on the season and 80% in the last 5 matches, supporting an Over 2.5 scenario. Additionally, BTTS rates are high: Chattanooga 100% season-to-date and Union 50% season-to-date (in the last 5 matches BTTS Union 80% vs Chattanooga 60%), which increases the probability of goals from both sides. Offensively Union averages 11.5 shots and 5.0 on target with a 17% conversion, Chattanooga 10.67 shots and 3.67 on target with a 16% conversion — these figures align with the projected xG 2.83. On this basis the strongest signal is Over 1.5 (clear edge: combined xG 2.83 and Chattanooga 100% of matches over 1.5), therefore the recommendation is Over 1.5.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
I predict an X/1 scenario (draw at Half-Time, Union Omaha win Full-Time) because in the last 5 matches Union Omaha were level at the break in 60% of games versus 20% for Chattanooga. The home side shows a clear advantage after the break: average goals in second halves over the last 5 matches are 2.2 for Union Omaha versus 1.0 for their opponents, and the hosts have won 60% of second halves. Additionally, Union have a higher xG of 1.66 versus 1.26 and average 5.0 shots on target compared to the visitors’ 3.67, which suggests a greater ability to convert chances into goals after the interval. Chattanooga, however, have 100% BTTS on the road, so I expect the visitors to score as well, but the balance of numbers and the second-half form favor a turnaround for the hosts to take the lead and win.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Union Omaha | Chattanooga Red Wolves | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 34% | 38% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.36 | 0.43 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Union Omaha is 43% better for: last-5 form.
2 pts / match - Union Omaha · 1.4 pts / match - Chattanooga Red Wolves
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Union Omaha is 26% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.11 goals / match - Union Omaha · 1.4 goals / match - Chattanooga Red Wolves
Union Omaha scores in 89% of matches (8 of 9 matches), while Chattanooga Red Wolves keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 5 matches).
Chattanooga Red Wolves scores in 80% of matches (4 of 5 matches), while Union Omaha keeps a clean sheet in 22% (2 of 9 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Union Omaha
Over / Under - Chattanooga Red Wolves
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Chattanooga Red Wolves is 5% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.33 pts / match - Union Omaha · 1.4 pts / match - Chattanooga Red Wolves
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Union Omaha - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 22% of matches and wins 67%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Chattanooga Red Wolves - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 40% of matches and wins 40%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 2.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 1.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 80% |
| No goal | 60% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -2 | +5 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.2 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 2.2 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 0% | 80% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +3 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (3 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Union Omaha
Chattanooga Red Wolves
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (USL League One).
Teams vs league
| Union Omaha | Liga | Chattanooga Red Wolves | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 2.89 | 2.75 | ▲ 3.20 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 67% | 58% | ▲ 80% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 67% | 57% | ▲ 80% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 22% | 24% | ▼ 0% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 67% | 75% | ▲ 100% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 100% | 77% | ▲ 80% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): Union Omaha 1 - 1 - 0 Chattanooga Red Wolves. Average goals 3.50, both teams scored in 50% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Union Omaha vs Chattanooga Red Wolves?
The USL League One match finished Union Omaha 2:0 Chattanooga Red Wolves. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Union Omaha and Chattanooga Red Wolves?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Union Omaha won 1, Chattanooga Red Wolves won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 3.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Union Omaha vs Chattanooga Red Wolves?
Union Omaha score 1.78 goals per game on average and Chattanooga Red Wolves 1.80. The USL League One average is 2.75 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 57% of games. Both teams score in 67% of Union Omaha's matches and 80% of Chattanooga Red Wolves's.
What form are Union Omaha and Chattanooga Red Wolves in?
Over the last 5 games Union Omaha have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Chattanooga Red Wolves 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Union Omaha vs Chattanooga Red Wolves?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.