United States - USL League OneData current as of 17 October 2026

Union Omaha vs Richmond Kickers: match statistics

Union Omaha crest
Union Omaha
5 : 1half-time 3:1
Richmond Kickers crest
Richmond Kickers

Union Omaha vs Richmond Kickers: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Union Omaha played Richmond Kickers in USL League One (United States). The match was played on 16 August 2026. Final score: 5:1.

Current form

Union Omaha: 4-1-0, 2.60 points/match. Richmond Kickers: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Union Omaha scores 1.70 and concedes 1.10 goals per match. Richmond Kickers scores 0.95 and concedes 1.84. League average: 2.89 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Union Omaha 60%, Richmond Kickers 42%. Over 2.5: Union Omaha 60%, Richmond Kickers 53%. League level: BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 60%.

xG, shots and style

Union Omaha has higher xG: 1.89 vs 1.37. Union Omaha: 16.1 shots per match, Richmond Kickers: 11.8.

Match halves

Union Omaha: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 1.10. Richmond Kickers: half-time lead 21%, second-half goals 0.37.

Goals by minute

Union Omaha: 76-90+ (13 goals). Richmond Kickers: 0-15 (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

USL League One: 2.89 goals per match, BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 60%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-3. Average goals 3.67, BTTS 67%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Union Omaha are top of the table and remain unbeaten at home, winning 78% of their matches and averaging 2.11 goals scored. The hosts create plenty of high-quality chances: their average home xG is 2.17, alongside 18.44 shots and 6.89 shots on target per match, while Richmond allow opponents an xG of 1.92 away from home. Richmond Kickers sit 16th, have lost 11 of their 19 matches this season, and have scored just 2 goals in their last five games, suffering 3 defeats. The visitors’ problems are particularly evident away from home, where they lose 80% of their matches, concede an average of 2.5 goals, and fail to score in 40% of their appearances. The difference in game control also favors Union Omaha, who average 60% possession compared with Richmond’s 44%, making a convincing home win the most likely outcome.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The stronger signal points to BTTS - No, primarily due to Richmond’s attacking problems: in their last 5 matches, the team has scored just 2 goals, averaging 0.4 per game. The visitors have failed to score in 40% of their matches this season, while their current BTTS rate stands at just 20%, significantly lower than Union Omaha’s 80% over their last five outings. Union Omaha have kept a clean sheet in 33% of their matches, while Richmond are averaging only 2.9 shots on target per game and currently generate an xG of 1.00. The hosts are in considerably better offensive form, scoring 2.4 goals per game in their last five matches, so the most likely outcome is a home win with a clean sheet rather than necessarily a goalless draw.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Union Omaha are in excellent attacking form: over their last 5 matches, they have averaged 2.4 goals with an xG of 2.12, while Richmond have conceded 1.8 goals per game during the same period. The hosts should also be able to exploit their opponents’ weakness throughout the season, as Richmond have conceded an average of 2.5 goals away from home and have kept a clean sheet in only 10% of matches. At the same time, the visitors have limited attacking potential: they average 0.8 goals, have scored just 2 goals in their last five appearances, and their average xG stands at 1.00. Despite Union Omaha’s advantage, the hosts themselves have not exceeded 2 goals scored in 89% of their matches this season, which limits the probability of a very high-scoring game. The Under 3.5 goals line therefore has the edge, as the projected total of 2.65 goals assumes a home win but does not require an open match with four goals.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Union Omaha are clear favourites: they average 1.11 goals at home, while Richmond concede as many as 2.50 goals per away match and have lost 80% of their games. The home side’s advantage is also evident in the quality of chances, with an average xG of 1.57 compared with Richmond’s 1.19, while Union average 4.89 shots on target to Richmond’s 2.90. Union led at the break in 38% of their matches, whereas Richmond were trailing at half-time in 50% of their games and scored just 0.40 goals in the first half. In their last five matches, the hosts averaged 2.4 goals and won 60% of their games, while their opponents scored only 0.4 goals and suffered defeats in 60% of those matches. The HT/FT scenario of Union Omaha leading at half-time and securing the final victory is therefore the strongest-supported outcome, backed by both the difference in form and Richmond’s very weak away defence.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

3 : 1
1st half
2 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

61Possession (%)39
Union OmahaRichmond Kickers
21Shots10
Union OmahaRichmond Kickers
11Shots on target3
Union OmahaRichmond Kickers
2.59xG1.06
Union OmahaRichmond Kickers
13Corners1
Union OmahaRichmond Kickers
71Dangerous attacks30
Union OmahaRichmond Kickers
11Fouls13
Union OmahaRichmond Kickers
3Cards1
Union OmahaRichmond Kickers

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Union OmahaRichmond Kickers
1.7Goals scored / match0.95
Union OmahaRichmond Kickers
1.1Goals conceded / match1.84
Union OmahaRichmond Kickers
58%Average possession42%
Union OmahaRichmond Kickers
5.75Shots on target / match3.84
Union OmahaRichmond Kickers

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

16.05Shots per match11.79
Union OmahaRichmond Kickers
5.75Shots on target3.84
Union OmahaRichmond Kickers
10.6%Shot conversion8%
Union OmahaRichmond Kickers
58%Possession42%
Union OmahaRichmond Kickers
1.89xG for1.37
Union OmahaRichmond Kickers
1.32xG against1.74
Union OmahaRichmond Kickers

Shooting quality

Union Omaha: DominantRichmond Kickers: Balanced
Union OmahaRichmond Kickers
Accuracy (shots on target)36%33%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.300.25

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Union Omaha is 117% better for: last-5 form.

2.6 pts / match - Union Omaha · 1.2 pts / match - Richmond Kickers

Union Omaha
WDWWW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
65% W10% D25% L
Season (W-D-L)
13-2-5
2.05 pts / match · goal difference +12
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-1-0
2.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
7-2-0
Last 5 at home
3-2-0
DWWWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.4Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 2.29Opponent xG: 1.06BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%
Richmond Kickers
LLLWW
Season result split
26% W16% D58% L
Season (W-D-L)
5-3-11
0.95 pts / match · goal difference -17
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-1-8
Last 5 away
0-0-5
LLLLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 2.2xG: 1.54Opponent xG: 1.71BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Union Omaha is 79% better for: goals scored per match.

1.7 goals / match - Union Omaha · 0.95 goals / match - Richmond Kickers

Union Omaha is 67% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.1 goals / match - Union Omaha · 1.84 goals / match - Richmond Kickers

Union Omaha scoring profile: very strong

Union Omaha scores in 80% of matches (16 of 20 matches), while Richmond Kickers keeps a clean sheet in 21% (4 of 19 matches).

Richmond Kickers scoring profile: strong

Richmond Kickers scores in 58% of matches (11 of 19 matches), while Union Omaha keeps a clean sheet in 20% (4 of 20 matches).

34Goals scored (season)18
Union OmahaRichmond Kickers
22Goals conceded (season)35
Union OmahaRichmond Kickers
2.8Average goals in match2.79
Union OmahaRichmond Kickers
12Goals scored (last 5)6
Union OmahaRichmond Kickers
5Goals conceded (last 5)11
Union OmahaRichmond Kickers

How often they score at least...

80%1 goal58%
Union OmahaRichmond Kickers
70%2 goals26%
Union OmahaRichmond Kickers
20%3 goals11%
Union OmahaRichmond Kickers
0%4 goals0%
Union OmahaRichmond Kickers

How often they concede at least...

80%1 goal79%
Union OmahaRichmond Kickers
30%2 goals53%
Union OmahaRichmond Kickers
0%3 goals26%
Union OmahaRichmond Kickers
0%4 goals16%
Union OmahaRichmond Kickers

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

56%
League average

Goal patterns

25%BTTS at half-time21%
Union OmahaRichmond Kickers
10%BTTS in both halves0%
Union OmahaRichmond Kickers
30%Scored in both halves21%
Union OmahaRichmond Kickers

BTTS and goal count

60%Min. 3 goals and BTTS37%
Union OmahaRichmond Kickers
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS16%
Union OmahaRichmond Kickers
80%BTTS - last 540%
Union OmahaRichmond Kickers

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

60%Min. 1 goal before half-time79%
Union OmahaRichmond Kickers
35%Min. 2 goals before half-time53%
Union OmahaRichmond Kickers
5%Min. 3 goals before half-time5%
Union OmahaRichmond Kickers

2nd half

90%Min. 1 goal after half-time63%
Union OmahaRichmond Kickers
60%Min. 2 goals after half-time32%
Union OmahaRichmond Kickers
20%Min. 3 goals after half-time16%
Union OmahaRichmond Kickers

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Union Omaha is 20% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.2 pts / match - Union Omaha · 1 pts / match - Richmond Kickers

Union Omaha - half-time state
20% leading60% draw20% trailing
Richmond Kickers - half-time state
21% leading37% draw42% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.2Points per match (1st half)1
Union OmahaRichmond Kickers
0.5Goals scored (1st half)0.42
Union OmahaRichmond Kickers
0.5Goals conceded (1st half)0.95
Union OmahaRichmond Kickers
1Average goals (1st half)1.37
Union OmahaRichmond Kickers
55%Clean sheet before half-time42%
Union OmahaRichmond Kickers
60%No goal before half-time58%
Union OmahaRichmond Kickers

After half-time (2nd half)

1.75Points per match (2nd half)1.05
Union OmahaRichmond Kickers
1.1Goals scored (2nd half)0.37
Union OmahaRichmond Kickers
0.6Goals conceded (2nd half)0.79
Union OmahaRichmond Kickers
1.7Average goals (2nd half)1.16
Union OmahaRichmond Kickers
45%Clean sheet after half-time58%
Union OmahaRichmond Kickers
35%No goal after half-time68%
Union OmahaRichmond Kickers

Union Omaha - second-half results

50% W25% D25% L
24
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
35
Second-half points
+10
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.20
PPG before half-time
Lead holding325%

Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 65%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Richmond Kickers - second-half results

21% W42% D37% L
19
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
-10
Goal difference (1st half)
20
Second-half points
-8
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding124%

Leads at half-time in 21% of matches and wins 26%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.2

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Union Omaha - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.601.80
Goals scored / match0.81.2
Goals conceded / match0.60.4
Average goals in match1.41.6
1 goal80%60%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+1+4
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 60% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 4
Richmond Kickers - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.801.20
Goals scored / match0.20.4
Goals conceded / match1.20.6
Average goals in match1.41.0
1 goal80%60%
2 goals60%40%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference-5-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Union Omaha
ScoredConceded
5
4
0-15
6
2
16-30
1
4
31-45
5
5
46-60
4
3
61-75
13
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (13 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +9 - wins late phases.

Richmond Kickers
ScoredConceded
6
7
0-15
2
8
16-30
3
5
31-45
4
7
46-60
2
3
61-75
1
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (6 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.79
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.8 : 1.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
97%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
51%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+31%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
46%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
8%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 13 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Union Omaha

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.57
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.03
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.19
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.22
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
96%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
98%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.55
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.6
Late goals
38% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 15% come in the first quarter-hour.
38%

Richmond Kickers

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.37
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.52
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+6.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.42
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.10
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
85%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
104%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.25
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.0
Late goals
6% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 33% come in the first quarter-hour.
6%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (USL League One).

Teams vs league

Union OmahaLigaRichmond Kickers
Average goals in match• 2.802.89▼ 2.79
Both teams scored▲ 60%56%▼ 42%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)• 60%60%▼ 53%
Clean sheets▼ 20%25%▼ 21%
Goal before half-time▼ 60%70%▲ 79%
Goal after half-time▲ 90%79%▼ 63%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.89
Average goals per match
56%
Both teams scored
60%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
25%
Clean sheets
1.77
Home goals / match
1.12
Away goals / match
+58%
Home attack advantage
+37%
Home defence advantage
+32%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
70%
1 goal
38%
2 goals
14%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
79%
1 goal
48%
2 goals
19%
3 goals
5%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Union OmahaGoalSergio Ors NavarroAssist: Sami Guediri
  2. Richmond KickersYellow cardOwen O'Malley
  3. Richmond KickersGoalSean Paul Vinberg
  4. Union OmahaYellow cardSamuel Owusu
  5. Union OmahaYellow cardMarlon Vargas
  6. Richmond KickersGoalMatthew BolducAssist: Tyler Freeman
  7. Richmond KickersSubstitutionOn: Joshua Eric KirklandOff: Zahir Vasquez
  8. Richmond KickersSubstitutionOn: Ali SasankhahOff: Owen O'Malley
  9. Union OmahaGoalDiego GutiérrezAssist: Allen Gavilanes
  10. Richmond KickersSubstitutionOn: Beckett HowellOff: Sean Paul Vinberg
  11. Union OmahaSubstitutionOn: Edrey CaceresOff: Gabriel Cabral de Freitas
  12. Union OmahaYellow cardEdrey Caceres
  13. Union OmahaGoalAllen Gavilanes

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (3): Union Omaha 0 - 0 - 3 Richmond Kickers. Average goals 3.67, both teams scored in 67% matches.

Richmond Kickers
2 : 1
Union Omaha
Union Omaha
3 : 4
Richmond Kickers
Richmond Kickers
1 : 0
Union Omaha

FAQ

What was the result of Union Omaha vs Richmond Kickers?

The USL League One match finished Union Omaha 5:1 Richmond Kickers. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Union Omaha and Richmond Kickers?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches Union Omaha won 0, Richmond Kickers won 3 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Union Omaha vs Richmond Kickers?

Union Omaha score 1.70 goals per game on average and Richmond Kickers 0.95. The USL League One average is 2.89 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 60% of games. Both teams score in 60% of Union Omaha's matches and 42% of Richmond Kickers's.

What form are Union Omaha and Richmond Kickers in?

Over the last 5 games Union Omaha have a 4-1-0 record (2.60 points per game) and Richmond Kickers 2-0-3 (1.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Union Omaha vs Richmond Kickers?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Union Omaha vs Richmond Kickers: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.