Univ. Concepción vs Cobresal: match statistics
Univ. Concepción vs Cobresal: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Univ. Concepción played Cobresal in Primera División (Chile). The match was played on 13 April 2026. Final score: 1:0.
Current form
Univ. Concepción: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Cobresal: 0-1-4, 0.20 points/match.
Goal statistics
Univ. Concepción scores 0.88 and concedes 1.75 goals per match. Cobresal scores 1.50 and concedes 2.38. League average: 2.65 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Univ. Concepción 50%, Cobresal 75%. Over 2.5: Univ. Concepción 50%, Cobresal 63%. League level: BTTS 43%, Over 2.5 49%.
xG, shots and style
Univ. Concepción has higher xG: 1.46 vs 1.37. Univ. Concepción: 14.1 shots per match, Cobresal: 12.9.
Match halves
Univ. Concepción: half-time lead 13%, second-half goals 0.50. Cobresal: half-time lead 25%, second-half goals 1.00.
Goals by minute
Univ. Concepción: 31-45+ (2 goals). Cobresal: 76-90+ (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Primera División: 2.65 goals per match, BTTS 43%, Over 2.5 49%.
Head-to-head
No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I back the home win: Univ. Concepción have won 75% of home matches, recording average xG 1.56, 14.5 shots per game and 4.5 on target. Defensively the hosts look superior — they concede an average 1.00 goal at home (xG against 1.25) and keep 50% clean sheets, whereas Cobresal concede 2.75 goals per away match (xG against 2.12) and have 0% clean sheets. In the last 5 matches Concepción have averaged 1.0 point per game, scoring 4 and conceding 10, while Cobresal average only 0.2 points per game: the visitors scored 7 in their last five but conceded 14. Quality of chances favors the hosts — average xG 1.56 versus 0.95 for the visitors and 14.5 vs 9.5 shots suggest more opportunities for Concepción, although Cobresal’s away conversion is high (16% vs the hosts’ 7%), which can yield a lone goal for the visitors. Considering the xG advantage, greater shot volume and better home defence, I estimate probabilities at roughly 65% home, 20% draw and 15% away.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Cobresal has a seasonal BTTS rate of 100% (both teams scored in all matches), with 12 goals scored and 19 conceded (avg 1.5 and 2.75 per match). Univ. Concepción has a seasonal BTTS of 50%, 7 goals scored and 14 conceded (avg 1.5 and 2.0), and in the last 5 home matches the hosts had BTTS 60% with 4 scored and 10 conceded. The visitors in their last 5 matches also show a high BTTS of 80%, scoring 7 and conceding 14, while over 2.5 goals occurs in Cobresal’s season in 75% of games (Univ. Concepción 50%), which together points to high-scoring matches. xG and shot metrics confirm this: Un. Concepción has xG 1.79 and 16.25 shots per match versus Cobresal’s xG 0.95 and 9.5 shots, but the visitors convert better (shot accuracy/conversion 16% vs 9%) and both teams have high xG against (1.55 and 2.12). Considering Cobresal’s 100% BTTS, the 60% and 80% values in the last 5 matches and the high goals conceded (2.0 and 2.75), I prefer BTTS with an estimated probability around 80% — I back 'BTTS - Yes'.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The xG-based model projects 1.96 expected goals for Univ. Concepción and 1.25 for Cobresal (total 3.21), calculated as the average of the team’s attacking xG and the xG the opponent typically concedes ((1.79+2.12)/2 and (0.95+1.55)/2). The 3.21 total exceeds the league average of 2.66 and is supported by season over 2.5 rates: home side 50% of matches over 2.5, away side 75%, with the last 5 matches showing 40% (home) and 60% (away). Additionally, Univ. Concepción averages 16.25 shots and 5.75 shots on target, Cobresal 9.5 shots and 3.25 on target, with shot conversion rates of 9% for the hosts and 16% for the visitors, which increases the effective conversion in scoring situations. Cobresal also has BTTS in 100% of matches; although fixtures involving both teams show 50% and 75% of matches with over 3.5 goals respectively, neither team has recorded an individual 4+ goal match (0%), which limits confidence for over 3.5. Therefore the strongest signal is the Over 2.5 line – the expected 3.21 goals combined with high BTTS frequency and conversion rates favor Over 2.5.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Univ. Concepción holds a clear xG advantage: 1.79 versus 0.95 for Cobresal, with more shots (16.25 vs 9.5) and more shots on target (5.75 vs 3.25), indicating a higher volume of goalscoring opportunities. At half-time the home side average 0.75 goals compared to 0.25 for the visitors; the hosts led at the break in 50% of matches, while Cobresal led at the break in 0% and were trailing at half-time in 75%, which points to the hosts’ superiority in the first half. For the full match, the hosts also benefit from a higher points-per-game average (1.5 for Univ. Concepción vs 0.25 for Cobresal) and a win rate of 50% versus 0%, making the home side the favorite for the final result. At the same time, Cobresal have 100% of away matches with both teams scoring, and the hosts have only 25% clean sheets, so a both-teams-to-score outcome (e.g. 2:1) is most likely. Therefore the strongest HT/FT signal is 1/1 — the hosts leading at half-time and ultimately winning.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Univ. Concepción | Cobresal | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 29% | 35% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.10 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.21 | 0.33 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Univ. Concepción is 400% better for: last-5 form.
1 pts / match - Univ. Concepción · 0.2 pts / match - Cobresal
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Cobresal is 70% better for: goals scored per match.
0.88 goals / match - Univ. Concepción · 1.5 goals / match - Cobresal
Univ. Concepción is 36% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.75 goals / match - Univ. Concepción · 2.38 goals / match - Cobresal
Univ. Concepción scores in 75% of matches (6 of 8 matches), while Cobresal keeps a clean sheet in 13% (1 of 8 matches).
Cobresal scores in 88% of matches (7 of 8 matches), while Univ. Concepción keeps a clean sheet in 25% (2 of 8 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Univ. Concepción
Over / Under - Cobresal
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Univ. Concepción - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 13% of matches and wins 38%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Cobresal - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 25% of matches and wins 25%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 1.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -5 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.20 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.0 | 1.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 3.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 20% |
| No goal | 100% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -6 | -1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (2 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (4 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Univ. Concepción
Cobresal
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Primera División).
Teams vs league
| Univ. Concepción | Liga | Cobresal | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 2.63 | 2.65 | ▲ 3.88 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 50% | 43% | ▲ 75% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | • 50% | 49% | ▲ 63% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 25% | 30% | ▼ 13% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 75% | 68% | ▲ 88% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 88% | 80% | ▼ 63% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
FAQ
What was the result of Univ. Concepción vs Cobresal?
The Primera División match finished Univ. Concepción 1:0 Cobresal. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Univ. Concepción vs Cobresal?
Univ. Concepción score 0.88 goals per game on average and Cobresal 1.50. The Primera División average is 2.65 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 49% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Univ. Concepción's matches and 75% of Cobresal's.
What form are Univ. Concepción and Cobresal in?
Over the last 5 games Univ. Concepción have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Cobresal 0-1-4 (0.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Univ. Concepción vs Cobresal?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Univ. Concepción vs Cobresal: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


