Universidad Católica vs Palestino: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Universidad Católica played Palestino in Primera División (Chile). The match was played on 22 November 2025. Final score: 2:1.

Current form

Universidad Católica: 4-0-1, 2.40 points/match. Palestino: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Universidad Católica scores 1.48 and concedes 0.89 goals per match. Palestino scores 1.33 and concedes 1.00. League average: 2.64 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Universidad Católica 44%, Palestino 59%. Over 2.5: Universidad Católica 37%, Palestino 52%. League level: BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 50%.

xG, shots and style

Palestino has higher xG: 1.52 vs 1.39. Universidad Católica: 12.6 shots per match, Palestino: 13.2.

Match halves

Universidad Católica: half-time lead 37%, second-half goals 0.78. Palestino: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.85.

Goals by minute

Universidad Católica: 76-90+ (10 goals). Palestino: 76-90+ (10 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Primera División: 2.64 goals per match, BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 50%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 100%.

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
1 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

38Possession (%)62
Universidad CatólicaPalestino
11Shots18
Universidad CatólicaPalestino
5Shots on target4
Universidad CatólicaPalestino
1.29xG1.76
Universidad CatólicaPalestino
3Corners11
Universidad CatólicaPalestino
35Dangerous attacks47
Universidad CatólicaPalestino
14Fouls8
Universidad CatólicaPalestino
1Cards3
Universidad CatólicaPalestino

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Universidad CatólicaPalestino
1.48Goals scored / match1.33
Universidad CatólicaPalestino
0.89Goals conceded / match1
Universidad CatólicaPalestino
55%Average possession58%
Universidad CatólicaPalestino
4.26Shots on target / match4.7
Universidad CatólicaPalestino

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12.59Shots per match13.19
Universidad CatólicaPalestino
4.26Shots on target4.7
Universidad CatólicaPalestino
11.8%Shot conversion10.1%
Universidad CatólicaPalestino
55%Possession58%
Universidad CatólicaPalestino
1.39xG for1.52
Universidad CatólicaPalestino
1.24xG against1.38
Universidad CatólicaPalestino

Shooting quality

Universidad Católica: BalancedPalestino: Balanced
Universidad CatólicaPalestino
Accuracy (shots on target)34%36%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.350.28

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Universidad Católica is 100% better for: last-5 form.

2.4 pts / match - Universidad Católica · 1.2 pts / match - Palestino

Universidad Católica
WWWLW
Season result split
56% W22% R22% P
Season (W-D-L)
15-6-6
1.89 pts / match · goal difference +16
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-0-1
2.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
10-0-3
Last 5 at home
4-0-1
WWWWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 0.4xG: 1.56Opponent xG: 1.26BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 20%
Palestino
LLWWL
Season result split
48% W22% R30% P
Season (W-D-L)
13-6-8
1.67 pts / match · goal difference +9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
5-4-4
Last 5 away
1-1-3
DLWLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.22Opponent xG: 1.11BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 100%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Universidad Católica is 11% better for: goals scored per match.

1.48 goals / match - Universidad Católica · 1.33 goals / match - Palestino

Universidad Católica is 12% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.89 goals / match - Universidad Católica · 1 goals / match - Palestino

Universidad Católica scoring profile: very strong

Universidad Católica scores in 81% of matches (22 of 27 matches), while Palestino keeps a clean sheet in 30% (8 of 27 matches).

Palestino scoring profile: strong

Palestino scores in 81% of matches (22 of 27 matches), while Universidad Católica keeps a clean sheet in 37% (10 of 27 matches).

40Goals scored (season)36
Universidad CatólicaPalestino
24Goals conceded (season)27
Universidad CatólicaPalestino
2.37Average goals in match2.33
Universidad CatólicaPalestino
6Goals scored (last 5)7
Universidad CatólicaPalestino
2Goals conceded (last 5)8
Universidad CatólicaPalestino

How often they score at least...

81%1 goal81%
Universidad CatólicaPalestino
37%2 goals44%
Universidad CatólicaPalestino
15%3 goals7%
Universidad CatólicaPalestino
7%4 goals0%
Universidad CatólicaPalestino

How often they concede at least...

63%1 goal70%
Universidad CatólicaPalestino
19%2 goals26%
Universidad CatólicaPalestino
7%3 goals4%
Universidad CatólicaPalestino
0%4 goals0%
Universidad CatólicaPalestino

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

44%
Universidad Católica - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.12 of 27 matches
53%
League average

Goal patterns

19%BTTS at half-time11%
Universidad CatólicaPalestino
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Universidad CatólicaPalestino
22%Scored in both halves19%
Universidad CatólicaPalestino

BTTS and goal count

26%Min. 3 goals and BTTS48%
Universidad CatólicaPalestino
11%Min. 3 goals without BTTS4%
Universidad CatólicaPalestino
0%BTTS - last 5100%
Universidad CatólicaPalestino

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

70%Min. 1 goal before half-time56%
Universidad CatólicaPalestino
30%Min. 2 goals before half-time15%
Universidad CatólicaPalestino
15%Min. 3 goals before half-time11%
Universidad CatólicaPalestino

2nd half

85%Min. 1 goal after half-time81%
Universidad CatólicaPalestino
26%Min. 2 goals after half-time48%
Universidad CatólicaPalestino
7%Min. 3 goals after half-time19%
Universidad CatólicaPalestino

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Universidad Católica - half-time state
37% leading37% draw26% trailing
Palestino - half-time state
33% leading44% draw22% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.48Points per match (1st half)1.44
Universidad CatólicaPalestino
0.7Goals scored (1st half)0.48
Universidad CatólicaPalestino
0.48Goals conceded (1st half)0.33
Universidad CatólicaPalestino
1.19Average goals (1st half)0.81
Universidad CatólicaPalestino
56%Clean sheet before half-time70%
Universidad CatólicaPalestino
56%No goal before half-time63%
Universidad CatólicaPalestino

After half-time (2nd half)

1.67Points per match (2nd half)1.52
Universidad CatólicaPalestino
0.78Goals scored (2nd half)0.85
Universidad CatólicaPalestino
0.41Goals conceded (2nd half)0.67
Universidad CatólicaPalestino
1.19Average goals (2nd half)1.52
Universidad CatólicaPalestino
63%Clean sheet after half-time44%
Universidad CatólicaPalestino
41%No goal after half-time37%
Universidad CatólicaPalestino

Universidad Católica - second-half results

48% W22% R30% P
40
Half-time points
19
Half-time goals
+6
Goal difference (1st half)
45
Second-half points
+10
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.48
PPG before half-time
Lead holding151%

Leads at half-time in 37% of matches and wins 56%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Palestino - second-half results

37% W41% R22% P
39
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
+4
Goal difference (1st half)
41
Second-half points
+5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.44
PPG before half-time
Lead holding145%

Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 48%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Universidad Católica - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.602.00
Goals scored / match0.60.6
Goals conceded / match0.20.2
Average goals in match0.80.8
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%80%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference+2+2
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3
Palestino - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.20
Goals scored / match0.41.0
Goals conceded / match0.61.0
Average goals in match1.02.0
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%80%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference-10
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Universidad Católica
ScoredConceded
7
3
0-15
3
2
16-30
9
8
31-45
9
2
46-60
2
4
61-75
10
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.

Palestino
ScoredConceded
2
4
0-15
4
2
16-30
7
3
31-45
4
5
46-60
9
6
61-75
10
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.35
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.2 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
89%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
52%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-15%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
66%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
4%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 25 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Universidad Católica

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.15
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.44
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-8.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.09
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.35
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
95%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
82%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.51
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 18% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

Palestino

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.14
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.19
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-6.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.19
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.38
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
122%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
65%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.47
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
28% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 6% come in the first quarter-hour.
28%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Primera División).

Teams vs league

Universidad CatólicaLigaPalestino
Average goals in match 2.372.64 2.33
Both teams scored 44%53% 59%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 37%50% 52%
Clean sheets 37%26% 30%
Goal before half-time 70%64% 56%
Goal after half-time 85%84% 81%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.64
Average goals per match
53%
Both teams scored
50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
26%
Clean sheets
1.55
Home goals / match
1.09
Away goals / match
+42%
Home attack advantage
+30%
Home defence advantage
+24%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
64%
1 goal
28%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
84%
1 goal
46%
2 goals
23%
3 goals
5%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. PalestinoYellow cardFrancisco Tomás Montes Romero
  2. PalestinoYellow cardJonathan Oscar Benítez
  3. Universidad CatólicaGoalFernando Matías Zampedri
  4. Universidad CatólicaSubstitutionOn: Diego Martín Valencia MorelloOff: Alfred Canales
  5. Universidad CatólicaYellow cardFernando Matías Zampedri
  6. PalestinoYellow cardJason León
  7. Universidad CatólicaSubstitutionOn: Carlos Agustín FaríasOff: Clemente Montes
  8. Universidad CatólicaSubstitutionOn: Diego CorralOff: Gary Alexis Medel Soto

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Gastón PhilippeMatches officiated: 11
7.36Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 236%Home wins27%Draws36%Away wins

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Universidad Católica 0 - 1 - 0 Palestino. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

CD Palestino
1 : 1
CD Universidad Católica

FAQ

What was the result of Universidad Católica vs Palestino?

The Primera División match finished Universidad Católica 2:1 Palestino. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Universidad Católica vs Palestino?

Universidad Católica score 1.48 goals per game on average and Palestino 1.33. The Primera División average is 2.64 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 50% of games. Both teams score in 44% of Universidad Católica's matches and 59% of Palestino's.

What form are Universidad Católica and Palestino in?

Over the last 5 games Universidad Católica have a 4-0-1 record (2.40 points per game) and Palestino 2-0-3 (1.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Universidad Católica vs Palestino?

The statistical background for Universidad Católica vs Palestino — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.