Universidad Católica vs Univ. Concepción: match statistics
Universidad Católica vs Univ. Concepción: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Universidad Católica played Univ. Concepción in Primera División (Chile). The match was played on 14 June 2026. Venue: Estadio San Carlos de Apoquindo. Final score: 5:1.
Current form
Universidad Católica: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match. Univ. Concepción: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Universidad Católica scores 2.14 and concedes 1.36 goals per match. Univ. Concepción scores 0.86 and concedes 1.50. League average: 2.75 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Universidad Católica 64%, Univ. Concepción 43%. Over 2.5: Universidad Católica 71%, Univ. Concepción 50%. League level: BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 53%.
xG, shots and style
xG is very similar for both teams. Universidad Católica: 13.5 shots per match, Univ. Concepción: 13.3.
Match halves
Universidad Católica: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 1.14. Univ. Concepción: half-time lead 21%, second-half goals 0.50.
Goals by minute
Universidad Católica: 31-45+ (10 goals). Univ. Concepción: 61-75 (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Primera División: 2.75 goals per match, BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 53%.
Head-to-head
No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I predict a home win (1). Universidad Católica sits 2nd in the table and holds a clear advantage over Univ. Concepción (11th): the hosts have scored 30 goals this season versus 12 for the visitors, and in the last 5 matches Católica has scored 9 and conceded 2, while Concepción managed 4 goals and conceded 7. At home Católica averages 2.5 goals scored and 1.33 conceded per match, whereas the visitors average 0.86 goals scored and 2.14 conceded on the road (differences of 1.64 and 0.81 in favor of the hosts). The hosts register 5 shots on target per game versus 3.57 for the visitors and have a conversion rate of 18% compared to just 6% for Concepción, with similar xG (1.43 vs 1.38), indicating greater finishing efficiency. Additionally, Católica have won 4 of their last 5 matches and average 2.4 points per game in that span, while Concepción average 1 point and have 29% of away matches without scoring, giving the hosts a clear edge.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Universidad Católica has a clear defensive edge: they concede 0.86 goals per season on average and record 57% clean sheets, and in the last 5 matches they have conceded only 2 goals (0.4 per match). Univ. Concepción scores 0.86 goals per season and has netted 4 goals in the last five fixtures (0.8 per match), while conceding 7 goals (1.4 per match), indicating limited attacking potency. Seasonal BTTS rates are mixed (29% for the home side vs 57% for the away side), but in the last 5 matches BTTS occurred in only 20% for the home team and 40% for the away team, which favors No Goal. Additionally, Universidad Católica generates 1.45 xG per match, while Univ. Concepción allows 2.15 xG on average; however the hosts have converted xG into only 0.86 goals seasonally (improving to 1.8 goals in the last 5), which together with the high clean sheet rate points toward a no-BTTS scenario. Therefore I tip "No" with a 70% probability versus 30% for "Yes".
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
I expect around 3.20 total goals: Universidad Católica ~1.85 xG/goals, Univ. Concepción ~1.35 xG/goals, based on xG comparison (xg_for_home 1.45 vs xg_against_away 2.15 yields ~1.80 for the home side; xg_for_away 1.38 vs xg_against_home 1.22 yields ~1.30 for the visitors) and recent form over the last 5 matches (home team scores 1.8 on average, visitors 0.8). Universidad Católica in the last 5 matches has scored 9 and conceded 2 (avg 1.8–0.4), while Univ. Concepción stands at 4–7 (0.8–1.4), which supports an Over 2.5 goals scenario. Seasonal rates show Over 2.5 occurs in 43% of home matches and 57% of away matches, with a league Over 2.5 rate of 52%, so 2.5 is a reasonable threshold. On that basis I assign the highest probability to Over 2.5 (63% vs 37%), while Over 1.5 is very likely (88%) and Over 3.5 less certain (32%). Therefore I recommend backing Over at the 2.5 line as the strongest signal.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The most likely scenario is a draw at half-time with Universidad Católica winning after the match (X/1) — I assess this at 40%. The home side dominates second halves: they score on average 0.71 goals after the break and collect 1.71 points in second halves, whereas Univ. Concepción scores only 0.29 goals after the break and has 0.71 points; the home team won 43% of second halves versus 14% for the visitors. A level score at the break is realistic because Universidad Católica averages only 0.14 goals in the first half while the visitors average 0.57, and the home side were level at half-time in 43% of matches vs 29% for the visitors. xG also supports a comeback by the home team: home xG is 1.45 versus 1.38 for the visitors, and the visitors’ defense looks weaker (xG against for the visitors 2.15 vs 1.22 for the home team), so an even start and a later home turnaround is the strongest signal.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Universidad Católica | Univ. Concepción | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 36% | 29% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.10 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.44 | 0.22 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Universidad Católica is 20% better for: last-5 form.
1.2 pts / match - Universidad Católica · 1 pts / match - Univ. Concepción
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Universidad Católica is 149% better for: goals scored per match.
2.14 goals / match - Universidad Católica · 0.86 goals / match - Univ. Concepción
Universidad Católica is 10% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.36 goals / match - Universidad Católica · 1.5 goals / match - Univ. Concepción
Universidad Católica scores in 86% of matches (12 of 14 matches), while Univ. Concepción keeps a clean sheet in 36% (5 of 14 matches).
Univ. Concepción scores in 71% of matches (10 of 14 matches), while Universidad Católica keeps a clean sheet in 21% (3 of 14 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Universidad Católica
Over / Under - Univ. Concepción
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Universidad Católica is 14% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.14 pts / match - Universidad Católica · 1 pts / match - Univ. Concepción
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Universidad Católica - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Univ. Concepción - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 21% of matches and wins 36%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 80% |
| No goal | 40% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -3 | 0 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (10 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +6 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (3 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Universidad Católica
Univ. Concepción
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Primera División).
Teams vs league
| Universidad Católica | Liga | Univ. Concepción | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 3.50 | 2.75 | ▼ 2.36 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 64% | 49% | ▼ 43% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 71% | 53% | ▼ 50% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 21% | 29% | ▲ 36% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 86% | 71% | ▲ 79% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 71% | 75% | ▼ 71% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
FAQ
What was the result of Universidad Católica vs Univ. Concepción?
The Primera División match finished Universidad Católica 5:1 Univ. Concepción. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Universidad Católica vs Univ. Concepción?
Universidad Católica score 2.14 goals per game on average and Univ. Concepción 0.86. The Primera División average is 2.75 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 53% of games. Both teams score in 64% of Universidad Católica's matches and 43% of Univ. Concepción's.
What form are Universidad Católica and Univ. Concepción in?
Over the last 5 games Universidad Católica have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and Univ. Concepción 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Universidad Católica vs Univ. Concepción?
The statistical background for Universidad Católica vs Univ. Concepción — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


