Universidad Chile vs Coquimbo Unido: match statistics
Universidad Chile vs Coquimbo Unido: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Universidad Chile played Coquimbo Unido in Primera División (Chile). The match was played on 6 September 2026. Venue: Estadio Nacional Julio Martínez Prádanos. Final score: 4:2.
Current form
Universidad Chile: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match. Coquimbo Unido: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Universidad Chile scores 1.33 and concedes 0.81 goals per match. Coquimbo Unido scores 1.35 and concedes 1.20. League average: 2.84 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Universidad Chile 48%, Coquimbo Unido 65%. Over 2.5: Universidad Chile 48%, Coquimbo Unido 50%. League level: BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 54%.
xG, shots and style
Universidad Chile has higher xG: 1.65 vs 1.50. Universidad Chile: 14.9 shots per match, Coquimbo Unido: 13.5.
Match halves
Universidad Chile: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 0.76. Coquimbo Unido: half-time lead 35%, second-half goals 0.75.
Goals by minute
Universidad Chile: 76-90+ (8 goals). Coquimbo Unido: 61-75 (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Primera División: 2.84 goals per match, BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 54%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 1-1-1. Average goals 1.33, BTTS 33%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Universidad Chile sit 2nd, while Coquimbo Unido are 10th, with the hosts winning 10 of their 21 league matches compared with the visitors’ 7 wins in 19 games. At home, Universidad Chile win 60% of their matches, scoring an average of 1.7 goals and conceding just 0.7, while Coquimbo concede an average of 1.5 goals away from home. The hosts create significantly more chances: their average home xG is 1.84 compared with Coquimbo’s 1.24 away from home, while shots on target stand at 6.0 to 3.7 per match. Universidad Chile keep a clean sheet in 50% of their home fixtures, whereas the visitors have done so in just 10% of their away matches. Recent form also favours the hosts, who have won 3 of their last 5 matches, while Coquimbo have failed to win any, drawing 4 times and scoring just 4 goals.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The BTTS signal is primarily supported by Coquimbo Unido’s profile: their matches ended with BTTS in 80% of games this season, well above the league average of 53%. Universidad Chile average 1.33 goals scored, with an xG of 1.73, while Coquimbo concede an average of 1.50 goals and keep a clean sheet in only 10% of matches. The hosts recorded BTTS in 80% of their last five games, scoring 8 goals and conceding an average of 1.2 goals per match. The main risk to this pick is the visitors’ weaker recent attacking output, having scored just 4 goals in their last five appearances. However, Universidad conceded in 78% of matches, keeping clean sheets in only 22%. Overall, the more likely scenario is that the hosts exploit the opponent’s defensive weaknesses, while the visitors contribute at least one goal.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Universidad Chile have clear grounds to score: they average 1.73 xG per match, while Coquimbo Unido allow opponents 1.35 xG and concede an average of 1.50 goals. However, the visitors are less convincing in attack, averaging 1.24 xG and just 0.80 goals scored across their last five matches, while the hosts allowed only 0.93 xG during that period. Over the course of the season, Universidad Chile matches finished below 3.5 goals in 78% of cases, with the corresponding figure for Coquimbo Unido standing at 60%. Even with the hosts' strong recent attacking form, generating 2.07 xG over their last five matches, the projected total of 2.55 goals points more strongly towards a game without four goals. Under 3.5 is therefore the strongest option, as the two teams combined do not consistently produce enough goal volume to surpass this high line.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Universidad de Chile have a clear first-half advantage: they have led at the break in 56% of matches, compared with just 20% for Coquimbo Unido, while the hosts concede only 0.11 goals per match before half-time. The home attack creates more chances, as reflected by an xG of 1.73 versus 1.24 for the visitors, as well as an average of 5.0 shots on target per match compared with the opponents’ 3.7. Coquimbo have been level at half-time in as many as 70% of their matches, making the draw at half-time and home win at full-time a significant alternative. In the final outcome, however, Universidad de Chile’s current form is decisive: three wins in their last five matches and an average of 1.6 goals scored, compared with Coquimbo’s winless run and 0.8 goals per game. The strongest scenario is therefore a home lead at the break followed by a home win, although the second half could be more evenly contested, as Coquimbo average 0.9 goals after the interval.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Universidad Chile | Coquimbo Unido | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 33% | 33% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.27 | 0.31 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Universidad Chile is 80% better for: last-5 form.
1.8 pts / match - Universidad Chile · 1 pts / match - Coquimbo Unido
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Universidad Chile is 48% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.81 goals / match - Universidad Chile · 1.2 goals / match - Coquimbo Unido
Universidad Chile scores in 76% of matches (16 of 21 matches), while Coquimbo Unido keeps a clean sheet in 20% (4 of 20 matches).
Coquimbo Unido scores in 80% of matches (16 of 20 matches), while Universidad Chile keeps a clean sheet in 43% (9 of 21 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Universidad Chile
Over / Under - Coquimbo Unido
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Coquimbo Unido is 8% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.48 pts / match - Universidad Chile · 1.6 pts / match - Coquimbo Unido
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Universidad Chile - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 48%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Coquimbo Unido - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 35% of matches and wins 40%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.7 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.80 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 20% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +2 | -3 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Universidad Chile
Coquimbo Unido
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Primera División).
Teams vs league
| Universidad Chile | Liga | Coquimbo Unido | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.14 | 2.84 | ▼ 2.55 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 48% | 52% | ▲ 65% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 48% | 54% | ▼ 50% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 43% | 27% | ▼ 20% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 57% | 73% | ▼ 60% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 81% | 77% | ▲ 90% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- Coquimbo UnidoYellow cardJoshua Arancibia Latapiat
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (3): Universidad Chile 1 - 1 - 1 Coquimbo Unido. Average goals 1.33, both teams scored in 33% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Universidad Chile vs Coquimbo Unido?
The Primera División match finished Universidad Chile 4:2 Coquimbo Unido. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Universidad Chile and Coquimbo Unido?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches Universidad Chile won 1, Coquimbo Unido won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 1.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Universidad Chile vs Coquimbo Unido?
Universidad Chile score 1.33 goals per game on average and Coquimbo Unido 1.35. The Primera División average is 2.84 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 54% of games. Both teams score in 48% of Universidad Chile's matches and 65% of Coquimbo Unido's.
What form are Universidad Chile and Coquimbo Unido in?
Over the last 5 games Universidad Chile have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and Coquimbo Unido 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Universidad Chile vs Coquimbo Unido?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Universidad Chile vs Coquimbo Unido: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


