Universidad Chile vs Palestino: match statistics
Universidad Chile vs Palestino: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Universidad Chile played Palestino in Primera División (Chile). The match was played on 10 August 2026. Venue: Estadio Nacional Julio Martínez Prádanos. Final score: 2:1.
Current form
Universidad Chile: 4-1-0, 2.60 points/match. Palestino: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Universidad Chile scores 1.24 and concedes 0.65 goals per match. Palestino scores 1.47 and concedes 1.41. League average: 2.84 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Universidad Chile 35%, Palestino 59%. Over 2.5: Universidad Chile 35%, Palestino 53%. League level: BTTS 51%, Over 2.5 54%.
xG, shots and style
Universidad Chile has higher xG: 1.53 vs 1.43. Universidad Chile: 13.5 shots per match, Palestino: 14.1.
Match halves
Universidad Chile: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 0.76. Palestino: half-time lead 41%, second-half goals 0.65.
Goals by minute
Universidad Chile: 16-30 (5 goals). Palestino: 16-30 (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Primera División: 2.84 goals per match, BTTS 51%, Over 2.5 54%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 2-1-0. Average goals 2.67, BTTS 67%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Universidad Chile are unbeaten at home, winning 63% of such matches and conceding just 0.5 goals per game, while Palestino have lost 63% of their away fixtures. The hosts create significantly more chances, averaging 16.63 shots and 5.88 shots on target per match, compared with Palestino’s 11.38 shots and 3.63 on target. The difference is also reflected in chance quality: Universidad Chile record a home xG of 1.80 with 0.89 xGA, while the visitors generate 1.24 xG away from home and allow as much as 1.77. Palestino concede an average of 2 goals per away match and keep a clean sheet in just 13% of games, which should benefit an efficient home side scoring 1.75 goals per match at home. Both teams have scored 9 goals in their last five appearances, but Universidad Chile have won 4 matches during that period, and their home advantage points to a victory for the hosts.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
A scenario with both sides scoring is primarily supported by Universidad Chile’s attacking output: they average 1.89 goals at home, while Palestino concede an average of 1.00 goal away from home on as many as 2.00 occasions. Palestino’s season average of just 1.00 goal scored is admittedly modest, but they have raised that figure to 1.80 goals across their last five matches and recorded BTTS in 80% of those games. The hosts are solid defensively, conceding an average of 0.89 goals, but Palestino have recently created chances worth 1.65 xG, providing a realistic basis for a single goal. Universidad Chile are also showing strong current attacking quality, with 2.11 xG in their last five appearances, while their opponents allow an average of 1.89 xG. The combined season BTTS figures—56% for the hosts and 63% for Palestino—support the BTTS - Yes pick, although the advantage is not decisive.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Universidad Chile average 1.89 goals at home, while Palestino concede as many as 2.00 goals per away match, clearly strengthening the outlook for home-team goals. The quality-of-chances indicators support this: Universidad’s average xG is 1.60, whereas Palestino allow an average of 1.77 xG. In their last five matches, both teams scored 1.8 goals per game, but Palestino conceded 1.8 goals during this period, compared with just 0.8 for the hosts. At least two goals were scored in 56% of Universidad’s matches and 75% of Palestino’s, while the visitors kept a clean sheet in only 13% of their appearances. Over 1.5 is the strongest selection, as the projected 2.90 goals provide a substantial margin above this line without the risk associated with needing at least three goals.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Universidad Chile hold a clear full-match advantage: they average 1.89 goals scored and 0.89 conceded, while Palestino score 1.00 and concede as many as 2.00 goals away from home. The difference is also reflected in the xG figures: the hosts create chances worth 1.60 xG, whereas their opponents allow 1.77 xG to opposing teams; Universidad also average 5.44 shots on target compared with Palestino’s 3.63. At half-time, the hosts were level in 5 of 9 matches, but their defence has been highly stable, conceding just 0.33 goals on average before the break and keeping a clean sheet in this period in 67% of matches. Recent form further favours the hosts, who have won 4 of their last 5 matches, scoring an average of 1.8 goals and conceding only 0.8. The most likely scenario is therefore Universidad Chile taking the lead at the break and maintaining their advantage until full-time, particularly as Palestino have not won a single second half in the season and average only 0.13 goals in those periods.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Universidad Chile | Palestino | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 35% | 33% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.10 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.27 | 0.32 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Universidad Chile is 30% better for: last-5 form.
2.6 pts / match - Universidad Chile · 2 pts / match - Palestino
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Palestino is 19% better for: goals scored per match.
1.24 goals / match - Universidad Chile · 1.47 goals / match - Palestino
Universidad Chile is 117% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.65 goals / match - Universidad Chile · 1.41 goals / match - Palestino
Universidad Chile scores in 71% of matches (12 of 17 matches), while Palestino keeps a clean sheet in 24% (4 of 17 matches).
Palestino scores in 71% of matches (12 of 17 matches), while Universidad Chile keeps a clean sheet in 53% (9 of 17 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Universidad Chile
Over / Under - Palestino
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Universidad Chile - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 47%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Palestino - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 41% of matches and wins 47%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.60 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 20% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +4 | +2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.8 | 0.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 80% |
| No goal | 40% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +1 | 0 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Universidad Chile
Palestino
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Primera División).
Teams vs league
| Universidad Chile | Liga | Palestino | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 1.88 | 2.84 | • 2.88 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 35% | 51% | ▲ 59% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 35% | 54% | • 53% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 53% | 28% | ▼ 24% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 47% | 72% | ▲ 76% |
| Goal after half-time | • 76% | 76% | ▼ 65% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- Universidad ChileSubstitutionOn: Bianneider Nauj Tamayo EscalonaOff: Charles Mariano Aránguiz Sandoval
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (3): Universidad Chile 2 - 1 - 0 Palestino. Average goals 2.67, both teams scored in 67% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Universidad Chile vs Palestino?
The Primera División match finished Universidad Chile 2:1 Palestino. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Universidad Chile and Palestino?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches Universidad Chile won 2, Palestino won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Universidad Chile vs Palestino?
Universidad Chile score 1.24 goals per game on average and Palestino 1.47. The Primera División average is 2.84 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 54% of games. Both teams score in 35% of Universidad Chile's matches and 59% of Palestino's.
What form are Universidad Chile and Palestino in?
Over the last 5 games Universidad Chile have a 4-1-0 record (2.60 points per game) and Palestino 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Universidad Chile vs Palestino?
The statistical background for Universidad Chile vs Palestino — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


