Uganda - Uganda Premier LeagueData current as of 13 October 2026

UPDF vs BUL: match statistics

UPDF crest
UPDF
0 : 1half-time 0:1
BUL crest
BUL
125%(0.00)
X30%(0.00)
245%(0.00)

BUL displays clearly better form in the last five matches, earning 1.2 points per match compared to UPDF's mere 0.4 points. The hosts sit in 14th place and haven't won any of their last five meetings, showing very poor home form (17% win rate). BUL demonstrates greater offensive efficiency in away matches, recording an average of 4.4 shots on target per match and a higher conversion rate (8% vs 6%). UPDF fails to score in 50% of home matches, which, combined with the visitors' better efficiency, points towards a BUL victory. Higher xG values for the visitors (1.49 vs 1.45) and their superior disposition suggest BUL has better chances of winning, though the instability of both teams leaves room for a draw.

UPDF vs BUL: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

UPDF played BUL in Uganda Premier League (Uganda). The match was played on 30 January 2026. Final score: 0:1.

Current form

UPDF: 0-2-3, 0.40 points/match. BUL: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

UPDF scores 0.86 and concedes 1.64 goals per match. BUL scores 0.93 and concedes 1.14. League average: 2.32 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: UPDF 43%, BUL 50%. Over 2.5: UPDF 50%, BUL 43%. League level: BTTS 44%, Over 2.5 41%.

xG, shots and style

UPDF has higher xG: 1.53 vs 1.52. UPDF: 11.0 shots per match, BUL: 9.7.

Match halves

UPDF: half-time lead 14%, second-half goals 0.50. BUL: half-time lead 36%, second-half goals 0.21.

Goals by minute

UPDF: 46-60 (4 goals). BUL: 31-45+ (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Uganda Premier League: 2.32 goals per match, BTTS 44%, Over 2.5 41%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

BUL displays clearly better form in the last five matches, earning 1.2 points per match compared to UPDF's mere 0.4 points. The hosts sit in 14th place and haven't won any of their last five meetings, showing very poor home form (17% win rate). BUL demonstrates greater offensive efficiency in away matches, recording an average of 4.4 shots on target per match and a higher conversion rate (8% vs 6%). UPDF fails to score in 50% of home matches, which, combined with the visitors' better efficiency, points towards a BUL victory. Higher xG values for the visitors (1.49 vs 1.45) and their superior disposition suggest BUL has better chances of winning, though the instability of both teams leaves room for a draw.

View the statistical overview

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

56Possession (%)44
UPDFBUL
8Shots5
UPDFBUL
3Shots on target3
UPDFBUL
1.4xG1.06
UPDFBUL
2Corners2
UPDFBUL
94Dangerous attacks72
UPDFBUL
16Fouls21
UPDFBUL
0Cards0
UPDFBUL

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

0.86Goals scored / match0.93
UPDFBUL
1.64Goals conceded / match1.14
UPDFBUL
48%Average possession41%
UPDFBUL
2.5Shots on target / match3.07
UPDFBUL

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11Shots per match9.71
UPDFBUL
2.5Shots on target3.07
UPDFBUL
7.8%Shot conversion9.6%
UPDFBUL
48%Possession41%
UPDFBUL
1.53xG for1.52
UPDFBUL
1.24xG against1.35
UPDFBUL

Shooting quality

UPDF: BalancedBUL: Balanced
UPDFBUL
Accuracy (shots on target)23%32%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.140.16
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.340.30

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

BUL is 200% better for: last-5 form.

0.4 pts / match - UPDF · 1.2 pts / match - BUL

UPDF
DDLLL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
21% W14% D64% L
Season (W-D-L)
3-2-9
0.79 pts / match · goal difference -11
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-2-3
0.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-1-4
Last 5 at home
1-1-3
LLWDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.58Opponent xG: 1.17BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%
BUL
LLWWL
Season result split
29% W29% D43% L
Season (W-D-L)
4-4-6
1.14 pts / match · goal difference -3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-2-3
Last 5 away
1-1-3
DLLWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.59Opponent xG: 1.60BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

BUL is 8% better for: goals scored per match.

0.86 goals / match - UPDF · 0.93 goals / match - BUL

BUL is 44% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.64 goals / match - UPDF · 1.14 goals / match - BUL

UPDF scoring profile: strong

UPDF scores in 64% of matches (9 of 14 matches), while BUL keeps a clean sheet in 36% (5 of 14 matches).

BUL scoring profile: strong

BUL scores in 71% of matches (10 of 14 matches), while UPDF keeps a clean sheet in 29% (4 of 14 matches).

12Goals scored (season)13
UPDFBUL
23Goals conceded (season)16
UPDFBUL
2.5Average goals in match2.07
UPDFBUL
3Goals scored (last 5)6
UPDFBUL
9Goals conceded (last 5)9
UPDFBUL

How often they score at least...

64%1 goal71%
UPDFBUL
21%2 goals14%
UPDFBUL
0%3 goals7%
UPDFBUL
0%4 goals0%
UPDFBUL

How often they concede at least...

71%1 goal64%
UPDFBUL
50%2 goals36%
UPDFBUL
21%3 goals14%
UPDFBUL
14%4 goals0%
UPDFBUL

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

21%BTTS at half-time21%
UPDFBUL
14%BTTS in both halves0%
UPDFBUL
21%Scored in both halves7%
UPDFBUL

BTTS and goal count

43%Min. 3 goals and BTTS36%
UPDFBUL
7%Min. 3 goals without BTTS7%
UPDFBUL
40%BTTS - last 580%
UPDFBUL

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

71%Min. 1 goal before half-time71%
UPDFBUL
43%Min. 2 goals before half-time29%
UPDFBUL
14%Min. 3 goals before half-time7%
UPDFBUL

2nd half

71%Min. 1 goal after half-time36%
UPDFBUL
36%Min. 2 goals after half-time36%
UPDFBUL
7%Min. 3 goals after half-time7%
UPDFBUL

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

BUL is 99% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.79 pts / match - UPDF · 1.57 pts / match - BUL

UPDF - half-time state
14% leading36% draw50% trailing
BUL - half-time state
36% leading50% draw14% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.79Points per match (1st half)1.57
UPDFBUL
0.36Goals scored (1st half)0.71
UPDFBUL
1Goals conceded (1st half)0.36
UPDFBUL
1.36Average goals (1st half)1.07
UPDFBUL
43%Clean sheet before half-time64%
UPDFBUL
64%No goal before half-time43%
UPDFBUL

After half-time (2nd half)

1.29Points per match (2nd half)0.79
UPDFBUL
0.5Goals scored (2nd half)0.21
UPDFBUL
0.64Goals conceded (2nd half)0.64
UPDFBUL
1.14Average goals (2nd half)0.86
UPDFBUL
57%Clean sheet after half-time64%
UPDFBUL
50%No goal after half-time79%
UPDFBUL

UPDF - second-half results

29% W43% D29% L
11
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
-9
Goal difference (1st half)
18
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.79
PPG before half-time
Lead holding150%

Leads at half-time in 14% of matches and wins 21%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.4

Defence stays stable across the full match.

BUL - second-half results

0% W79% D21% L
22
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
+5
Goal difference (1st half)
11
Second-half points
-6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.57
PPG before half-time
Lead holding81%

Leads at half-time in 36% of matches and wins 29%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

UPDF - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.401.20
Goals scored / match0.20.4
Goals conceded / match1.20.6
Average goals in match1.41.0
1 goal80%60%
2 goals60%40%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet20%60%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference-5-1
Half-time: 0% leading - 40% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1
BUL - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.600.60
Goals scored / match0.60.6
Goals conceded / match0.41.4
Average goals in match1.02.0
1 goal80%80%
2 goals20%80%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+1-4
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 60% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

UPDF
ScoredConceded
2
3
0-15
2
2
16-30
1
9
31-45
4
2
46-60
1
4
61-75
2
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (4 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

BUL
ScoredConceded
1
4
0-15
2
2
16-30
7
1
31-45
2
2
46-60
1
3
61-75
0
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (7 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.29
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.0 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
98%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
47%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
45%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
10%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 10 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

UPDF

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.29
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-1.07
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+2.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.67
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.40
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
59%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
191%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.39
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

BUL

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.17
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.38
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.59
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.21
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
108%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
78%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.06
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.5
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Uganda Premier League).

Teams vs league

UPDFLigaBUL
Average goals in match▲ 2.502.32▼ 2.07
Both teams scored• 43%44%▲ 50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 50%41%▲ 43%
Clean sheets▼ 29%34%▲ 36%
Goal before half-time▲ 71%61%▲ 71%
Goal after half-time▲ 71%62%▼ 36%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.32
Average goals per match
44%
Both teams scored
41%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
34%
Clean sheets
1.46
Home goals / match
0.86
Away goals / match
+70%
Home attack advantage
+41%
Home defence advantage
+25%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
61%
1 goal
30%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
62%
1 goal
32%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

FAQ

What was the result of UPDF vs BUL?

The Uganda Premier League match finished UPDF 0:1 BUL. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before UPDF vs BUL?

UPDF score 0.86 goals per game on average and BUL 0.93. The Uganda Premier League average is 2.32 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 41% of games. Both teams score in 43% of UPDF's matches and 50% of BUL's.

What form are UPDF and BUL in?

Over the last 5 games UPDF have a 0-2-3 record (0.40 points per game) and BUL 2-0-3 (1.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for UPDF vs BUL?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for UPDF vs BUL: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.