Uganda - Uganda Premier LeagueBombo StadiumData current as of 20 September 2026

UPDF vs Maroons: match statistics

UPDF crest
UPDF
1 : 0half-time 1:0
Maroons crest
Maroons

UPDF vs Maroons: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

UPDF played Maroons in Uganda Premier League (Uganda). The match was played on 17 September 2026. Venue: Bombo Stadium. Final score: 1:0.

Current form

UPDF: 0-2-1, 0.67 points/match. Maroons: 1-0-2, 1.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

UPDF scores 0.33 and concedes 0.67 goals per match. Maroons scores 1.67 and concedes 1.67. League average: 2.03 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: UPDF 33%, Maroons 100%. Over 2.5: UPDF 33%, Maroons 100%. League level: BTTS 38%, Over 2.5 38%.

xG, shots and style

Maroons has higher xG: 1.47 vs 1.25. UPDF: 7.0 shots per match, Maroons: 10.7.

Match halves

UPDF: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.00. Maroons: half-time lead 100%, second-half goals 0.33.

Goals by minute

UPDF: 16-30 (1 goals). Maroons: 31-45+ (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Uganda Premier League: 2.03 goals per match, BTTS 38%, Over 2.5 38%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-1. Average goals 1.50, BTTS 50%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Maroons sit higher in the table, in 9th place compared with UPDF in 11th, and have averaged 1.2 points per game over their last five matches, compared with 0.6 for the hosts. The visitors have scored 6 goals in their last five games, while UPDF have managed just 2, and their away record stands at an average of 3 goals per match. UPDF remain unbeaten at home and have kept a clean sheet in every home game, but they have also failed to score in 100% of their home matches despite an xG of 1.38. Maroons create more chances away from home, averaging 13 shots and 5 on target, compared with UPDF’s 9 shots and 4 on target, while their xG stands at 1.77. However, the visitors’ defence allows an average of 2.33 xG, making a draw a realistic scenario, but greater efficiency and attacking activity favour Maroons.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The recent-form signal cautiously points toward BTTS - No: UPDF have averaged only 0.4 goals across their previous five matches, while the two teams recorded BTTS in 40% and 60% of those games, respectively. The hosts failed to score in three of their last five appearances, which is a key risk to the Goal/Goal scenario. Maroons are clearly more dangerous in attack, averaging 5.0 shots on target compared with UPDF’s 2.5 and posting a seasonal average of 3.0 goals, making their scoring highly probable. At the same time, UPDF and Maroons have averaged only 1.22 and 1.35 xG respectively across their last five matches, while the league has a low BTTS rate of 39%. Both teams’ seasonal 100% BTTS record indicates goal potential, but given UPDF’s poor current finishing, it is more likely that at least one side will fail to score.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

UPDF’s latest form points to limited attacking output: the team has averaged just 0.4 goals over their last 5 matches, with 1.22 xG. Maroons scored 1.2 goals per game during this period and conceded 1.6, giving them an advantage but not automatically suggesting a very high-scoring game. The league average is only 1.96 goals, and just 35% of matches go Over 2.5 goals, which is why the projected total of 2.20 goals remains moderate. Although previous results involving both teams often went Over 2.5 goals, UPDF recorded Over 2.5 in 40% of their last five matches, while Maroons did so in 80%, reducing confidence in a high Over. The strongest option is Under 3.5, as it takes at least 4 goals to lose this bet, while UPDF’s current output and the competition’s low average clearly do not support such a high total.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Maroons possess the clearer attacking potential: in the current data, they average 3.0 goals per match compared with UPDF’s 1.0, while also recording 5.0 shots on target against the hosts’ 2.5. In their last five matches, the visitors led at the break on 60% of occasions, whereas UPDF failed to take the lead even once and scored just 0.2 goals per match before half-time. Maroons’ superiority is also reflected in the quality of their chances, with an xG of 1.77, while UPDF allows opponents an xG of 1.32. The hosts remain without a win in their last five matches, averaging only 0.4 goals, which limits their chances of overturning a deficit after the break. The most likely scenario is therefore that Maroons establish a lead before half-time and hold on to it until the final whistle.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

45Possession (%)55
UPDFMaroons
6Shots5
UPDFMaroons
3Shots on target3
UPDFMaroons
1.23xG1.11
UPDFMaroons
8Corners4
UPDFMaroons
86Dangerous attacks78
UPDFMaroons
16Fouls10
UPDFMaroons
0Cards0
UPDFMaroons

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

0.33Goals scored / match1.67
UPDFMaroons
0.67Goals conceded / match1.67
UPDFMaroons
46%Average possession42%
UPDFMaroons
3.33Shots on target / match3.33
UPDFMaroons

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

7Shots per match10.67
UPDFMaroons
3.33Shots on target3.33
UPDFMaroons
4.8%Shot conversion15.6%
UPDFMaroons
46%Possession42%
UPDFMaroons
1.25xG for1.47
UPDFMaroons
1.23xG against1.65
UPDFMaroons

Shooting quality

UPDF: BalancedMaroons: Counter-attacking
UPDFMaroons
Accuracy (shots on target)48%31%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.180.14
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.100.50

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Maroons is 49% better for: last-5 form.

0.67 pts / match - UPDF · 1 pts / match - Maroons

UPDF
DLD
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
0% W67% D33% L
Season (W-D-L)
0-2-1
0.67 pts / match · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-2-1
0.67 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-1-0
Last 5 at home
0-1-0
D
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.3Goals conceded: 0.7xG: 1.25Opponent xG: 1.23BTTS: 33%Over 2.5: 33%
Maroons
LWL
Season result split
33% W0% D67% L
Season (W-D-L)
1-0-2
1.00 pts / match · goal difference 0
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-2
1.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-0-0
Last 5 away
1-0-0
W
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.7Goals conceded: 1.7xG: 1.47Opponent xG: 1.65BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 100%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Maroons is 406% better for: goals scored per match.

0.33 goals / match - UPDF · 1.67 goals / match - Maroons

UPDF is 149% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.67 goals / match - UPDF · 1.67 goals / match - Maroons

UPDF scoring profile: strong

UPDF scores in 33% of matches (1 of 3 matches), while Maroons keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 3 matches).

Maroons scoring profile: strong

Maroons scores in 100% of matches (3 of 3 matches), while UPDF keeps a clean sheet in 67% (2 of 3 matches).

1Goals scored (season)5
UPDFMaroons
2Goals conceded (season)5
UPDFMaroons
1Average goals in match3.33
UPDFMaroons
1Goals scored (last 5)5
UPDFMaroons
2Goals conceded (last 5)5
UPDFMaroons

How often they score at least...

33%1 goal100%
UPDFMaroons
0%2 goals33%
UPDFMaroons
0%3 goals33%
UPDFMaroons
0%4 goals0%
UPDFMaroons

How often they concede at least...

33%1 goal100%
UPDFMaroons
33%2 goals67%
UPDFMaroons
0%3 goals0%
UPDFMaroons
0%4 goals0%
UPDFMaroons

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

33%BTTS at half-time0%
UPDFMaroons
0%BTTS in both halves0%
UPDFMaroons
0%Scored in both halves33%
UPDFMaroons

BTTS and goal count

33%Min. 3 goals and BTTS100%
UPDFMaroons
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
UPDFMaroons
33%BTTS - last 5100%
UPDFMaroons

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

33%Min. 1 goal before half-time100%
UPDFMaroons
33%Min. 2 goals before half-time33%
UPDFMaroons
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
UPDFMaroons

2nd half

33%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
UPDFMaroons
0%Min. 2 goals after half-time100%
UPDFMaroons
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
UPDFMaroons

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Maroons is 200% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1 pts / match - UPDF · 3 pts / match - Maroons

UPDF - half-time state
0% leading100% draw0% trailing
Maroons - half-time state
100% leading0% draw0% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1Points per match (1st half)3
UPDFMaroons
0.33Goals scored (1st half)1.33
UPDFMaroons
0.33Goals conceded (1st half)0
UPDFMaroons
0.67Average goals (1st half)1.33
UPDFMaroons
67%Clean sheet before half-time100%
UPDFMaroons
67%No goal before half-time0%
UPDFMaroons

After half-time (2nd half)

0.67Points per match (2nd half)0.33
UPDFMaroons
0Goals scored (2nd half)0.33
UPDFMaroons
0.33Goals conceded (2nd half)1.67
UPDFMaroons
0.33Average goals (2nd half)2
UPDFMaroons
67%Clean sheet after half-time0%
UPDFMaroons
100%No goal after half-time67%
UPDFMaroons

UPDF - second-half results

0% W67% D33% L
3
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
2
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Maroons - second-half results

0% W33% D67% L
9
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
+4
Goal difference (1st half)
1
Second-half points
-4
Goal difference (2nd half)
3.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding33%

Leads at half-time in 100% of matches and wins 33%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+1.7

Concedes 1.7 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

UPDF - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.000.67
Goals scored / match0.30.0
Goals conceded / match0.30.3
Average goals in match0.70.3
1 goal33%33%
2 goals33%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet67%67%
No goal67%100%
Goal difference0-1
Half-time: 0% leading - 100% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 67% draw - 33% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 33% - Half-time goals total: 1
Maroons - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match3.000.33
Goals scored / match1.30.3
Goals conceded / match0.01.7
Average goals in match1.32.0
1 goal100%100%
2 goals33%100%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet100%0%
No goal0%67%
Goal difference+4-4
Half-time: 100% leading - 0% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 33% draw - 67% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

UPDF
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
1
0
16-30
0
1
31-45
0
0
46-60
0
1
61-75
0
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (1 goal). Concedes most in 31-45 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Maroons
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
1
0
16-30
3
0
31-45
1
2
46-60
0
1
61-75
0
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (3 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.17
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.0 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
107%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
67%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-31%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
33%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

UPDF

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.02
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.36
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.92
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.56
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
28%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
78%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.3
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

Maroons

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.18
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.18
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.20
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.02
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
194%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
143%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-1.0
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Uganda Premier League).

Teams vs league

UPDFLigaMaroons
Average goals in match 1.002.03 3.33
Both teams scored 33%38% 100%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 33%38% 100%
Clean sheets 67%40% 0%
Goal before half-time 33%52% 100%
Goal after half-time 33%69% 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.03
Average goals per match
38%
Both teams scored
38%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
40%
Clean sheets
1.17
Home goals / match
0.86
Away goals / match
+36%
Home attack advantage
+26%
Home defence advantage
+17%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
52%
1 goal
24%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
69%
1 goal
31%
2 goals
7%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): UPDF 0 - 1 - 1 Maroons. Average goals 1.50, both teams scored in 50% matches.

Maroons
0 : 0
UPDF
UPDF
1 : 2
Maroons

FAQ

What was the result of UPDF vs Maroons?

The Uganda Premier League match finished UPDF 1:0 Maroons. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between UPDF and Maroons?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches UPDF won 0, Maroons won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 1.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before UPDF vs Maroons?

UPDF score 0.33 goals per game on average and Maroons 1.67. The Uganda Premier League average is 2.03 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 38% of games. Both teams score in 33% of UPDF's matches and 100% of Maroons's.

What form are UPDF and Maroons in?

Over the last 5 games UPDF have a 0-2-1 record (0.67 points per game) and Maroons 1-0-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for UPDF vs Maroons?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for UPDF vs Maroons: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.