Uganda - Uganda Premier LeagueBombo StadiumData current as of 23 October 2026

UPDF vs URA: match statistics

Reasoning:

Full analysis and pick in the app

Check the betting analysis, pick, value bet and full reasoning for this match.

Check analysis and pick

UPDF vs URA: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

UPDF play URA in Uganda Premier League (Uganda). The match date is 27 October 2026. Venue: Bombo Stadium.

Current form

UPDF: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. URA: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

UPDF scores 0.67 and concedes 0.83 goals per match. URA scores 0.60 and concedes 1.40. League average: 2.16 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: UPDF 33%, URA 40%. Over 2.5: UPDF 33%, URA 40%. League level: BTTS 36%, Over 2.5 39%.

xG, shots and style

UPDF has higher xG: 1.24 vs 1.23. UPDF: 7.0 shots per match, URA: 6.6.

Match halves

UPDF: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.00. URA: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.40.

Goals by minute

UPDF: 0-15 (2 goals). URA: 76-90+ (2 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Uganda Premier League: 2.16 goals per match, BTTS 36%, Over 2.5 39%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-1. Average goals 2.50, BTTS 50%.

Before the match

1X2 odds

(-)
(-)
(-)

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

0.67Goals scored / match0.6
UPDFURA
0.83Goals conceded / match1.4
UPDFURA
44%Average possession58%
UPDFURA
3.33Shots on target / match2.6
UPDFURA

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

7Shots per match6.6
UPDFURA
3.33Shots on target2.6
UPDFURA
9.5%Shot conversion9.1%
UPDFURA
44%Possession58%
UPDFURA
1.24xG for1.23
UPDFURA
1.33xG against1.4
UPDFURA

Shooting quality

UPDF: BalancedURA: Balanced
UPDFURA
Accuracy (shots on target)48%39%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.180.19
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.200.23

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

UPDF is 75% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / match - UPDF · 0.8 pts / match - URA

UPDF
LDWWL
Season result split
33% W33% D33% L
Season (W-D-L)
2-2-2
1.33 pts / match · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-1-1
Last 5 at home
1-1-1
DWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.21Opponent xG: 1.44BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
URA
WLLLD
Season result split
20% W20% D60% L
Season (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match · goal difference -4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-0-1
Last 5 away
1-0-1
WL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.23Opponent xG: 1.40BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

UPDF is 12% better for: goals scored per match.

0.67 goals / match - UPDF · 0.6 goals / match - URA

UPDF is 69% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.83 goals / match - UPDF · 1.4 goals / match - URA

UPDF scoring profile: strong

UPDF scores in 50% of matches (3 of 6 matches), while URA keeps a clean sheet in 20% (1 of 5 matches).

URA scoring profile: more difficult

URA scores in 40% of matches (2 of 5 matches), while UPDF keeps a clean sheet in 50% (3 of 6 matches).

4Goals scored (season)3
UPDFURA
5Goals conceded (season)7
UPDFURA
1.5Average goals in match2
UPDFURA
4Goals scored (last 5)3
UPDFURA
5Goals conceded (last 5)7
UPDFURA

How often they score at least...

50%1 goal40%
UPDFURA
17%2 goals20%
UPDFURA
0%3 goals0%
UPDFURA
0%4 goals0%
UPDFURA

How often they concede at least...

50%1 goal80%
UPDFURA
33%2 goals20%
UPDFURA
0%3 goals20%
UPDFURA
0%4 goals20%
UPDFURA

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

17%BTTS at half-time20%
UPDFURA
0%BTTS in both halves0%
UPDFURA
0%Scored in both halves0%
UPDFURA

BTTS and goal count

33%Min. 3 goals and BTTS40%
UPDFURA
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
UPDFURA
40%BTTS - last 540%
UPDFURA

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

50%Min. 1 goal before half-time60%
UPDFURA
33%Min. 2 goals before half-time20%
UPDFURA
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time20%
UPDFURA

2nd half

50%Min. 1 goal after half-time60%
UPDFURA
17%Min. 2 goals after half-time20%
UPDFURA
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
UPDFURA

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

UPDF is 318% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.67 pts / match - UPDF · 0.4 pts / match - URA

UPDF - half-time state
33% leading67% draw0% trailing
URA - half-time state
0% leading40% draw60% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.67Points per match (1st half)0.4
UPDFURA
0.67Goals scored (1st half)0.2
UPDFURA
0.17Goals conceded (1st half)1
UPDFURA
0.83Average goals (1st half)1.2
UPDFURA
83%Clean sheet before half-time40%
UPDFURA
50%No goal before half-time80%
UPDFURA

After half-time (2nd half)

0.5Points per match (2nd half)1
UPDFURA
0Goals scored (2nd half)0.4
UPDFURA
0.67Goals conceded (2nd half)0.4
UPDFURA
0.67Average goals (2nd half)0.8
UPDFURA
50%Clean sheet after half-time60%
UPDFURA
100%No goal after half-time80%
UPDFURA

UPDF - second-half results

0% W50% D50% L
10
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
3
Second-half points
-4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.67
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

URA - second-half results

20% W40% D40% L
2
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
-4
Goal difference (1st half)
5
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.40
PPG before half-time
Defence after half-time-0.6

Defence stays stable across the full match.

UPDF - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.800.40
Goals scored / match0.80.0
Goals conceded / match0.20.8
Average goals in match1.00.8
1 goal60%60%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal40%100%
Goal difference+3-4
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 40% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4
URA - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.401.00
Goals scored / match0.20.4
Goals conceded / match1.00.4
Average goals in match1.20.8
1 goal60%60%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal80%80%
Goal difference-40
Half-time: 0% leading - 40% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

UPDF
ScoredConceded
2
0
0-15
1
0
16-30
1
1
31-45
0
1
46-60
0
1
61-75
0
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (2 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

URA
ScoredConceded
1
1
0-15
0
1
16-30
0
3
31-45
0
2
46-60
0
0
61-75
2
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (2 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.75
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.0 : 0.7
Estimated goal split
home : away
81%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
37%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+43%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
20%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
30%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 3 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

UPDF

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.09
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.07
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.57
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.50
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
59%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
80%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.07
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.7
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 50% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

URA

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.17
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.63
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.63
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
0.00
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
58%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
124%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
67% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 33% come in the first quarter-hour.
67%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Uganda Premier League).

Teams vs league

UPDFLigaURA
Average goals in match▼ 1.502.16▼ 2.00
Both teams scored▼ 33%36%▲ 40%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 33%39%• 40%
Clean sheets▲ 50%39%▼ 20%
Goal before half-time▼ 50%59%• 60%
Goal after half-time▼ 50%70%▼ 60%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.16
Average goals per match
36%
Both teams scored
39%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
39%
Clean sheets
1.13
Home goals / match
1.04
Away goals / match
+9%
Home attack advantage
+8%
Home defence advantage
+11%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
59%
1 goal
23%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
70%
1 goal
32%
2 goals
13%
3 goals
7%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): UPDF 0 - 1 - 1 URA. Average goals 2.50, both teams scored in 50% matches.

UPDF
0 : 0
URA
URA
3 : 2
UPDF

FAQ

When do UPDF and URA play?

UPDF face URA on 27 October 2026 in Uganda Premier League at Bombo Stadium. The exact kick-off time in your timezone is shown at the top of the match page.

What is the head-to-head record between UPDF and URA?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches UPDF won 0, URA won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before UPDF vs URA?

UPDF score 0.67 goals per game on average and URA 0.60. The Uganda Premier League average is 2.16 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 39% of games. Both teams score in 33% of UPDF's matches and 40% of URA's.

What form are UPDF and URA in?

Over the last 5 games UPDF have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and URA 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for UPDF vs URA?

The statistical background for UPDF vs URA — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.