URA vs Kitara: match statistics
URA vs Kitara: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
URA played Kitara in Uganda Premier League (Uganda). The match was played on 4 December 2025. Final score: 0:1.
Current form
URA: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. Kitara: 4-0-1, 2.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
URA scores 1.63 and concedes 1.13 goals per match. Kitara scores 1.57 and concedes 0.86. League average: 2.49 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: URA 63%, Kitara 43%. Over 2.5: URA 38%, Kitara 43%. League level: BTTS 51%, Over 2.5 46%.
xG, shots and style
URA has higher xG: 1.71 vs 1.63. URA: 11.6 shots per match, Kitara: 11.9.
Match halves
URA: half-time lead 38%, second-half goals 0.88. Kitara: half-time lead 71%, second-half goals 0.57.
Goals by minute
URA: 31-45+ (4 goals). Kitara: 0-15 (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Uganda Premier League: 2.49 goals per match, BTTS 51%, Over 2.5 46%.
Head-to-head
No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| URA | Kitara | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 46% | 40% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.15 | 0.14 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.30 | 0.33 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Kitara is 50% better for: last-5 form.
1.6 pts / match - URA · 2.4 pts / match - Kitara
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Kitara is 31% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.13 goals / match - URA · 0.86 goals / match - Kitara
URA scores in 63% of matches (5 of 8 matches), while Kitara keeps a clean sheet in 29% (2 of 7 matches).
Kitara scores in 71% of matches (5 of 7 matches), while URA keeps a clean sheet in 38% (3 of 8 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - URA
Over / Under - Kitara
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Kitara is 62% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.5 pts / match - URA · 2.43 pts / match - Kitara
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
URA - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 38% of matches and wins 25%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Kitara - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 71% of matches and wins 57%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.
Concedes 0.6 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 1.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.60 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.2 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 20% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +5 | +1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (4 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (5 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
URA
Kitara
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Uganda Premier League).
Teams vs league
| URA | Liga | Kitara | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 2.75 | 2.49 | • 2.43 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 63% | 51% | ▼ 43% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 38% | 46% | ▼ 43% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 38% | 30% | • 29% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 63% | 58% | ▲ 71% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 63% | 60% | ▲ 86% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Away team
Other recorded players
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- KitaraGoalPatrick Kaddu
FAQ
What was the result of URA vs Kitara?
The Uganda Premier League match finished URA 0:1 Kitara. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before URA vs Kitara?
URA score 1.63 goals per game on average and Kitara 1.57. The Uganda Premier League average is 2.49 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 46% of games. Both teams score in 63% of URA's matches and 43% of Kitara's.
What form are URA and Kitara in?
Over the last 5 games URA have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Kitara 4-0-1 (2.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for URA vs Kitara?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.